Misplaced Pages

Talk:People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:49, 27 December 2017 editThe Mighty Glen (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,562 editsm Reverted 4 edits by Mr. Meseeks (talk) to last revision by Lowercase sigmabot III. (TW)← Previous edit Revision as of 17:51, 27 December 2017 edit undoMr. Meseeks (talk | contribs)14 edits I love president trump and hate Bill Maher.Next edit →
Line 55: Line 55:
Hi, I'm from the Hebrew Misplaced Pages. I just updated the logo of PETA. ] ] (]) 14:18, 28 September 2017 (UTC) Hi, I'm from the Hebrew Misplaced Pages. I just updated the logo of PETA. ] ] (]) 14:18, 28 September 2017 (UTC)


Maga, I don't like anyone who isn't a republican. I support President Trump. We are at war with those who disagree with us. The Alt-right will prevail. Hail Trump!!!
== PeTAs and Bill Maher's hypocrisy and psychopathy ==

Despite his successes as a comedian, Bill Maher is an abject failure as a human being. By vilifying researchers who seek the truth by conspiring with the extremist animal rights movement, who are some of the greatest masters of modern-day fake news, he lacks all measure of credibility or respect.

Mr. Maher’s latest antihuman (and anti-animal) crusade is directed at Texas A & M researchers who are attempting to cure Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy <1>. As the parent of a child whose short life was burdened with this disease, I know how much suffering it brings, not just to the victim, but to their loved ones as well. Ironically, in Maher’s attack on the use of a dog model of Muscular Dystrophy to develop a cure for this disease, he forgets that any cure developed through this research could also benefit the dogs that have this disease. It reminds me of a Law and Order episode in which an antiabortionist kills a women seeking an abortion, and thereby dons the mantle of an abortionist.

At a time when the United States is facing an unprecedented health-care crisis from the specter of Alzheimer’s Disease, Parkinson’s Disease, Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy and many more neurodegenerative diseases, Mr. Maher is supporting a group that wants to cripple the research that scientists such as Joe Kornegay are pursuing in their efforts to cure debilitating diseases. This is on par with the deniers of global warming, whose efforts will likely make the Earth uninhabitable for most of its human and animal inhabitants.

Mr, Maher is a board member of the radical animal rights group PeTA <2>, which is opposing Dr. Kornegay’s groundbreaking research to cure Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. If you don’t know how malignant they are; their founder once infamously said: “Even if animal research led to a cure for AIDS, we’d be against it.” <3> Fortunately, we were undeterred by this vicious mindset and today an infection with HIV is no longer a death sentence. In another irony, PeTA personnel were charged with animal cruelty and illegal disposal of the carcasses of the dogs and cats they killed after they collected them from veterinarians and animal shelters with the false promise that they would be taken to PeTA's animal shelter for adoption <4>. Sadly, the animals likely would have been killed even if they made it back to PeTA's shelter in Virginia <5>. It would appear that to Mr. Maher and PeTA; humans, and dogs and cats not involved in research, are not included in their version of humane. More anti-human comments from the founder of PeTA have also been archived <6> as they seem to be unavailable from the PeTA website.

So, I applaud Texas A & M in their steadfast heroic struggle against the deplorable attacks of animal rights zealots who seek to sabotage Texas A & M’s noble mission to promote the health and well-being of humans and animals alike. https://today.tamu.edu/2017/12/15/research-in-veterinary-medicine-offering-hope-for-youths-with-debilitating-disease/
References
(1) https://www.peta.org/features/bill-maher-takes-on-tamu/
(2) https://en.wikipedia.org/Bill_Maher
(3) Vogue September 1989
(4) http://www.roanoke-chowannewsherald.com/2005/06/18/peta-duo-charged-with-62-felonies/ http://www.suffolknewsherald.com/2005/11/15/peta-case-goes-to-superior-court/
(5) http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/07/us/peta-finds-itself-on-receiving-end-of-others-anger.html
(6) http://www.naiaonline.org/articles/article/animal-welfare-is-not-animal-rights#sthash.1i1af2Ml.dpbs

] (]) 03:19, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:51, 27 December 2017

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Peace dove with olive branch in its beakPlease stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 26, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconAnimal rights Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Animal rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of animal rights on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Animal rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Animal rightsTemplate:WikiProject Animal rightsAnimal rights
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconVirginia Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconOrganizations High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Text and/or other creative content from PETA Asia-Pacific was copied or moved into PETA with this edit on July 30, 2011. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Archiving icon
Archives
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Archives by topic:
Insulin, POV tag


This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Can someone fix the spelling of Bill Maher's name?

It is in the list of members under Bill Mahar. I was going to change it but cannot due to the protected status of the article.

This article needs more criticism before it can become a good article or a featured article. Perhaps a criticism section or a separate article for criticism?

As the title to this section states, this article is in need of well-written, legitimate criticism of the group and of certain of its unethical aspects, which is largely absent or hard to find. Could you fellow editors reach a new consensus on including criticism in a separate section? We do not want PETA sockpuppets to whitewash the article of criticism. Also, if a criticism section cannot be made, how about a separate article about criticism in the "See also" section? What do you think, ladies and gentlemen? Zakawer (talk) 20:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Agreed. At the moment all criticism is squashed into the intro. --31.49.114.250 (talk) 19:49, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Agreed. For such a controversial group, it seems odd that the criticism is watered down throughout the article instead of standing on it's own. I agree a separate article may be better suited, how would that fit in with the protected status of the PETA article? ourweakness (talk) 15:32, 5 August 2017 (UTC)


I completely agree. I actually came to this page because I wanted to know more about the controversy of PETA and wikipedia often has a section about that. Deep.fried.bacon (talk) 15:33, 10 January 2017 (UTC) (Also I couldn't figure out how to add a separate post nested under this original one so I just added this here. I wasn't sure if that was the proper way to do it, so if not if someone could let me know what is the proper way, I'd be grateful.)

If a criticism and controversy section and/or a separate article for criticism doesn't work, we're gonna have to incorporate a buttload of criticism into the article's lead and especially into the body of the article. Still, the article needs a lot of work before reaching GA or FA status. Zakawer (talk) 18:15, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Agree. I was disappointed to not find anything about the case where PETA sued photographer David Slater because a monkey took a selfie with his camera and he published it in a book. Apparently he is now bankrupt from the ongoing court case where PETA demands the monkey should own the copyrights and be reimbursed. There is a wikipedia article on the case but I couldn't find a link in the PETA article. Monkey selfie 2001:14BA:2F8:F700:9153:6A96:43A2:2556 (talk) 14:03, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
Agree, too. Why it's there a link to the controversy of the Monkey selfie copyright dispute? 212.59.44.4 (talk) 13:45, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Why don't you use the SVG Version?

Hi, I'm from the Hebrew Misplaced Pages. I just updated the logo of PETA. Take a look here טוסטר אובן (talk) 14:18, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

Maga, I don't like anyone who isn't a republican. I support President Trump. We are at war with those who disagree with us. The Alt-right will prevail. Hail Trump!!!

Categories: