Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 06:17, 8 September 2018

• WP:AN/3
• WP:AN3
• WP:AN/EW
• WP:ANEW
• WP:AN/3RR

This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

• See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
• If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.

You must notify any user you have reported.

You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Additional notes

• When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
• The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
• Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
• Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

Definition of edit warring

Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)

Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.

User:185.8.61.235 reported by User:Vedamulu (Result: Blocked )

Page:  Page-multi error: no page detected.
User being reported: 185.8.61.235 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Pharmacology/Categorization&diff=858284455&oldid=694380493.https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Pharmacology/Categorization&diff=858284455&oldid=694380498.https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Pharmacology/Categorization&diff=858284455&oldid=694380499

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

• * Blocked – for a period of a few hours, ironically partly for edit-warring on this page to remove the edit-warring report. -- Euryalus (talk) 03:51, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

• The filer, Vedamulu (talk · contribs), is indef blocked by User:Widr for long term abuse. EdJohnston (talk) 16:43, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

User:1990'sguy reported by User:Jytdog (Result: Blocked 24 hours)

Page: Is Genesis History? (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 1990'sguy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: diff (edit by IP, removing "psuedoscience"

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. diff 13:14, 6 September 2018
2. diff 13:44, 6 September 2018 (different issue)
3. diff 14:27, 6 September 2018
4. diff 14:38, 6 September 2018

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: Didn't bother in this incident. They are well aware of the policy.

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: here and here, the latter called "Pseudoscience, again". See also here

Comments:

Per the edit stats on the page, the subject created the page and is the biggest contributor to it; twice as many edits is the next editor (me). The WP:OWN and continued POV pushing against the WP:PSCI policy is clear, as is the edit warring in this instance. Jytdog (talk) 15:57, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

First off, Jytdog links to several "warnings" I received about edit warring (1,2,3), but each of those times, he templated me for reverting him only once on articles not under a 1RR restriction. Blatant violations of WP:DTR.

Also, as User:Acdixon noted on Talk:Is Genesis History?, the wording being pushed on that article is so absurd that it even astounded him (a seasoned admin). The content I reverted clearly meets exeption 7 of WP:NOT3RR, as the wording has been shown to be patently false, biased, unsourced, and going against BLP (Ken Ham is a living, and controversial, person). I apologize for the number of reverts, but the fact that the content I was reverting was false and covered by NOT3RR, this report here is ridiculous. --1990'sguy (talk) 16:05, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Also, I do not WP:OWN any articles here -- I've admitted this multiple times. You're confusing WP:OWN with removing patently false information (with POV wording) about a living person (Ken Ham). I do not engage in POV-pushing here -- labeling legitimate editors who you disagree with as "POV-pushers" is unhealthy for this website. --1990'sguy (talk) 16:08, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

I'm a little confused - what in any of those reverts is "false, biased, unsourced, and going against BLP"? I don't see anything that resembles that. Black Kite (talk) 16:25, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Ken Ham is a BLP, and as Acdixon noted, he does not own the Ark Encounter. That type of wording is false, and it is also used exclusively by his opponents when they mock AiG and Ham. --1990'sguy (talk) 16:53, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

You acknowledged that you are aware of the policy. Thanks for that. Citing an admin's support on the content, as if that justifies your behavior, is terrible. You have unambiguously violated 3RR in pursuing the culture wars here in WP. This is not what editing privileges are for. Jytdog (talk) 16:39, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

No, I cited WP:NOT3RR, specifically point 7. The edit inserted false info about Ham, which was worded in a biased manner. I am not "pursuing the culture wars" here, and I did not register on WP, nor start editing YEC-related topics, to fight any battles. You violate WP:NOTBATTLE by adding blatantly biased info into WP articles like the false claim that Ham own the Ark Encounter (see the comment linked above). --1990'sguy (talk) 16:53, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

You have not walked back from policy-violating behavior here; not one step. On how this is part of a larger issue, diff Unfortunately, it is essentially impossible to remove their bias -- I've tried for a while unsuccessfully. If you are unable to make your changes there, I recommend CreationWiki or Conservapedia, which offer a different point of view on creation. I will not be replying further. Your further behavior here - trying to argue the content here, CRYINGBLP, etc, only provides further reason that a block is due. Jytdog (talk) 16:58, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

You have been trying to "punish" me for a while already -- you first constantly templated me simply for reverting you once on articles without 1RR restrictions. Next, you nominated one of my articles for deletion (the result was a 3:1 keep) and accused me of all sorts of other ANI-worthy violations on the AfD and the article talk page. Then, you !voted delete the next time the AfD happens (article is kept again) and accuse me of violations. Next, you falsely accuse me of COI and seek to block/ban me. Now, you've pounced on the fact that I reverted a blatantly false and biased phrase from the article and are seeking to block me. It's you who have the battleground mentality. I've never tried to block you or delete your articles because of our disagreements.

The comment you linked above was me offering advice to a frustrated new editor. I have genuinely tried to make WP's articles on YEC less biased (in the sense of them intentionally going out of their way to bash YEC, rather than simply providing the mainstream viewpoint), and have proposed wording/solutions that even I would never add to one of the websites I mentioned above. That's why now I mainly edit politics (a lot less biased, surprisingly) these days. --1990'sguy (talk) 17:18, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 24 hours. Straight-up 3RR vio. The invocation of point 7 of WP:NOT3RR doesn't work for this content AFAIC. Bishonen | talk 17:34, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

User:2601:42:901:E7A0:DD4A:B31F:C02A:F1C2 reported by User:Moxy (Result: Warned)

Page

Italy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

2601:42:901:E7A0:DD4A:B31F:C02A:F1C2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 03:42, 7 September 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 858429893 by Moxy (talk)"
2. 03:27, 7 September 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 858427081 by Donner60 (talk)"
3. 02:54, 7 September 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 858413170 by Urbanoc (talk)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

There are more reverts...but with a different IP ...but they are clearly related Moxy (talk) 03:51, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

I do not understand why I was reported. I have left a few messages now on users' talk section, as well as on the talk section of Italy. There are inconsistencies in the summary sections on other nations and these are not removed, yet they are removed on the Italy section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:42:901:E7A0:DD4A:B31F:C02A:F1C2 (talk) 04:15, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Here is a link to my discussion I had with one other user: https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:2601:42:901:E7A0:DD4A:B31F:C02A:F1C2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:42:901:E7A0:DD4A:B31F:C02A:F1C2 (talk) 04:38, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

• Result: The IP editor is warned they may be blocked if they revert again at Italy before they have obtained a consensus in their favor on the article talk page. EdJohnston (talk) 15:22, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

User:Lillyput4455 reported by User:Saqib (Result: Blocked)

Page

Madiha Imam (actress) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Lillyput4455 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 18:48, 6 September 2018 (UTC) "/* Career */Hip in Pk is not a poor source site."
2. 15:00, 6 September 2018 (UTC) "/* Career */Career should not just rely on on one role."
3. 14:24, 6 September 2018 (UTC) ""
4. 13:06, 6 September 2018 (UTC) "/* Career */You should take a look at actress articles. Poor source doesn't matter in Career of an actress."
5. 08:49, 5 September 2018 (UTC) "/* Career */"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 07:40, 5 September 2018 (UTC) "Caution: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on Madiha Imam (actress). (TW)"
2. 17:13, 5 September 2018 (UTC) "Warning: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on Madiha Imam (actress). (TW)"
3. 17:17, 5 September 2018 (UTC) "/* Original research */ new section"
4. 14:36, 6 September 2018 (UTC) "/* September 2018 */ new section"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

This user edit warring and repeatedly adding poorly sourced material to a BLP by saying that the source is reliable. Saqib (talk) 06:13, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

• Blocked – 24 hours by User:Ymblanter for disruptive editing, per a complaint at WP:ANI. Adding material to an article not found in the source. EdJohnston (talk) 18:14, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

User:24.59.39.91 reported by User:Alsee (Result: Semi)

Page: Cobalt International Energy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 24.59.39.91 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (Also one edit from 24.59.43.73 back in June, and one edit from 74.79.255.200)

Previous version reverted to: # 22:55, 7 June 2018 This is the identical content initially added by closely related IP 24.59.43.73.

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 16:49, 2 September 2018
2. 15:02, 4 September 2018 (Note: Identical content from IP 74.79.255.200)
3. 00:01, 5 September 2018
4. 00:41, 5 September 2018
5. 10:44, 7 September 2018
6. 10:47, 7 September 2018 (3 minutes!)
7. 10:48, 7 September 2018 (1 minute!)
8. 10:50, 7 September 2018 (2 minutes!)
9. 10:51, 7 September 2018 (1 minute!)
10. 11:02, 7 September 2018 (11 minutes!)

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: There are zero posts on the article talk page from anyone, however the user has received level 1, level 2, level 3, and level 4 warnings on their user talk from 4 different editors before I saw any of this.

Comments:

The content is an unsourced angry attack on the company, and a potential BLP concern against a named individual. It was removed 11 times by six or seven different people (once was by an IP). Alsee (talk) 12:31, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Result: Page semiprotected one month. Unsourced negative material, POV-pushing. EdJohnston (talk) 18:16, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Query

Can any uninvolved admin have a look at Talk:The House of Fine Art & User talk:Accesscrawl#Vandalistic edit?. The page creator twice restored all of the removed user-generated/redundant sources without any explanation, although I've explained each of my edits clearly. And now they are not responding at the article's talk page in spite of my repeated requests at their talk page. I just want explanation from them for their unexplained disruptive edits, so that I can continue the cleanup of the article. BTW, I don't know about the correct forum for this sort of request, so my apologies in advance. Thanks. - NitinMlk (talk) 06:10, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

@NitinMlk: WP:ANI —AE (talk • contributions) 06:15, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. I will copy-paste this request there. - NitinMlk (talk) 06:17, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

• Misplaced Pages noticeboards
• Misplaced Pages edit warring
• Misplaced Pages:Edit warring