| Revision as of 17:39, 16 August 2011 editMann jess (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers14,672 edits →New Section: [] on []← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:52, 20 November 2018 edit undoMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,138,457 edits →ArbCom 2018 election voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery | ||
| (36 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Who should we put instead of Einstein? == | |||
| Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and ] Thank you for ]. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: | |||
| Hi :-) We can't just allow this argument to go own forever and go in cirles. I opened a new discussion regarding who to put instead of Einstein: Please feel free to offer any ideas! ] (]) 07:22, 13 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| : ] ''']''' | |||
| : <big><big><big><font color="orange">'''5'''</font></big></big></big><!----> ''']''' | |||
| : ] ''']''' | |||
| : ] ''']''' | |||
| : ] ''']''' | |||
| : ] ''']''' | |||
| : ] ''']''' | |||
| : ] ''''']''''' | |||
| == Klinsmann == | |||
| I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on my talk page, or place <code><nowiki>{{helpme}}</nowiki></code> on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! <font face="Cambria">] (])</font> 12:33, 9 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
| Don't look at the file - look at gallery of the Germans page. It's not Klinsmann. This whole "Germans" page/talk-page has become a madhouse. --] (]) 19:30, 14 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| == chemistry == | |||
| ==Talkback== | |||
| Hey, I am not trying to force you to edit war with me, so rather than just restore them, could you explain why you would want to delete the references to Nature and the NYTimes regarding the arsenic nonsense? This is not my pet theory and I am not defending it at all - just curious why remove the refs from a wikipedia standpoint. I will look for your answer here. ] (]) 22:58, 4 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
| {{talkback|WP:MCQ|collages|ts=22:50, 14 January 2013 (UTC)}} | |||
| :Hey Medeis, thanks for the message. I was just busy starting to write on your talk page to explain in more detail so you didn't think I was editing it to annoy you... I took the refs out because they are secondary refs of the original and don't add further support to what is being said in the article. I kept the NASA page as a ref for NASA funding, and the original article for the rest. The Nature News and NYTimes article are mainly summaries of the original, so they shouldn't be used to give the impression of independent support. They don't corroborate the original, but just report on it. Same with the Redfield 'Letter to Science', that just summarizes the original blog criticisms, so I removed it. I had originally taken out the PHB/water activity statement because it isn't a properly developed theory, but more or less just a single statement in the original paper. I also simply didn't think this would be the right place to go into that much detail, especially since there is a whole article on it, so repeating all that seemed a bit too much. I only added the criticisms to make it more balanced; if I were to write it from scratch, I think there should just be a brief mention with linkouts, something like: “It has been speculated that the earliest life forms on Earth may have used arsenic in place of phosphorus in the backbone of their DNA. Although arsenate esters are so much less stable to hydrolysis than corresponding phosphate esters that arsenic would not be suitable for this function, a heavily criticized 2010 geomicrobiology study supported in part by NASA claimed that a bacterium, named GFAJ-1, collected in the sediments of Mono Lake, can employ such 'arsenic DNA' .” That captures the gist of it, and links out to the relevant articles. I don't have particularly strong feelings about the wording of the article, so do whatever you want. Have a nice day.] (]) 23:43, 4 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ] (]) 22:50, 14 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks. My only concern then would be that a reference remains which is accessible to lay readers. If I get around to it find it necessary I might restore one.00:02, 5 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::As far as I know, the article will remain freely available at the cited source, so it should be fine.] (]) 11:01, 5 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==Trying to (finally) close the discussion with a conclusion== | |||
| == Re: Felisa Wolfe-Simon lead == | |||
| Hi! Here’s what I wrote: . | |||
| Is there anything you would like to add? I tried to summarize it as much as possible, hope I didn’t skip anything worth mentioning! ] (]) 10:03, 15 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :PS Is there a chance you could maybe do the change in the image? I don't know how to do it. It's annoying you can't jsut make a file and re-upload it! ] (]) 10:03, 15 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :Prefer that as well, thanks. ] (]) 10:04, 10 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == Talk section in Gentleman scientist == | |||
| Hi,<br> | |||
| Misplaced Pages policy encourages removal of ''potentially'' (keep your opinion if you want) insulting content about living persons and this exactly that I want to do with this discussion. If necessary I will apply for help exactly following instructions as it is advised in the banner at the top of the talk page. ] (]) 18:55, 10 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| :There is very little in the discussion that could be construed as insulting to a living person, it hardly even mentions a person. The only passage that makes any reference to a living person is 'The work may be notable but the scientists, which is the subject of this article, are not'. Although I can't see how this is insulting, removing this passage might be an option. Deleting the whole discussion thread seems a little radical. The discussion mainly deals with the removal of unsourced material and the notability of a particular study. It is not concerned with the biography of a living person. Please specify which particular sections you find potentially insulting. Those can then be selectively blanked. Cheers, ] (]) 21:59, 10 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692225944 --> | |||
| ::All discussion must be blanked as it discloses sensitive personal information that is not published elsewhere (fact of <nowiki><words blanked later></nowiki>). The project team (two living persons) is not willing to share this information. As I understand, they do not need to go into endless discussions why they do not like the content ] (]) 05:05, 11 August 2011 (UTC). | |||
| :::Sorry to go on about this, but there has been no disclosure of personal information in the discussion. If anything, the discussion very clearly demonstrates that there is no basis to believe that anyone involved in the study (which isn't even mentioned, so there is nothing in the discussion to link this to an actual person) had any voluntary contribution. The only person ever to have suggested this was in fact you, in the article (and this information has been removed). Just because you personally don't like the contents or outcome of a particular discussion thread does not mean you can delete it on the grounds that someone else may not like it. I have seen no evidence that the team involved has any opinion at all about any 'disclosure'. To say that they do is another unfounded assumption by you. I suspect that you simply are unhappy with the discussion yourself, could this be true? Cheers, ] (]) 09:13, 11 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Yes, me, but I have blanked my posts also. ] (]) 13:36, 11 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Not really an answer, is it?...] (]) 13:51, 11 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::Sorry, I have already said everything and have nothing more to add, at least to the listener of your kind. ] (]) 13:58, 11 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::::So you are saying that there was no real reason for your deletion in the first place? Why did you do it then? Also please elaborate on 'the listener of your kind', Thanks. ] (]) 14:02, 11 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::::I have restored the discussion in redacted format to remove any direct references. I think this is a solution we both can live with. Please note that I have not altered any of your entries, as it would be inapproprate for me to do so. I think your entries are fine, but please do check. Thanks, ] (]) 10:36, 12 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ==] |
== ]: Voting now open! == | ||
| {{uw-3rr|Water Memory}} — ]<span style="margin:0 7px;font-variant:small-caps;font-size:0.9em">· ]]</span> 17:39, 16 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Rainbowwrasse. Voting in the ''']''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review ] and submit your choices on ''']'''. ] (]) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52 bot@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52_bot/spamlist/40&oldid=750777917 --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2017 election voter message == | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Rainbowwrasse. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2017/Coordination/MMS/08&oldid=813407029 --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2018 election voter message == | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Rainbowwrasse. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/09&oldid=866998319 --> | |||
Latest revision as of 00:52, 20 November 2018
Who should we put instead of Einstein?
Hi :-) We can't just allow this argument to go own forever and go in cirles. I opened a new discussion regarding who to put instead of Einstein: Please feel free to offer any ideas! Guitar hero on the roof (talk) 07:22, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Klinsmann
Don't look at the file - look at gallery of the Germans page. It's not Klinsmann. This whole "Germans" page/talk-page has become a madhouse. --IIIraute (talk) 19:30, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 22:50, 14 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
ww2censor (talk) 22:50, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Trying to (finally) close the discussion with a conclusion
Is there anything you would like to add? I tried to summarize it as much as possible, hope I didn’t skip anything worth mentioning! Guitar hero on the roof (talk) 10:03, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- PS Is there a chance you could maybe do the change in the image? I don't know how to do it. It's annoying you can't jsut make a file and re-upload it! Guitar hero on the roof (talk) 10:03, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Rainbowwrasse. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Rainbowwrasse. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Rainbowwrasse. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)