| Revision as of 02:04, 3 January 2020 editL293D (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers34,889 edits Message re. Tukkhum (HG) (3.4.9)Tag: Huggle | Revision as of 16:29, 13 February 2020 edit undoArsenekoumyk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users507 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of ] —specifically <span class="plainlinks"></span> to ]—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the ]. Thanks. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --><span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">] (] • ])</span> 02:04, 3 January 2020 (UTC) | ] Hello, I'm ]. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of ] —specifically <span class="plainlinks"></span> to ]—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the ]. Thanks. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --><span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">] (] • ])</span> 02:04, 3 January 2020 (UTC) | ||
| == Disruption and edit warring == | |||
| Hi, Zandxo, you make edits against sources and disrupt the article. Please stop and articulate on talk page why you change contents against sources. | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->\ | |||
Revision as of 16:29, 13 February 2020
January 2020
Hello, I'm L293D. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Tukkhum—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. L293D (☎ • ✎) 02:04, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
Disruption and edit warring
Hi, Zandxo, you make edits against sources and disrupt the article. Please stop and articulate on talk page why you change contents against sources.
Your recent editing history at Uchar-hadji shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.\