Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/List of Federalist Papers: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:24, 12 December 2004 editSWAdair (talk | contribs)Rollbackers8,626 edits Not a list, but a table of contents that has seen no expansion in the six months since last VfD  Revision as of 04:30, 12 December 2004 edit undoPostdlf (talk | contribs)Administrators91,183 edits keepNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
===]=== ===]===
Was listed for VfD six months ago -- see ]. It survived because the only vote (mine) was to wait-and-see. The only two edits in six months were to add categories. This Table of Contents is less useful to our readers than the first external link at ]. We already link to a more informative (external) page and it looks like no one is going to add anything to this page. Not a list, but a table of contents. ] | ] 04:24, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC) Was listed for VfD six months ago -- see ]. It survived because the only vote (mine) was to wait-and-see. The only two edits in six months were to add categories. This Table of Contents is less useful to our readers than the first external link at ]. We already link to a more informative (external) page and it looks like no one is going to add anything to this page. Not a list, but a table of contents. ] | ] 04:24, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
*'''Keep'''. Valid and useful information. We should never delete an article because its contents can be found on another website. This table is also too long to merge into ]. I've intended for awhile to write some articles on at least the most notable individual Federalist Papers, and there is quite a bit that can be said on all of them. Sooner or later, someone is going to take up the task, and this list is certainly not harming anything in its current state. ] 04:30, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:30, 12 December 2004

List of Federalist Papers

Was listed for VfD six months ago -- see Talk:List of Federalist Papers. It survived because the only vote (mine) was to wait-and-see. The only two edits in six months were to add categories. This Table of Contents is less useful to our readers than the first external link at Federalist Papers. We already link to a more informative (external) page and it looks like no one is going to add anything to this page. Not a list, but a table of contents. SWAdair | Talk 04:24, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

  • Keep. Valid and useful information. We should never delete an article because its contents can be found on another website. This table is also too long to merge into Federalist Papers. I've intended for awhile to write some articles on at least the most notable individual Federalist Papers, and there is quite a bit that can be said on all of them. Sooner or later, someone is going to take up the task, and this list is certainly not harming anything in its current state. Postdlf 04:30, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)