| Revision as of 03:58, 21 November 2020 editPkeets (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users25,536 edits →Edit at Sidney Powell: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:02, 21 November 2020 edit undoVaselineeeeeeee (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers89,970 edits →BRD: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| CozyandDozy, I didn't remove your paragraph, but combined it with the one above. If you don't like the way I revised to remove redundancies, then please do it yourself. There is no need to say things twice in three paragraphs. Thank you. ] (]) 03:58, 21 November 2020 (UTC) | CozyandDozy, I didn't remove your paragraph, but combined it with the one above. If you don't like the way I revised to remove redundancies, then please do it yourself. There is no need to say things twice in three paragraphs. Thank you. ] (]) 03:58, 21 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
| == BRD == | |||
| ] Your recent ] edit has been reverted. Per the ], after a bold edit is reverted, the ] should remain while a discussion is started instead of ], and it should be resolved before reinstating the edit, after a needed ] is formed to keep it.<!--Template:Uw-brd--> ''']<sup><small>]</small></sup>''' 13:02, 21 November 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:02, 21 November 2020
LoS as neo-Nazi group
Hi. I cannot find a source that explicitly says that the League of the South is a neo-Nazi organization. The SPLC says they have aligned themselves with the neo-Nazi Nationalist Front, but does not say that they are themselves neo-Nazi. If you have a source that does say this, please add it to the article and restore "neo-Nazi" to the lead. Thanks, Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:57, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Important Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Misplaced Pages's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Template:Z33 Doug Weller talk 11:17, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
June 2020
Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Nick Fuentes, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Misplaced Pages has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Meters (talk) 22:01, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Richard B. Spencer . Bump to final. Recently removed a level 3. Meters (talk) 22:10, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
- People actually do read sources to see if they support the claims being made. Meters (talk) 22:14, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Edit at Sidney Powell
CozyandDozy, I didn't remove your paragraph, but combined it with the one above. If you don't like the way I revised to remove redundancies, then please do it yourself. There is no need to say things twice in three paragraphs. Thank you. Pkeets (talk) 03:58, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
BRD
Your recent bold edit has been reverted. Per the bold, revert, discuss cycle, after a bold edit is reverted, the status quo should remain while a discussion is started instead of edit-warring, and it should be resolved before reinstating the edit, after a needed consensus is formed to keep it. Vaselineeeeeeee 13:02, 21 November 2020 (UTC)