| Revision as of 02:58, 23 January 2005 view sourceRaul654 (talk | contribs)70,896 edits →Arbitrators' opinions on hearing this matter (0/7/0/0)← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:00, 23 January 2005 view source Grunt (talk | contribs)8,638 edits →Davenbelle: - '''Rejected'''Next edit → | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| ==New requests== | ==New requests== | ||
| ===Davenbelle=== | |||
| Davenbelle as demonstrated by a cursory examination of recent edits, is repeatedly breaching Misplaced Pages policies by: | |||
| * False accusations of vandalism, trolling as the basis for reverting every edit I make. | |||
| * Repeated unexplained reverts | |||
| * Trolling | |||
| * Personal attacks in edit summaries, talk pages etc. | |||
| I have attempted to resolve this both directly and with assistance but have not succeeded. I believe it is likely that he is a sockpuppet of Radicalsubversiv, as I have not much interaction with him until his RfA request. I considered an RfC although it appears no one else is involved with this so it would not be possible. I also considered doing nothing but believe it has now reached the stage where there is little choice. | |||
| I will be posting evidence illustrating the above in the next twenty minutes and would appreciate Arbitrators waiting until the expiry of that time. There is no shortage of evidence. | |||
| ] 02:44, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Ollieplatt, you might seek the support of ], whose to ] I just reverted. — ] 04:07, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ====Arbitrators' opinions on hearing this matter (0/7/0/0)==== | |||
| *Reject. Please follow earlier steps of dispute resolution, and in future, if posting an arbitration request, please post evidence along with the initial request. ] 02:57, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *Reject. ''See also'' ]. ]<sup>]</sup> 02:58, Jan 20, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *Reject. Cited edits are not particularly objectionable. Insufficient previous attempts at dispute resolution. If this is a serious issue, please try ] before coming here. -- ]] ] 02:59, 2005 Jan 20 (UTC) | |||
| *Reject. If there's a substantive issue here, you'll need to do mediation and the RFC process first. And have more (and more convincing) evidence - ] 08:10, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| *Reject -- ] ] 11:13, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| * Reject -- I think your plate is full right now, please resolve your own case first. ] 13:18, Jan 22, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| * Reject ] 15:12, 22 Jan 2005 (UTC) | |||
| * Reject, per previous reasons stated. ] 02:58, Jan 23, 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Matters currently in Arbitration == | == Matters currently in Arbitration == | ||
Revision as of 03:00, 23 January 2005
Shortcut
| ||||||||||||
Arbitration Committee proceedings
Currently, there are no requests for arbitration. Open cases
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases). Clarification and Amendment requestsCurrently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open. Arbitrator motions
|
The last step of Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution is Arbitration. Please review the Dispute resolution for other avenues you should take. If you do not follow any of these routes, it is highly likely that your request for Arbitration will be rejected. If all other steps have failed, and you see no reasonable chance that the matter can be resolved in another manner, you may request that it be decided by the Arbitration Committee.
See Misplaced Pages:Arbitration policy, Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee, /Admin enforcement requested, /Standing orders, /Template
Structure of this page
The procedure for accepting requests is described in the Arbitration policy. Important points:
- Be brief - put a quick list of the nature of the complaints. Link to detailed evidence in the standard /Template format elsewhere if you need to.
- You are required to place a notice on the user talk page of each person you lodge a complaint against.
- Please sign and date at least your original submission with '~~~~'.
- New requests to the top, please.
The numbers in the Comments and votes by Arbitrators (0/0/0/0) section corresponds to Accept/Reject/Recuse/Other.
New requests
Matters currently in Arbitration
- /Libertas - Accepted with six votes on 16 January 2005. Evidence to /Libertas/Evidence, please.
- /Everyking - Accepted for Arbitration with five votes and two recusals on 16 January 2005. Evidence to /Everyking/Evidence, please.
- /Antifinnugor - Accepted for Arbitration with five votes and two abstentions on January 9, 2005. Evidence to /Antifinnugor/Evidence, please.
- /Rienzo - Accepted for Arbitration with four votes on January 1, 2005. Evidence to /Rienzo/Evidence, please.
- /Chuck F - Accepted for Arbitration with four votes on December 7, 2004. Evidence to /Chuck F/Evidence, please.
- /172 - Accepted for Arbitration with four votes and two abstentions on August 30, 2004 (delayed due to overlap with previously running cases). Evidence to /172/Evidence, please.
Archives
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Completed requests
- Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Rejected requests