Revision as of 14:28, 23 December 2006 editCoelacan (talk | contribs)14,831 edits edit warring on Ghazal Omid, accusing me of wikistalking, and getting close to 3RR← Previous edit |
Revision as of 23:26, 23 December 2006 edit undo68.5.96.201 (talk) ←Blanked the pageNext edit → |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
== Re:] == |
|
|
|
|
|
I have reverted your edit again. See ] for my rationale, and please discuss any further changes there before implementing them. -] 03:00, 21 September 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Ghazal Omid, again == |
|
|
|
|
|
I am not Wikistalking you. I just monitor new additions to ]. If the additions are not obviously appropriate, I remove them. Many of the additions should simply be in ]. If your only edits are to add inappropriate pages to ], then I suppose it would have the appearance of Wikistalking when I revert all those edits. But that's neither my fault nor my problem. Regarding Ghazal Omid, especially, whose article you have taken particular interest in, ] asked you months ago to take your issues to the talk page. I asked you to do the same in my edit summary, . You're welcome to take it up on the talk page, but I will continue removing the category until you provide sufficient rationale for its inclusion, ''as opposed to simply being in ] alone.'' |
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, you are approaching 3RR , so here is fair warning: |
|
|
|
|
|
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Ghazal Omid|, as you are doing in ]}}. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for ], even if they do not technically violate the ]. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR --> — ] ] — 14:28, 23 December 2006 (UTC) |
|