Revision as of 09:23, 2 June 2006 editජපස (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers60,484 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 13:11, 2 May 2020 edit undoVsmith (talk | contribs)Administrators272,689 editsm Vsmith moved page Talk:Creation–evolution controversy/to do to Talk:Rejection of evolution by religious groups/to do: There is no controversy |
(26 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{tasks |
|
* Should creationism be happy with the 'emergence' of ID? Even if ID is not creationism, many of the arguments used by ID proponents to challenge evolution can also be used by creationists. Irreducible complexity, for example. |
|
|
|
|requests= |
|
|
|
|
|
|copyedit= |
|
* <s>Include first cause arguments and responses.</s> |
|
|
|
|wikify= |
|
|
|
|
|
|merge= |
|
* <s>Include the creationist claims that evolution is racist, misogynist, etc. with responses</s> |
|
|
|
|cleanup= |
|
|
|
|
|
*Arguments relating to the definition, limits and philosophy of science' section. |
|
* Include ]. |
|
|
|
<nowiki></nowiki> |
|
|
|expand= |
|
|
*'Forums for the controversy' section should go beyond debates, and eventually add an introductory sentence. |
|
|
*'Public policy issues' & 'Issues relating to religion' sections require introductory paragraphs to provide an overview and give structure to their sub-sections. |
|
|
}} |