Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 14:20, 22 December 2006

Meisterchef (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Request Unblock : So, can everyone that sides with user:miracleimpulse on the sweetest day page issue expect to be "infinitely" blocked from wikipedia? Am I experiencing a malicious block that is a result of admins attempting to manufacture consensus? I'm beginning to wonder.. Do not call newcomers disparaging names such as "sockpuppet" or "meatpuppet". If a lot of newcomers show up on one side of a vote, you should make them feel welcome while explaining that their votes may be disregarded. No name-calling is necessary. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Request Unblock : So, can everyone that sides with user:miracleimpulse on the sweetest day page issue expect to be "infinitely" blocked from wikipedia? Am I experiencing a malicious block that is a result of admins attempting to manufacture consensus? I'm beginning to wonder.. Do not call newcomers disparaging names such as "sockpuppet" or "meatpuppet". If a lot of newcomers show up on one side of a vote, you should make them feel welcome while explaining that their votes may be disregarded. No name-calling is necessary. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Request Unblock : So, can everyone that sides with user:miracleimpulse on the sweetest day page issue expect to be "infinitely" blocked from wikipedia? Am I experiencing a malicious block that is a result of admins attempting to manufacture consensus? I'm beginning to wonder.. Do not call newcomers disparaging names such as "sockpuppet" or "meatpuppet". If a lot of newcomers show up on one side of a vote, you should make them feel welcome while explaining that their votes may be disregarded. No name-calling is necessary. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Hi. Just a comment: ordinary editors and admins don't have access to logged-in users' IP addresses per Misplaced Pages privacy policy. Only a very select few would be able to look at your IP address to see if it is shared with other editors. Just making sure you know that. Not a dog 04:37, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

I've contacted the blocking admin for comment. In the meantime, please bear with us, and thanks for your patience. Luna Santin 07:44, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Meisterchef is definitely not a sock puppet. JzG owes him a big wikipology. Miracleimpulse 08:24, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Are we really having such a hard time with determining that I am not the user you're accusing me of being? Is it really so hard to believe that I agree with him, and am otherwise unaffiliated? Can you really justify a blanket indefinite ban as a result of a single post that agrees with another user? I'm totally amazed honestly.

And how can you possibly say that I'm using complex wikipedia procedures and must therefore be a sock puppet? Me signing one post incorrectly is what started this mess to begin with. Someone please submit this issue to an impartial admin with actual authority. IP addresses must be reviewed in order to clear this up. I'm not user:Miracleimpulse, but I do agree with his viewpoint. That is all. meisterchef 16:51, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

I've left a message on the admin noticeboard to see if another admin would be willing to review the situation. I will also say that when you start off posting with a distinct lack of assumption of good faith as you did in your point 3 of the post at Talk:Sweetest Day you can't expect people to be overly willing to go out of their way to extend WP:AGF to you.--Isotope23 20:52, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Still not unbanned, still not a sockpuppet. Oh the injustice of it all...

And in point 3 of my post, I didn't make any assumptions at all. I only posted what it looked like to me. The post in question asked specifically for an outside opinion and I gave it. Sorry if you found it offensive!

meisterchef 04:38, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

I love how theres some kind of "wiki-trial" going against me here..

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets/miracleimpulse

..and I can't even post on it in my own defense because I'm banned.

meisterchef 14:10, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Oh, I can't post on the admin board either.

meisterchef 14:20, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

• Requests for unblock