Revision as of 15:27, 7 November 2006 editWerdnabot (talk | contribs)60,702 editsm Automated archival of 2 sections to User talk:ZimZalaBim/Archive 6← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:30, 7 November 2006 edit undoFakir005 (talk | contribs)57 edits →Dan Milward on e-Commerce lite - double standards?Next edit → | ||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
] 23:22, 30 October 2006 (UTC) | ] 23:22, 30 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
:I have no opinion on, nor have I looked at, your attempt to create the article ]. All I know is that it was deleted, and you should not continue adding links to a non-existent article to Misplaced Pages. If you have questions about the appropriateness of articles about software, perhaps you should read ] and perhaps also ]. --] (]) 23:26, 30 October 2006 (UTC) | :I have no opinion on, nor have I looked at, your attempt to create the article ]. All I know is that it was deleted, and you should not continue adding links to a non-existent article to Misplaced Pages. If you have questions about the appropriateness of articles about software, perhaps you should read ] and perhaps also ]. --] (]) 23:26, 30 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
:Also, reading your message again, please do not delete articles to make a ] - that is considered vandalism. If you feel certain articles read like advertisements, feel free to ], or take ] as appropriate. --] (]) 23:38, 30 October 2006 (UTC) | :Also, reading your message again, please do not delete articles to make a ] - that is considered vandalism. If you feel certain articles read like advertisements, feel free to ], or take ] as appropriate. --] (]) 23:38, 30 October 2006 (UTC)<br><br> | ||
FAKIR ON WIKIPEDIA<br><br> | |||
I WAS DRIVEN TO THIS SECTION BY SOME MESSAGE I FOUND AFTER I LOGGED IN. I DID NOT KNOW THAT THIS MESSAGE WAS DIRECTED AT ME. I DID NOT EVEN KNOW THAT T WAS CLICKABLE. I JUST HAPPENED TO CLICK ON IT TO SATISFY MY CUROSITY. I FOUND THAT SEVERAL MESSAGES WERE PLACED TO DRAW MY ATTENTION. BASICALLY I WAS OLD NOT TO COMMENT ON THE SHAMELESS PRODUCT PROMOTION BEING MADE BY ADWARES LKE ZEDO AND THE CLAIMS OF ZEDO WHO ARE BEING PROMOTED AS MAJOR PRODUCT VENDORS. YOU FIND THAT THESE PROMOTERS HAVE WORKED HARD TO HAVE THE KEYWORDS RELATING TO THESE CONTRIUTIONS PLACED IN ALL THE SEARCH ENGINES. | |||
THESE SHAMELESS PRODUCT PROMOTERS ERASE MY CONTRIBUTIONS AS SOON AS I mAKE THEM. BU THEY ARE NOT SATISFIED WITH THAT. NOW THEY ARE THREATENING TO BLOCK ME IF I PERSIST. THIS IS A NONSENSE I'LL NOT TOLERATE. OBVIOUSLY WIPEDIA SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED BY THE THREE BRANCHES OF THE USA GOVERNMENT. IF SOME LAWYERSS READ THESE COMMENTS I'D LIKE THEM TO INDICATE THEIR WILLINGNESS TO BAR THE PRODUCT VENDORS AND ADWARES FROM SHAMELESSLY PROMOTE THEIR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES. IF THE ADWARES PERSIST WITH THEIR THREATS I"D BE FORCED TO SEEK THE ASSISTANCE OF THE LEGISLATURE AND LAW DEPARTMENTS AT THE FEDERAL AND STATE LEVELS. | |||
== User:216.127.205.194 == | == User:216.127.205.194 == | ||
] re-added his nonsense edits to ] following your recent revert. I have reverted his most recent edits to the article. --] 23:37, 31 October 2006 (UTC) | ] re-added his nonsense edits to ] following your recent revert. I have reverted his most recent edits to the article. --] 23:37, 31 October 2006 (UTC) | ||
I WAS TRYING TO EDIT SOME NONSENSE COMMENTS THAT WERE MEANT MAINLY FOR MY EDITING. THESE COMMENTS VANISHED TOTALLY ONCE I HIT THE EDIT BUTTON> THESE COMMENTS REAPPEAR AFTER I HIT THE AVE BUTTON. IT IS MAGIC. I'VE TO ANSWERS TESE COMMENTS BECAUE THEY CONTAIN A THREAT AGAINST ME THAT I"LL BE BLOKED. | |||
WIKIPEDIA HAS BECOME TOTAL NON SENSE. ALL THE NONSENSE IS BEING ADDED TO WIKIPEDIA IN PRETENSION OF PRODUCT INFORMATION. IT IS A SHAMELESS SPAM. SHAME LESS PRODUCT PROMTION. SHAMELESS PRODUCT AND SITE LINKAGE. IT IS NPOV STATED POLICY THAT LINKAGE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. THE BIG PROMOERS HAVE SOFTWARE THAT DOES THE LINKAGE FOR THEM VERY SWIFTLY. THIS PRODUCT PROMOTION IS AGAINST NPOV POLICY AND SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED. | |||
IS ZIMZALABIM A REPRESENTATIVE OF ZEDO? HOW MUCH OF THE WIKIPEDIA CONTENT HIS CONTRIBUTION? IS HE ERASING THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF OTHERS? | |||
WIKIPEDIA IS NO LOGER THE ENCYCLOPEDIA IT CLAIMS TO BE. LET THERE BE AN INQUIRY AS TO ITS CONTENT AND FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTORS. IKIPEDIA SHOULD BE MADE TO PUBLISH AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE CONTENT CONTRIBUTION OF ITS FINANCIAL SUPPORTERS. | |||
IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THE WIKIPEDIA CONTENT CONTRIBUTION IS A SHAMELESS PROMOTION OF THE BUSINESSES OF VERY PERSISTENT ADWARES LIKE ZEDO THAT CALL THEMSELVES LEGITEMATE BUSINESSES. FOR EXAMPLE LET NPOV MAKE A PUBLIC INQUIRY INO THE MODE OF OPERATION BY ZEDO AND IT ASSOCIATION WITH THE BUSINESSES THAT HAVE THEIR LINKS PLACED ON WIKIPEDIA | |||
== PLEASE read talk pages first before deleting stuff == | == PLEASE read talk pages first before deleting stuff == |
Revision as of 18:30, 7 November 2006
Talk page for user ZimZalaBim |
|
Archives |
---|
Dan Milward on e-Commerce lite - double standards?
I cannot add e-Commerce lite wikipedia and nor can I add it to this software list: http://en.wikipedia.org/Electronic_commerce#Software
Apprently it is because I am promoting software. If that is true then I should do the right thing and delete all of the following from the above page to ensure that Misplaced Pages is not exercising double standards.
ATG Cubecart e-Commerce lite ECommerce Shopping Cart eMeta Corporation Ingenta NetSuite Inc. osCommerce Shop-Script Zen Cart Microsoft Commerce Server
Danmilward 23:22, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- I have no opinion on, nor have I looked at, your attempt to create the article e-Commerce lite. All I know is that it was deleted, and you should not continue adding links to a non-existent article to Misplaced Pages. If you have questions about the appropriateness of articles about software, perhaps you should read WP:N and perhaps also WP:SPAM. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 23:26, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
- Also, reading your message again, please do not delete articles to make a point - that is considered vandalism. If you feel certain articles read like advertisements, feel free to tag them as such, or take other measures as appropriate. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 23:38, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
FAKIR ON WIKIPEDIA
I WAS DRIVEN TO THIS SECTION BY SOME MESSAGE I FOUND AFTER I LOGGED IN. I DID NOT KNOW THAT THIS MESSAGE WAS DIRECTED AT ME. I DID NOT EVEN KNOW THAT T WAS CLICKABLE. I JUST HAPPENED TO CLICK ON IT TO SATISFY MY CUROSITY. I FOUND THAT SEVERAL MESSAGES WERE PLACED TO DRAW MY ATTENTION. BASICALLY I WAS OLD NOT TO COMMENT ON THE SHAMELESS PRODUCT PROMOTION BEING MADE BY ADWARES LKE ZEDO AND THE CLAIMS OF ZEDO WHO ARE BEING PROMOTED AS MAJOR PRODUCT VENDORS. YOU FIND THAT THESE PROMOTERS HAVE WORKED HARD TO HAVE THE KEYWORDS RELATING TO THESE CONTRIUTIONS PLACED IN ALL THE SEARCH ENGINES.
THESE SHAMELESS PRODUCT PROMOTERS ERASE MY CONTRIBUTIONS AS SOON AS I mAKE THEM. BU THEY ARE NOT SATISFIED WITH THAT. NOW THEY ARE THREATENING TO BLOCK ME IF I PERSIST. THIS IS A NONSENSE I'LL NOT TOLERATE. OBVIOUSLY WIPEDIA SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED BY THE THREE BRANCHES OF THE USA GOVERNMENT. IF SOME LAWYERSS READ THESE COMMENTS I'D LIKE THEM TO INDICATE THEIR WILLINGNESS TO BAR THE PRODUCT VENDORS AND ADWARES FROM SHAMELESSLY PROMOTE THEIR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES. IF THE ADWARES PERSIST WITH THEIR THREATS I"D BE FORCED TO SEEK THE ASSISTANCE OF THE LEGISLATURE AND LAW DEPARTMENTS AT THE FEDERAL AND STATE LEVELS.
User:216.127.205.194
User:216.127.205.194 re-added his nonsense edits to Carlos Camacho following your recent revert. I have reverted his most recent edits to the article. --TommyBoy 23:37, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
I WAS TRYING TO EDIT SOME NONSENSE COMMENTS THAT WERE MEANT MAINLY FOR MY EDITING. THESE COMMENTS VANISHED TOTALLY ONCE I HIT THE EDIT BUTTON> THESE COMMENTS REAPPEAR AFTER I HIT THE AVE BUTTON. IT IS MAGIC. I'VE TO ANSWERS TESE COMMENTS BECAUE THEY CONTAIN A THREAT AGAINST ME THAT I"LL BE BLOKED.
WIKIPEDIA HAS BECOME TOTAL NON SENSE. ALL THE NONSENSE IS BEING ADDED TO WIKIPEDIA IN PRETENSION OF PRODUCT INFORMATION. IT IS A SHAMELESS SPAM. SHAME LESS PRODUCT PROMTION. SHAMELESS PRODUCT AND SITE LINKAGE. IT IS NPOV STATED POLICY THAT LINKAGE WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. THE BIG PROMOERS HAVE SOFTWARE THAT DOES THE LINKAGE FOR THEM VERY SWIFTLY. THIS PRODUCT PROMOTION IS AGAINST NPOV POLICY AND SHOULD NOT BE PERMITTED.
IS ZIMZALABIM A REPRESENTATIVE OF ZEDO? HOW MUCH OF THE WIKIPEDIA CONTENT HIS CONTRIBUTION? IS HE ERASING THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF OTHERS?
WIKIPEDIA IS NO LOGER THE ENCYCLOPEDIA IT CLAIMS TO BE. LET THERE BE AN INQUIRY AS TO ITS CONTENT AND FINANCIAL CONTRIBUTORS. IKIPEDIA SHOULD BE MADE TO PUBLISH AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE CONTENT CONTRIBUTION OF ITS FINANCIAL SUPPORTERS.
IT IS OBVIOUS THAT THE WIKIPEDIA CONTENT CONTRIBUTION IS A SHAMELESS PROMOTION OF THE BUSINESSES OF VERY PERSISTENT ADWARES LIKE ZEDO THAT CALL THEMSELVES LEGITEMATE BUSINESSES. FOR EXAMPLE LET NPOV MAKE A PUBLIC INQUIRY INO THE MODE OF OPERATION BY ZEDO AND IT ASSOCIATION WITH THE BUSINESSES THAT HAVE THEIR LINKS PLACED ON WIKIPEDIA
PLEASE read talk pages first before deleting stuff
I always read talk pages before deleting stuff, especially other editors' pictures. If you had to bothered to read Talk:YouTube first (see section 38), you would have realized that the problem is that YouTube deliberately selected a building surrounded by trees (obviously for privacy since they were sick and tired of tourists like me driving past the loft in downtown San Mateo). That picture is as good as it's going to get unless someone well-connected inside the FAA can get clearance to fly a helicopter at low altitude through the congested airspace just west of SFO (which is practically impossible). And in case you were wondering, that is an EquityOffice office complex in a planned development which means there is no curb parking. Either you have a permit to park in the garage or you don't. The point is to drive away unwanted tourists, transients, and the like. Please reply at Talk:YouTube. --Coolcaesar 05:50, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- I've replied at Talk:YouTube#Location_in_San_Mateo.3F. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 10:35, 1 November 2006 (UTC)