| Revision as of 17:29, 26 December 2006 editLaSaltarella (talk | contribs)1,494 edits "I will not discuss this ay further"← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:35, 26 December 2006 edit undoKillerChihuahua (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users34,578 edits fyiNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| Hi, sorry for late responses. As for prose, I've also the same problems, but I took the same measures as you did. Ask people to do the copyediting. I saw you'd been helped by some people before. So good luck with the article. — ] (]) — 17:07, 26 December 2006 (UTC) | Hi, sorry for late responses. As for prose, I've also the same problems, but I took the same measures as you did. Ask people to do the copyediting. I saw you'd been helped by some people before. So good luck with the article. — ] (]) — 17:07, 26 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==FYI== | |||
| Hi, you seem to be taking a simple check as a personal attack - I assure you, it is not. You have contributed to only one article, and its sub-articles, as can easily be seen by looking at your contribs. This article has had a history of contention. Administrators regulalary check out and ask questions about accounts whose only contributions are to a contentious subject; Misplaced Pages is getting very large and part of that means a lot of sockpuppets pushing their POV. If you're not a sock, be happy that people are trying to keep Misplaced Pages sockpuppet free - and if you are, well, that will of course be different. It is similar to a roadcheck by police for license and insurance card. The police are not accusing you of anything, and if you are legal, you go on your way. Becoming angry, uncivil, or making statements about consulting with authorities about what to do about the unfairness or indignity of the checkpoint is not only silly, it is counter productive. I hope this analogy helps you view things a little differently - please let me know if you have any questions. ]<sup>]</sup> 17:35, 26 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:35, 26 December 2006
I may respond on this page, so please watch for responses.
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thanks for your contributions!
You might like to check out our tutorial, a resource created especially for new users like yourself.
You also may want to introduce yourself to the community at the new user log.
I would suggest a look through our policies and guidelines.
If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page, or at our questions forum.
I hope very much you enjoy being here with us, and I wish you luck with your contributions.
- Zapptastic at 09:13, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 Archives |
Response
Hi, sorry for late responses. As for prose, I've also the same problems, but I took the same measures as you did. Ask people to do the copyediting. I saw you'd been helped by some people before. So good luck with the article. — Indon (reply) — 17:07, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
FYI
Hi, you seem to be taking a simple check as a personal attack - I assure you, it is not. You have contributed to only one article, and its sub-articles, as can easily be seen by looking at your contribs. This article has had a history of contention. Administrators regulalary check out and ask questions about accounts whose only contributions are to a contentious subject; Misplaced Pages is getting very large and part of that means a lot of sockpuppets pushing their POV. If you're not a sock, be happy that people are trying to keep Misplaced Pages sockpuppet free - and if you are, well, that will of course be different. It is similar to a roadcheck by police for license and insurance card. The police are not accusing you of anything, and if you are legal, you go on your way. Becoming angry, uncivil, or making statements about consulting with authorities about what to do about the unfairness or indignity of the checkpoint is not only silly, it is counter productive. I hope this analogy helps you view things a little differently - please let me know if you have any questions. KillerChihuahua 17:35, 26 December 2006 (UTC)