| Revision as of 18:02, 25 April 2020 editNick (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators22,291 edits →Blocked for sockpuppetry: decline← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:47, 25 April 2020 edit undoMagnolia677 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers138,973 edits →Concern: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| {{unblock reviewed | 1=I have been an editor since 2014 with over 10'000 edits. I was unaware of the rules regarding this sort of thing and I can ensure that this will not happen again. Genuine mistake. . ] (]) 17:55, 25 April 2020 (UTC) | decline = I am concerned, you have demonstrated experience of policy and considerable interest in the administrative areas behind Misplaced Pages (one needs only look at your interest in AfD, for example) but claim not to know basic policy considering the abuse of multiple accounts. I am also far from satisfied your explanations above are a correct, accurate and truthful explanation of what has occurred with regards to the checkuser block placed on this and another account. I would suggest you consider a proper, truthful unblock request before your talk page access is revoked. ] (]) 18:02, 25 April 2020 (UTC)}} | {{unblock reviewed | 1=I have been an editor since 2014 with over 10'000 edits. I was unaware of the rules regarding this sort of thing and I can ensure that this will not happen again. Genuine mistake. . ] (]) 17:55, 25 April 2020 (UTC) | decline = I am concerned, you have demonstrated experience of policy and considerable interest in the administrative areas behind Misplaced Pages (one needs only look at your interest in AfD, for example) but claim not to know basic policy considering the abuse of multiple accounts. I am also far from satisfied your explanations above are a correct, accurate and truthful explanation of what has occurred with regards to the checkuser block placed on this and another account. I would suggest you consider a proper, truthful unblock request before your talk page access is revoked. ] (]) 18:02, 25 April 2020 (UTC)}} | ||
| == Concern == | |||
| {{ping|Boing! said Zebedee|Yamla|L235|Nick}} I have interacted with TwinTurbo several times the past few months and I have some concerns. Recently at ], I noted that TwinTurbo was canvasing votes. TwinTurbo also recently ], which effectively hid the history to most users. This editor has also created a large number of articles about garage bands, which have ultimately been deleted. Now this sock puppetry, which I and others suspected when the newly-created sock was used to influence ], an article TwinTurbo created. There seems to be a ruthlessness to preventing these TwinTurbo-created articles about musicians from being deleted. Why is this? Two weeks ago, ] started ] regarding their concern that TwinTurbo may have a conflict of interest. My concern is that TwinTurbo demonstrates a pattern of being paid editor. Thank you. ] (]) 18:47, 25 April 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:47, 25 April 2020
 Archives | ||
|
||
Blocked for sockpuppetry
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/TwinTurbo. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:00, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
|
TwinTurbo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have no association with the account I have been accused of using as a "sockpuppet", the only article I have had in common with that account was - Frenzo Harami. I have no relation with that account and I do not associate with it. . TwinTurbo (talk) 17:21, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
A technical connection between the two accounts has been confirmed by CheckUser, so you would need to explain how that might happen. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:30, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TwinTurbo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I told my neighbour that I am a Misplaced Pages editor and he decided to make one too. I was not aware that this was against Misplaced Pages policy. I had no influence in his edits
Decline reason:
No, this is not what happened. Had this been the only thing that happened, your neighbour wouldn't be using your IP address, your computer, and editing the same articles as you. Yamla (talk) 17:46, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TwinTurbo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
In all honesty; I am a uni student, we are living a uni accommodation, with access to the same devices and internet. Either way, I have acknowledged the wrongdoings regarding this and I will not influence his decisions to benefit my outcomes as I was unaware that this was against the guidelines of Misplaced Pages. I was merely just trying to show him the ropes. I would much rather prefer to use my account with all the contributions I have made (around 10'000). TwinTurbo (talk) 17:50, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This is an utterly unconvincing explanation for the technical evidence here. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 17:52, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
TwinTurbo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have been an editor since 2014 with over 10'000 edits. I was unaware of the rules regarding this sort of thing and I can ensure that this will not happen again. Genuine mistake. . TwinTurbo (talk) 17:55, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am concerned, you have demonstrated experience of policy and considerable interest in the administrative areas behind Misplaced Pages (one needs only look at your interest in AfD, for example) but claim not to know basic policy considering the abuse of multiple accounts. I am also far from satisfied your explanations above are a correct, accurate and truthful explanation of what has occurred with regards to the checkuser block placed on this and another account. I would suggest you consider a proper, truthful unblock request before your talk page access is revoked. Nick (talk) 18:02, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Concern
@Boing! said Zebedee, Yamla, L235, and Nick: I have interacted with TwinTurbo several times the past few months and I have some concerns. Recently at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Smoke Dawg (2nd nomination), I noted here that TwinTurbo was canvasing votes. TwinTurbo also recently archived their talk page, which effectively hid the history to most users. This editor has also created a large number of articles about garage bands, which have ultimately been deleted. Now this sock puppetry, which I and others suspected here when the newly-created sock was used to influence Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Frenzo Harami, an article TwinTurbo created. There seems to be a ruthlessness to preventing these TwinTurbo-created articles about musicians from being deleted. Why is this? Two weeks ago, User:Praxidicae started this discussion regarding their concern that TwinTurbo may have a conflict of interest. My concern is that TwinTurbo demonstrates a pattern of being paid editor. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:47, 25 April 2020 (UTC)