| Revision as of 06:19, 22 June 2019 editDGG (talk | contribs)316,874 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:11, 24 June 2019 edit undo7&6=thirteen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers152,696 edits →Marbella Apartments: KNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| *'''Redirect''' to ] ] (]) 10:16, 21 June 2019 (UTC) | *'''Redirect''' to ] ] (]) 10:16, 21 June 2019 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep.''' . If it was notable for being the tallest in thecity once, it remains notable--just as for every topic. Large buildings likethis usully have sufficient sources if looked for carefully, , as does this. The article isn';t promotional , which can sometimes be a problem. ''']''' (]) 06:19, 22 June 2019 (UTC) | *'''Keep.''' . If it was notable for being the tallest in thecity once, it remains notable--just as for every topic. Large buildings likethis usully have sufficient sources if looked for carefully, , as does this. The article isn';t promotional , which can sometimes be a problem. ''']''' (]) 06:19, 22 June 2019 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' for reasons cited above. No compliance with ]. <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">] (])</span> 12:11, 24 June 2019 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:11, 24 June 2019
Marbella Apartments
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Marbella Apartments (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An apartment building. No indication whatsoever of how this meets WP:NBUILD which require the building to have " historic, social, economic, or architectural importance" and receive significant coverage from reliable sources. Rusf10 (talk) 16:09, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 16:09, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 16:09, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep It was the tallest in Jersey City when built but is now not so outstanding. But a second tower has been built in the complex. That seems to be known as "M2 at Marbella" and, being newer, is easier to find sources for, e.g. this. There's no reason to delete this developing complex as our policies WP:ATD, WP:NOTPAPER and WP:PRESERVE apply. Andrew D. (talk) 18:57, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Lots of coverage, I added a few sources to the page. More sources available at nj.com, , the website owned by teh Star Ledger tha thosts many New Jersey newspapers.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:19, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included by Andrew D. in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:00, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of tallest buildings in Jersey City Djflem (talk) 10:16, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. . If it was notable for being the tallest in thecity once, it remains notable--just as for every topic. Large buildings likethis usully have sufficient sources if looked for carefully, , as does this. The article isn';t promotional , which can sometimes be a problem. DGG ( talk ) 06:19, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep for reasons cited above. No compliance with WP:Before. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:11, 24 June 2019 (UTC)