Revision as of 14:28, 25 August 2020 editFadesga (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users264,959 edits →References← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:47, 24 September 2020 edit undoTelsho (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,833 edits paraphrasing/ce/updatesNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Capitalism}} | {{Capitalism}} | ||
{{Economic systems sidebar|By model}} | {{Economic systems sidebar|By model}} | ||
The '''East Asian model''' (sometimes known as ''' |
The '''East Asian model''' (sometimes known as '''state–sponsored capitalism''')<ref>{{cite book |last= Chun|first= Lin |title= China and Global Capitalism |publisher= Palgrave Macmillan|date=5 December 2013|isbn= 978-1137301253|page = 78|quote=}}</ref> is an ] where the government invests in certain sectors of the economy in order to stimulate the growth of new (or specific) industries in the ]. It generally refers to the model of development pursued in ] such as ] and the ] of ], ], ] and ]. ] is also sometimes included.<ref name="An East Asian Model of Economic Development: Japan, Taiwan and South Korea, 1988">{{cite journal |last1=Kuznets |first1=Paul W. |title=An East Asian Model of Economic Development: Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea |journal=Economic Development and Cultural Change |date=April 1988 |volume=36 |issue=S3 |pages=S11–S43 |doi=10.1086/edcc.36.s3.1566537 }}</ref> It has also been used to classify the contemporary economic system in ] since ]'s ] during the late 1970s.<ref name="Does China follow the 'East Asian Development Model'?, 2005">{{cite journal |last1=Baek |first1=Seung-Wook |title=Does China follow 'the East Asian development model'? |journal=Journal of Contemporary Asia |date=January 2005 |volume=35 |issue=4 |pages=485–498 |doi=10.1080/00472330580000281 }}</ref> | ||
The main shared approach of East Asian economies is the role of the government. |
The main shared approach of East Asian economies is the strong role of the government. East Asian governments had recognized the limitations of markets in allocation of scarce resources in the economy, and thus its governments had used interventions to promote economic development.<ref name=":0">{{cite journal |last1=Danju |first1=Ipek |last2=Maasoglu |first2=Yasar |last3=Maasoglu |first3=Nahide |title=The East Asian Model of Economic Development and Developing Countries |journal=Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences |date=8 January 2014 |volume=109 |pages=1168–1173 |doi=10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.606 |doi-access=free }}</ref> Similar to ], key aspects of the East Asian model include state control of finance, direct support for state-owned enterprises in strategic sectors of the economy or the creation of privately owned ], high dependence on the export market for growth and a high rate of savings.<ref name=":1">{{cite book |last1=Singh |first1=Ajit |chapter=Asian capitalism and the financial crisis |chapterurl=https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/54932/ |pages=339–368 |editor1-last=Eatwell |editor1-first=John |editor2-last=Taylor |editor2-first=Lance |title=International Capital Markets: Systems in Transition |date=2002 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-514765-0 }}</ref> | ||
Although there is the one single term which is used to describe capitalism of east Asian countries. There is not one single approach to economy of Asian countries and it widely varies in economic structure as well as development experiences among the East Asian economies. Especially then between Northeast and Southeast Asian countries.<ref name=":0" /> (e.g. Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand relied much more on FDI (Foreign direct investment) than Taiwan or Singapore)<ref name=":1">{{cite book |last1=Singh |first1=Ajit |chapter=Asian capitalism and the financial crisis |chapterurl=https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/54932/ |pages=339–368 |editor1-last=Eatwell |editor1-first=John |editor2-last=Taylor |editor2-first=Lance |title=International Capital Markets: Systems in Transition |date=2002 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-514765-0 }}</ref> | |||
This economic system differs from a centrally ], where the national government would mobilize its own resources to create the needed industries which would themselves end up being state-owned and operated. East Asian model of capitalism refers to the high rate of savings and investments, high educational standards, assiduity and export-oriented policy.<ref>{{cite report |last1=Prokurat |first1=Sergiusz |title=European Social Model and East Asian Economic Model – Different Approach to Productivity and Competition in Economy |date=24 November 2010 |ssrn=2545004 }}</ref> | This economic system differs from a centrally ], where the national government would mobilize its own resources to create the needed industries which would themselves end up being state-owned and operated. East Asian model of capitalism refers to the high rate of savings and investments, high educational standards, assiduity and export-oriented policy.<ref>{{cite report |last1=Prokurat |first1=Sergiusz |title=European Social Model and East Asian Economic Model – Different Approach to Productivity and Competition in Economy |date=24 November 2010 |ssrn=2545004 }}</ref> | ||
==Success of the model== | ==Success of the model== | ||
East Asian countries saw rapid economic growth during from of the end of the Second World War to the East Asian financial crisis in 1997. |
East Asian countries saw rapid economic growth during from of the end of the Second World War to the East Asian financial crisis in 1997. For instance, percentage annual average growth was high between 1970–96 in mainland China, Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan.<ref name=":0" /> Within this period, development of these countries were growing three times as more than was the rate of growth of the global world economy.<ref name=":1" /> Hence those countries attract most of foreign and private capital inflows into those countries.<ref name=":0" /> | ||
During this period, East Asian countries also achieved dramatic reductions in poverty; the greatest example is Indonesia, where the percentage of people living below the official poverty line fell from 60% to 12% between 1970 and 1996. Further, Indonesia's population increased from 117 to 200 million. Equally impressive is the growth of real wages between 1980 and 1992, with average wages in newly industrialised Asian countries increasing at a rate of 5 percent a year, whereas at the same employment in manufacturing increased by 6 per cent a year. In conclusion the growth period in the East Asian countries saw a large improvement in the overall standards of living.<ref name=":1" /> | |||
==Causes of GDP growth== | ==Causes of GDP growth== | ||
Behind this success stands |
Behind this success stands the export oriented economy which has brought high foreign direct investment and greater technological developments. Big companies such as Creative, Hyundai, LG, Mitsubishi and Samsung were successful due to the huge government support and its intervention into the bank sector in order to give huge credit to big companies. The governments were also crucial in controlling infrastructure, provisions and trade unions. Such policies also made these countries more attractive for foreign investors.<ref name=":0" /> | ||
== |
==Examples of the Asian miracle== | ||
===Japan=== | |||
''“Eight countries in East Asia–Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Thailand, Malaysia, and Indonesia–have become known as the East Asian miracle.”''<ref>{{cite book |last1=Campos |first1=Jose Edgardo |last2=Root |first2=Hilton L. |title=The Key to the Asian Miracle: Making Shared Growth Credible |date=2001 |publisher=Brookings Institution Press |isbn=978-0-8157-2303-5 }}{{pn|date=April 2020}}</ref> Beside successes of the East Asian economy mentioned above in the Success of the model, there are 2 another example why they are called Asian miracle. | |||
The East Asian model of capitalism was first used in Japan after The Second World War in 1950. After the war and American occupation, recently occupied Japan was considered a developing country. The main development was between 1950 and 1980. It took Japan about 25 years, a non-competitive country (in steel production), to overcome Germany in producing cars (Germany was at that time the largest exporter of automobiles in the world. 5 years later, Japan produced more automobiles than the United States. In a post-war period, The Korean War (1950-1953) can be seen as a turning point for the Japanese economy, as the country moved from economic depression to economic recovery. Japan, still being occupied by the ], was a staging place for the US-led United Nations forces deployed in the Korean peninsula. The country found itself in a good position to make a profit as Japanese goods and services were procured by the U.N. troops. This, along with economic reform, gave an initial boost for economy that will experience rapid growth for next half a century. In 1950s and early 1960s, average annual growth rates were around 10% to 13%. | |||
In the early post-war years, Japan had also initiated economic reforms, Zaibatsu corporations were dismantled, and agricultural land reform brought modern machinery and practices in recently distributed land, which meant that small agricultural producers can earn profit as opposed to the pre-war years where big land lords were owners of agricultural land. In the 1960s, Japan developed a consumer-oriented economy, with industry orienting towards production of high-quality technological products aimed for exports as well as domestic market. Japanese exports rose rapidly and in subsequent years it became the world leader in car manufacturing, shipbuilding, precision optical devices, high technology. Beginning with 1965, Japan started having a trade surplus and by the next decade saw Japan having the third largest gross national product in the world. In 1970s, the growth was significantly slow down partly due to the oil crisis, as the country was heavily dependent on oil and food imports. In the 1980s, Japan diversified its raw material sources, due to economic misfortunes of the previous decade, and shifted its production’s emphasis towards telecommunication and computer technologies. Even though Japanese economic expansion ended in early 1990s, Japan is still the leader in highly sophisticated technology along with its traditional heavy industry products. | |||
# '''Korea:''' Korea followed Japan and despite its backward industrial development in nearly 40 years Korea was able to compete in chip developing the most important country in electronic chip technology, U.S.A. In the 1950s South Korea was one of the poorest countries in the world, heavily depended on foreign help provided mostly by the US. Beginning with early 1960s, country’s autocratic leadership initiated economic development reforms that paved the way for rapid economic expansion. Heavy protectionist policies only allowed imports of raw materials, which initiated domestic production of consumer goods. By 1990 average annual growth was around 9%. Family businesses that turned into big conglomerates (i.e. Samsung, Hyundai) had government financial help, for instance in a form of tax breaks, thus spearheading economic growth. South Korea became highly industrialised country with skilled workforce and along with Taiwan, Singapore and Hong Kong ended up being one of the Four Asian Tigers. However, in 1990s economic growth significantly slowed, which resulted in huge financial help form the International Monetary Fond of 57 billion USD, which was IMF’s larges intervention. In early 21st century South Korea enjoyed stable economy and the country initiated slow liberalisation.<ref name=":1" /> | |||
== |
===Singapore=== | ||
Besides many secondary actors in bringing out a crisis (such as a property price bubble, macroeconomic mistakes or a fall in a rate of growth of experts) the core of the crisis was in The East Asian model itself. The over-investment, misallocation of foreign capital inflows<ref name=":1" /> (Big corporations getting money from each other, whether investment was sufficient or not)<ref name=":0" /> and other problems in the financial sector.<ref name=":1" /> Another side of the government-controlled market were massive corruption,<ref name=":0" /> which was due to close relationship between government and business.<ref name=":1" /> This so called “crony capitalism” (which means influence of government and businessmen) led to crisis of confidence in the economies, firstly in Thailand and then other Asian countries drive into financial crisis in 1997. Because of the crisis GDP and export collapsed, unemployment went up, also inflation and as result all of this the governments accumulated huge foreign debt. <ref name=":0" /> | |||
Facing severe unemployment and a housing crisis after the end of World War II, Singapore embarked on a modernisation programme beginning in the late 1960s through the 1970s that focused on establishing a manufacturing industry, developing large public housing estates, and investing heavily in public education and infrastructure under the leadership of ]. | |||
==Other problems caused by the model in some countries== | |||
Korea: Due to government interventions such as directed credits, regulations, explicit and implicit subsidies, the market had lack of discipline which has contributed to the problem of unproductive or excessive investment which has contributed in causing crisis.<ref name=":1" /> | |||
Lee's programs in Singapore had a profound effect on the leadership in China, who made a major effort, especially under ], to emulate his policies of economic growth and entrepreneurship. Over 22,000 Chinese officials were sent to Singapore to study its methods.<ref>Chris Buckley, "In Lee Kuan Yew, China Saw a Leader to Emulate," </ref> | |||
Indonesia: ,, Trade restriction, import monopolies and regulations have impeded economic efficiency, competitiveness, reduced the quality and productivity of investment.” <ref name=":1" /> | |||
By the 1990s, the country had become one of the world's most prosperous nations, with a highly ] ] and strong ] links. It now has the highest ] in Asia and is 7th in the world, and it is ranked 9th on the UN ], the highest for a sovereign country in Asia.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?end=2018&locations=SG-Z4-JP-KR&name_desc=true&start=1960 |title=GDP per capita (current US$) - Singapore, East Asia & Pacific, Japan, Korea |work=World Bank }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2019/01/weodata/weorept.aspx?sy=2017&ey=2024&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&pr1.x=60&pr1.y=11&c=137,516,453,576,178&s=NGDPD,PPPGDP,NGDPDPC,PPPPC&grp=0&a=|title=Report for Selected Countries and Subjects|website=www.imf.org|access-date=7 October 2019}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2019/01/weodata/weorept.aspx?sy=2018&ey=2018&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&pr1.x=55&pr1.y=9&c=512,946,914,137,612,546,614,962,311,674,213,676,911,548,193,556,122,678,912,181,313,867,419,682,513,684,316,273,913,868,124,921,339,948,638,943,514,686,218,688,963,518,616,728,223,836,516,558,918,138,748,196,618,278,624,692,522,694,622,142,156,449,626,564,628,565,228,283,924,853,233,288,632,293,636,566,634,964,238,182,662,359,960,453,423,968,935,922,128,714,611,862,321,135,243,716,248,456,469,722,253,942,642,718,643,724,939,576,644,936,819,961,172,813,132,726,646,199,648,733,915,184,134,524,652,361,174,362,328,364,258,732,656,366,654,734,336,144,263,146,268,463,532,528,944,923,176,738,534,578,536,537,429,742,433,866,178,369,436,744,136,186,343,925,158,869,439,746,916,926,664,466,826,112,542,111,967,298,443,927,917,846,544,299,941,582,446,474,666,754,668,698,672&s=PPPPC&grp=0&a=|title=Report for Selected Countries and Subjects|website=www.imf.org|access-date=7 October 2019}}</ref> | |||
Thailand: Political connectivity with the market have led to giving a priority to political affair at the expense of the economic decisions. For instance, delaying the implementation of necessary policy measures due general election in November 1996. In this and other cases, special interest has often influence on the allocation of budgetary resources and other public policy actions. | |||
===South Korea=== | |||
Overall in a number of countries, there were inadequate disclosure of information and data deficiencies, direct lending. In general, there has also often been a lack of transparency in policy implementation, for example decisions with regards to public infrastructure projects and ad hoc tax exemptions.<ref name=":1" /> | |||
Despite its backward industrial development for nearly 40 years due to the Korean War, the country was able to compete in ]. In the 1950s, South Korea was one of the poorest countries in the world, heavily depended on foreign help provided mostly by the United States. Beginning in the early 1960s, the country’s autocratic leadership initiated economic development reforms that paved the way for rapid economic expansion. Heavy protectionist policies only allowed imports of raw materials, which initiated domestic production of consumer goods. | |||
==IMF== | |||
In order to manage crisis and repay debt East Asian countries asked International Monetary Fund and World Bank for economic aid.<ref name=":0" /> | |||
By 1990, average annual growth was around 9%. Family businesses that turned into big conglomerates such as Hyundai and Samsung had government financial help, for instance in a form of tax breaks, thus spearheading economic growth. South Korea became a highly industrialised country with a skilled workforce and along with Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan ended up being one of the Four Asian Tigers. However, in 1990s economic growth also significantly slowed especially during the financial crisis of 1997, which resulted in huge financial aid from the ] of US$57 billion. In the early 21st century however, South Korea has recovered and enjoyed a stable developed economy.<ref name=":1" /> | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
Line 52: | Line 51: | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
{{Portal bar|Society|Asia|China|Hong Kong|Japan|Singapore|South Korea|Taiwan}} | |||
{{East Asian topics}} | {{East Asian topics}} | ||
{{Aspects of capitalism}} | {{Aspects of capitalism}} |
Revision as of 17:47, 24 September 2020
Part of a series on |
Economic systems |
---|
Major types |
By ideology |
By coordination |
By regional model
|
Sectors |
Property types |
Transition |
Coordination |
Other types |
The East Asian model (sometimes known as state–sponsored capitalism) is an economic system where the government invests in certain sectors of the economy in order to stimulate the growth of new (or specific) industries in the private sector. It generally refers to the model of development pursued in East Asian economies such as Japan and the Four Asian Tigers of Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan. Macau is also sometimes included. It has also been used to classify the contemporary economic system in Mainland China since Deng Xiaoping's economic reforms during the late 1970s.
The main shared approach of East Asian economies is the strong role of the government. East Asian governments had recognized the limitations of markets in allocation of scarce resources in the economy, and thus its governments had used interventions to promote economic development. Similar to dirigisme, key aspects of the East Asian model include state control of finance, direct support for state-owned enterprises in strategic sectors of the economy or the creation of privately owned national champions, high dependence on the export market for growth and a high rate of savings.
This economic system differs from a centrally planned economy, where the national government would mobilize its own resources to create the needed industries which would themselves end up being state-owned and operated. East Asian model of capitalism refers to the high rate of savings and investments, high educational standards, assiduity and export-oriented policy.
Success of the model
East Asian countries saw rapid economic growth during from of the end of the Second World War to the East Asian financial crisis in 1997. For instance, percentage annual average growth was high between 1970–96 in mainland China, Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan. Within this period, development of these countries were growing three times as more than was the rate of growth of the global world economy. Hence those countries attract most of foreign and private capital inflows into those countries.
During this period, East Asian countries also achieved dramatic reductions in poverty; the greatest example is Indonesia, where the percentage of people living below the official poverty line fell from 60% to 12% between 1970 and 1996. Further, Indonesia's population increased from 117 to 200 million. Equally impressive is the growth of real wages between 1980 and 1992, with average wages in newly industrialised Asian countries increasing at a rate of 5 percent a year, whereas at the same employment in manufacturing increased by 6 per cent a year. In conclusion the growth period in the East Asian countries saw a large improvement in the overall standards of living.
Causes of GDP growth
Behind this success stands the export oriented economy which has brought high foreign direct investment and greater technological developments. Big companies such as Creative, Hyundai, LG, Mitsubishi and Samsung were successful due to the huge government support and its intervention into the bank sector in order to give huge credit to big companies. The governments were also crucial in controlling infrastructure, provisions and trade unions. Such policies also made these countries more attractive for foreign investors.
Examples of the Asian miracle
Japan
The East Asian model of capitalism was first used in Japan after The Second World War in 1950. After the war and American occupation, recently occupied Japan was considered a developing country. The main development was between 1950 and 1980. It took Japan about 25 years, a non-competitive country (in steel production), to overcome Germany in producing cars (Germany was at that time the largest exporter of automobiles in the world. 5 years later, Japan produced more automobiles than the United States. In a post-war period, The Korean War (1950-1953) can be seen as a turning point for the Japanese economy, as the country moved from economic depression to economic recovery. Japan, still being occupied by the U.S. military, was a staging place for the US-led United Nations forces deployed in the Korean peninsula. The country found itself in a good position to make a profit as Japanese goods and services were procured by the U.N. troops. This, along with economic reform, gave an initial boost for economy that will experience rapid growth for next half a century. In 1950s and early 1960s, average annual growth rates were around 10% to 13%.
In the early post-war years, Japan had also initiated economic reforms, Zaibatsu corporations were dismantled, and agricultural land reform brought modern machinery and practices in recently distributed land, which meant that small agricultural producers can earn profit as opposed to the pre-war years where big land lords were owners of agricultural land. In the 1960s, Japan developed a consumer-oriented economy, with industry orienting towards production of high-quality technological products aimed for exports as well as domestic market. Japanese exports rose rapidly and in subsequent years it became the world leader in car manufacturing, shipbuilding, precision optical devices, high technology. Beginning with 1965, Japan started having a trade surplus and by the next decade saw Japan having the third largest gross national product in the world. In 1970s, the growth was significantly slow down partly due to the oil crisis, as the country was heavily dependent on oil and food imports. In the 1980s, Japan diversified its raw material sources, due to economic misfortunes of the previous decade, and shifted its production’s emphasis towards telecommunication and computer technologies. Even though Japanese economic expansion ended in early 1990s, Japan is still the leader in highly sophisticated technology along with its traditional heavy industry products.
Singapore
Facing severe unemployment and a housing crisis after the end of World War II, Singapore embarked on a modernisation programme beginning in the late 1960s through the 1970s that focused on establishing a manufacturing industry, developing large public housing estates, and investing heavily in public education and infrastructure under the leadership of Lee Kuan Yew.
Lee's programs in Singapore had a profound effect on the leadership in China, who made a major effort, especially under Deng Xiaoping, to emulate his policies of economic growth and entrepreneurship. Over 22,000 Chinese officials were sent to Singapore to study its methods.
By the 1990s, the country had become one of the world's most prosperous nations, with a highly developed free market economy and strong international trading links. It now has the highest per capita gross domestic product in Asia and is 7th in the world, and it is ranked 9th on the UN Human Development Index, the highest for a sovereign country in Asia.
South Korea
Despite its backward industrial development for nearly 40 years due to the Korean War, the country was able to compete in chip technology. In the 1950s, South Korea was one of the poorest countries in the world, heavily depended on foreign help provided mostly by the United States. Beginning in the early 1960s, the country’s autocratic leadership initiated economic development reforms that paved the way for rapid economic expansion. Heavy protectionist policies only allowed imports of raw materials, which initiated domestic production of consumer goods.
By 1990, average annual growth was around 9%. Family businesses that turned into big conglomerates such as Hyundai and Samsung had government financial help, for instance in a form of tax breaks, thus spearheading economic growth. South Korea became a highly industrialised country with a skilled workforce and along with Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan ended up being one of the Four Asian Tigers. However, in 1990s economic growth also significantly slowed especially during the financial crisis of 1997, which resulted in huge financial aid from the International Monetary Fund of US$57 billion. In the early 21st century however, South Korea has recovered and enjoyed a stable developed economy.
See also
- Autarky
- Corporatism
- Chinese model
- Developmental state
- Dirigisme
- Economic interventionism
- Four Asian Tigers
- Nordic model
- Singapore model
- State capitalism
- Tiger Cub Economies
References
- Chun, Lin (5 December 2013). China and Global Capitalism. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 78. ISBN 978-1137301253.
- Kuznets, Paul W. (April 1988). "An East Asian Model of Economic Development: Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea". Economic Development and Cultural Change. 36 (S3): S11 – S43. doi:10.1086/edcc.36.s3.1566537.
- Baek, Seung-Wook (January 2005). "Does China follow 'the East Asian development model'?". Journal of Contemporary Asia. 35 (4): 485–498. doi:10.1080/00472330580000281.
- ^ Danju, Ipek; Maasoglu, Yasar; Maasoglu, Nahide (8 January 2014). "The East Asian Model of Economic Development and Developing Countries". Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 109: 1168–1173. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.606.
- ^ Singh, Ajit (2002). "Asian capitalism and the financial crisis". In Eatwell, John; Taylor, Lance (eds.). International Capital Markets: Systems in Transition. Oxford University Press. pp. 339–368. ISBN 978-0-19-514765-0.
{{cite book}}
: External link in
(help); Unknown parameter|chapterurl=
|chapterurl=
ignored (|chapter-url=
suggested) (help) - Prokurat, Sergiusz (24 November 2010). European Social Model and East Asian Economic Model – Different Approach to Productivity and Competition in Economy (Report). SSRN 2545004.
- Chris Buckley, "In Lee Kuan Yew, China Saw a Leader to Emulate," The New York Times 23 March 2015
- "GDP per capita (current US$) - Singapore, East Asia & Pacific, Japan, Korea". World Bank.
- "Report for Selected Countries and Subjects". www.imf.org. Retrieved 7 October 2019.
- "Report for Selected Countries and Subjects". www.imf.org. Retrieved 7 October 2019.