Misplaced Pages

Draft:Operational Chow ring: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:12, 4 November 2015 editTakuyaMurata (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers89,986 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:13, 26 October 2019 edit undoTakuyaMurata (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, Pending changes reviewers89,986 edits Changed redirect target from Chow group#Operational Chow Ring to Bivariant theory#Operational Chow ringTag: Redirect target changed 
(22 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT ]
The basic question was whether there is a ]:
:<math>A^*(X) \to \operatorname{H}^*(X, \mathbb{Z}).</math>
If ''X'' is smooth, such a map exists since <math>A^*(X)</math> is the usual ] of ''X''. {{harv|Totaro|2014}} has shown that there might not be such a map even if ''X'' is a ], roughly a variety admitting a cell decomposition. He also notes Voevodsky’s ] is "probably more useful " than the operational Chow ring for a singular scheme (§ 8 of loc. cit.)


{{r to section}}
== References ==
*W. Fulton, R. MacPherson, F. Sottile, and B. Sturmfels, ‘Intersection theory on spherical varieties’, J. Alg. Geom. 4 (1995), 181–193.
*Totaro,

{{geometry-stub}}

Latest revision as of 15:13, 26 October 2019

Redirect to: