| Revision as of 12:22, 8 August 2020 editThe C of E (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers46,000 edits compromise proposal← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:24, 8 August 2020 edit undoRitchie333 (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators125,314 edits cmtNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| :::I'm still not happy with the hook. Could we have something about the coat of arms, instead? That would be more suitable for the main page. ] ] ] 12:15, 8 August 2020 (UTC) | :::I'm still not happy with the hook. Could we have something about the coat of arms, instead? That would be more suitable for the main page. ] ] ] 12:15, 8 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
| :::::Can I ask what is factually wrong with it? The only reason I chose that was because I thought it was the most interesting thing in the article. If you want me to drop the police claim in favour of date and context, I'm open to that. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.5em 0.5em 0.6em;"> ''']''' (])</span> 12:21, 8 August 2020 (UTC) | :::::Can I ask what is factually wrong with it? The only reason I chose that was because I thought it was the most interesting thing in the article. If you want me to drop the police claim in favour of date and context, I'm open to that. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.5em 0.5em 0.6em;"> ''']''' (])</span> 12:21, 8 August 2020 (UTC) | ||
| ::::::I don't think you're understanding what I'm getting at. Essentially, you have a reputation now for pushing a particular POV on NI politics (whether real or just imagined, that's what people think), and therefore I would ''much'' rather see a hook about the coat of arms. It's more interesting to me, and won't involve the same sort of kerfuffle that has happened in previous threads on ]. ] ] ] | |||
| {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 12:24, 8 August 2020
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Fermanagh County Council
( )
Arms of Fermanagh County Council
- ... that Fermanagh County Council (coat of arms pictured) said they did not recognise the government of Northern Ireland and pledged allegiance to the unrecognised Dáil, which led to the police evicting them from their offices? Source: National Library of Australia
- Reviewed: Rohani Darus Danil
5x expanded by The C of E (talk). Self-nominated at 09:29, 21 July 2020 (UTC).
The article has been expanded 5 times on the nomination date, and there are no obvious copyvios. However, I am not happy with the hook, which seems to be another attempt to push pro-Unionist politics onto the main page. Specifically, the hook does not say when the council did not recognise the NI government, and might give the impression they were forced out of the building at gunpoint by the Royal Ulster Constabulary, reinforcing the pro-Loyalist view. Ritchie333 11:55, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- That is not the case at all. It's because it is on the maximum hook length that I didn't include the date, I can change it around if you'd like. Also by the way, it wasn't the Royal Ulster Constabulary, it was the Royal Irish Constabulary. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 12:14, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- I'm still not happy with the hook. Could we have something about the coat of arms, instead? That would be more suitable for the main page. Ritchie333 12:15, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- Can I ask what is factually wrong with it? The only reason I chose that was because I thought it was the most interesting thing in the article. If you want me to drop the police claim in favour of date and context, I'm open to that. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 12:21, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- I don't think you're understanding what I'm getting at. Essentially, you have a reputation now for pushing a particular POV on NI politics (whether real or just imagined, that's what people think), and therefore I would much rather see a hook about the coat of arms. It's more interesting to me, and won't involve the same sort of kerfuffle that has happened in previous threads on WT:DYK. Ritchie333
- Can I ask what is factually wrong with it? The only reason I chose that was because I thought it was the most interesting thing in the article. If you want me to drop the police claim in favour of date and context, I'm open to that. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 12:21, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- I'm still not happy with the hook. Could we have something about the coat of arms, instead? That would be more suitable for the main page. Ritchie333 12:15, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
