| Revision as of 07:11, 2 November 2006 editEdgarde (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,109 editsm →[]: I guess the subject is "set", singular← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:43, 3 November 2006 edit undoKyndFellow (talk | contribs)519 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| As an editor involved in this dispute, you are invited to enter a statement in the ] under ]. — ] 22:16, 31 October 2006 (UTC) | As an editor involved in this dispute, you are invited to enter a statement in the ] under ]. — ] 22:16, 31 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == ] == | |||
| Edgarde, This is Daniel who you've been corrisponding with regarding the Sex tourism page. In case you haven't noticed by now, I'm new at Misplaced Pages. :-) I just read through the guidelines and the processes of despute resolution. Thank you for making that RfC link for us, and introducing it on the talk page of Sex tourism. | |||
| I made a change to the end of the Sex tourism definition, and I wanted to know if this is acceptable to you?<br> | |||
| Daniel E. Knodel, M.A. 06:00, 2 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| : This is not acceptable. For the same reasons stated repeatedly by me and by ], the points of which you have managed to repeatedly miss. I find it very hard to believe you are being sincere. | |||
| : Please revert your definition to the former one. Please remove your spam link to Sly Sex Guide. It has been explained to you with clarity what you are doing wrong; your latest set of changes does not address any of these problems. — ] 06:54, 2 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:43, 3 November 2006
Request for Comment: Sex tourism
As an editor involved in this dispute, you are invited to enter a statement in the RfC under Talk:Sex_tourism. — edgarde 22:16, 31 October 2006 (UTC)