Revision as of 01:26, 11 December 2006 editKerr avon (talk | contribs)1,186 edits warhawks vandalism← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:51, 11 December 2006 edit undoBill Huffman (talk | contribs)986 edits 4RRNext edit → | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
==Vandalism== | ==Vandalism== | ||
Please do not remove hidden entries without consensus like you did here . This is considered vandalism. If you want you an use the sandbox instead.] 01:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC) | Please do not remove hidden entries without consensus like you did here . This is considered vandalism. If you want you an use the sandbox instead.] 01:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
== 4RR == | |||
WarHawkSP, you apparently have on the ] article within 24 hours. Please be more careful. Thank you, ] 04:51, 11 December 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:51, 11 December 2006
3RR
Just a friendly reminder that you're at 3 reverts on the Derek Smart article for today. Ehheh 21:00, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Really? I thought it was two. Thanks for the headsup though. WarHawkSP 21:20, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
derek smart
When editing the article, do not remove sourced material. Unsourced material may be removed per WP:V, but removal of sourced material is frowned upon and may violate wikipedia policy. I refer specifically to the daily victim references that you removed. ⇒ SWATJester Aim Fire! 06:32, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
You have been blocked for 12 hours
For a 3 revert rule violation on Derek Smart. Please be careful with reverts. Thanks. --Woohookitty 12:59, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Vandalism
Please do not remove hidden entries without consensus like you did here . This is considered vandalism. If you want you an use the sandbox instead.Kerr avon 01:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
4RR
WarHawkSP, you apparently have four reverts on the Derek Smart article within 24 hours. Please be more careful. Thank you, Bill Huffman 04:51, 11 December 2006 (UTC)