Misplaced Pages

Revolution: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:58, 24 November 2006 edit199.185.86.242 (talk) →Study of revolutions← Previous edit Revision as of 05:04, 25 November 2006 edit undoPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers286,062 edits →External links: rm spamNext edit →
(24 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
:''For other uses, see ].'' :''For other uses, see ].''


], ] ] during the ].]]
A '''revolution''' is a significant ] that usually occurs in a relatively short period of time. Variously defined revolutions have been happening throughout ]. They vary in terms of numbers of their participants (]), means employed by them, duration, ] and many other aspects. They may result in a ]-] in the ]-]s, or a major change in a ] or ]. A '''revolution''' (from ] ''revolutia'' which means "a turn around") is a significant ] that usually occurs in a relatively short period of time. Variously defined revolutions have been happening throughout ]. They vary in terms of numbers of their participants (]), means employed by them, duration, ] and many other aspects. They may result in a ]-] in the ]-]s, or a major change in a ] or ].


Scholarly debates about what is and what is not a revolution center around several issues. Early study of revolutions primarly analyzed events in ] from ] perspective, soon however new theories where offered using explantions for more global events and using works from other ]s such as ] and ]s. Several generations of scholarly though have generated many competing theories of revolutions, gradually increasing our understanding of this complex phenomena.
The word revolution derives from ] ''revolutia'' and means "a turn around."

⚫ ] was a leader in the ]]]


==Etymologies== ==Etymologies==
The word derives from ] ''revolutio''- "a revolving," from ] ''revolvere'' "turn, roll back". It entered ], from ] ''révolution'', in ], originally only applied to ]. Only circa ] was it being used to mean " instance of great change in affairs"; the presently dominant political meaning is first recorded ], again following ], and was especially applied to the expulsion of the ] king ] in ] and transfer of sovereignty in Britain to ] and ]. ''Revolutionary'' as a ] is first attested ], from the ].<ref name="word">. Last accessed on 27 October 2006</ref> The word derives from ] ''revolutio''- "a revolving," from ] ''revolvere'' "turn, roll back". It entered ], from ] ''révolution'', in ], originally only applied to ]. Only circa ] was it being used to mean " instance of great change in affairs"; the presently dominant political meaning is first recorded ], again following ], and was especially applied to the expulsion of the ] king ] in ] and transfer of sovereignty in Britain to ] and ]. ''Revolutionary'' as a ] is first attested ], from the ].<ref name="word">. Last accessed on 27 October 2006</ref>

==Study of revolutions==
⚫ sex toys have been studied by many ], particularly ]s, ]s and ]s. Among the leading schools in that area have been or are ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], aall the others were not sex gods like the ones listed but... they shall do for now that is at least ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ].<ref name="NOWO:5">], ''No Other Way Out: States and Revolutionary Movements, 1945-1991'', Cambridge University Press, 2001, ISBN 2001, p.5</ref> ] differentiates four 'generations' of scholarly research dealing with revolutions.<ref name="Goldstonet3">], "Theories of Revolutions: The Third Generation'', '']'' 32, 1980:425-53</ref><ref name="Goldstonet4">Jack Goldstone, "Towards a Fourth Generation of Revolutionary Theory", '']'' 4, 2001:139-87</ref><ref name="Forantorr">], "Theories of Revolution Revisited: Toward a Fourth Generation", '']'' 11, 1993:1-20</ref><ref name="Kroeber">], ''Theory and History of Revolution'', ] 7.1, 1996:21-40</ref>


==Political and socioeconomic revolutions== ==Political and socioeconomic revolutions==
⚫ ] was a leader in the ]...]]
⚫ Perhaps most often, the word 'revolution' is employed to denote a ]-] in the ]-]s. ] gives two definitions of a revolution. Broader, where revolution is 'any and all instances in which a state or a political ] is overthrown and therby transformed by a popular ] in an irregular, extraconstitutional and/or violent fashion'; and narrower, in which 'revolutions entail not only ] and regime change, but also more or less rapid and fundamental social, economic and/or cultural change, during or soon after the struggle for ] ]'.<ref name="NOWO:9">Goodwin, op.cit., p.9</ref> ] defines them as 'an effort to transform the political institutions and the justifications for political authority in society, accompanied by formal or informal mass mobilization and noninstitutionalized actions that undermine authorities.<ref name="Goldstonet4"/>


⚫ Perhaps most often, the word 'revolution' is employed to denote a ]-] in the ]-]s.<ref name="Goldstonet3">], "Theories of Revolutions: The Third Generation'', '']'' 32, 1980:425-53</ref><ref name="Forantorr">], "Theories of Revolution Revisited: Toward a Fourth Generation", '']'' 11, 1993:1-20</ref><ref name="Kroeber">], ''Theory and History of Revolution'', ] 7.1, 1996:21-40</ref> ] gives two definitions of a revolution. Broader, where revolution is 'any and all instances in which a state or a political ] is overthrown and therby transformed by a popular ] in an irregular, extraconstitutional and/or violent fashion'; and narrower, in which 'revolutions entail not only ] and regime change, but also more or less rapid and fundamental social, economic and/or cultural change, during or soon after the struggle for ] ]'.<ref name="NOWO:9">Goodwin, op.cit., p.9</ref> ] defines them as 'an effort to transform the political institutions and the justifications for political authority in society, accompanied by formal or informal mass mobilization and noninstitutionalized actions that undermine authorities.<ref name="Goldstonet4">Jack Goldstone, "Towards a Fourth Generation of Revolutionary Theory", '']'' 4, 2001:139-87</ref>
See ] for a list of such revolutions.


⚫ Political and socioeconomic revolutions have been studied by many ], particularly ]s, ]s and ]s. Among the leading scholars in that area have been or are ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ], to name just a few.<ref name="NOWO:5">], ''No Other Way Out: States and Revolutionary Movements, 1945-1991'', Cambridge University Press, 2001, ISBN 2001, p.5</ref>
⚫ ==Cultural, intellectual and philosophical revolutions==
] was a leader in the ].]]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


] differentiates four 'generations' of scholarly research dealing with revolutions.<ref name="Goldstonet4"/> The scholars of the first generation such as ], ] or ], were mainly ] in their approach and their explanations of the phenomena of revolutions was usually related to ], such as Le Bon's ] theory.<ref name="Goldstonet3"/>
==Technological revolutions==

These usually lead to transformations in society, culture and philosophy.
Second generation theorists sought to develop detailed theories of why and when revolutions arise, grounded in more complex ] theories. They can be divided into three major approaches: ], ] and ]. The works of ], ], ], ], ] and ] fall into the first category. They followed theories of ] and ] and saw the cause of revolution in the state of mind of the masses, and while they varied in their approach as to what exactly caused the people to revolt (ex. ], ] or ]), they agreed that the primary cause for revolution was the widespraed fustration with socio-political situation. The second group, composed of academics such as ], ], ], ], ], ], followed in the footsteps of ] and the ] theory in sociology; they saw society as a system in equilibrium between various resources, demands and subsystems (political, cultural, etc.). As in the psychological school, they differed in their definitions of what causes disequilibrium, but agreed that it is a state of a severe disequilibrium that is responsible for revolutions. Finally, the third group, which included writers such as ], ], ] and ] followed the path of ] and looked at ] and ]. Those theories sees events as outcomes of a ] between competing ]s. In such a model, revolution happen when two or more groups cannot come to terms within a normal ] process traditional for a given ], and simoultanesly possess resources enough to employ ] in pursuing their goals.<ref name="Goldstonet3"/> The second generation theorists saw the devolopment of the revolutions as a two-step process; first, some ] results in present situation being different from the past, second, the new situation creates an opportunity for a revolution to occur. In that situation an event that in the past would not be sufficient to cause a revolution (ex. a war, a riot, a bad harest), now is sufficient - however if authorities are aware of the danger, they can still prevent a revolution (through ] or ]).
⚫ * ]

* ]
] entered ] in June 1949 after many years of armed struggle...]]
* ]
Many of such early studies of revolutions usually concentrated on the four classic ']', seen as famous and uncontroversial examples fitting virtually all definitions of revolutions: the ] (1688), the ] (1789–1799), the ] and ] (1927-1949).<ref name="Goldstonet4"/> In time, scholars begun analyze hundreds of other events as revolutions (see ]), and differences in definitions and approaches gave rise to new definitions and explantions. Theories of the second generation have been criticized for their limited geographical scope, difficulty in ] verification, as well as that while they may explain some particular revolutions, they did not explain why revolutions did not occur in other societies in very similar situations.
* ]

⚫ * ]
The criticism of the second generation led to the raise of the third generation of theories, with writers such as ], ], ] and others expanded on the old ] ] approach, turning attention to rural agrarian-state conflicts, state conflicts with autonomous ] and the impact of interstate ] and ] competition on domestic ]. Particulary Skocpol's '']'' became one of the most widely recognized works of the third generation; Skocpol defined revolution as "rapid, basic transformations of society's state and class structures...accompanied and in part carried through by class-based revolts from below", attributing revolutions to a conjunction of multiplie conflicts involving state, elites and the lower classes.<ref name="Goldstonet4"/>
* ]

{{socio-stub}}
] and most of the events of the ] in Europe, 1989, were sudden and peaceful.]]
{{politics-stub}}
From the late 1980s a new body of scholary work begun questioning the domiance of the theories of the third generation. The old theories were also dealt a significant blow by new revolutinary events that could not be easily explain by them. The ] and ] of 1979, the 1986 ] in ] and the ] in Europe in 1989 saw multi-class coalitions toppled seemingly powerful regims amidt popular demonstrations and mass strikes in ]. Defining revolutions as mostly European violent state versus people and ]s conflicts was no longer sufficient. The study of revolutions thus evolved in three directions. First, some researchers are applying previous or updated ] theories of revolutions to events beyond the previously analyzed mostly European conflicts. Second, scholars called for greater attention to conscious ] in the form of ] and ] in shaping revolutionary ] and objectives. Third, analysts of both revolutions and ] realized that those phenomena have much in common, and a new 'fourth generation' literature on ] has developed that attempts to combine insights from the study of social movements and revolutions in hopes of understanding both phenomena.<ref name="Goldstonet4"/>

It should be noted that while revolutions encompass events ranging from ] to the ], they exclude ], ], ] that make no effort to transform institutions or the justification for authority (such as ]'s ] of 1926 or ]), as well as peaceful transitions to ] through institutional arrangements such as ] and ], as in ] after the death of ].<ref name="Goldstonet4"/>

===Types of political and socioeconomic revolutions===
Some popular types of revolutions as discussed in social science literature include:
*] - revolutions that transform economic and social structures as well as political institutions, such as the ] of 1789 or ]
*] - revolutions that change only ]
*] - revolutions that involve autonomous lower-class revolts,
*] or ] - sweeping reforms carried out by elites who directly control mass mobilization
*] or ] - revolutions inspired by the ideas of Marxism that aims to replace ] with ]
*] or ] - revolutions that fail to secure power after temporary victories or large-scale mobilization
*] (popularly known as ] in the post-] period) - relativly recent pheomena where revolutionary political change is combined with very low level of violence

⚫ ==Cultural, intellectual, philosophical and technological revolutions==
<!--please list only events which are named 'revolutions'-->
] in ]. The development of the ] propelled the Industrial Revolution in ] and the world. The steam engine was created to ] water from ]s, enabling them to be deepened beyond ] levels.]]
]'' became one of the symbols of the ].]]
The term revolution has been used to describe ]s in areas not primarily related to ]. They are usually recognized as having transformed in society, culture, philosophy and technology much more than ]s. Such revolutions include, in alphabetical order:
⚫ *]s, which include:
**] (perhaps 10000 years ago), which formed the basis for human civilization to develop. It is commonly reffered to as the 'First Agricultural Revolution'.
**] (1945- ), the use of industrial fertilizers and new crops greatly increases the world's agricultural output. It is commonly reffered to as the 'Second Agricultural Revolution'.
**] (1990s-), the use of ]tically modified plants and animals. It is sometimes reffered to as the 'Third Agricultural Revolution'.
**] (18th century), which spurred urbanisation and consequently helped launch the ].
**] (18th century), which led to the so-called ].
* ] - a period of spiritual awakening in American history from 1964 to 1984
* ] - a struggle for power within the Communist Party of China, which grew to include large sections of Chinese society and eventually brought the People's Republic of China to the brink of civil war, and which lasted from 1966 to 1976
* ] - the sweeping changes brought about by computing and communication technology during the latter half of the 20th Century
* ] - the major shift of technological, socioeconomic and cultural conditions in the late 18th and early 19th century that began in Britain and spread throughout the world
⚫ ** ] (1871–1914)
* ] - a series of economic events from the second half of the 15th century to the first half of the 17th, the price revolution refers most specifically to the high rate of inflation that characterized the period across Western Europe
* ] - a period of rapid change in Quebec, Canada, in the 1960s
* ] - a fundamental transformation in scientific ideas around 16th century
* ] - a change in sexual morality and sexual behavior throughout the Western world, from 1960s till today


==See also== ==See also==
{{wikiquote}} {{wikiquote}}
⚫ {{wiktionary}}
* ]
* ] * ]
* ] - revolutions named after colors, plants etc. in the period after the Cold War, mainly in post-communist societies
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
⚫ {{wiktionary}}


==References== ==References==
Line 59: Line 77:


==External links== ==External links==
* , containing histories of revolutionary movements throughout the world.
* *
* Michael Barker, , 1 November 2006. * Michael Barker, , 1 November 2006.

Revision as of 05:04, 25 November 2006

It has been suggested that Revolutionary be merged into this article. (Discuss) Proposed since September 2006.
For other uses, see Revolution (disambiguation).
The storming of the Bastille, 14 July 1789 during the French Revolution.

A revolution (from Late Latin revolutia which means "a turn around") is a significant change that usually occurs in a relatively short period of time. Variously defined revolutions have been happening throughout human history. They vary in terms of numbers of their participants (revolutionaries), means employed by them, duration, ideology and many other aspects. They may result in a socio-political change in the socio-political institutions, or a major change in a culture or economy.

Scholarly debates about what is and what is not a revolution center around several issues. Early study of revolutions primarly analyzed events in European history from psychological perspective, soon however new theories where offered using explantions for more global events and using works from other social sciences such as sociology and political sciences. Several generations of scholarly though have generated many competing theories of revolutions, gradually increasing our understanding of this complex phenomena.

Etymologies

The word derives from Late Latin revolutio- "a revolving," from Latin revolvere "turn, roll back". It entered English, from Old French révolution, in 1390, originally only applied to celestial bodies. Only circa 1450 was it being used to mean " instance of great change in affairs"; the presently dominant political meaning is first recorded 1600, again following French, and was especially applied to the expulsion of the Stuart king James II of England in 1688 and transfer of sovereignty in Britain to William III and Mary. Revolutionary as a noun is first attested 1850, from the adjective.

Political and socioeconomic revolutions

Two famous revolutionaries from two differnt times and places: George Washington was a leader in the American Revolution...

Perhaps most often, the word 'revolution' is employed to denote a socio-political change in the socio-political institutions. Jeff Goodwin gives two definitions of a revolution. Broader, where revolution is 'any and all instances in which a state or a political regime is overthrown and therby transformed by a popular movement in an irregular, extraconstitutional and/or violent fashion'; and narrower, in which 'revolutions entail not only mass mobilization and regime change, but also more or less rapid and fundamental social, economic and/or cultural change, during or soon after the struggle for state power'. Jack Goldstone defines them as 'an effort to transform the political institutions and the justifications for political authority in society, accompanied by formal or informal mass mobilization and noninstitutionalized actions that undermine authorities.

Political and socioeconomic revolutions have been studied by many social scientists, particularly sociologists, political scientists and historians. Among the leading scholars in that area have been or are Crane Brinton, Charles Brockett, Farideh Farhi, John Foran, John Mason Hart, Samuel Huntington, Jack Goldstone, Jeff Goodwin, Ted Roberts Gurr, Fred Halliday, Chalmers Johnson, Tim McDaniel, Barrington Moore, Jeffery Paige, Vilfredo Pareto, Terence Ranger, Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy, Theda Skocpol, James Scott, Eric Selbin, Charles Tilly, Ellen Kay Trimbringer, Carlos Vistas, John Walton, Timothy Wickham-Crowley and Eric Wolf, to name just a few.

... and Vladimir Lenin was a leader in the Russian Revolution of 1917.

Jack Goldstone differentiates four 'generations' of scholarly research dealing with revolutions. The scholars of the first generation such as Gustave Le Bon, Charles A. Ellwood or Pitirim Sorokin, were mainly descriptive in their approach and their explanations of the phenomena of revolutions was usually related to social psychology, such as Le Bon's crowd psychology theory.

Second generation theorists sought to develop detailed theories of why and when revolutions arise, grounded in more complex social behaviour theories. They can be divided into three major approaches: psychological, sociological and political. The works of Ted R. Gurr, Ivo K. Feierbrand, Rosalind L. Feierbrand, James A. Geschwender, David C. Schwartz and Denton E. Morrison fall into the first category. They followed theories of cognitive psychology and frustration-aggression theory and saw the cause of revolution in the state of mind of the masses, and while they varied in their approach as to what exactly caused the people to revolt (ex. modernization, recession or discrimination), they agreed that the primary cause for revolution was the widespraed fustration with socio-political situation. The second group, composed of academics such as Chalmers Johnson, Neil Smelser, Bob Jessop, Mark Hart, Edward A. Tiryakian, Mark Hagopian, followed in the footsteps of Talcott Parsons and the structural-functionalist theory in sociology; they saw society as a system in equilibrium between various resources, demands and subsystems (political, cultural, etc.). As in the psychological school, they differed in their definitions of what causes disequilibrium, but agreed that it is a state of a severe disequilibrium that is responsible for revolutions. Finally, the third group, which included writers such as Charles Tilly, Samuel P. Huntington, Peter Ammann and Arthur L. Stinchcombe followed the path of political sciences and looked at pluralist theory and interest group conflict theory. Those theories sees events as outcomes of a power struggle between competing interest groups. In such a model, revolution happen when two or more groups cannot come to terms within a normal decision making process traditional for a given political system, and simoultanesly possess resources enough to employ force in pursuing their goals. The second generation theorists saw the devolopment of the revolutions as a two-step process; first, some change results in present situation being different from the past, second, the new situation creates an opportunity for a revolution to occur. In that situation an event that in the past would not be sufficient to cause a revolution (ex. a war, a riot, a bad harest), now is sufficient - however if authorities are aware of the danger, they can still prevent a revolution (through reform or repressions).

File:Communists enter Beijing (1949).jpg
Revolutions differ in many aspects. Soldiers of the victorious People's Liberation Army entered Beijing in June 1949 after many years of armed struggle...

Many of such early studies of revolutions usually concentrated on the four classic 'great revolutions', seen as famous and uncontroversial examples fitting virtually all definitions of revolutions: the Glorious Revolution (1688), the French Revolution (1789–1799), the Russian Revolution of 1917 and Chinese Revolution (1927-1949). In time, scholars begun analyze hundreds of other events as revolutions (see list of revolutions and rebellions), and differences in definitions and approaches gave rise to new definitions and explantions. Theories of the second generation have been criticized for their limited geographical scope, difficulty in empirical verification, as well as that while they may explain some particular revolutions, they did not explain why revolutions did not occur in other societies in very similar situations.

The criticism of the second generation led to the raise of the third generation of theories, with writers such as Theda Skocpol, Barrington Moore, Jeffery Paige and others expanded on the old Marxist class conflict approach, turning attention to rural agrarian-state conflicts, state conflicts with autonomous elites and the impact of interstate economic and military competition on domestic political change. Particulary Skocpol's States and Social Revolutions became one of the most widely recognized works of the third generation; Skocpol defined revolution as "rapid, basic transformations of society's state and class structures...accompanied and in part carried through by class-based revolts from below", attributing revolutions to a conjunction of multiplie conflicts involving state, elites and the lower classes.

File:Berlin-wall-dancing.jpg
...but the fall of the Berlin Wall and most of the events of the Autumn of Nations in Europe, 1989, were sudden and peaceful.

From the late 1980s a new body of scholary work begun questioning the domiance of the theories of the third generation. The old theories were also dealt a significant blow by new revolutinary events that could not be easily explain by them. The Iranian Revolution and Nicaraguan Revolution of 1979, the 1986 1986 EDSA Revolution in Philippines and the Autumn of Nations in Europe in 1989 saw multi-class coalitions toppled seemingly powerful regims amidt popular demonstrations and mass strikes in nonviolent revolutions. Defining revolutions as mostly European violent state versus people and class struggles conflicts was no longer sufficient. The study of revolutions thus evolved in three directions. First, some researchers are applying previous or updated structuralist theories of revolutions to events beyond the previously analyzed mostly European conflicts. Second, scholars called for greater attention to conscious agency in the form of ideology and culture in shaping revolutionary mobilization and objectives. Third, analysts of both revolutions and social movements realized that those phenomena have much in common, and a new 'fourth generation' literature on contentious politics has developed that attempts to combine insights from the study of social movements and revolutions in hopes of understanding both phenomena.

It should be noted that while revolutions encompass events ranging from the relatively peaceful revolutions that overthrewcommunist regimes to the violent Islamic revolution in Afghanistan, they exclude coups d'état, civil wars, revolts and rebellions that make no effort to transform institutions or the justification for authority (such as Józef Piłsudski's May Coup of 1926 or American Civil War), as well as peaceful transitions to democracy through institutional arrangements such as plebiscite and free elections, as in Spain after the death of Francisco Franco.

Types of political and socioeconomic revolutions

Some popular types of revolutions as discussed in social science literature include:

Cultural, intellectual, philosophical and technological revolutions

A Watt steam engine in Madrid. The development of the steam engine propelled the Industrial Revolution in Britain and the world. The steam engine was created to pump water from coal mines, enabling them to be deepened beyond groundwater levels.
File:Pb1253.jpg
Playboy became one of the symbols of the sexual revolution.

The term revolution has been used to describe social changes in areas not primarily related to politics. They are usually recognized as having transformed in society, culture, philosophy and technology much more than political systems. Such revolutions include, in alphabetical order:

  • Agricultural Revolutions, which include:
  • Consciousness Revolution - a period of spiritual awakening in American history from 1964 to 1984
  • Cultural Revolution - a struggle for power within the Communist Party of China, which grew to include large sections of Chinese society and eventually brought the People's Republic of China to the brink of civil war, and which lasted from 1966 to 1976
  • Digital Revolution - the sweeping changes brought about by computing and communication technology during the latter half of the 20th Century
  • Industrial Revolution - the major shift of technological, socioeconomic and cultural conditions in the late 18th and early 19th century that began in Britain and spread throughout the world
  • Price revolution - a series of economic events from the second half of the 15th century to the first half of the 17th, the price revolution refers most specifically to the high rate of inflation that characterized the period across Western Europe
  • Quiet Revolution - a period of rapid change in Quebec, Canada, in the 1960s
  • Scientific revolution - a fundamental transformation in scientific ideas around 16th century
  • Sexual revolution - a change in sexual morality and sexual behavior throughout the Western world, from 1960s till today

See also

References

  1. EtymologyOnLine:revolution. Last accessed on 27 October 2006
  2. ^ Jack Goldstone, "Theories of Revolutions: The Third Generation, World Politics 32, 1980:425-53
  3. John Foran, "Theories of Revolution Revisited: Toward a Fourth Generation", Sociological Theory 11, 1993:1-20
  4. Clifton B. Kroeber, Theory and History of Revolution, Journal of World History 7.1, 1996:21-40
  5. Goodwin, op.cit., p.9
  6. ^ Jack Goldstone, "Towards a Fourth Generation of Revolutionary Theory", Annual Review of Political Science 4, 2001:139-87
  7. Jeff Goodwin, No Other Way Out: States and Revolutionary Movements, 1945-1991, Cambridge University Press, 2001, ISBN 2001, p.5

External links

Categories: