| Revision as of 07:20, 19 November 2019 editHijiri88 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,390 edits →Please read the evidence before !voting← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:21, 19 November 2019 edit undoHijiri88 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users37,390 edits →Please read the evidence before !votingNext edit → | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| :I didn't dismiss Hasegawa, but that source is no better or worse than Yuko Kawanishi, and he didn't even contradict Yuko Kawanishi. I never saw a secondary source contradicting Taylor either. You keep on quibbling with the credentials of people with far greater credentials than either of us and making up ideas about why the Buddhist origin of mottainai is wrong, even when everyone else says otherwise. I guess I just have a pet peeve against original research, and that's clearly what you're doing there. ] (]) 18:31, 18 November 2019 (UTC) | :I didn't dismiss Hasegawa, but that source is no better or worse than Yuko Kawanishi, and he didn't even contradict Yuko Kawanishi. I never saw a secondary source contradicting Taylor either. You keep on quibbling with the credentials of people with far greater credentials than either of us and making up ideas about why the Buddhist origin of mottainai is wrong, even when everyone else says otherwise. I guess I just have a pet peeve against original research, and that's clearly what you're doing there. ] (]) 18:31, 18 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
| ::Taylor says the word ''mottainai'' appears in the 弓流 narrative in the ''Genpei Jōsuiki'', but he cites a translation of the ''Heike Monogatari''. Hasegawa says that the word ''mottainai'' is used in the 平氏手向を嫌ふ narrative in the ''Genpei''. Moreover, no Japanese text of the 弓流 uses the word, and McCullough's translation doesn't mention it either. Do you want me to waste more time looking for a secondary source that explicitly says the 弓流 narrative doesn't appear in the ''Genpei Jōsuiki''? ] (<small>]]</small>) 07:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | ::Taylor says the word ''mottainai'' appears in the 弓流 narrative in the ''Genpei Jōsuiki'', but he cites a translation of the ''Heike Monogatari''. Hasegawa says that the word ''mottainai'' is used in the 平氏手向を嫌ふ narrative in the ''Genpei''. Moreover, no Japanese text of the 弓流 uses the word, and McCullough's translation doesn't mention it either. Do you want me to waste more time looking for a secondary source that explicitly says the 弓流 narrative doesn't appear in the ''Genpei Jōsuiki''? ] (<small>]]</small>) 07:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
| ::Anyway, if you think that what I am doing is "original research" (by Misplaced Pages's "No Original Research" policy's definition) then ]. Nothing I have inserted into the article is original research, and if you make such an accusation again I will request that you be blocked for your repeated and unapologetic personal attacks. ] (<small>]]</small>) 07:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:21, 19 November 2019
Welcome!
Hello, IvoryTower123, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Misplaced Pages
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to complete the Misplaced Pages Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Misplaced Pages. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! aboideau 01:26, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited CIUT-FM, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Electronic, Indie and Folk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:21, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of curiosity
Have you ever edited under another account? I find it really weird that an editor with scarcely 100 edits under their belt would show up and lecture me on Misplaced Pages policy. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 20:18, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
BTW, the fifth sentence of the opening paragraph of WP:NOR explains why what I am doing would not be a policy violation even if I weren't just maintaining a previous consensus. It would be a good idea not to make such comments again. Repeatedly calling talk page comments "original research" is a pretty good sign of tendentious editing. No one would need to make such comments in good faith. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 20:57, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- No, I have never used any other Misplaced Pages accounts, but as I was commenting on other articles, I did want to make note of what looks to me like original research.
IvoryTower123 (talk) 21:22, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- But... you have only ever edited one article talk page before...? Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 22:49, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Please read the evidence before !voting
I can kinda understand some of the other editors who don't read Japanese !voting the way they have, but for your to outright dismiss Hasegawa as a source and completely ignore the evidence he gives comes across as being in bad faith. I will ask you to take this last chance to demonstrate your good faith by either retracting your !vote or explaining how the description of mottainashi's use in the Genpei Jōsuiki (soon to be added to Version C if all goes well) actually doesn't contradict the claim attributed in Version A to Taylor. Please also note that Taylor actually admits he didn't consult the Jōsuiki -- his cited source, if you read the endnote, is the Heike Monogatari. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 02:13, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- I didn't dismiss Hasegawa, but that source is no better or worse than Yuko Kawanishi, and he didn't even contradict Yuko Kawanishi. I never saw a secondary source contradicting Taylor either. You keep on quibbling with the credentials of people with far greater credentials than either of us and making up ideas about why the Buddhist origin of mottainai is wrong, even when everyone else says otherwise. I guess I just have a pet peeve against original research, and that's clearly what you're doing there. IvoryTower123 (talk) 18:31, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Taylor says the word mottainai appears in the 弓流 narrative in the Genpei Jōsuiki, but he cites a translation of the Heike Monogatari. Hasegawa says that the word mottainai is used in the 平氏手向を嫌ふ narrative in the Genpei. Moreover, no Japanese text of the 弓流 uses the word, and McCullough's translation doesn't mention it either. Do you want me to waste more time looking for a secondary source that explicitly says the 弓流 narrative doesn't appear in the Genpei Jōsuiki? Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 07:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
- Anyway, if you think that what I am doing is "original research" (by Misplaced Pages's "No Original Research" policy's definition) then you need to re-read it. Nothing I have inserted into the article is original research, and if you make such an accusation again I will request that you be blocked for your repeated and unapologetic personal attacks. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 07:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)