Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 11:51, 7 December 2006

Regarding your edit to Image:Prince William of Wales.jpg:

Your recent edit to Image:Prince William of Wales.jpg (diff) was reverted by automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a shared IP address to add email addresses, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, or forum links to a page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 00:13, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Communist Dissidents

You have removed two articles from the category named "Dissedents". In light of this I have proposed that the category should be renamed "Communist dissidents" 87.194.35.230 05:30, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

RK

Actually I'm not particularly bothered by GA status. Its good to fix things up, but the rest is just window dressing. But I'm not trying to take anything away from your work. Thats just my personal take. Frelke 20:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi WJBscribe,

thanks for your kind remarks regarding the Ruth Kelly article.

After seeing your editing work over the last days I apologize for my comment on the Ruth Kelly talk page suggesting bad faith editing in the Fathers for Justice section of the article. The days before I had seen several obvious bad faith edits by other users (not in the RK article), but I shouldn't have extrapolated. --Túrelio 21:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

AfD

They definitely should be put up for AfD. I will put them up. --Ineffable3000 05:49, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Nominate List of famous tall men, List of famous tall women. I am about to leave. --Ineffable3000 05:59, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

User:Rafikilives' block

Thanks for your message. I suppose it depends on one's assumptions about human nature. When I see someone register an account and immediately make more than one unambiguous vandalistic edit on a high-profile article, I am inclined to do as I did. If the user wanted to post something on his talk page (which he can still edit), indicating an intention to improve their behaviour, I might reconsider. But I think it might be easier in this case for them just to start a new account. --Guinnog 22:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Talk:List_of_bisexual_people

I've replied to your note at the above-referenced page.

Thanks for working to improve Misplaced Pages :)

— User:Adrian/zap2.js 02:55, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

... and you replied to my reply about sixty seconds before I posted here. I should pay more attention :)

— User:Adrian/zap2.js 02:58, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

No need to worry -- you did quite the right thing; it's important to be able to support this sort of statement. Thanks for your prompt replies and willingness to help keep Misplaced Pages accurate and useful! :)

— User:Adrian/zap2.js 03:08, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

(outdent) Random suggestion -- you might find it helpful to other users to include a link to your talk page in your signature. It simplifies replying to your posts, and in this modern, goofy, mixed-up world, we need all the simplicity we can get :) — User:Adrian/zap2.js 03:39, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

I take it back. People are always griping about technical aspects of my .sig, and I always say to heck with 'em. Do it any 'ol way you want :P

— User:Adrian/zap2.js 03:49, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

unhelpful

Yes, I do think you are unhelpful to everyone. Too many people on wikipedia like being 'the police' or the run around frightened doing what they think the police want. TerriNunn 11:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC)