| Revision as of 03:44, 5 February 2020 editUditanalin (talk | contribs)301 edits objection ~~~~← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:52, 5 February 2020 edit undoUditanalin (talk | contribs)301 edits ~~~~Next edit → | ||
| Line 25:
*'''Delete''' - ] is policy. Userfying or draftifying is just encouraging the continuation of the effort to publish original research on Misplaced Pages. A waste of everybody's time. -- ] (]) 01:59, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
I had the same trouble when I was trying to create the page ]. You guys wasted too much of my time. There is something you need to understand. | |||
Revision as of 03:52, 5 February 2020
Misplaced Pages:Finding Eigenvectors: Fast and Nontraditional Method
- Misplaced Pages:Finding Eigenvectors: Fast and Nontraditional Method (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Original research and article in wrong namespace. Anita5192 (talk) 02:45, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
This is a discovery made after three centuries and will help students and researchers around the world with this new method of finding eigenvectors. Why are you trying to delete this? Please let someone knowledgeable about the subject matter have a second look. Thank you. Uditanalin (talk) 04:04, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- Draftify - I have forgotten all of the mathematics that is involved (because I have forgotten all of the higher math that I learned in college), but I know that a review of whether the mathematics is original research can be done in draft space. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:19, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
The century old methods uses what we call the Gaussian elimination or simply row-reduction to find eigenvectors. This can be extremely difficulty when the matrix is bigger. I discovered a technique that is very simple and fast. The paper has been submitted to Journal of American mathematical Society for possible publication. I hope they will. This is only the calculation part of it since this is not the right place to discuss all the math behind. I showed completely worked out examples to assist the reader of Wiki to understand it. What you see in this page is not a presentation of the research work. This page has been linked to the main "Eigenvalue and Eigenvector" page to assist the calculation process. Thank you. Uditanalin (talk)
- Userfy. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:44, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
@SmokeyJoe What is the meaning of Userfy Uditanalin
- Also, you should create User:Uditanalin to, at least, briefly introduce yourself and your interests on Misplaced Pages. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:42, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
@SmokeyJoe Thanks for the explanation. Will the page be visible to public after Userfy? If not I'm against to that. Since no one can get the benefit of this efficient algorithm of finding eigenvectors.Uditanalin
- Do you understand that Misplaced Pages is not for original publishing? Read WP:No original research. Also WP:NOTHOWTO. In userspace, in your userspace, only Wikipedians will see it, it is a place for you to develop things. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:26, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
@SmokeyJoe It has already been developed. If you want, go ahead add delete the page. I will create this as a google page. You need to revise those policies for special cases. Otherwise there is no future, but the same old things. Uditanalin —Preceding undated comment added 07:35, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, as the author is not interested in userfication or the Misplaced Pages content policy WP:NOR. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:06, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- SmokeyJoe, You !voted twice. Not sure if you want to strike the earlier !vote. Although we notionally don't vote, I suspect this was just an oversight. Doug Mehus T·C 01:23, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
- Soft delete per SmokeyJoe and per WP:IAR above, so WP:REFUND can apply if and when the creator agrees to userification. Doug Mehus T·C 01:24, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete - Misplaced Pages:No original research is policy. Userfying or draftifying is just encouraging the continuation of the effort to publish original research on Misplaced Pages. A waste of everybody's time. -- Whpq (talk) 01:59, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
I had the same trouble when I was trying to create the page Katugampola fractional operator. You guys wasted too much of my time. There is something you need to understand. The research in mathematics is different from other sciences. In physics or chemistry, when someone say something it has to be tested for verification, while the case is different for mathematics in which we prove something is right or wrong. You need to understand this simple logic without wasting my time. That's why I said you need to revise those policies. I asked what is the meaning of those terms. None tried to explain it to me. If it is not visible to public, there is no point wasting my time here. I have already developed the theories by submitting a 40-page long manuscript to a top math journal. What I wanted to do is to expose them to the readers of wiki since they can use them without waiting those results to be published. I have other important things to do. So finally, if one more person say delete, I'll go ahead and delete the page whether you like it or not. I do not worry about the policies... I'll change them. I have already moved ...mfd... to the bottom of the page. I'll continue to do that until you take a decision. That is my stance at this time.