| Revision as of 21:19, 5 April 2018 editTronald-Drumpf (talk | contribs)30 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:52, 5 April 2018 edit undoMrX (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers97,648 edits KNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| *'''Merge''' - Hosts like her would have long list of such articles if every controversy (which they create whether intentionally or not) has its own article, and would have a separate article for the list (]). ] (]) 21:16, 5 April 2018 (UTC) | *'''Merge''' - Hosts like her would have long list of such articles if every controversy (which they create whether intentionally or not) has its own article, and would have a separate article for the list (]). ] (]) 21:16, 5 April 2018 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' There are countless multi-sided sources on this topic that could much bolster the points, and make the article much larger. I will work to make it so. ] (]) 21:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' There are countless multi-sided sources on this topic that could much bolster the points, and make the article much larger. I will work to make it so. ] (]) 21:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' - The subject has received significant coverage in major newspapers (Boston Globe, Seattle PI, The New York Times) and magazines (GQ, AdAge, Inc., Newsweek, Variety) across the US, and even internationally (Paris Match, The Guardian, Deutsche Welle, Sydney Morning Herald, Japan Times). It easily meets GNG and is an important part of historical impact of student activism following the watershed Stoneman Douglas shooting. ] does not apply since the subject is not routine reporting. The material is too long to be merged into another article without trimming essential information. Mysteriously, the OP recently voted '''strong keep''', at an AfD for a far-less-notable subject..- ]] 🖋 21:52, 5 April 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:52, 5 April 2018
Boycott of The Ingraham Angle
- Boycott of The Ingraham Angle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is an event that happened in the news about news. Misplaced Pages is WP:NOTNEWS. Article has no encyclopedic value on its own and basically amounts to a gossip piece. Could be merged with David Hogg and/or Laura Ingraham but those articles already have content on this minor event. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 17:43, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NOT applies.--MONGO 18:38, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- Merge the relevant parts to the Hogg and Ingraham articles. Per WP:NOTNEWS, the boycott is relevant to the people involved but does not have sufficient enduring notability for its own article. -- irn (talk) 19:32, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NOTNEWS, as per above. One too many articles are being created about the gun violence protests now. Werehilly (talk) 19:42, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- Comment. The peak of this article is the "List of advertisers in boycott" section. It currently contains only one source. If we merge this anywhere, I believe that this stand-alone list would not be included on any other article. wumbolo ^^^ 20:21, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The article is well sourced, with multiple points of view, and is not gossip, but a serious boycott of a nationwide television news show. Wasabi,the,one (talk)
- merge to The Ingraham Angle When there's a not-that-long, current controversy article that's about the same length as its parent, there's no need for two articles. Mangoe (talk) 21:08, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- Merge - Hosts like her would have long list of such articles if every controversy (which they create whether intentionally or not) has its own article, and would have a separate article for the list (List of controversies involving Laura Ingraham). Acnetj (talk) 21:16, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep There are countless multi-sided sources on this topic that could much bolster the points, and make the article much larger. I will work to make it so. Tronald-Drumpf (talk) 21:19, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - The subject has received significant coverage in major newspapers (Boston Globe, Seattle PI, The New York Times) and magazines (GQ, AdAge, Inc., Newsweek, Variety) across the US, and even internationally (Paris Match, The Guardian, Deutsche Welle, Sydney Morning Herald, Japan Times). It easily meets GNG and is an important part of historical impact of student activism following the watershed Stoneman Douglas shooting. WP:NOTNEWS does not apply since the subject is not routine reporting. The material is too long to be merged into another article without trimming essential information. Mysteriously, the OP recently voted strong keep, at an AfD for a far-less-notable subject..- MrX 🖋 21:52, 5 April 2018 (UTC)