Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jake b: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:44, 15 December 2006 editCrossmr (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers18,925 edits Your comment on James Kim← Previous edit Revision as of 19:48, 16 December 2006 edit undoJake b (talk | contribs)397 edits Your comment on []Next edit →
Line 15: Line 15:


Thank you for your recent comment {{#if:{{{1|}}}|on ]}}. However article talk pages are reserved for discussion surround the improvement of the article. They are not to be used for general discussion of the subject. If you would like to experiment please try the ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Mess1 --> --] 16:44, 15 December 2006 (UTC) Thank you for your recent comment {{#if:{{{1|}}}|on ]}}. However article talk pages are reserved for discussion surround the improvement of the article. They are not to be used for general discussion of the subject. If you would like to experiment please try the ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Mess1 --> --] 16:44, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
:Fuck you. It's the Talk page, and I'll comment if I choose. Who the fuck are you? Self-appointed asshole, apparently. ] 19:48, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:48, 16 December 2006

Your edits on phpBB

Why do you keep changing the accompanying link text on phpBB to forumimages.com to "fan site"? Talrias (t | e | c) 23:30, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

For accuracy. Jake b 18:21, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Your comment on Even Knievel

You posted, unsigned, "what are you babbleing about?" on the Evel Knievel discussion page. I wonder what you mean by this? Bstone 09:21, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Marshalbannana

User:Marshalbannana is a likely sockpuppet of (banned) User:Jacknicholson. Some Anon-IP user edited the sockpuppet case to include you; after a quick look I realized that the accusation against you was silly and I removed you from the case. Sorry if they caused you any confusion. jesup 16:31, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Your comment on James Kim

Thank you for your recent comment . However article talk pages are reserved for discussion surround the improvement of the article. They are not to be used for general discussion of the subject. If you would like to experiment please try the the sandbox. Thank you. --Crossmr 16:44, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Fuck you. It's the Talk page, and I'll comment if I choose. Who the fuck are you? Self-appointed asshole, apparently. Jake b 19:48, 16 December 2006 (UTC)