| Revision as of 18:00, 11 January 2019 editJeh (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers19,611 editsm →Oscilloscope: archiving yet another section that belonged on the subject article's talk page← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 15:20, 22 July 2020 edit undoSro23 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators53,146 edits rv |
| (16 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Deceased Wikipedian}} |
|
|
{{Nobots}} |
|
{{usertalkpage|logo=no|noindex=yes|rounded=yes|border-radius=10px|border-s=10|border-c=#ddddd2}} |
|
{{usertalkpage|logo=no|noindex=yes|rounded=yes|border-radius=10px|border-s=10|border-c=#ddddd2}} |
|
{{tinc}} |
|
{{tinc}} |
| Line 17: |
Line 19: |
|
|
|
|
|
<!-- ] 03:14, 19 January 2038 (UTC) --> |
|
<!-- ] 03:14, 19 January 2038 (UTC) --> |
|
|
|
|
{{ambox |
|
{{ambox |
|
| type = content | text = '''''Discussions of article content belong on that article's talk page, not here!''''' Please do not use this page to complain about, argue against, etc., my edits—not, at least on the basis of their content. You can of course thank me for them here if you want! But per ], '''any''' discussion (argument, debate, dispute, whatever) over article content ''belongs on that article's talk page'', not here. That way, ] can see the discussion and participate. (Who knows? Consensus might go against me! But that can't happen if nobody else sees the discussion.) Thank you for understanding. |
|
| type = content | text = '''''Discussions of article content belong on that article's talk page, not here!''''' Please do not use this page to complain about, argue against, etc., my edits—not, at least on the basis of their content. You can of course thank me for them here if you want! But per ], '''any''' discussion (argument, debate, dispute, whatever) over article content ''belongs on that article's talk page'', not here. That way, ] can see the discussion and participate. (Who knows? Consensus might go against me! But that can't happen if nobody else sees the discussion.) Thank you for understanding. |
| Line 25: |
Line 26: |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Usertalkback|you=watched|me=watched|icon=info}} |
|
{{Usertalkback|you=watched|me=watched|icon=info}} |
|
|
|
|
{{ambox |
|
{{ambox |
|
<!--| type = content-->| text = If I've edited a page, or its talk page, I am either a) watching it or b) don't care about it any more. <br/>So if you edit a page I've edited, or its talk page, a message ''here'' to go look ''there'' is either a) unnecessary or b) pointless. And clutters up the edit history here and requires deletion. |
|
<!--| type = content-->| text = If I've edited a page, or its talk page, I am either a) watching it or b) don't care about it any more. <br/>So if you edit a page I've edited, or its talk page, a message ''here'' to go look ''there'' is either a) unnecessary or b) pointless. And clutters up the edit history here and requires deletion. |
| Line 32: |
Line 32: |
|
| type = notice |
|
| type = notice |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
==Oscilloscope== |
|
|
Dear {{notif|}}Jeh, you removed the last change I provided in the article ] and so went back to the CRT with yoke deflection coils. I strongly believe, this picture is simply wrong and misleading. Having worked about 3 years in that industry, I maintain that oscilloscope CRTs, ONLY electrostatic deflection was used (no more the case with the current LED panels), rather than the magnetic deflection commonly and only used with television and other large CRTs. The sources and external reference will confirm my current assumption. So shouldn't you agree with my proposal, at least remove the yoke deviation coil presented--] (]) 16:59, 11 January 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
: As it said above your edit window when you were posting your comment - discussions of article content belong on the article's talk page, not on any editor's talk page. ] (]) 17:12, 11 January 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Done}} |
|
