| Revision as of 08:36, 27 November 2006 editCentrx (talk | contribs)37,287 edits rm RfCs older than 1 month & 1 deleted page← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:00, 29 November 2006 edit undoAndries (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers27,090 edits yet another dispute regarding Sathya Sai BabaNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| {{RFCheader|Religion and philosophy}} | {{RFCheader|Religion and philosophy}} | ||
| <!--<nowiki>Add new items here at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> | <!--<nowiki>Add new items here at the TOP. Use ~~~~~ (five tildes) to sign </nowiki>--> | ||
| *] One editor asserts that quoting a newspaper violates ] writing style. Other editor asserts that well-sourced information relevant to the persons notability is removed without good reason. A comment at the WP:BLP noticeboard yielded no response from non-involved editors. 19:00, 29 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *]. Does a recent rewrite improve the article? Please help us improve the article in this longstanding dispute? 07:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC) | *]. Does a recent rewrite improve the article? Please help us improve the article in this longstanding dispute? 07:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *] ] is on an anti-anti-Semitism crusade (a quick look at his/her contribs will exhibit this) throughout Misplaced Pages, which afflicts this particular article in terms of a continuous edit war regarding both content and categorization. The consensus both in scholarship and on the talk page is generally against his/her POV. 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC) | *] ] is on an anti-anti-Semitism crusade (a quick look at his/her contribs will exhibit this) throughout Misplaced Pages, which afflicts this particular article in terms of a continuous edit war regarding both content and categorization. The consensus both in scholarship and on the talk page is generally against his/her POV. 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:00, 29 November 2006
Shortcut- ]
- talk:Sathya Sai Baba One editor asserts that quoting a newspaper violates WP:BLP writing style. Other editor asserts that well-sourced information relevant to the persons notability is removed without good reason. A comment at the WP:BLP noticeboard yielded no response from non-involved editors. 19:00, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Opus Dei. Does a recent rewrite improve the article? Please help us improve the article in this longstanding dispute? 07:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:John Chrysostom User:Beit Or is on an anti-anti-Semitism crusade (a quick look at his/her contribs will exhibit this) throughout Misplaced Pages, which afflicts this particular article in terms of a continuous edit war regarding both content and categorization. The consensus both in scholarship and on the talk page is generally against his/her POV. 00:45, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Sathya Sai Baba → Go RFC Section: Two editor dispute: A critic of the Indian guru is attributing quotes to a fellow critic's compendium, attempting to bypass referencing the quotes to their actual and original book sources. I say reference the quotes to the original book sources. Critic says reference the quotes through the compendium, which is not the original source for the quotes. 22:55, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- Rejection of Misplaced Pages policy This is a dispute about not knowing the difference between supporting Misplaced Pages policy and purposely overlooking Misplaced Pages rules on notability and verifiability to favor an obvious hoax. 16:07, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Indian caste system Dispute with Muslim editors over the relative importance of the Fatwa-i-Jahandari on the establishment of the Muslim Castes in India. 00:22, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Communism#Anarch_RFC Regarding the mention of Anarchist communism. 23:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Brahma_Kumaris_World_Spiritual_University Dispute about verifiability and reliable sourcing. 11:23, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Islam Dispute over whether a crtiticism section of Islam should be kept or not - Christianity has one, but other religions do not. Accusations of Islamophobia have already been thrown. 07:51, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Reforms under Islam (610-661)#Statements for RfC There is a controversy (point #2) over whether or not direct citation of hadith constitutes WP:OR, and otherwise there are accusations of pro-Islam bias. 07:47, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Rudolf Steiner: edit war over anti-semitism and use of quotes. 01:53, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:James L. Holly - Should a site that some editors find objectionable be ruled out as a source? 20:45, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:New Kadampa Tradition#Request for Comment: NPOV: Dispute over NPOV 13:42, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Christianity and Buddhism#RfC: Dispute about whether the page should be re-written. 18:24, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Sahaja_Yoga#Request for Comment: Religious Movements source: Dispute on the validity of a source. 02:40, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Islam and slavery: Dispute over relevance of "modern slavery". The view of two editors could be found here: 03:34, 26 October 2006 (UTC) <-- not addressed yet 10:42, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Halloween#Religious_attitudes: There has been an intense controversy about Christian attitudes towards Halloween. Adherents of celtic pagan and Wicca practices try to impose a view on this site which is offensive for many Christians. I suggested a neutral and balanced view of the spiritual concerns many Christians have by presenting arguments for all positions. Repeated removal of my edits, references and links by users engaging in mass reverting and abusive editing+ad-hominem attacks and reporting as "vandal". Need some help by people who are interested in an objective and fair debate which is tolerant and not offensive in matters of faith. It should be possible to present also the perspectives of the Christian community objectively without being attacked. Please participate in the discussion! Thanks! Talk:Halloween#Lets_get_back_to_a_constructive_discussion_-_Reasonable_solution_proposed 23:57, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- Tantramassage: The entry was a copy of the entry in the German Misplaced Pages, where it was deleted after a Editwar (it was pure PR for a method called "Original Tantramassage"). The entry has no sources. And as I undertand Tantrism it has nothing to do with the so called Tantramassage which is often used as synonym for erotic massage. 16:32, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
- Talk:Nun#Request for Comment: This is a controversy about whether a group of activists called the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence belongs on this page. 15:03, 28 October 2006 (UTC)