Revision as of 20:33, 16 November 2006 view sourceWilliam M. Connolley (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers66,022 edits User notice: temporary 3RR block← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:09, 16 November 2006 view source BabyDweezil (talk | contribs)1,482 edits →Regarding reversions made on [] [] to []Next edit → | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
] 20:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)</div> | ] 20:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)</div> | ||
::Pure vindictiveness on the part of Harrison. Reversions were clearly explained as being due to BLP concerns which the author refused to discuss.] 21:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:09, 16 November 2006
Welcome to BabyDweezil's Talk Page.
Request for mediation
This user page is currently inactive and is retained for historical reference. If you want to revive discussion regarding the subject, you might try contacting the user in question or seeking broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/OpenNote is deprecated. Please see User:MediationBot/Opened message instead. |
--Cberlet 15:47, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
(wacky rant from GrownUpAndWise deleted)
Fred Newman
Baby, please do not restore material about a living person that might be a violation of BLP. You restored it claiming it was sourced when it very clearly was not sourced. Misplaced Pages takes BLP issues very, very seriously, so please edit in accordance with WP:BLP in future. Many thanks, SlimVirgin 21:24, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- It was sourced. Please cite what you feel needs sourcing, and as I always have done, it will be addressed. BabyDweezil 21:26, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- If you add that again without a reliable source (not a self-published newsletter), you will be blocked from editing. SlimVirgin 23:36, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Three-revert rule
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Tom Harrison 17:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- Have attempted to discuss endlessly--Berlet refuses to address issues. There is a WP:BLP issue which Berlet refuses to discuss.
- Information available solely on partisan websites or in obscure newspapers should be handled with caution, and, if derogatory, should not be used at all. Information found in self-published books, newspapers, or websites/blogs should never be used, unless written by the subject
- I would also appreciate the invlovement of admins other than the two thus far, both of whom are heavily involved in the editing of the Berlet Misplaced Pages entry. BabyDweezil 17:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
User notice: temporary 3RR block
Regarding reversions made on November 16 2006 to Fred Newman
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. The duration of the block is 8 hours.Also, impolite edit summaries area bad idea
William M. Connolley 20:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)- Pure vindictiveness on the part of Harrison. Reversions were clearly explained as being due to BLP concerns which the author refused to discuss.BabyDweezil 21:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC)