| Revision as of 15:44, 11 June 2007 editMakeroftoys (talk | contribs)3 edits MIsleading aspects regarding PB 100 identified← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 12:54, 11 November 2018 edit undoOrangemike (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators126,287 edits removed NPOV violations/trolling, unsourced assertions, begging the questionTag: Replaced |
| (27 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
*Keep length under approx. 45k |
|
|
*Improve Business culture section |
|
*Improve Business culture section |
|
|
*Sources for business and user culture |
|
*A bit of cleaning up. Might help shorten the article as well. |
|
|
|
*Scour for typos, dead links, etc. |
|
|
|
|
*Research Nubus claim - my recollection was that it was initially developed by MIT&TI for TI Explorers |
|
|
(and later adopted and promoted by Apple, since it was 680X0-CPU friendly) |
|
|
] 10:55, 25 April 2007 (UTC)rhyre417 |
|
|
|
|
|
The article leads the reader to think that 1) the Powerbook 100 came out first, and 2) that Sony was somehow responsible for the ergonomic innovation of the Powerbooks. Both are incorrect. The PB 100, 140, and 170 were all introduced on the same day (Oct 21, 1991) and the industrial design of the PB 100 was dictated by Apple. |
|