Revision as of 13:10, 2 December 2017 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,979 editsm Signing comment by Indian ai - "→Text from fake news site: "← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:20, 7 December 2017 edit undoArjayay (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers628,208 edits Npov warning PoV deletionsNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
It is not a fake news site. Just because a few left-wing commentators call it fake, it doesn't become fake. If you would have spent a few minutes reading the content of the article, you'd have known that there was nothing 'fake' about it. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 13:09, 2 December 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | It is not a fake news site. Just because a few left-wing commentators call it fake, it doesn't become fake. If you would have spent a few minutes reading the content of the article, you'd have known that there was nothing 'fake' about it. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 13:09, 2 December 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
] Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own ] to Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to ]. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's ] and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npov2 --> - ] (]) 18:20, 7 December 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:20, 7 December 2017
Text from fake news site
Hello. The text that you have reinstated is referenced from a fake news site. Can you provide the authentic source? Edwige9 (talk) 18:20, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
It is not a fake news site. Just because a few left-wing commentators call it fake, it doesn't become fake. If you would have spent a few minutes reading the content of the article, you'd have known that there was nothing 'fake' about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Indian ai (talk • contribs) 13:09, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles, as you did to Jammu. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:20, 7 December 2017 (UTC)