Revision as of 11:47, 9 January 2021 editAsterix757 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users643 edits →Olivier Duhamel and sexual violence: new sectionTag: 2017 wikitext editor← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:58, 9 January 2021 edit undoXIIIfromTOKYO (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users981 edits →Olivier Duhamel and sexual violenceNext edit → | ||
Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
An entire section added has been written inaccuratly pretending facts that are not in the sources and is using also poor source (]). It's like a gossip article. I added some tags. ] (]) 11:47, 9 January 2021 (UTC) | An entire section added has been written inaccuratly pretending facts that are not in the sources and is using also poor source (]). It's like a gossip article. I added some tags. ] (]) 11:47, 9 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
:I'm not surprised, and I think {{ping|MePhisto}} won't be either. | |||
:Junk sources, fraudulent use of references, and abusive promotion of Paris Assas University. Nothing New. ] (]) 20:57, 9 January 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:58, 9 January 2021
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sciences Po article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Introduction
Please stop removing ranking in the introduction and putting laudatory inaccurate statements.
By world reputation, it not ranked by THE among the top 100 in the world and the top 3 of France. QS : Social Sciences: 69th (4rd in France) THE : Social Sciences: 68th (2nd in France). It is not " one of the most prestigious and selective European schools in the social sciences."
--Delfield (talk) 08:36, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
A new QS ranking by subject has now been published according to which Sciences Po is ranked 2nd in Politics and International Relations (together with Princeton). So this needs to be updated in the description. https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/university-subject-rankings/2020/politics — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.156.161.98 (talk) 14:57, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Merging discussion
It has been suggested that Sciences Po Law School be merged into this page. (Discuss) Proposed since February 2020. wbm1058 (talk) 21:45, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
Adding the controversy about the law in Sciences Po / Sockpuppet investigation
Hello User:MePhisto,
I used the sources provided by LawStudentJam in the Sciences Po Law School article. If you had a conclusion in your previous discussions, please give us a link, but do not make personal attacks and remove content with source.
Regarding the ranking in the lead, I think I read that it should be either complete or there should not be anything, but it should not be only the best ranking as if it was a global one.
If you disagree about something, please let me know.
Thanks!
--Delfield (talk) 08:41, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
HelloDelfield,
your edits are clearly part of a sockpuppet-account of the banned account"Launabee". You have been banned from making direct edits to articles on French academic institutions on 11 October 2017 (https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Launebee#Topic_ban).
There have been previous sockpuppet investigations after your ban, this is merely the latest, unfortunate episode (https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Launebee/Archive).
Your identity is clearly visible through 1. your content-behavior, 2. your language-style.
1. Launabee has continuously attempted to diminish the reputation of Sciences Po, specifically the Sciences Po law school. At the same time Launabee has written promotional content on the law school of Paris II Panthéon-Assas. Your edits clearly, unmistakably fit this pattern. For example:
"In 2009, Sciences Po created the "Sciences Po Law School". It is not a faculty of law, nor does it give undergraduate degree in law, nor does it have its own building, but it is an administrative appellation (see the disambiguation page, third meaning).
In 2008, partly as an answer to the announcement of the creation of a "law school" in this new meaning in Sciences Po, University of Paris II Panthéon-Assas, created a "law college" (undergraduate level) and then a "law school" (graduate level) on top of its faculty of law to attract top students in France (see the disambiguation page, second meaning). It was widely reported in the media as the creation of a "way of excellence in law" for "brilliant students". Several universities followed this model, and created these highly selective schools.)
2. Launabee has used an incorrect, French-style English-grammar and wording. The edits of Delfield fit into this pattern. This includes sentences such as "They managed to have the education in law to have a special place in the French Code of Education", or the wording "take a masters degree".
Im referring this matter to a sockpuppet-investigation. This is unfortunate. We all could be using our energy more productively.
MePhisto (talk) 12:56, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Dear MePhisto,
If you have a problem with another French user, please see with him. I used the sources provided by another user.
I tried a new formulation, I hope this will be ok for you.
I mention Paris II since many many sources are talking about the dispute about the name "law school", so I thought it is worth mentioning, but others can give their opinion too.
--Delfield (talk) 13:46, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
The sockpuppet investigation against Delfield is open: https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Launebee. I hope this unfortunate matter can be settled objectively and swiftly, without yet another tiresome editing war. We have been here before, several times. To all users with an interest in maintaining good faith editing: Please feel free to contribute to the investigation.
MePhisto (talk) 11:16, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Olivier Duhamel and sexual violence
An entire section added has been written inaccuratly pretending facts that are not in the sources and is using also poor source (Gala). It's like a gossip article. I added some tags. Asterix757 (talk) 11:47, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not surprised, and I think @MePhisto: won't be either.
- Junk sources, fraudulent use of references, and abusive promotion of Paris Assas University. Nothing New. XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 20:57, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class France articles
- Low-importance France articles
- Paris task force articles
- All WikiProject France pages
- B-Class Libraries articles
- Low-importance Libraries articles
- WikiProject Libraries articles
- B-Class Higher education articles
- WikiProject Higher education articles
- B-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles