Misplaced Pages

:Administrators' noticeboard/Personal attacks: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:28, 17 October 2006 editShell Kinney (talk | contribs)33,094 editsm →New reports: rm Tequendamia, please do not use this page as dispute resolution← Previous edit Revision as of 08:29, 17 October 2006 edit undoShell Kinney (talk | contribs)33,094 editsm →Open reports: rm old reportsNext edit →
Line 30: Line 30:
==Open reports== ==Open reports==
<!-- Place reports below this line only after there has been reply to the report --> <!-- Place reports below this line only after there has been reply to the report -->

==={{User|Street Scholar}}===
The user has made disparaging attacks against me on ] . he has refused to cooperate with my dispute resolution process with ] as the mediator (who has worked very hard to engage in good faith DR process initiated by me concerning his edits) and consistently makes incivil comments. He has a history of making racist and sexist remarks and for which he has been censured by admins . I would NPA-warn him but I fear that he will only escalate in his disruption if I do, based on his tendentious edits , and and many other places which show consitent assumption of bad faith and veiled ethnic slurs against users that are getting disruptive. I abjectly request admin intervention.Thanks.] 12:18, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
::'''Update:'''Actually I just remembered that I HAD warned him informally for violating ] as well as ] in edit. The warning is so I have warned him.] 12:32, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

*I have told ] to only discuss content in disputes, not other editors. —]→]&nbsp;&bull; 18:16, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

==={{User|RPJ}}===

Above user has been blocked on at least four separate occasions for personal attacks and general trolling. User has difficulty with assuming good faith, using reliable sources, and ] even when users go out of their way to inform him that the problem with his edit is not the content but the sources he chooses to use. But more important than that, user continues to write long diatribes against editors such as and implying that myself and Gamaliel are government agents trying to supress his voice. User has been warned through his previous block and I also warned him . ] 23:49, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

A simple matter of questioning an unreliable source is greeted with a full blown attack. This user - who has been repeatedly blocked for various offenses - does not play well with other editors and a community ban should be considered. ] 00:51, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

: is another attack by this editor. Please do something quickly. ] 17:44, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

==={{User|Ernham}}===
This user has received both <nowiki>{{npa2}}</nowiki> and <nowiki>{{npa2}}</nowiki> warnings, as well as numerous informal warnings. Personal attacks have continued such as calling me a "stalker" and calling honest edits "massive vandalism/total lies/complete NPOV non-sense" and honest editors vandals . Editor also has the habit of calling people stupid or not understanding his own "logic" for example and "stop correcting your damn spelling mistakes so i can respond, too. Yes, I know you can't spell very well."

User has replaced personal attacks, even after they've been removed and he's been warned .

Using this noticeboard is not a move I take lightly, this is the first time I have had the occasion to since I joined the project in 2004. ] 10:30, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

*This editor is already blocked for ] violations. Since this appears to be an ongoing problem, I'd highly suggest ]. ] <sup>]</sup> 19:10, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

*] has many personal attacks and much edit warring in his history, and is a rather single-purpose account. I have warned him that if he continues he will be blocked. —]→]&nbsp;&bull; 18:01, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

==={{User|Nagarajachar}}===

Hi ] has been constantly provking me, inspite of warnings, now he is accusing me of putting nonsense material on Misplaced Pages, u can see my contributions in my homepage and i am open for discussions , can u warn him please--] 10:29, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

:* Please supply at least one or two diffs of these personal attacks - especially in light of the fact that it appears that ] recently advised you on the inappropriateness of replying with attacks of your own. You ned to show us exactly what it is that's been said that you feel constitutes a personal attack. --] 11:08, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

* I have warned ] that his comments were inappropriate and that if he continues he will be blocked. I have told ] that he should not respond to personal attacks angrily. —]→]&nbsp;&bull; 17:52, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

=== {{User|JJay}} ===

{{vandal|JJay}} does not contribute to actual articles, but merely votes in afds. Recently, he has almost exclusively limited his activites to stalking my afds. This includes the current ]. There is only two articles he has been concerned with in the last 7 days: One is a sex toy afd and the other is my afd.

This user has been doing this to my edits and most recently confronted him on his talk and he gave : "If you nominate articles for deletion you should expect to encounter differing points of view." Independently another addressed his behavior, but that admin had to step away from wikipedia.

Examples of the disruptive behavior in my afds in the past few weeks:

*]
*]
*]
*] (Not mine, but voted right after me, see comments on this one-- he didn't even bother looking at the article.)
*] See his comments about me (the nom)

Clearly this user is ] me.

Trying to address these issues with this user is not possible as he removes comments from and does so . ] 04:13, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

*Have you tried warning him that his actions may result in a block, and that he can see every AfD that's currently going on at ]? That may help. It's possible he's wikistalking you because he likes to participate in AfDs, and doesn't know of the list.--]] ] 04:16, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

:: Yes, and on his talk not to mention in various other places. I first mention his ill-treatment of my comments in . This user does not contribute to the editting or improving[REDACTED] at all. ] 04:21, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
:* Arbustoo's post here is baseless. I have made no attacks on this user nor am I "stalking" him (although he has admitted stalking me to various articles). He is a frequent nominator on AfD and I have participated in just a small portion of those nominations. However, he has a long history of reacting with hostility, sarcasm and personal attacks on anyone who "votes" keep in one of those nominations. His language and style of comments in these debates are not acceptable and often cross the line into personal attack. Some examples include: , , , , etc.
:* This behavior has frequently led to complaints from other users , , and I have previously warned him to tone down his language and not to shadow my AfD participation , , . Finally, his remark about not contributing "to actual articles" is absurd. I invite anyone to review my many thousands of edits. In fact, even editors who disagree with my philosophical approach to article inclusion at[REDACTED] have called me . --] 12:27, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
:: You do engaged in childish actitivies, and should be blocked. Your "evidence" is bogus the full quote of Brenneman was "JJay can also be a valuable contributor. He drives me mental and we agree on almost nothing, this is true. But he's passionate and prolix. The desired outcome is that everyone can contibute without friction. That may be difficult." Hence "can be" is much different than "an incredibly valuable contributor." ] 17:30, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
:*Well, after reading that, I think if anyone should be temporarily blocked it's Arbustoo. I'm not an administrator, though, so this issue needs to wait until one comes along and makes a decision.--]] ] 16:42, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

:: Perhaps you should look at the context and dates. Example: the Norwegian afd before he used that out of context quote another user said to JJay Then JJay gives another claim that fails to make sense to which another user says: . And then I said what I said, and I stand by it that he has a misunderstanding of policy.] 17:30, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

:There you have it JJay denies WPSTALK: "I have made no attacks on this user nor am I 'stalking' him". Funny look through history and look through mine. He is gaming[REDACTED] and should be blocked. ] 17:30, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

*I see no evidence of personal attacks by ], and ] is unduly focusing on him for some reason. —]→]&nbsp;&bull; 17:43, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

::Okay. So I understand: Removing isn't a personal attack? Doing this ?

::If you look at the dates

::What does this user do when I try to reply to an adminstrator about doing an rfc on his behavior? He .

::Using motivation isn't incivil?

::Here is one of my afds with user voting keep says Jjay’s comments in the afd . ] 00:01, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

His edit history almost exactly corresponds to my afds:
*].
*]
*]
*]
*] (Not mine, but voted right after me, see comments on this one-- he didn't even bother looking at the article.)
*] See his comments about me (the nom) ] 17:55, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

*There are no personal attacks. Even if he were to be checking through your AfD nominations, that is not harassment and is not in itself bad. He clearly participates in many AfDs. —]→]&nbsp;&bull; 18:20, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

::Okay. So I understand: Removing isn't a personal attack? Doing this ? ] 00:01, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

::: I was hoping that someone here would look at JJay's and notice that out of all the afds he votes in many are nominated by one user. Do you see any other common nominator's he frequently votes in? In the afd's I nominated how does he usually vote? How does he use policy? I see this is going nowhere, and in hindsight I should have took this to other people who deal with stalking. ] 00:06, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

==={{User|Pumpkin Pie}}===
*]: User made threats of physical violence against User 4.18GB. . I have warned him twice about personal attacks and he seems to continue and even tries to justify it on my talk page . --] <sup>]</sup> <sup>]</sup> 21:26, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

* User has continued attacks, . --] <sup>]</sup> <sup>]</sup> 01:53, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
::No more PA since final warning. I left a stern warning that no further PA will be tolerated. ] 11:32, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

*I blocked him for 24 hours. —]→]&nbsp;&bull; 17:35, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Note to 4.18GB (nice name :D) and Centrx: Its a girl, not a guy...and she's 11... ] 03:09, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
:Isn't it interesting that an eleven year old talks like she did in her attacks, introducing ''physical'' threats, swearing, and gang affiliated slang? I find that kind of...er, strange for that age. - ]<sup>]</sup>\<sub>]</sub> 20:56, 16 October 2006 (UTC)


== ] == == ] ==

Revision as of 08:29, 17 October 2006

Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles,
content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards


    Red crossThis is a failed proposal.
    Consensus for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use the talk page or initiate a thread at the village pump.
    This page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference.
    Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump.
    ShortcutThis page is intended to get attention quickly when dealing with personal attacks. It is not intended to serve as a form of mediation or a type of RFC. Only Personal attacks are dealt with on this page, on their own merits in accordance with Misplaced Pages's No Personal Attacks policy

    For editors who want a personal attack situation reviewed:

    1. Consider that in most cases, ignoring the attack is better than requesting sanction against the attacker. Do not report people if you are likewise guilty of hostility towards them.
    2. Make sure the user has actually commited a personal attack. (Please note that "personal attacks" are defined only under the WP:NPA policy. If a statement is not considered a personal attack under the intended spirit of this policy, it does not belong here.)
    3. The editor must have been warned earlier. The {{npa2}}, and {{npa3}} templates may be appropriate for new users; for long-term editors, it's preferable to write something rather than using a standard template. Reports of unwarned editors may be removed.
    4. If the behavior hasn't stopped, add the following header to the New Reports section of this page in the following format:
      ==={{User|NAME OF USER}}=== replacing NAME OF USER with the user name or IP address concerned, with a brief reason for listing below. Be sure to include diffs.
    5. If an editor removes the IP or username and doesn't handle the matter to your satisfaction, take it to the editor's talk page or the administrators' noticeboard, but do not re-list the user here.
    6. NB - Due to misunderstanding of these instructions and/or mis-use of this process, comments not in strict adhereance to these instructions WILL be removed. This page deals only with personal attacks under the policy WP:NPA. Reports deemed to be inappropriate for this page are liable to be moved to an appropriate venue where one exists.


    For those reported on this page:

    1. A reviewer or an administrator will review each report on this page. In dealing with the report, the contribution history of the reported user shall be checked along with the diffs provided in the report. Where no personal attack is evident, then no action will be taken - however, should an administrator see that another seperate issue is evident, appropriate action or advice for that issue may be taken/given at his or her discretion and in line with wiki policy.
    2. Reports on this page stand on their own merits in accordance with Misplaced Pages's no personal attacks policy. As such, disputes and discussions over reports are not suitable for this page except for such comments left by admins or reviewers describing their actions and/or findings. If you notice your account reported at this page, please trust that the administrators and reviewers dealing with reports will deal with it in an even-handed and fair manner on the basis of policy alone. If you feel strongly that another "side to the story", issue, or another piece of information is missing from a report please refrain from posting here, and instead leave your comment on your talk page under the title NPA Report or another other clear and related title. The reviewing party will see this message and take it into account where applicable.

    For users handling assistance requests:

    1. For each of the users linked here, open their contributions and check for personal attacks. Also check if the users have been sufficiently warned for the current personal attack and whether they've continued to commit personal attacks after being warned.
    2. Note that there is an important difference between a user who makes many good contributions and a few personal attacks, and a user whose last edits are (nearly) all personal attacks or other conflict.
    3. Do nothing, warn them again, or, if you are an adminstrator, block the user in question as you think is required. Explain things carefully to the user who listed the attacker if you feel there's been a misunderstanding.
    4. Move the report to the Open Reports section and give an update to the status of the report.
    5. Delete old reports that have been dealt with.

    Please consider adding this page to your watchlist to make life easier for non-administrator RC-patrollers.

    New reports

    Post new reports here.

    Madseason777 (talk · contribs)

    User is engaging in general trolling behavior as seen here and here despite being warned. Ramsquire 23:48, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

    Mujeerkhan (talk · contribs)

    • Abuse Again

    user Mujeerkhan has abused me again ( see my talk page and home page) through his another creation Ajib Bhukda, he is constantly provoking me, if you dont take any action, i might have to answer him in his foul islamic language.--Vikramji 17:46, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

    Add:The diff of the attack is provided .Hkelkar 08:17, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

    • Master Tippu Puppeteer

    The other two sock puppets of Mujeerkhan are Hydman and True Indian, since its been found out that Mujebrakhan has be creating sock puppets , he is been lying low and i think might creat more sock puppets. More over he has repeatedly used abusive language against me and Hkelkar through his numerous sock puppets, he uses very abusive and foul language then tries warning and mediating between his own sock puppets which is very disgusting. Especially the one about Kannadigas and Karnataka is very offensive. Can you please block him for ever.--Vikramji 10:07, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

    Add: RFCU against Mujeerkhan establishing sockpuppetry and pattern abuse/vandalism is below:

    WP:RFCU#mujeerkhan

    NOte comments by third party mediator User:Martinp23 attesting to pattern vandalism and personal attacks.Hkelkar 08:17, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

    Open reports

    User:Eupator

    user Eupator is constantly spreading libel remarks about me throuhout wikipedia, see here http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Portal:Armenia/Armenia-related_Wikipedia_notice_board&oldid=81655933

    When I try to remove the remarks he tries to bate me into an edit war, this behavior must stop please help--Caligvla 20:31, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

    Caligvla, for some reason, I find you a lot more disruptive.--Tekleni 21:14, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
    Categories:
    Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Personal attacks: Difference between revisions Add topic