Misplaced Pages

User talk:BallenaBlanca: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:21, 27 May 2018 editIñaki LL (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,820 edits →Recent obstructive activity← Previous edit Revision as of 19:31, 27 May 2018 edit undoBallenaBlanca (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,901 edits Removed per WP:HUSH. The user is not discussing in the article's talk pages and instead, comes here with accusations.Next edit →
Line 108: Line 108:


Cheers! --] (]) 17:27, 23 May 2018 (UTC) Cheers! --] (]) 17:27, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

==Recent obstructive activity==

So you jump now from partisan, one-purpose obstructive activity in the ], scaring away editors, to Basque matters? Not only that, you are now ] me, intervening in articles I have edited recently, all of them in articles that '''have nothing to do with your claimed focus topic''', . Furthermore, the manual of style is not a dogma, not even a WP policy, and let alone a throwing weapon against those with whom you do not share views. The MoS is to be applied with common sense. I have added further comments in for your enlightenment.

Your recent edits on are not helpful, are '''adding more controversy on red hot national topics''' in Spain (in line with present-day political events in Spain) and your activity does not add smoothness to WP. Stick to constructive edits and not removing inconvenient information for your views. Your activity looks like you are ], and does not add harmony to the EN WP. Should you not stop wikihounding me or unhelpful editing, I will take matters a step further inside WP, where my EN WP activity will be checked but also yours. ] (]) 19:17, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

:Also please do stop edit-warring. ] (]) 19:21, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:31, 27 May 2018

Archiving icon
Archives
2015
2016
2017

Welcome!

Hello, BallenaBlanca, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Misplaced Pages Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Misplaced Pages. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Cirt (talk) 06:17, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Question: Fibromyalgia prognosis

Hi, I appreciate the help with my edit on the fibromyalgia entry. By secondary source does Misplaced Pages only consider publications such as the British Medical Journal for example or would an online journal, staffed by journalists, doctors, pharmacists and TV news director, such as National Pain Report be adequate? (http://nationalpainreport.com/staff) Thanks Leeraven172 (talk) 14:20, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Question

Thanks for your comments at WP:MED. I think you make some good points. I'm not sure your expressed opinion fits with Option 5. This, to me, reads that we can keep all the videos provided the promotional start/end sections are removed. You can see Doc James supports this as he already has plans to remove those parts of the videos. So you will end up entirely with the same problems you describe, just with a bit less promotion. Since you appear to favour "short videos on specific aspects", which is close to what I suggest at WP:NOTYOUTUBE, that doesn't fit with the current Osmosis model of producing videos on entire topics. It seems to me your comments fit more with Option 3 (remove all) with of course the option to consider "another approach" to videos.

I haven't read all your discussion with OsmoseIt wrt your claim they are "proud and arrogant". In my experience, newbies need some time to orient themselves to WP practice, and OsmoseIt has made fewer than 50 edits to WP, and none to any article body text, so even though they've been here since 2015, they are still clueless and some allowances might be justified. Outsiders do not naturally understand our concerns. Mind you, there are one or two long-term editors that don't seem to understand our concerns either :-(.

Not trying to pressure you to change your vote. Just FYI. -- Colin° 09:21, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

What does Osmosis plan to do with the inaccurate videos

https://xkcd.com/386/

. :-) -- Colin° 12:41, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Small thing

Hello, BallenaBlanca,

This is just a small thing: When people add blank lines in talk page replies, it screws up things for some of our blind editors. You can read more about the problem at WP:LISTGAP if you're curious, but the basic story is that it's helpful to remove blank lines between all paragraphs that start with : before saving. A lot of people don't know about this problem, but I thought that you'd want to know. WhatamIdoing (talk) 15:44, 31 March 2018 (UTC)

Chromium deficiency - talk

I have created new content about chromium dietary supplements. Because I have a declared COI, I placed it as New section in Chromium deficiency Talk. I am asking you and several other editors with an interest in nutrition/supplements to look at it and comment, perhaps making changes and/or stating that it is appropriate to move into the article, or not. A separate question is whether it belongs in Chromium deficiency, Chromium, or both. Thank you for the consideration. David notMD (talk) 11:50, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

One of the other editors I asked moved the content into the article, so if you plan to get to it, it's there now. ] (talk) 11:20, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Irregular editing in Catalan referendum

I suggest you give up reactive edits like this in the article Catalan independence referendum, 2017 when informations that contradict Spanish official versions are added. The article is presently hermetic, and your attitude seems to not be helping a lot. Your edit revert is also confusing ("Leaving aside other considerations, trim this content per WP:SPA. Before reinserting again, please reach consensus in the PD"). "Trim this content per WP:SPA"? PD?

Adding confusing edit summaries or forcing repeated discussions to extenuation with complete disregard to the WP general principles may be regarded as disruptive editing, and/or WP:GAME. Thanks Iñaki LL (talk) 21:36, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

sorry?

The content you deleted was backed up with a secondary source, what are you talking about?ApolloCarmb (talk) 17:05, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

My user talk page is not the place for this conversation. Use the specific talk page. Thanks. --BallenaBlanca 🐳 ♂ (Talk) 17:32, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Spanish politicians

Hi! I noticed you're currently restoring the nationalities of several Spanish nationalities edited by Apollo. I thought you might want be interested in a list of some of the articles:

Cheers! --Jamez42 (talk) 17:27, 23 May 2018 (UTC)