Revision as of 15:14, 8 January 2007 view sourceWerdnabot (talk | contribs)60,702 editsm Automated archival of 1 sections to User talk:Malber/Archive/Archive 01← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:52, 8 January 2007 view source Pascal.Tesson (talk | contribs)25,698 edits Thanks for the tipNext edit → | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
OK, everyone is entitled to a change of opinion. I apologize for the exlamation above. I appreciate the consideration you have given to the matter. Again, sorry for being harsh. Sincerely, --] <font color = "blue"><sup>]</sup></font> 03:15, 4 January 2007 (UTC) | OK, everyone is entitled to a change of opinion. I apologize for the exlamation above. I appreciate the consideration you have given to the matter. Again, sorry for being harsh. Sincerely, --] <font color = "blue"><sup>]</sup></font> 03:15, 4 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
== Thanks for the tip == | |||
Thanks for the tip. But I really think I gave my honest answer. I don't claim to fully understand all the finer points of every policy out there and the best I can say is that I will do my homework conscientiously before using tools that I'm not so familiar with, especially sensitive ones like protection issues. Cheers, ] 17:52, 8 January 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:52, 8 January 2007
This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 5 days are automatically archived to User talk:Malber/Archive/Archive_01. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
edcuactional
very witty - especially in the context of educational background! :-) --Spartaz 19:11, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, indeed, perhaps the best word in that question to spell wrong. --Deskana (talk) 20:20, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
LOL, thanks! I'll fix it. :-) —Malber (talk • contribs) 21:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Regarding my RfA
In response to your comment in my RfA the only thing I can really say is -- WOW! --BostonMA 03:00, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Reply on BostonMA's talk page
OK, everyone is entitled to a change of opinion. I apologize for the exlamation above. I appreciate the consideration you have given to the matter. Again, sorry for being harsh. Sincerely, --BostonMA 03:15, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the tip
Thanks for the tip. But I really think I gave my honest answer. I don't claim to fully understand all the finer points of every policy out there and the best I can say is that I will do my homework conscientiously before using tools that I'm not so familiar with, especially sensitive ones like protection issues. Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 17:52, 8 January 2007 (UTC)