| Revision as of 01:40, 13 October 2006 editBubba73 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers93,211 edits Don't call normal edits vandalism← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:32, 13 October 2006 edit undoTHB (talk | contribs)14,317 edits →Vandalism and harassmentNext edit → | ||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
| You appear to have done a lot of work on the ] but I've added some comments on the ] talk page about whether the procedures ] and it needs to be proposed at ] - perhaps you could respond on ] so that we can all work together to take it forward. — ] <sup>]</sup> 19:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC) | You appear to have done a lot of work on the ] but I've added some comments on the ] talk page about whether the procedures ] and it needs to be proposed at ] - perhaps you could respond on ] so that we can all work together to take it forward. — ] <sup>]</sup> 19:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==Vandalism and harassment== | |||
| == Don't call normal edits vandalism == | |||
| I would never label normal edits "vandalism". However, if someone repeatedly reversed multiple edits to articles, always narrowly avoiding the 3RR rule, it would eventually become obstructive, and become vandalism, and I would call it vandalism, since there would be an obvious absence of good faith. | |||
| If someone repeatedly made comments about comments I made to other Wikipedians, and repeatedly threatened me, it would become harassment as well, and I would label that behavior harassment, in the obvious absence of good faith. | |||
| Don't call an edit over content ]. You have done that at least twice. Please read that article. ] ], 01:40, 13 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
| If someone suddenly became amenable to discussing edits after a request for arbitration had been filed, and also filed a complaint complaining about a supposed disruption, even though they themselves were making no constructive edits, only reversing those of others, I would call that harassment as well, and personally, I would choose not to become involved in it, at least not without thoroughly reviewing their record of contributions. | |||
| -] 03:30, 13 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:32, 13 October 2006
Think Before Posting!
Please don't make posts that could be construed as harassment, personal attacks, or otherwise uncivil behavior.
Commonwealth vs. American English
Q:When are you guys gonna learn to spell ?
A:This grievance comes from those who aren't aware that British and American spellings sometimes differ.
We've been at the centre of some rancour, but we're not going to take offence or harbour any grievances. The catalogue of complaints won't colour this organisation's programme. It's a grey area anyway. And we don't want to labour the point.
Nursing ethics
Thanks for the recognition. I certainly value your many contributions to the nursing pages, particularly the new portal and the timeline of nursing history. --Vince 22:17, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
Your edit to Clean House: Television Series
Your recent edit to Clean House: Television Series (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Misplaced Pages articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 01:14, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, your bot fucked up. Bad bot. -01:17, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Moving Sanskar Kendra to Museum at Ahmedabad
Hello. You moved the article Sanskar Kendra to Museum at Ahmedabad. Can you tell me the reason for the move? Museum at Ahmedabad is not the same as Sanskar Kendra which is the name of the museum. Regards - Aksi_great (talk) 07:26, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- Hello. The link that you gave me is a picture of the Sanskar Kendra - the museum built by Le Corbusier. - Aksi_great (talk) 18:54, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- No problem. I am not sure of the English translation. "Kendra" in means center as in "center for studies". "Sankar" has different meanings , but I think here it means values as in "moral values". So the name Sanskar Kendra could translate to Centre for Values - but I could be wrong. I will try and get some pics for both the buildings. There are also some houses in Ahmedabad designed by Corbusier. I'll see what I can do. Regards, - Aksi_great (talk) 19:24, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Request for Mediation
|
A Request for Mediation to which you are a party has been accepted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Telepathy.
|
Nursing Portal & wikiproject
You appear to have done a lot of work on the Portal:Nursing but I've added some comments on the Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Nursing talk page about whether the procedures Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Council/Guide and it needs to be proposed at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject/List of proposed projects - perhaps you could respond on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Nursing so that we can all work together to take it forward. — Rod 19:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Vandalism and harassment
I would never label normal edits "vandalism". However, if someone repeatedly reversed multiple edits to articles, always narrowly avoiding the 3RR rule, it would eventually become obstructive, and become vandalism, and I would call it vandalism, since there would be an obvious absence of good faith.
If someone repeatedly made comments about comments I made to other Wikipedians, and repeatedly threatened me, it would become harassment as well, and I would label that behavior harassment, in the obvious absence of good faith.
If someone suddenly became amenable to discussing edits after a request for arbitration had been filed, and also filed a complaint complaining about a supposed disruption, even though they themselves were making no constructive edits, only reversing those of others, I would call that harassment as well, and personally, I would choose not to become involved in it, at least not without thoroughly reviewing their record of contributions.