| Revision as of 22:24, 6 August 2019 editAtsme (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers42,813 edits →Bulldog breeds: add note← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:46, 6 August 2019 edit undoNormal Op (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,816 edits →Bulldog breeds: Vote KeepNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] <sub>]</sub> ] 19:56, 6 August 2019 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the ]. ] <sub>]</sub> ] 19:56, 6 August 2019 (UTC)</small> | ||
| :<small>Note: This discussion has been included on ]. ] <sub>]</sub> ] 22:24, 6 August 2019 (UTC)</small> | :<small>Note: This discussion has been included on ]. ] <sub>]</sub> ] 22:24, 6 August 2019 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Keep:''' The nominator deleted everything in the article and is now requesting an article deletion. I believe everything should be put back in the article and the article left alone. ]]]] 21:55, 6 August 2019 (UTC)ble | |||
| ::I only deleted unrecognized, non-notable "breeds", including one that is owned by a single person under the guise of "rare breed". 😳 I just hope editors who are knowledgeable about dog breeds, and what actually constitutes notability and categorization of purebred dogs will weigh-in here because there is quite a bit of article clean-up left to do in this t-area. ] <sub>]</sub> ] 22:08, 6 August 2019 (UTC) | ::I only deleted unrecognized, non-notable "breeds", including one that is owned by a single person under the guise of "rare breed". 😳 I just hope editors who are knowledgeable about dog breeds, and what actually constitutes notability and categorization of purebred dogs will weigh-in here because there is quite a bit of article clean-up left to do in this t-area. ] <sub>]</sub> ] 22:08, 6 August 2019 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''' Appears to be parallel to other ] articles like], ], and ], which are names that encompass multiple breeds, just in this case ] is a specific breed by itself. Parallel overview sections like Genetics and Origins would be welcome. ]<sup>]</sup> 21:59, 6 August 2019 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' Appears to be parallel to other ] articles like], ], and ], which are names that encompass multiple breeds, just in this case ] is a specific breed by itself. Parallel overview sections like Genetics and Origins would be welcome. ]<sup>]</sup> 21:59, 6 August 2019 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep:''' After doing a hatchet job on the article, nominator now wants the article deleted in favor of simply a 'category', however the article provides more information than a category can possibly offer. Nom offered the reason "unsourced SYNTH" to delete a section. SYNTH requires two or more sources in order to create ]; perhaps nom meant ] instead. Nom removed several other sections while stating they aren't officially recognized breeds and fails GNG. However, ] is related to whether or not something gets its own article in Misplaced Pages, not whether it gets a mention within a related article. Nom removed the Alano Español section stating "unsourced and issues with verifiability", however some of the information was sourced in the ], whose link was provided. Nom has nominated two other articles for deletion today alleging they are not "real" dog breeds because they are not officially recognized as breeds. ] (]) 22:46, 6 August 2019 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:46, 6 August 2019
Bulldog breeds
New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- How to contribute
- Introduction to deletion process
- Guide to deletion (glossary)
- Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
- Bulldog breeds (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Possibly a dab, list or category already is a Category:Bulldog_breeds. Does not to be a standalone article. Talk 📧 19:56, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Talk 📧 19:56, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Equine. Talk 📧 22:24, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: The nominator deleted everything in the article and is now requesting an article deletion. I believe everything should be put back in the article and the article left alone. Aquataste
talk 21:55, 6 August 2019 (UTC)ble
- I only deleted unrecognized, non-notable "breeds", including one that is owned by a single person under the guise of "rare breed". 😳 I just hope editors who are knowledgeable about dog breeds, and what actually constitutes notability and categorization of purebred dogs will weigh-in here because there is quite a bit of article clean-up left to do in this t-area. Talk 📧 22:08, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Appears to be parallel to other dog type articles likePinscher, Schnauzer, and Spaniel, which are names that encompass multiple breeds, just in this case bulldog is a specific breed by itself. Parallel overview sections like Genetics and Origins would be welcome. Reywas92 21:59, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: After doing a hatchet job on the article, nominator now wants the article deleted in favor of simply a 'category', however the article provides more information than a category can possibly offer. Nom offered the reason "unsourced SYNTH" to delete a section. SYNTH requires two or more sources in order to create WP:SYNTH; perhaps nom meant WP:OR instead. Nom removed several other sections while stating they aren't officially recognized breeds and fails GNG. However, WP:GNG is related to whether or not something gets its own article in Misplaced Pages, not whether it gets a mention within a related article. Nom removed the Alano Español section stating "unsourced and issues with verifiability", however some of the information was sourced in the Alano Español, whose link was provided. Nom has nominated two other articles for deletion today alleging they are not "real" dog breeds because they are not officially recognized as breeds. Nomopbs (talk) 22:46, 6 August 2019 (UTC)