Misplaced Pages

Talk:Sciences Po: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:47, 9 January 2021 editAsterix757 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users643 edits Olivier Duhamel and sexual violence: new sectionTag: 2017 wikitext editor← Previous edit Revision as of 20:58, 9 January 2021 edit undoXIIIfromTOKYO (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users981 edits Olivier Duhamel and sexual violenceNext edit →
Line 87: Line 87:


An entire section added has been written inaccuratly pretending facts that are not in the sources and is using also poor source (]). It's like a gossip article. I added some tags. ] (]) 11:47, 9 January 2021 (UTC) An entire section added has been written inaccuratly pretending facts that are not in the sources and is using also poor source (]). It's like a gossip article. I added some tags. ] (]) 11:47, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
:I'm not surprised, and I think {{ping|MePhisto}} won't be either.
:Junk sources, fraudulent use of references, and abusive promotion of Paris Assas University. Nothing New. ] (]) 20:57, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:58, 9 January 2021

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sciences Po article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 3 months 

Template:Vital article

Peace dove with olive branch in its beakPlease stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconFrance: Paris Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Paris task force.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconLibraries Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconHigher education
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Misplaced Pages. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconPolitics Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Introduction

Please stop removing ranking in the introduction and putting laudatory inaccurate statements.

By world reputation, it not ranked by THE among the top 100 in the world and the top 3 of France. QS : Social Sciences: 69th (4rd in France) THE : Social Sciences: 68th (2nd in France). It is not " one of the most prestigious and selective European schools in the social sciences."

--Delfield (talk) 08:36, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

A new QS ranking by subject has now been published according to which Sciences Po is ranked 2nd in Politics and International Relations (together with Princeton). So this needs to be updated in the description. https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/university-subject-rankings/2020/politics — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.156.161.98 (talk) 14:57, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Merging discussion

It has been suggested that Sciences Po Law School be merged into this page. (Discuss) Proposed since February 2020. wbm1058 (talk) 21:45, 11 April 2020 (UTC)


Adding the controversy about the law in Sciences Po / Sockpuppet investigation

Hello User:MePhisto,

I used the sources provided by LawStudentJam in the Sciences Po Law School article. If you had a conclusion in your previous discussions, please give us a link, but do not make personal attacks and remove content with source.

Regarding the ranking in the lead, I think I read that it should be either complete or there should not be anything, but it should not be only the best ranking as if it was a global one.

If you disagree about something, please let me know.

Thanks!

--Delfield (talk) 08:41, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

HelloDelfield,

your edits are clearly part of a sockpuppet-account of the banned account"Launabee". You have been banned from making direct edits to articles on French academic institutions on 11 October 2017 (https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Launebee#Topic_ban).

There have been previous sockpuppet investigations after your ban, this is merely the latest, unfortunate episode (https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Launebee/Archive).

Your identity is clearly visible through 1. your content-behavior, 2. your language-style.

1. Launabee has continuously attempted to diminish the reputation of Sciences Po, specifically the Sciences Po law school. At the same time Launabee has written promotional content on the law school of Paris II Panthéon-Assas. Your edits clearly, unmistakably fit this pattern. For example:

"In 2009, Sciences Po created the "Sciences Po Law School". It is not a faculty of law, nor does it give undergraduate degree in law, nor does it have its own building, but it is an administrative appellation (see the disambiguation page, third meaning).

In 2008, partly as an answer to the announcement of the creation of a "law school" in this new meaning in Sciences Po, University of Paris II Panthéon-Assas, created a "law college" (undergraduate level) and then a "law school" (graduate level) on top of its faculty of law to attract top students in France (see the disambiguation page, second meaning). It was widely reported in the media as the creation of a "way of excellence in law" for "brilliant students". Several universities followed this model, and created these highly selective schools.)

2. Launabee has used an incorrect, French-style English-grammar and wording. The edits of Delfield fit into this pattern. This includes sentences such as "They managed to have the education in law to have a special place in the French Code of Education", or the wording "take a masters degree".

Im referring this matter to a sockpuppet-investigation. This is unfortunate. We all could be using our energy more productively.

MePhisto (talk) 12:56, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Dear MePhisto,

If you have a problem with another French user, please see with him. I used the sources provided by another user.

I tried a new formulation, I hope this will be ok for you.

I mention Paris II since many many sources are talking about the dispute about the name "law school", so I thought it is worth mentioning, but others can give their opinion too.

--Delfield (talk) 13:46, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

The sockpuppet investigation against Delfield is open: https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Launebee. I hope this unfortunate matter can be settled objectively and swiftly, without yet another tiresome editing war. We have been here before, several times. To all users with an interest in maintaining good faith editing: Please feel free to contribute to the investigation.

MePhisto (talk) 11:16, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Olivier Duhamel and sexual violence

An entire section added has been written inaccuratly pretending facts that are not in the sources and is using also poor source (Gala). It's like a gossip article. I added some tags. Asterix757 (talk) 11:47, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

I'm not surprised, and I think @MePhisto: won't be either.
Junk sources, fraudulent use of references, and abusive promotion of Paris Assas University. Nothing New. XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 20:57, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Categories: