| Revision as of 10:44, 28 May 2018 editAlex Shih (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users20,202 editsm Reverted edits by Koppadasao (talk) to last version by Alex ShihTag: Rollback← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:44, 28 May 2018 edit undoKoppadasao (talk | contribs)99 edits Undid revision 843320473 by Alex Shih (talk)Tag: UndoNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| ::As I said, Misplaced Pages is a left wing propaganda site. At least now everyone interested in the case can see it is so--] (]) 10:02, 28 May 2018 (UTC) | ::As I said, Misplaced Pages is a left wing propaganda site. At least now everyone interested in the case can see it is so--] (]) 10:02, 28 May 2018 (UTC) | ||
| :::The situation is more complex than that. Anyone could make a document and post it somewhere, then copy it from there to an article here, claiming that the document was a scan of a court order. Clearly such activity cannot go unchecked: there needs to be a way to verify the actual document. Further, a primary source like that is unsuitable because it might have rescinded an hour later. That is why a ] is required. ] (]) 10:16, 28 May 2018 (UTC) | :::The situation is more complex than that. Anyone could make a document and post it somewhere, then copy it from there to an article here, claiming that the document was a scan of a court order. Clearly such activity cannot go unchecked: there needs to be a way to verify the actual document. Further, a primary source like that is unsuitable because it might have rescinded an hour later. That is why a ] is required. ] (]) 10:16, 28 May 2018 (UTC) | ||
| == User page == | |||
| Hi, I've never had to do this before, so apologies if I have made a faux-pas. You were transcluding your user page at meta wiki in order to have your Misplaced Pages user page display some hash tags which fall outside of Misplaced Pages's goals. The policy prohibiting this kind of advocacy can be read here. ]. Rather than take the matter up at Metawiki, where I'm sure they have their own policies, I've replaced your user page here with a deletion template. You are free to remove this template and replace the content with material which falls within the guidelines detailed at ]. many thanks ] (]) 10:39, 28 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == Blocked indefinitely == | |||
| Hi, I have ] this account indefinitely as recent strings of edit suggests it is being used as a ], which is against the ] of Misplaced Pages. You may appeal this decision by following the instructions at ]. ] (]) 10:41, 28 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:44, 28 May 2018
ANI
I mentioned your addition to Tommy Robinson (activist) at ANI. A secondary source would be needed to describe a document as "fascist", and mentioning "Misplaced Pages admins" is undue, and original research, and unsuitable for an article. Johnuniq (talk) 09:55, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
- Please cool down. If you have found this on Twitter only, it is unreliable sourcing. Like it or not, we are not going to report what has happened to Tommy Robinson until the so-called mainstream media reports it.--♦IanMacM♦ 09:58, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
- As I said, Misplaced Pages is a left wing propaganda site. At least now everyone interested in the case can see it is so--Koppadasao (talk) 10:02, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
- The situation is more complex than that. Anyone could make a document and post it somewhere, then copy it from there to an article here, claiming that the document was a scan of a court order. Clearly such activity cannot go unchecked: there needs to be a way to verify the actual document. Further, a primary source like that is unsuitable because it might have rescinded an hour later. That is why a secondary source is required. Johnuniq (talk) 10:16, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
- As I said, Misplaced Pages is a left wing propaganda site. At least now everyone interested in the case can see it is so--Koppadasao (talk) 10:02, 28 May 2018 (UTC)