Misplaced Pages

:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:05, 14 June 2020 editGeo Swan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers112,843 edits →Derek Chauvin (police officer): new section← Previous edit Revision as of 09:52, 14 June 2020 edit undoDeepfriedokra (talk | contribs)Administrators173,429 edits →Derek Chauvin (police officer): Not Done. I don't see why we could not attempt a HISTMERGE, but this might not be uncontroversial and this venue is not for AfD's. You would need to present your arguments at WP:DRV for full mulling. (using responseHelper)Next edit →
Line 775: Line 775:
* The closure on that AFD was speedily overturned, at DRV, less than two days later. * The closure on that AFD was speedily overturned, at DRV, less than two days later.
* I'd like the deleted revisions grafted to the newer article, so I could see for myself how close the two different versions were. —] (]) 06:05, 14 June 2020 (UTC) * I'd like the deleted revisions grafted to the newer article, so I could see for myself how close the two different versions were. —] (]) 06:05, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
*<!-- Begin Template:UND -->] '''Not done'''<!-- End Template:UND - nd --> I don't see why we could not attempt a HISTMERGE, but this might not be uncontroversial and this venue is not for AfD's. You would need to present your arguments at ] for full mulling. --<b>]</b> ] 09:52, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:52, 14 June 2020

"WP:RFU" redirects here. For requests to unblock, see Category:Requests for unblock. For requests to unprotect, see Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level.
Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles,
content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards

    This page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.

    Shortcuts

    Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in two cases. The first case is restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions (G6) or stale Articles for creation drafts (G13)), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. In the second use case, this page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be "userfied", i.e., restored as a draft or emailed to you; this way, the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). Be clear as to which namespace is intended, when requesting the restoration of a deleted article.

    This means that content deleted after discussion – through deletion processes – may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process but through deletion review instead. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided.

    Do not request that pages or media deleted under speedy deletion criteria F7, F9, F11, U5, A7, A9, A11, G3, G4, G10, G11 or G12 be undeleted here.

    Instructions for special cases:

    Enter the page's title:

    Deletion discussions
    Articles
    Templates and modules
    Files
    Categories
    Redirects
    Miscellany
    Speedy deletion
    Proposed deletion
    Archiving icon
    Archives

    This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.


    Sergei Millian

    I, codyave, am requesting an undeletion for Sergei Millian.

    I created a new wikipedia page for Mr. Millian a couple of days ago, but he has just informed me on Twitter that he had an active page many years ago. He says, however, that sometime in January 2017, it was deleted without his awareness (he has provided screenshots in his tweet as proof).

    At the time of deletion, he was a public figure, and reportedly is currently involved in the FBI's investigation into Trump-Russia collusion.

    Codyave (talk) 20:35, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

    To be clear, I would be okay with the page being fully reverted back to its c. 2017 state.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/Sergei_Millian

    https://twitter.com/sergeimillian/status/1266801195785601024

    Codyave (talk) 21:21, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

    — Preceding unsigned comment added by Codyave (talk • contribs) 20:53, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

    Not done Nothing to undelete that I can see. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:37, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

    Hmm...interesting.

    Just for clarificiation: this means there are no records of a wikipedia page for Sergei Millian, prior to the one I just created a few days ago, right? Codyave (talk) 16:14, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

    Look at the history https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sergei_Millian&action=history where you will see that there was a version. I cannot see any history logs that it was deleted or restored though. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:17, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
    Agree. No article ever existed at Sergei Millian until your creation on the 29th, barring something unusual like the whole thing being oversighted. —Cryptic 15:30, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
    Graeme Bartlett, I'm not sure if I totally understand what happened, so bear with me, and please help me understand it. It appears that JJMC89 took my sandbox/research subpage and redirected it the non-existent Sergei Millian, thus creating an article with the history of my sandbox. That made it possible for Codyave to then create the article. I have no problem with the creation of the article. It was needed. I do have a problem with my private subpage being used in the process. Now my subpage is gone, and its history is part of the new article. I want my subpage and its history restored, and that part of the Sergei Millian article history removed. Codyave should have a "clean start" for his article.
    JJMC89 made my page a redirect and deleted its content. (The article history shows that the size of the deleted content at the redirect matches the size of the existing content when the article was created.) That is so wrong. I have never seen that done before. My subpage should not have been touched, much less deleted. I have requested on their talk page that they fix it, but they do not respond.
    Here's the log for the redirect. Pinging Muboshgu, as they too should look at this. -- Valjean (talk) 15:16, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
    Holy shit! This gets weirder. I just noticed the dates for the merge in that log, and see that the merge was done the next day, after Codyave had started his article. What the heck happened here? -- Valjean (talk) 15:17, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
    It happened right after the creation of this thread. -- Valjean (talk) 15:30, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

    @Codyave: did you find my subpage and start editing it and use it as the start of your article? What's the timeline here? -- Valjean (talk) 15:20, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

    Looks like User:JJMC89 history merged Codyave's article and your sandbox. I don't see any obvious justification for it; they seem editorially independent. —Cryptic 15:30, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
    I agree. There is no need for attribution as they are completely independent. -- Valjean (talk) 15:31, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
    This is weird. But, resolved? – Muboshgu (talk) 15:38, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
    @Muboshgu: it isn't resolved yet. I want my subpage restored, with its history, and for the new article's history to start fresh, without any mention of the history from my subpage. I have never seen this happen before. It is very weird. -- Valjean (talk) 16:50, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
    Valjean, it is, and I still don't really understand what happened. This was done by JJMC89, and they should undo it. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:53, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
    I left two messages on their talk page, but they will not respond. What happened is not an unforgivable sin (maybe just poor judgement?), but the lack of a response is concerning behavior for an admin. Poor judgement is human, but maturity requires accepting responsibility, and that is a requirement for an admin if they wish to retain their position/tools. -- Valjean (talk) 19:13, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
    Still no response, so pinging here: @JJMC89: -- Valjean (talk) 23:09, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
    Valjean, I'll look into this later today. I'm not at my home base atm. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:36, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
    Muboshgu I remembered wrong. It turns out that my subpage's history was not deleted, so I have just reverted. It appears that JJMC89 has removed the history from my subpage from the so it now starts fresh. That's good.
    There is an improper edit warring deletion which I shouldn't touch, but someone else needs to restore the proper content to the lead, and the IPs need to be stopped. Maybe protect the article.-- Valjean (talk) 16:20, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

    Traefik

    Please restore as draft so I may resubmit with additional references meeting criteria for creation —Kcmastrpc (talk) 22:47, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

    Spartaz, any objections? – Muboshgu (talk) 00:21, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
    Any update on this? In the meantime, would you please email me the article or put it in my sandbox? — Kcmastrpc (talk) 12:36, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

    Forced conversion to Islam in Pakistan

    There was nothing wrong on this page. Forced conversion is happening in Pakistan. The deletion should be undone. If the heading of the Page seems like attacking a particular religion (i.e Islam), then it could be changed to just "Forced conversion in Pakistan". I don't think it's a good idea to delete a whole wikipedia page which is about about grave human rights violation in Pakistan —Banksboomer (talk) 08:42, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:28, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

    Yofavgirlasia

    Yofavgirlasia. I did not do anything wrong just like people who write about Abraham Lincoln. I was writing about someone i know and someone i know who will make history. I did not give out there social media at all so its not like i was promoting them. I was staring information about them just like what everyone else does. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:C9:180:3A0:B1A7:7E9:1EA9:A869 (talk) 17:39, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

    Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title (or any reasonable permutation of it) in any reasonable namespace! Are you sure that the page's title, capitalisation and all, is correct? As you're requesting this from an IP, I can't look in userspace. Misplaced Pages is not for those who in your opinion will be famous someday; it is for those who already have some fame/notoriety. —A little blue Bori v^_^v 18:00, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
    I assume they refer to this which was a u5. Praxidicae (talk) 14:47, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
    Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion U5. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
    Good find, Praxidicae. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:01, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Rob James (Politician)

    I, Volvicuk, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Volvicuk (talk) 21:24, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:36, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Myrtle Sheldon

    I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:34, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:38, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

    Serrana (composition)

    I was about to redirect it to the article on the composer, Jason Becker, but got sidetracked —Ingratis (talk) 02:51, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:37, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Exponential bound on capsets

    G13; I am requesting undeletion because I cannot access the deleted content and thus I cannot tell for example if there are some materials worth merged into the mainspace articles. —Taku (talk) 05:04, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:39, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Pramath Raj Sinha

    I, Tantrumzzz03, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tantrumzzz03 (talk) 05:49, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:40, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Pramath Raj Sinha

    I, Tantrumzzz03, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tantrumzzz03 (talk) 06:08, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

    • Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:29, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Ina_Maud_Sheldon-Williams

    I, Little antipodes, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Little antipodes (talk) 10:33, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

    • Done – as a draft that was deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. However, the draft namespace, though it is intended to provide some breathing room to create and develop a page without the time pressure of immediate review, is not for the indefinite hosting of material that is unsuitable for inclusion in the article mainspace. Please continue to work on the draft so that it meets Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines for inclusion and then submit it for review—at the least, prior to another six months elapsing. When you are ready, a review can be requested by placing this code at the top of the page and then saving: {{subst:submit}}. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:41, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Student politics in Venezuela

    I, Kingsif, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kingsif (talk) 16:53, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:13, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Pride of the Americas

    Draft was deleted due to inactivity. My intent was to update with more supporting documentation and resubmit but due to the pandemic, my attention had shifted. I would still like this opportunity to edit the page and resubmit. Would you please undelete the page so that I can do this? Thank you! —MiikMartorell (talk) 18:59, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:15, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

    Arise from Darkness

    Soft deleted at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Arise from Darkness. Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Michael.j.schwartz (talk) 20:36, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

    Soft deleted at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Arise from Darkness. Hello, I'm requesting that the article be moved to the Draftspace, so that I may improve it and see if someone can review it (I have conflict of interest because I'm part of the film studio). An editor proposed the deletion and all of the movie and studio articles were deleted. I am suspecting an intentional reprisal due to the fact two days prior an email was sent to our film studio asking for precise wordage to be removed from several of our Misplaced Pages articles in relationship to a movie. Within 48 hours all of the studio and movie pages on Misplaced Pages were proposed to deletion, claiming that none of the references used were valid (a reviewer checked and published the article years ago, with those same references). I understand that there may be discrepancies, but can there be such a wide criterion to evaluate a group of references? Thank you very much for your help. —Michael.j.schwartz (talk) 20:36, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. You can now find it at Draft:Arise from Darkness. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:42, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

    All India Sunni Jamiyyathul Ulama

    Request refund to draft (or failing that userification) of both article page and talk page. Previously deleted at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/All India Sunni Jamiyyathul Ulama. Intention to develop article as lede of Grand Mufti of India (oldid=961149600) indicates and is sourced to indicate importance of organisation in election process of the Grant Mufti incumbent. Attempted to contact XfD closer contacted at User talk:Yunshui#All India Sunni Jamiyyathul Ulama first but no response within 48 hours (closer seems taking a short break from WP and is certainly entitled to RL) so coming to WP:RFU for refund. Please remember to restore talk page as well or indicate if talk page not present. Thankyou. —Djm-leighpark (talk) 23:19, 7 June 2020 (UTC) Djm-leighpark (talk) 23:19, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

    Userfied – the page has been restored to the userspace at Draft:All India Sunni Jamiyyathul Ulama. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:29, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Rishabh Dubey

    I, Gitpush, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gitpush (talk) 00:09, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:36, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Aleksi Godard

    I, Silex158, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Silex158 (talk) 01:26, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:36, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Rabbi Chaim Bentzion Raskin

    I, מענדל סופרין, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. מענדל סופרין (talk) 03:29, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:33, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

    UpCounsel

    Please restore UpCounsel to Draft:UpCounsel. I found out that the article had been deleted through this edit removing it from a list. I would like to work on improving the article to address the {{db-a7}} concerns. —Cunard (talk) 07:00, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

    Userfied – the page has been restored to the userspace at Draft:UpCounsel. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Iridescent (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:33, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Nicholas_Kharkongor

    I, Ved.Maddison, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ved.Maddison (talk) 07:52, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

    • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:30, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

    Bad bitch

    This article succumbed to a PROD on June 16, 2017. I'd like it restored to user space to see if anything can be done with it. —gobonobo 09:25, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Sunil Nihal Duggal

    G13: Abandoned draft or AfC submission and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Madan Dhawan (talk) 18:47, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:46, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

    Radhesh Aria

    {{subst:refund|1= Radhesh Aria |2= This article is a college project and we would very much appreciated if we could work on it , thanks


    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Pmo17 (talk) 20:34, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

    Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with the criteria for speedy deletion. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
    I see that Draft:Radhesh Aria exists, and that's where you should focus your attention. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:49, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

    Chris Tyson

    Can you please undelete the above article because I was not able to contest the deletion—Soccerg7932 (talk) 20:38, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:50, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Wilson Hurley

    I, JoIIygreen, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. JoIIygreen (talk) 21:46, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:54, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Choelquoit lake

    I, Tatlayoko, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tatlayoko (talk) 00:43, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. DES DESiegel Contribs 01:28, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

    File:Henry Kulka working, St Heliers, Auckland, 1970.jpg

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Wasuwatanabe (talk) 01:13, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

    1=File:Henry Kulka working, St Heliers, Auckland, 1970.jpg

    2= I requested to remove this image after uploading it, I did not understand the process for inserting it into a wiki page at the time of uploading, I now understand how to do this. Can you please upload this page so I can place it on the correct page.

    Thanks

     Done DES DESiegel Contribs 01:22, 9 June 2020 (UTC) @Wasuwatanabe: DES DESiegel Contribs 01:23, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Erica C. Barnett

    I, B k, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. B k (talk) 01:36, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. DES DESiegel Contribs 02:17, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

    Fethi Haddaoui

    I have found reliable references and I want to add them. —37.111.203.190 (talk) 03:21, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.. However, moved to Draft:Fethi Haddaoui because this is just not in shape for mainspace at this time. DES DESiegel Contribs 03:39, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

    Yaacov_Heller

    I, Productionguru008, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Productionguru008 (talk) 05:23, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

    Not done – this page was deleted as a blatant advertisement under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion and Misplaced Pages is not to be used as a vehicle for promotion. This does not necessarily mean a suitable article on this topic cannot be created. If it is a notable topic, e.g., multiple reliable, secondary, published sources that are entirely independent of the subject have written about it in substantive detail (not just mere mentions), then a neutrally written article may be possible. This one was written like a commercial. The page was not a draft, but an article, and was in my view rather promotional. Two deleting admins felt the same. I will therefore not undelete it, but I would be willing to extract thje cited sourcees and send them by email to be used as the basis of a fresh article. Heller may well be notsble, but the previous textm is not a good starting place in my view, Productionguru008. DES DESiegel Contribs 15:31, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

    Tonko House

    G13; my Google search tells me this anime studio is probably notable enough for Misplaced Pages —Taku (talk) 08:57, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. TakuyaMurata DES DESiegel Contribs 16:02, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

    Yoshio Ikezaki

    G13; an interview like tells me he might be notable despite deletion. —Taku (talk) 09:03, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

    I can find no evidence that this ever existed, TakuyaMurata, at least not under this title. If you can provide the exact title then I can check it, but failing that anyone is free to start a new draft about Ikezaki. Note that interviews do not usually contribute to notability. DES DESiegel Contribs 15:40, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
    DESiegel here ya go. Praxidicae (talk) 16:06, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
    Sorry, as you found out, I left out Draft:. @DESiegel: a question: Why is an interview article not contributing to the notability? One interview alone will be insufficient but it still gives an indication of the notability. —- Taku (talk) 20:56, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
    Actually, TakuyaMurata, it depends on the kind of interview. In what might be called the classic interview, the reporter or interviewer asks short, often rather generic questions, and the subject gives relatively long and detailed answers. In that kind of piece, all the significant detail is in the subject's words, so it is considers as being much the same as the subject posting an essay on his or her own website, or perhaps writing an op-ed for a newspaper. It ism not an independent source so it doesn't help establish what others have to say about the subject. Here at Misplaced Pages, we define notability largely in terms of what independent and reliable sources have written about the subject. Since an article should not be primarily based on what a subject has to say about him- or herself,. in the absence of independent sources, there is nothing to write. Once notability is clearly established, interviews or statements by the subject or the subjects associates or employer can be sued to support specific facts, but should not the the main support of the article.
    There is, however, a different kind of interview, where the reporter uses answers from the subject as the basis for extended comments and/or analysis. That kind of interview is independent, and can help establish notability. Brut that kind is less common, particularly in celebrity journalism, so we mostly advise new edsit5ors not to count on interviews, rather than get into possibly endless arguments about which interviews should or should not count. Do read our guideline on the notability of individual people. DES DESiegel Contribs 21:21, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
    @DESiegel: I think I understand now: an interview can be a primary source (after aL. the answers are given by a subject). What I meant was more like: the subject is unlikely a no-body since he was doing an interview (but anyway I will investigate further on the notability of this particular subject). —- Taku (talk) 21:37, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
    TakuyaMurata, that line of reasoning: "If X was interviewed by major-source-Y, X must be notable" used to get some traction on Misplaced Pages. But it was found to be far too often the case that journalists would interview anyone with some temporary name recognition, especially people who are briefly "celebrities", and that planting interviews is a common PR technique, but one hard to detect, and so interviews are now taken as no evidence for notability at all, unless they also include independent comment of s0ome sort. And by saying that an interview is a primary source you fall victim to a frequent confusion here, the problem is not that it is primary, but that it is not independent. Sources affiliated with a subject are usually primary, but many primary sources are independent. For example, an eyewitness account of a crime is (usually) independent of the victim or the accused, but it is still a primary source. So are police reports and most other government records. And a biased, partisan source might be secondary, but not independent (this is an unusual situation). Independent p0rimary sources sometimes contribute tyo notability, but most often not. Sources that are secondary, independent, and in depth are the needed evidence of notability. Without them there would be little to write beyond a stub, even when notability can be established in some other way (say by winning a notable award). DES DESiegel Contribs 00:25, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
    DESiegel I had to reread your reply a few times. Ok, yes, I can see that an interview that is essentially a part of some promotion works of the subject cannot be used to establish the notability. I think that last part is the key; Misplaced Pages articles need to be written based on some significant, secondary independent coverage of the subjects; interviews are often not such.
    Somehow related question: is there a place to ask other editors whether a given topic is notable or not? Tea house perhaps? Or should there be one? not just for draft articles. As I go through (deleted or not) draft articles, I frequently come across ones that I find hard to tell whether or not about notable topics (I know I am not alone with such a difficulty.) -- 06:46, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Visual Arts in Hong Kong

    G13; a topic like this is usually notable. —Taku (talk) 09:06, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:26, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Mono Mukundu

    G13; my quick Googling tells me he is potentially notable —Taku (talk) 09:08, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Sobibor uprising (section for the main article)

    I, Botterweg14, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Botterweg14 (talk) 13:21, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:26, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:John J. Lennon

    I, Energyreeling, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Energyreeling (talk) 19:28, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:34, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Example

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Ottavina (talk) 21:51, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:33, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Porto Metro Line A

    I, AlgaeGraphix, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AlgaeGraphix (talk) 05:19, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:37, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:SANDHU JATT

    • ] · ( ] | logs | ] | ) · ]]

    Draft:SANDHU JATT should be created I have new Revisions about the subject and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Irfaan ali khan (talk) 05:40, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

    Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with the criteria for speedy deletion. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion. If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:39, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

    Audition Room

    Audition Room attempts to provide information to aspiring actors on how to crack auditions. This book provides an in-depth understanding of the entertainment industry for budding actors. Appreciating Audition Room, Om Purisaid, "An effort of this kind will help aspiring actors to get a clear view of the entertainment industry. When most youngsters come to this town pursuing their dreams, they often don't know what to expect and how to go about it. For many reasons, more lies and half truths are floating around and there are very few facts." So i request you please Republish (undeletion) this article - Thanks —BMR09 (talk) 06:00, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

    References

    1. "Om Puri praises Manoj Ramola's new book 'Audition Room'". CNN-News18. 2015-12-07. Retrieved 2015-12-07.
    Note for the reviewing admin, this was deleted via discussion. Praxidicae (talk) 13:32, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Audition Room, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, 78.26 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:40, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Amber Studio

    I, Kthan75, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kthan75 (talk) 09:05, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:40, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Medea (1978 play)

    I, Erin.snape, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Erin.snape (talk) 12:51, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:41, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

    Cricket Archive

    not sure why a page on Cricket Archive cannot be submitted, happy to discuss what we need to do to get this simple page added? I have not violated any copyrights, we are a small organistion that has many links to it from existing Misplaced Pages articles and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Ian Smith, Cricket Archive (talk) 14:49, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/CricketArchive, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, CactusWriter (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:37, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

    Rona De Ricci, User:Rootview/sandbox

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Rootview (talk) 15:40, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

    Hello,

    I have looked up the deletion thread and found that it merits a challenge, contest and hopefully the reinstating of either my entry or the one from 2015 of which I only have a recollection of and would like a copy of it. Please direct me to the right place to get it.

    I copied and pasted the bit about the base to which the original article got deleted: • Seems like a pretty obvious Keep. ...Just kidding. Delete - so non-notable that I don't even know the movies. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk)(contributions) 20:41, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

    Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Rona De Ricci.

    1. The previous bit records editor Wgolf (see link) to either mock or question: “Actress who has an amazing 2 roles and has not been in anything since”. This seems to be the base of his imitative to delete the article (2015). I challenge the implication that imposes a continuous (future) work as criteria to value previous work. I could list people that have produced one public work and stopped (reasons abound), and yet their mention is justified, including in Misplaced Pages. However, I will pick one to simplify the example: author J.D. Salinger.

    The editor, New Age Retro Hippie, assumes that if he (even!) doesn’t know the movie than it’s non-notable. How closed-minded and ignorant. Will information and knowledge be limited to whether one person knows of a certain fact, opinion, concept, etc. to be open to all or not?

    2. Her performances in those films produced interest and positive reviews, notably an article about her and another actress, which was included as a reference in both the original article (not mine) in 2015 and mine. Please see the entries.

    3. Finally, I would like to ask this: if both films merited a Misplaced Pages entry and are built on the cast's work then why the actress in the female starring role doesn't? After all, she is what made that film (along with the other actors, etc.) 'notable'. How come the parts don't make up the sum?

    I uploaded a JPG image of the actress along with the entry yesterday (June 8th, 2020). I have the copyright, and it is of professional quality. The entry by itself is short and simple (as recommended) and consists only of information.

    I used the form indicated to retrieve a copy of my entry, following the instructions but was unsuccessful. Could you please help? Also, I would like to see a copy of the original entry from 2015 (again, not mine). It has apparently triggered the speedy delete of my entry.

    Thank you, Rootview (talk) 15:40, 10 June 2020 (UTC) Rootview

    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Rona De Ricci, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Michig (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:10, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Vivek Kumar

    I, Theshubhamsingh, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Theshubhamsingh (talk) 16:36, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
    I've moved it to Draft:Vivek Kumar (filmmaker) due to the existence of Vivek Kumar, the cricketer. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:47, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

    Bharat Sundar

    I, Smandira, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Smandira (talk) 18:58, 10 June 2020 (UTC)


    was unable to edit during the last six months —Smandira (talk) 19:01, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

    Bharat Sundar

    I, 223.226.121.219, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 223.226.121.219 (talk) 19:33, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Navin Doshi

    I, 117.213.166.76, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 117.213.166.76 (talk) 19:45, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

    Cookie_Dough_Bites

    Hi, this article was deleted due to it being considered "promotion". I would like the opportunity to take the undeleted page into my drafts or offline, to revise and alter it so that it is no longer considered promotion, but rather is an appropriate encyclopedic entry. I have more sources that cite and additional encyclopedic information to add to the article. I just would like to recover my writing work on it, and don't need it to be published in its deleted form. Thank-you. —MarvelJason (talk) 22:02, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

    For this kind of speedy deletion, first ask the deleter, user:Seraphimblade. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:51, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Taylor Swift sexual assault trial (2017)

    I, Adun7592, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Adun7592 (talk) 02:50, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Cambridge Mathematics

    G13; I don’t know what the draft is about; but according to my Google search, it can be potentially a notable topic (but basically I can’t tell without the access to the deleted content). —Taku (talk) 05:50, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Glossary of K-pop terms

    G13; the topic like this is generally notable. —Taku (talk) 05:56, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

    Janice Griffith

    I was reading the article about Dan Blizerian and noticed that the page link for Janice Griffith no longer exists. I also noticed that it exists in es.wikipedia, so I'm wondering why this does't exist in en.wikipedia.org —2605:A601:AB5A:C600:D19:BC4D:6DD5:302A (talk) 06:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Toshiki Tateishi

    G13; there is a corresponding article in Japanese Misplaced Pages, according to which he is likely notable. —Taku (talk) 06:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:List of terrorist incidents in the 1940s

    G13; a topic like this is generally notable. —Taku (talk) 06:04, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Human Right in Lithuania

    G13; a topic like this is generally notable, though it is possible that the draft had some issues preventing the move to mainspace. —Taku (talk) 06:14, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Taro Izumi

    G13; from my Google search, I am not convinced that he is notable but there is a potential; e.g., (and the access to the deleted content will be helpful). —Taku (talk) 06:19, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Filippo Graziani

    I, A.schillaci, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. A.schillaci (talk) 08:14, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

    73.240.62.151

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 73.240.62.151 (talk) 08:31, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

    JusticeForAll27

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) JusticeForAll27 (talk) 08:47, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

    Naomi Isted

    Naomi Isted is a British Travel and Fashion Television Presenter for ITV and E!, she is a children's book author, columnist and podcast Co-Host, who has been featured regularly in UK Press. She has also been a columnist and contributor for global press. Please see a range of links below: https://www.itv.com/goodmorningbritain/articles/holiday-essentials, https://www.eonline.com/uk/news/698037/fashion-guru-naomi-isted-shares-her-top-fashion-week-tips, https://www.hellomagazine.com/fashion/news/2017030956937/naomi-isted-london-fashion-week-style-diary/, https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/photos/naomi-isted?family=editorial&phrase=naomi%20isted&sort=best#license, https://www.standard.co.uk/author/naomi-isted, https://www.standard.co.uk/fashion/framing-fashion-london/fashion-blogger-naomi-isteds-best-of-london-fashion-week-a3355081.html https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/author/naomi-isted/?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAADB3A5JI8zC6z1dQinKyqgaD4GDNBCci3n6CTWwwGEkXTsE7J_h1axg0sK97Nf3CeUAS9M870uzutcR9zaHwZQomVzYPec7WsO3ZlQr9B7Vk_GQ2OwMhCw565dWgbj9jFfWoWIZfUd6BXaIQR_NPJf3-0Z_Ww99D6vzXHrlvbWj-, https://www.themediaeye.com/news?nf=16b3b6dc-2576-41ce-8049-ab8300edf41b, https://www.amazon.co.uk/Teleporting-Funland-teleporting-adventures-Isted/dp/B089D19GHY, https://www.thesun.co.uk/?s=naomi+isted, https://www.heraldscotland.com/author/profile/73418.Beauty_and_the_Best/, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gak7FifCTi0, https://www.pinkribbonfoundation.org.uk/2020/02/06/official-charity-ambassador-role-for-style-expert-and-presenter-naomi-isted/, https://open.spotify.com/show/0A8KozMLwhWEMv9M8iAwdD, —2A02:C7F:C686:3000:7DCF:9E71:736E:15B6 (talk) 12:20, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Template:R_from_diacritics

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —187.243.26.56 (talk) 12:56, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

    Puppets Against AIDS (photos were deleted)

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —Marcywinograd (talk) 13:40, 11 June 2020 (UTC) Dear Administrator: 

      I respectfully ask that the four photos deleted from my entry Puppets Against AIDS be reposted to my article (that is still posted). Wikimedia approved the use of the photos after weeks of back and forth communication and signed releases by Gary Friedman, the owner of the copyright, as well as by Mr. Trupin, the heir to the deceased photographer Gisele Wulfsohn.

     Below are some of the relevant communications:

    Permissions - Wikimedia Commons <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org> Thu, Apr 23, 5:55 AM to me

    Dear Winograd,

    Thank you for your information, your liaison work and Mr.Turpin's permission. I am writing to inform you that the permissions listed images has been verified.

    The permission has been added to the file pages. Please verify that the file descriptions contain the correct author attribution you desire. If you have any concerns, please respond to this email.

    Should Mr.Turpin is ready to release his permission of the remaining 5 images, please inform me at once.

    Thank you for your contribution to Wikimedia Commons.

    Yours sincerely, Chris Wong OTRS Volunteer


    I was unable to do the interactive release as preferred by Wikimedia, so instead I have printed the email template, inserted the links, and signed it as per attached…

    I hope you can forward it to them and this works out.

    Good luck with it.

    Mark Turpin


    Fwd:

    Hi Mark, Nathaniel (photo submissions at Misplaced Pages), and Gary, I am forwarding Mark Turpin's (copied here) letter granting permission to use the four photos for my Puppets Against AIDS draft Misplaced Pages entry. Below the ticket number are links to the four photos uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. To clarify, after I originally uploaded the photos, the pictures were nominated for deletion because I do not hold the copyright on the photos; Gary Friedman (copied here), creator and former director of Puppets Against AIDS, holds the copyright on the photos. The photos were taken by late-Gisele Wulfsohn in Johannesburg. Since Gisele passed away and Gary holds the copyright, Misplaced Pages asked Gary to have Gisele's heir use the Misplaced Pages templates to grant a release under Creative Commons to put the photos in the public domain. Mark Turpin is Gisele's heir and I am forwarding his letter because he had difficulty using the Wikimedia/Wikipedia upload. Thank you, Nathaniel and Wikimedia/Wikipedia, for your assistance in this matter. See below. Best wishes, Marcy Winograd



    https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:Soweto,_South_Africa._1980%27s._Children_following_puppeteers_with_Puppets_Against_AIDS.jpg

    https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:Cape_Town,_South_Africa,_1980s._World_AIDS_Day_Performance_of_Puppets_Against_AIDS.jpg

    https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:Cape_Town,_South_Africa,_1980s._World_AIDS_Day_Performance_of_Puppets_Against_AIDS.jpg

    https://commons.wikimedia.org/File:1992._World_AIDS_Day,_Cape_Town,_South_Africa._Joe_%26_Gladys,_the_two_puppets,_discuss_whether_to_have_sex_without_a_condom.jpg

    Marcywinograd you cannot appeal commons deletions here. You'll need to look on commons for how to do so there. Praxidicae (talk) 17:42, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
    Not done Nothing to do. Puppets Against AIDS exists, and the restoration of the images is not under our purview. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:34, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Bharat Sundar

    I, Smandira, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Smandira (talk) 16:24, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Newline Interactive

    I, 108.185.119.98, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 108.185.119.98 (talk) 21:34, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:34, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

    1708 Gallery

    {{subst:refund|1= 1708 Gallery |2= The wikipedia article provides valuable links to information concerning the 1708 Gallery. A non profit Art Gallery in Richmond Virginia founded in 1978. It's deletion serves no purpose that I can think of as an artist from Virginia. }

    • Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/1708 Gallery, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, JBW (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:33, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

    File:United States Postal Service Logo.svg

    This non-free file was deleted and replaced with File:USPS Official Corporate Signature.png. I have no idea why one would replace this SVG with a PNG. I didn't see anything in USPS's usage policy that forbids usage of vector logos. —Saucy 23:29, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

    Posture & the Grizzly

    I, Pasteourpique, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pasteourpique (talk) 00:43, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:44, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Hmwe Thet

    I, Cape Diamond MM, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. —Cape Diamond MM (talk) 00:49, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:44, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Champlain College (New York)

    I, FloridaArmy, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:22, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:45, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Zuasti

    I, Pepis, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pepis (talk) 09:19, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as an Articles for creation (AfC) submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click on the button in the AfC submission template that says Submit your draft for review!. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:45, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Siddhant Sarang

    I, Penthous, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Penthous (talk) 09:38, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:45, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    Number of test per day in India

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below —223.227.22.26 (talk) 10:38, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    Editing Draft:The Mesivta High School of Greater Philadelphia

    I, Jack12578, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jack12578 (talk) 15:41, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    Tina Bhatia

    She has acted in multiple notable films like Gully Boy, Gulabo Sitabo and Oass. Apart from this she has acted in tv serial Pyaar Ke Papad and Kyuki Jeena Isi Ka Naam Hai. There are many possible Sources available on Google like 1 2 —Virenderthind2019 (talk) 16:24, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    MBisanz, I'm curious as to why you closed Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Tina Bhatia as a soft delete. I usually only see that when there is WP:NOQUORUM, but this did have participation. Was it the WP:TOOSOON flavor of the delete votes? – Muboshgu (talk) 19:55, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
    I see MBisanz hasn't edited in about two weeks. So I will draftify this. You can find it at Draft:Tina Bhatia. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:46, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
    Done – Muboshgu (talk) 20:46, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Andy Williams (Every Time I Die)

    I, Harshmustard, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Harshmustard (talk) 16:32, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:36, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft talk:13ReasonsWhy(season1) and Draft talk:13ReasonsWhy(season2)

    1. Please restore those two talk pages.
    2. Please move them back to Draft talk:13 Reasons Why (season 1) and Draft talk:13 Reasons Why (season 2) respectively. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 17:10, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Rebekah Marine

    I, ChristianCanCook, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ChristianCanCook (talk) 17:34, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:51, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Damage Incorporated

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Cataos001 (talk) 17:54, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    I assume they meant Draft:Damage Incorporated Praxidicae (talk) 17:56, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:52, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    Miss District of Columbia World

    Soft deleted at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Miss District of Columbia World. This article was nominated for deletion by a user that was blocked from editing for being a sock-puppet, see the nominator's user page in the deletion discussion. https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Miss_District_of_Columbia_World —IZ041 (talk) 19:14, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Miss District of Columbia World, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, Premeditated Chaos (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:52, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
    • As a note, this was not soft deleted. It was deleted by consensus even discarding the blocked sock, as the rationale explicitly states. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:32, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:2013–14 IIHF European Women's Champions Cup

    I, Spitzmauskc, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Spitzmauskc (talk) 19:50, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:58, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Meir Ouziel

    I, Er ouz, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Er ouz (talk) 19:51, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:58, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Biography of Moses Nkereuwem Nkodi (a.k.a Moescoro)

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Moescoro (talk) 21:53, 12 June 2020 (UTC) Biography of Moses Nkereuwem Nkodi (a.k.a Moescoro)

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:15, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

    Cleaning up User:JzG's mess

    JzG intended to roll back a few of my edits wrapperifying welcome templates but instead accidentally rolled back well over a hundred of my unrelated template edits dating back years, including these deletions. He has acknowledged it was an accidental misclick here and here, but has steadfastly ignored requests from myself and others to clean up after himself. I would appreciate it if another admin could do so instead. —{{u|Sdkb}}  00:05, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Sebastien Chiffot

    I, Ginx.visual.arts, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ginx.visual.arts (talk) 08:11, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

    ajay develoka

    He is a well known director and not enough time was given for review —Mil234 (talk) 12:45, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

    The HeadacheHorse

    I, HeadacheHorseOrigin, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. HeadacheHorseOrigin (talk) 13:24, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

    Matt Jaissle

    I nominated this article for deletion some months ago, but since then I've come to question my choice since I've found some sources which I think may provide notability. I would like to be able to see the content in the article so I can copy it for my sandbox User:*Treker/sandbox/project 59 to work on for a potential mainspace inclusion in the future. —★Trekker (talk) 15:23, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

    Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Nova umjetnička praksa

    I, Zblace, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Zblace (talk) 17:00, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

    Draft:Sons of Southern Ulster

    I, 89.127.47.109, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 89.127.47.109 (talk) 18:23, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

    File:Rongorongo-dietrich-orion-adze-northsouth-reverseboustrophedon.png

    Some time ago, I got into a content dispute, which led to my section being reverted, and the single non-free image being orphaned and deleted. I ended up taking a wikibreak, and after returning, I restored my content with no problems. since the image is fair use and helps illustrate the material (Decipherment_of_rongorongo#Dietrich, more specifically Decipherment_of_rongorongo#Gallery), and since it won't be orphaned now that the section is back up, I'd appreciate having it restored, TIA (pardon me if I've made any formatting errors) —Xcalibur (talk) 01:12, 14 June 2020 (UTC) Xcalibur (talk) 01:12, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

    ==

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Crueldrama (talk) 05:28, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

    Let me work a lil bit more on it and see if I can convince you guys more

    Derek Chauvin (police officer)

    I'd like to request that the deleted revisions of Derek Chauvin (police officer) be grafted to the beginning of Derek Chauvin.

    Categories: