Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 08:45, 10 February 2020

Paragraph on reported attacks on Muslims

This article includes a paragraph on Muslims having been attacked and forced to chant Jai Shri Ram. It is repeatedly being removed, generally without explanation but sometimes with comments such as "hate crime", "fake news" or "hinduphobia", and restored. Should it be Retained or Removed?

• Retain. The claim is reported in reliable sources and the text is neutrally phrased (it says there were reports of such attacks; it states that these reports have been disputed). Misplaced Pages is not censored. Dorsetonian (talk) 10:49, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

• Retain - Almost every news media has reported those incidents. Not only Indian,but major foreign to India too. Can't see any reason to remove it. Edward Zigma (talk) 08:38, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Own notes

• Politics after Television : Hindu Nationalism and the Reshaping of the Public in India ∯WBG 15:38, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Did

this expression even exist in any significant manner, prior to BJP/VHP introduction? I think the only focus of this article, (which I am going to write over the course of next few days), will be about folks from BJP using it as a war-cry against Muslims/Christians. I am seeing nearly nothing in scholarly literature, otherwise. ∯WBG 16:02, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Addition of Gargi college sexual harassment incident.

I have added a well cited 5 news links which is removed by an editor Harshil169 ,(despite various warnings to him to stay away and open discussions if he has any problem) telling every single 5 citation as unreliable. Requesting @DBigXray: to take a look. Edward Zigma (talk) 06:08, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

I don’t want to engage in discussion with you but India times, Lallantop and National Herald are not reliable sources and that’s fact. Also, just yesterday, it’s decided that we’re not going to add each and every incident but only notable one. That’s why I removed the content.— Harshil 06:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

It is a notable incident reported by various media houses of India for Aajtak to paper portals such as Dainik Jagran. You can check yourself. It is not a normal incident and the usage of such slogans in such cases make it noteworthy. If you need links to check notability of the incident, do let me know. Edward Zigma (talk) 06:47, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Please try to understand one thing. We are not newspaper. Your content is challenged. Follow WP:BRD strictly and don’t restore it until consensus is reached.— Harshil 08:03, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

@Kautilya3, Winged Blades of Godric, DBigXray, and My Lord: please try to let this user understand. I’m in long conflict with them and they’re not understanding about RS and not news even a bit and starts edit warring.— Harshil 08:10, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

As everyone knows here you and I were warned a lot of times to stop this behaviour and I never involved in your edits after that even if you continued with your biased norms. I am citing proper article and that slogan was reported by many media houses now and I cited 5 of them. Instead of involving in a fruitful discussiom that why it is wrong you start to keep reverting my edits not even open any discussion. I always open discussion if there is any problem in it. And after last involvement I refrained myself from that totally but you did not.You keep reverting my edits and bully other editors and their edits instead of giving them a chance.

And the matter of incident, for that I want to say this incident is of huge notability and many politicians have commented on it and asked for strict action. How could mass harassment if this type be a small news for yo???

I seriously request @Kautilya3, Winged Blades of Godric, DBigXray, and My Lord: to take a look as this editor is always behind me whatever edit I do. From here to wikimedia commons he keeps reverting and involving instead of tellimg why its wrong. This is a serious bullying for me now Edward Zigma (talk) 08:45, 10 February 2020 (UTC)