| Revision as of 17:34, 19 December 2006 editGhirlandajo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers89,657 edits reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:40, 19 December 2006 edit undoGhirlandajo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers89,657 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| As the author of this article I am asking administrators to stop the vandalism of this article made by ]. Significant changes have been made without any consultation. The changes (vandalism) of ] have completely changed the article. It is my understanding that if any user is in disagreement, they shoul voice their objections first, before making such significant changes as have been made by the aforementioned user. --] 17:31, 19 December 2006 (UTC) | As the author of this article I am asking administrators to stop the vandalism of this article made by ]. Significant changes have been made without any consultation. The changes (vandalism) of ] have completely changed the article. It is my understanding that if any user is in disagreement, they shoul voice their objections first, before making such significant changes as have been made by the aforementioned user. --] 17:31, 19 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :I will not report you on ] for the time being. Please consult ] before making outrageous (and quite silly) accusations against your opponents in the future. --<font color="FC4339">]</font> <sup><font color="C98726">]</font></sup> 17:34, 19 December 2006 (UTC) | :I will not report you on ] for the time being. Please consult ] before making outrageous (and quite silly) accusations against your opponents in the future. --<font color="FC4339">]</font> <sup><font color="C98726">]</font></sup> 17:34, 19 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Since my intention is to discuss content (rather than indulge in incivility as you do), I will point out that your ambition to represent the battle as a clash between "Ukraine" (anachronistic term) and "Muscovy" (also incorrect) is flawed. Trubetskoy's army contained a lawfully elected Ukrainian hetman (Vyhovsky had been deposed) and substantial Ukrainian contingents. So, it was a mixed East Slavic Orthodox force. Vyhovsky's army was a motley crew composed of peoples of different religions and ethnicities: Tatars, Poles, and Cossacks. Any attempt to represent this battle in isolation from the events of the Russo-Polish War is doomed. Since Vyhovsky betrayed the Treaty of Pereyaslav and returned to the policy of a Polish alliance, he naturally became the enemy of the Tsar, whose army occupied Vilnius at the period. A failure to mention these basic facts is the best evidence of bias. --<font color="FC4339">]</font> <sup><font color="C98726">]</font></sup> 17:40, 19 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:40, 19 December 2006
As the author of this article I am asking administrators to stop the vandalism of this article made by user: Ghirlandajo. Significant changes have been made without any consultation. The changes (vandalism) of User: Ghirlandajo have completely changed the article. It is my understanding that if any user is in disagreement, they shoul voice their objections first, before making such significant changes as have been made by the aforementioned user. --Hillock65 17:31, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- I will not report you on WP:PAIN for the time being. Please consult WP:Vandalism#What vandalism is not before making outrageous (and quite silly) accusations against your opponents in the future. --Ghirla 17:34, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Since my intention is to discuss content (rather than indulge in incivility as you do), I will point out that your ambition to represent the battle as a clash between "Ukraine" (anachronistic term) and "Muscovy" (also incorrect) is flawed. Trubetskoy's army contained a lawfully elected Ukrainian hetman (Vyhovsky had been deposed) and substantial Ukrainian contingents. So, it was a mixed East Slavic Orthodox force. Vyhovsky's army was a motley crew composed of peoples of different religions and ethnicities: Tatars, Poles, and Cossacks. Any attempt to represent this battle in isolation from the events of the Russo-Polish War is doomed. Since Vyhovsky betrayed the Treaty of Pereyaslav and returned to the policy of a Polish alliance, he naturally became the enemy of the Tsar, whose army occupied Vilnius at the period. A failure to mention these basic facts is the best evidence of bias. --Ghirla 17:40, 19 December 2006 (UTC)