Revision as of 16:07, 18 July 2020 editMikola22 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,399 edits →Issue with sourcing: Radoje Pajović← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:53, 18 July 2020 edit undoAntidiskriminator (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers58,480 edits →Issue with sourcing: Radoje Pajović: reNext edit → | ||
Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
:::Re academic assessment, the sources I presented for my above statements are written by multiple historians including Adžić, Andrijašević and Dimitrijević.--] (]) 15:36, 18 July 2020 (UTC) | :::Re academic assessment, the sources I presented for my above statements are written by multiple historians including Adžić, Andrijašević and Dimitrijević.--] (]) 15:36, 18 July 2020 (UTC) | ||
::::You can't remove such an expert from an article. How did you think that this proposal would pass? I thought you and Sadko were joking. ] (]) 16:07, 18 July 2020 (UTC) | ::::You can't remove such an expert from an article. How did you think that this proposal would pass? I thought you and Sadko were joking. ] (]) 16:07, 18 July 2020 (UTC) | ||
::::Another Montenegrin historian, Dr Dragutin Papović also heavily criticized Pajović in his PhD thesis as one of the communist party historians () who glorified Josip Broz Tito and communist forces. Re to {{u|Peacemaker67}}, the sources I presented are not {{tq|Serbian news and web sources}} but exactly more or less {{tq|obituaries from Montenegro}} in which Pajović's anti-Serbian and anti-Chetnik activism, both in his real life and his works, is actually openly glorified as something good and normal.--] (]) 17:53, 18 July 2020 (UTC) | |||
== Issue with family details 2 == | == Issue with family details 2 == |
Revision as of 17:53, 18 July 2020
Skip to table of contents |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pavle Đurišić article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Pavle Đurišić. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Pavle Đurišić at the Reference desk. |
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting. |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Pavle Đurišić is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Misplaced Pages community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
This article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page as Today's featured article on April 13, 2014. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Guild of Copy Editors | ||||
|
Đurišić was wounded
More than four years ago there was debate on the talkpage about whether Đurišić was wounded or not in October 1944 in Montenegro. Here is the link to that debate: link.
During this debate I presented multiple sources which confirmed that Đurišić was wounded. The other two editors who participated in the debate labeled those sources as nonreliable. A source extensively used in this article (Pajović, Radoje (1977). Kontrarevolucija u Crnoj Gori: Četnički i federalistički pokret, 1941–1945 (in Serbo-Croatian). Cetinje, Yugoslavia: Obod. OCLC 5351995.) also confirms that Djurisic was wounded in Montenegro in October 1944.
On the page 515, in connection to Djurisic's meeting with Albanian delegation, Pajovic confirms that Djurisic was wounded. Here is the quote: "На састанку је постигнута начелна сагласност о сарадњи четника и албанских националиста али је потписивање споразума одложено због Ђуришићевог рањавања." .
Djurisic's wounding is important aspect of this topic.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:53, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- Just add it. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:37, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Removed "unresolved" tag, as the only reason it is unresolved is because Antid won't add it. He has access to the source, so he should take responsibility for the edit. Adding an unresolved tag when you could resolve it is disrupting Misplaced Pages to make a point (what the point is, is beyond me). Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:30, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Rebels in the part of the front which included Đurišić negotiated peace agreement with Italians in mid-August 1941?
According to Milovanović (Milovanović, Nikola B. (1984). Kontrarevolucionarni pokret Draže Mihailovića. Izdavačka radna organizacija "Rad". {{cite book}}
: Invalid |ref=harv
(help)) rebels on the front which included Đurišić when faced with advancing Italian troops managed to negotiate peace agreement with Italians who accepted some of rebel demands including:
- giving up attempts to establish Montenegro as independent state
- stop torching villages
- retreating Albanian forces
while rebels agreed to:
- allow Italians to re-occupy towns (not villages) captured by rebels during the uprising
- releasing prisoners they took during the uprising
I don't know if there are other sources about this agreement, but if this agreement was indeed concluded, it should be included it into the text of the article to provide important context of activity of Đurišić.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 08:48, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
- You are the one that has the source, so I suggest you add it. I will fix any citation or grammar issues. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:53, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
Issue with sourcing: Radoje Pajović
Assertion: The article cites works of Radoje Pajović more than 30 times. Many of the assertions presented in the text of this article rely solely on his works. Having in consideration that Pajović is considered as member of group of Communist party historians who more than any other used his works to promote ideas of the Communist party and struggle against ideas of Chetnik movement. He was also publicly struggling for ideas about autochthonous (non-Serb) Montenegrin ethnicity with autocephalous Montenegrin Orthodox Church, which are also directly opposed to ideas of members or supporters of Chetnik movement. To resolve this issue I propose to replace Pajović with some work authored by neutral uninvolved authors (if it is possible) or to contradict assertions based on Pajović with text based on sources with non-Communist perspective.
Sources:, , ,
References
- Димитријевић, Бојан (2019). Голгота Четника (in Serbian). Вукотић Медиа доо. ISBN 978-86-89613-99-5.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help) - JBČ (2 June 2019). "Preminuo Radoje Pajović". RTCG. RTCG. Retrieved 17 July 2020.
- Andrijašević, Živko (5 December 2019). "Naučnik koji nije mijenjao strane" (in Serbian). Pobjeda. Retrieved 17 July 2020.
- Adžić, Novak (24 February 2020). "Prof. dr Radoje Pajović u odbrani Crne Gore i Crnogoraca od velikosrpske negacije i asimilacije (1934-2019)". Antena M. Retrieved 17 July 2020.
--Antidiskriminator (talk) 10:09, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- I strongly oppose this course of action. Pajović is reliable and well cited across the academic literature, and will remain in the article. Serbian sources aren't likely to be neutral as you claim, as they may well be opposed to his ideas about Montenegrin ethnicity and therefore have an axe to grind in criticising his work. I have sought a number of obituaries from Montenegro and elsewhere to compare and contrast with the Serbian news and web sources you have linked, the reliability of which I have yet to look at. Until these have been examined, I suggest you refrain from adding any material from these or attempting to remove Pajović. I remind you that you were TBANed for tendentious editing behaviour on this article in the past, and I will not hesitate to report it if it occurs again. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 10:38, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Pavle Đurišić is Chetnik from Montenegro, surely historians from Montenegro know much more about him and his actions, and that is why this book has been used so many times. Moving that source from the article makes no sense, in any case there are ways to challenge that source but I think everything is clean. Mikola22 (talk) 11:25, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- His roots are irrelevant. The author is obviously biased and should be used as little as possible. Author such as the same Communist fanatic and the likes of MD/wanna be historian Cohen are the reasons why Misplaced Pages as a project has lower quality of articles then it should be, which is supported by some editors who are not able to comprehend this rather obvious fact - no biased authors should be used. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 11:32, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- I strongly oppose the extreme POV attempts to discredit a well-respected historian. In international bibliography, he has been assessed as the most prominent Montenegrin historian of this period (Pavlović, Srdja (2008). "Realm of the Black Mountain: A History of Montenegro". Balkanistica. 21: 172.) and esteemed Montenegrin historian (Morrison, Kenneth (2018). Nationalism, Identity and Statehood in Post-Yugoslav Montenegro. Bloomsbury Publishing.) If Sadko and Antidiskriminator don't like the academic assessment and the fact that wikipedia functions according to it, there are other websites which might be more welcome to their approach.--Maleschreiber (talk) 13:51, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Re academic assessment, the sources I presented for my above statements are written by multiple historians including Adžić, Andrijašević and Dimitrijević.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 15:36, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- You can't remove such an expert from an article. How did you think that this proposal would pass? I thought you and Sadko were joking. Mikola22 (talk) 16:07, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Another Montenegrin historian, Dr Dragutin Papović also heavily criticized Pajović in his PhD thesis as one of the communist party historians (link) who glorified Josip Broz Tito and communist forces. Re to Peacemaker67, the sources I presented are not
Serbian news and web sources
but exactly more or lessobituaries from Montenegro
in which Pajović's anti-Serbian and anti-Chetnik activism, both in his real life and his works, is actually openly glorified as something good and normal.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 17:53, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Re academic assessment, the sources I presented for my above statements are written by multiple historians including Adžić, Andrijašević and Dimitrijević.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 15:36, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- I strongly oppose the extreme POV attempts to discredit a well-respected historian. In international bibliography, he has been assessed as the most prominent Montenegrin historian of this period (Pavlović, Srdja (2008). "Realm of the Black Mountain: A History of Montenegro". Balkanistica. 21: 172.) and esteemed Montenegrin historian (Morrison, Kenneth (2018). Nationalism, Identity and Statehood in Post-Yugoslav Montenegro. Bloomsbury Publishing.) If Sadko and Antidiskriminator don't like the academic assessment and the fact that wikipedia functions according to it, there are other websites which might be more welcome to their approach.--Maleschreiber (talk) 13:51, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Issue with family details 2
Almost 8 years ago I pointed to the fact (link) that A class biography article about 20th century person should contain family details, like family origin, name of the father, mother, son....
Thanks to my initiative the name of his father was added to the article. But at that time I was unable to find source for rest of his family members, except some websites. In the meantime I found additional and reliable source for the rest of his family members: page 41 and 45 of confirms that Pavle had two children, daughter Ljiljana (1937—1943) and son Ilija who was born in 1940, while his mother was Ivana (from Radović family, clan Brnović).--Antidiskriminator (talk) 16:03, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
References
- Димитријевић, Бојан (2019). Голгота Четника (in Serbian). Вукотић Медиа доо. ISBN 978-86-89613-99-5.
{{cite book}}
: Invalid|ref=harv
(help)
- Misplaced Pages articles that use American English
- Misplaced Pages featured articles
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page
- Featured articles that have appeared on the main page once
- Old requests for peer review
- All unassessed articles
- FA-Class biography articles
- FA-Class biography (military) articles
- Mid-importance biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- FA-Class Bosnia and Herzegovina articles
- Mid-importance Bosnia and Herzegovina articles
- All WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina pages
- FA-Class military history articles
- FA-Class Balkan military history articles
- Balkan military history task force articles
- FA-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- FA-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- Successful requests for military history A-Class review
- FA-Class Montenegro articles
- Mid-importance Montenegro articles
- FA-Class Serbia articles
- Mid-importance Serbia articles
- WikiProject Serbia articles
- FA-Class Yugoslavia articles
- Mid-importance Yugoslavia articles
- WikiProject Yugoslavia articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors