Revision as of 22:19, 23 June 2019 editDjflem (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers104,734 edits →Provost Square: keep/direct← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:14, 24 June 2019 edit undo7&6=thirteen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers152,696 editsm K & ENext edit → | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*'''Redirect/delete''' Not every generic apartment building is notable, even if it's tall and got routine local coverage that a developer is constructing it. Your stupid WP:PRESERVE does not mean everything on this entire site is immune from deletion. ]<sup>]</sup> 20:06, 21 June 2019 (UTC) | *'''Redirect/delete''' Not every generic apartment building is notable, even if it's tall and got routine local coverage that a developer is constructing it. Your stupid WP:PRESERVE does not mean everything on this entire site is immune from deletion. ]<sup>]</sup> 20:06, 21 June 2019 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep & expand/Redirect & add ]] (]) 22:19, 23 June 2019 (UTC) | *'''Keep & expand/Redirect & add ]] (]) 22:19, 23 June 2019 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep & expand''' per above. No compliance with ]. <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">] (])</span> 12:14, 24 June 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:14, 24 June 2019
Provost Square
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Provost Square (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An apartment building. No indication whatsoever of how this meets WP:NBUILD which require the building to have " historic, social, economic, or architectural importance" and receive significant coverage from multiple reliable sources. Rusf10 (talk) 16:15, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 16:15, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 16:15, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep A substantial development of this sort is comparable with a small town or large village. It naturally attracts coverage in the same way and this one seems to be no exception. Examples include Foundation Work Underway For Provost Square...; New York Times; Wall Street Journal; The 28-story tower overlooks the newly created Provost Square .... And, of course, there are sensible alternatives to deletion, such as merger with Powerhouse Arts District, Jersey City or the List of tallest buildings in Jersey City. Our editing policy, WP:PRESERVE, therefore applies. Andrew D. (talk) 16:54, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- WP:PRESERVE does not mean we do not delete anything. WP:NBUILD requires significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability. A paragraph in the New York Times or even a full article in some obscure publication does not meet that requirement.--Rusf10 (talk) 19:21, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included by Andrew D. in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:01, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- Can the article be expanded? If not merge to one of the places suggested. Dream Focus 04:32, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect/delete Not every generic apartment building is notable, even if it's tall and got routine local coverage that a developer is constructing it. Your stupid WP:PRESERVE does not mean everything on this entire site is immune from deletion. Reywas92 20:06, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep & expand/Redirect & add List of tallest buildings in Jersey CityDjflem (talk) 22:19, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
- Keep & expand per above. No compliance with WP:Before. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:14, 24 June 2019 (UTC)