Misplaced Pages

Presidential Commission to Counter Attempts to Falsify History to the Detriment of Russia's Interests: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:14, 31 May 2009 editDigwuren (talk | contribs)11,308 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 04:24, 9 December 2024 edit undoPppery (talk | contribs)Interface administrators, Administrators100,997 editsm Pppery moved page Presidential Commission of the Russian Federation to Counter Attempts to Falsify History to the Detriment of Russia's Interests to Presidential Commission to Counter Attempts to Falsify History to the Detriment of Russia's Interests: Requested by Graham11 at WP:RM/TR: Per WP:CONCISE. Just looking at Google, it appears that the existing form is slightly less common than the shorter form "(Presidential) Commission to Counter... 
(326 intermediate revisions by 87 users not shown)
Line 1: {{Use dmy dates|date=November 2020}} The '''Historical TruthPresidential Commission''', fullyof the ''Russian Federation's President'sto commissionCounter forAttempts actionsto againstFalsify falsificationHistory ofto historythe in contrary to interestsDetriment of Russia's Interests''' ({{lang-langx|ru|комиссия при президенте Российской Федерации по противодействию попыткам фальсификации истории в ущерб интересам России}}), was a commission in the ] that was set up by a decree issued by president ], president of ] on 15 May 2009,<ref>{{cite news |script-title=ru:Медведев создал комиссию при президенте РФ по противодействию попыткам фальсификации истории в ущерб интересам России |url=http://www.interfax.ru/politics/news.asp?id=80400 |language=Russian |publisher=] |date=19 May 2009 |accessdate=24 May 2009}}</ref> officially to "defend Russia against falsifiers of history and those who would deny Soviet contribution to the victory in ]".<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090523093807/http://document.kremlin.ru/doc.asp?ID=052421 |date=23 May 2009 icon}} {{in lang|ru}}</ref> The commission iswas headed by Medvedev's ] ]. andThe staffeddecree byestablishing currentthe andcommission formerwas ]on members,14 suchFebruary as2012,<ref name=dissolution>Указом Президента Российской Федерации от 14 февраля 2012 г. № 183]&mdash;Presidential decree of February 14, ]repealed and("abrogated") ]original decree: May 15, and2009 No. 549 (Collected officialsLegislation of Russia'sthe armedRussian forcesFederation, 2009, No. 21, p. 2541); and ]amendments: January 22, e2010 No.g 97 (Collected Legislation Russian Federation, 2010, No. General4, ]. Amongpractices, glorifying the 28Soviet membersUnion areand 3its professional historianscrimes.<ref name="panel" />   ==Origins, tasks and related legislation== ==Criminalization of criticism of the Soviet Union== Concerns had been raised in Russia for some time regarding the alleged attempts in some former Soviet countries to revise the outcome of the ]<ref>E.g.: {{cite web |url=http://www.un.int/russia/other/latv1941.htm |title=Involvement of the Lettish SS Legion in War Crimes in 1941–1945 and the Attempts to Revise the Verdict of the Nuremberg Tribunal in Latvia |accessdate=2 December 2005 |author=], Permanent Mission to the UN |publisher=] website |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20051123100752/http://www.un.int/russia/other/latv1941.htm |archivedate=23 November 2005}} Also: {{cite web |url=http://www.un.int/russia/other/eest1941.htm |title=Involvement of the Estonian SS Legion in War Crimes in 1941–1945 and the Attempts to Revise the Verdict of the Nuremberg Tribunal in Estonia |accessdate=23 June 2009 |author=], Permanent Mission to the UN |publisher=] website |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20090511175048/http://www.un.int/russia/other/eest1941.htm |archivedate=11 May 2009}}</ref> and rewrite the history of World War II, before the suggestion of the federal ], ], finally raised the issue to that of a state political matter in February 2009.{{cn|date=April 2021}} In conjunction with the creation of the Commission, the Kremlin is drafting legislation that will criminalize criticism of the Soviet Union. The laws could see people fined, or even imprisoned for up to five years, for deviating from the official history. Foreign countries whose officials who the commission rules to be guilty of the new crimes will face sanction as well. The bill gives Russia the authority to expel ambassadors or sever diplomatic relations with offending nations and to impose full transport and communications blockades on them.<ref name="Moscow Times">{{Cite news |title=Commission to Guard Against False History |date=20 May 2009 |first=Nabi |last=Abdullaev |work=] |url=http://www.themoscowtimes.com/article/1010/42/377270.htm |accessdate=24 May 2009 }}</ref> The new law could also be used to bar historians who discuss ] by the ] or point out that Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union were once allies under the ].<ref name="telegraph"/>   According to commission chairman ], the tasks of the commission would not be to "re-write" or "politicise" history in the manner of countries like ] and ]. Instead, the commission would analyse alleged falsifications of historical facts aimed at tarnishing Russia's international reputation, and advise the Russian president on the ways in which such alleged falsifications can be countered. It was foreseen that the commission would meet at least twice per year.<ref>{{cite news |script-title=ru:Комиссия против фальсификации истории обещает не переписывать книги и не учить ученых |url=http://www.newsru.com/russia/17jun2009/history.html |language=Russian |publisher=] |date=17 June 2009 |accessdate=18 June 2009}}</ref> ==Reception==   The commission was staffed by then current and former ] members, such as ], ] and ], and officials of Russia's armed forces and ], including General of the army ]. Among the twenty-eight members were five professional historians: Andrey Artizov (the head of the Federal Archive Agency),<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120425132907/http://arhidelo.ru/press-center/rus/detail-14148.html |date=25 April 2012 }} at arhidelo.ru {{in lang|ru}}</ref> Alexander Chubaryan (the head of the Institute of World History of the ])<ref> at planetguide.info {{in lang|ru}}</ref> ], ] (before 2010 the head of the Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences) and ].   ==Reception== === In Russia === Supporters of the Commission hope that it will become involved in some of the long-standing conflicts between Russia and its neighbours over the interpretation of history, such as in ]'s ongoing legal proceedings against former ] ] for alleged war crimes.<ref>{{cite news |title=Кремлевская комиссия займется делом Кононова |url=http://rus.delfi.lv/archive/article.php?id=24659049 |language=Russian |publisher=] |date=20 May 2009 |accessdate=24 May 2009}}</ref> In an interview with the website Liberty.ru, historian ], a critic (regularly featured by the Russian state media) of the anti-Soviet historiography predominant in the Baltic states and Ukraine, has said that ''"only those who falsify history need fear the work of the Commissioncommission"''.<ref>{{cite web |first=Вячеслав |last=Данилов |script-title=ru:Тема: Александр Дюков: Бояться деятельности Комиссии по борьбе с фальсификацией истории могут только те, кто эту историю фальсифицируют |url=http://liberty.ru/Themes/Aleksandr-Dyukov-Boyat-sya-deyatel-nosti-Komissii-po-bor-be-s-fal-sifikaciej-istorii-mogut-tol-ko-te-kto-etu-istoriyu-fal-sificiruyut |language=Russian |publisher=Liberty.ru |dateaccessdate=24 May 2009 |accessdatearchive-url=24https://web.archive.org/web/20090527014549/http://www.liberty.ru/Themes/Aleksandr-Dyukov-Boyat-sya-deyatel-nosti-Komissii-po-bor-be-s-fal-sifikaciej-istorii-mogut-tol-ko-te-kto-etu-istoriyu-fal-sificiruyut |archive-date=27 May 2009 |url-status=dead}}</ref>   Russian opposition politicians attacked the commission as effectively reintroducing state ideology for the first time since the fall of the Soviet Union, which was explicitly forbidden by the ] of that time. According to former Duma deputy, ] (of the ]), the commission and new legislation criminalizing criticism of the Soviet Union allows the state to impose its own idea of political will and ideology and was also part of a continuing rehabilitation of Stalin and the former Soviet dictator's policies.<ref name="telegraph">{{cite news |first=Adrian |last=Blomfield |title=Russia threatens to bar Europeans who deny Red Army 'liberated' them |url=httphttps://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/5350777/Russia-threatens-to-bar-Europeans-who-deny-Red-Army-liberated-them.html |work=] |date=19 May 2009 |accessdate=24 May 2009 | location=London}}</ref> TheHuman Russianrights dailyactivist and former lawmaker '']'' noteddubbed the namedecree ofopenly the] commissionand leavesclaimed openthat theit falsificationdiscredited ofPresident historyMedvedev ''in favor'' of Russia, establishingas a "cultlawyer.<ref of victoryname="sobkorr">{{mdash}}similarcite tonews civil|first=Ульяна religions|last=Иванова upon|author2=Урсулов, whichДмитрий authoritarian|script-title=ru:Медведев andсоздал totalitarianкомиссию statesпо haveборьбе beenс builtискажением in the past.<ref>{{cite news |title=От редакции: Наша борьбаистории |url=http://www.vedomostisobkorr.ru/newspapernews/article.shtml?20092/05/20/1963484A1263D299255.html |language=Russian |workpublisher=]ИА Собкор®ru |date=2019 May 2009 |accessdate=246 MayJune 2009}}</ref> ] has also expressed disapproval of Medvedev's decree.<ref>{{cite news |agency=Press Trust of India|authorlink=Press Trust of India |title=RosyjskaGorbachev prasablasts oKremlin "komisji'managed' Miedwiediewa"democracy in Russia |url=http://www.rpdnaindia.plcom/artykul/29,308222_Rosyjska_prasa_o__komisji_Miedwiediewa_report.htmlasp?newsid=1258111 |work=] |language=Polish |date=2022 May 2009 |accessdate=246 MayJune 2009}}</ref> Supporters of the Commission hope that it will become involved in some of the long-standing conflicts between Russia and its neighbours over the interpretation of history, such as in ]'s ongoing legal proceedings against former ] ] for alleged war crimes.<ref>{{cite news |title=Кремлевская комиссия займется делом Кононова |url=http://rus.delfi.lv/archive/article.php?id=24659049 |language=Russian |publisher=] |date=20 May 2009 |accessdate=24 May 2009}}</ref> In an interview with the website Liberty.ru, historian ], a critic (regularly featured by the Russian state media) of the anti-Soviet historiography predominant in the Baltic states and Ukraine, has said that ''"only those who falsify history need fear the work of the Commission"''.<ref>{{cite web |first=Вячеслав |last=Данилов |title=Тема: Александр Дюков: Бояться деятельности Комиссии по борьбе с фальсификацией истории могут только те, кто эту историю фальсифицируют |url=http://liberty.ru/Themes/Aleksandr-Dyukov-Boyat-sya-deyatel-nosti-Komissii-po-bor-be-s-fal-sifikaciej-istorii-mogut-tol-ko-te-kto-etu-istoriyu-fal-sificiruyut |language=Russian |publisher=Liberty.ru |date= |accessdate=24 May 2009 }}</ref>   Some Russian media and individual opposition journalists also criticised the developments. The business daily '']'' noted the name of the commission leaves the way clear for the falsification of history in favor of Russia, establishing a "]"{{mdash}}similar to the civil religions upon which authoritarian and totalitarian states have been built in the past.<ref>{{cite news |script-title=ru:От редакции: Наша борьба |url=http://www.vedomosti.ru/newspaper/article.shtml?2009/05/20/196348 |language=Russian |work=] |date=20 May 2009 |accessdate=24 May 2009}}</ref><ref name="rp.pl">{{cite news |title=Rosyjska prasa o "komisji Miedwiediewa" |url=http://www.rp.pl/artykul/29,308222_Rosyjska_prasa_o__komisji_Miedwiediewa_.html |work=] |language=Polish |date=20 May 2009 |accessdate=24 May 2009}}</ref> Journalist and author ] compared the commission to ]'s '']'': "The whole idea was copied from Orwell's ''1984'' and from the famous phrase about Russia as a country with unpredictable past."<ref name="wpost">{{cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/19/AR2009051900931_pf.html|title=Russian commission to guard against false history |last=Gutterman |first=Steve |date=19 May 2009 |newspaper=] |accessdate=1 June 2009}}{{dead link|date=June 2021|bot=medic}}{{cbignore|bot=medic}} </ref> According to the newspaper '']'', the struggle over historical truth in Russia declared at the highest level has taken grotesque form as an article by historian Sergey Kovalyov published on the official website of the ] blamed ] for starting World War II.<ref>{{cite news |first=Иван |last=Сухов |script-title=ru:"Ради исторической правды": На сайте Минобороны Польшу обвинили в начале второй мировой войны |url=http://www.vremya.ru/2009/96/4/230575.html |work=] |language=Russian |date=4 June 2009 |accessdate=6 June 2009}} Kovalyov's article has since been removed from the Ministry's website , but the text is still available via ]'s cached HTML version: (as of 8 June 2009).</ref> Russian opposition politicians attacked the commission as effectively reintroducing state ideology for the first time since the fall of the Soviet Union. According to former Duma deputy, ] (]), the commission and new legislation criminalizing criticism of the Soviet Union allows the state to impose its own idea of political will and ideology and was also part of a continuing rehabilitation of Stalin and the former Soviet dictator's policies.<ref name="telegraph">{{cite news |first=Adrian |last=Blomfield |title=Russia threatens to bar Europeans who deny Red Army 'liberated' them |url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/russia/5350777/Russia-threatens-to-bar-Europeans-who-deny-Red-Army-liberated-them.html |work=] |date=19 May 2009 |accessdate=24 May 2009}}</ref> The Russian daily '']'' noted the name of the commission leaves open the falsification of history ''in favor'' of Russia, establishing a "cult of victory"{{mdash}}similar to civil religions upon which authoritarian and totalitarian states have been built in the past.<ref>{{cite news |title=От редакции: Наша борьба |url=http://www.vedomosti.ru/newspaper/article.shtml?2009/05/20/196348 |language=Russian |work=] |date=20 May 2009 |accessdate=24 May 2009}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Rosyjska prasa o "komisji Miedwiediewa" |url=http://www.rp.pl/artykul/29,308222_Rosyjska_prasa_o__komisji_Miedwiediewa_.html |work=] |language=Polish |date=20 May 2009 |accessdate=24 May 2009}}</ref>   Historian ] criticized the commission for the numbers of professional historians there; he counted three members as historians out of actual five, stating "even they are not recognized among professionals."<ref>{{cite news |script-title=ru:История все стерпит? |work=] |language=Russian |date=20 May 2009 |accessdate=7 June 2009 |quote=Там всего лишь три историка, да и то не имеющих авторитета среди профессионалов. |url=http://kommersant.ru/doc.aspx?DocsID=1172794 }}</ref><ref name="jamestown">{{cite web |url=http://www.jamestown.org/single/?no_cache=1&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=35018&tx_ttnews%5BbackPid%5D=13&cHash=6729b2258e |title=Medvedev Forms a Commission to Protect Russian History |last=Felgenhauer |first=Pavel |date=21 May 2009 |work=] |publisher=] |accessdate=1 June 2009 }}</ref>   === Outside Russia ===   The legislation has received criticism in many countries, mainly former ] countries and former ]. The ] argue about the recognition of the ], ] disputes the ], and ] argues the ]. Critics saysaid the official view from Moscow glossesglossed over Soviet-era crimes. In many countries, particularly the Baltic states which were first invaded by the USSR, the years of the Soviet Union are seen as ahostile ].<ref name="telegraphwsj1" /><ref name="wsj1telegraph" />   Some critics, like Heorhiy Kasyanov from Ukraine'sthe ], saysaid the Kremlin iswas trying to whitewash Soviet history in order to justify its denial of human rights: ''"It's part of the Russian Federation's policy to create an ideological foundation for what is happening in Russia right now."''<ref>{{cite news |title=Russia panel to 'protect history' |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8058087.stm |publisher=] |date= 19 May 2009|accessdate=24 May 2009}}</ref> Historian and author ], a professor at the ], who views the new commission is part of a clampdown on historical scholarship, stated: ''"They're idiots if they think they can change the discussion of Soviet history internationally, but they can make it hard for Russian historians to teach and publish. It's like we're back to the old days."''<ref name="wsj1">{{cite news |first=Andrew |last=Osborn |title=Medvedev Creates History Commission |url=httphttps://onlinewww.wsj.com/articlearticles/SB124277297306236553.html |work=] |date=20 May 2009 |accessdate=24 May 2009}}</ref> The Baltic media has noted that the commission's three "historians" are not all even acknowledged as such in legitimate academia.<ref>{{cite news|first= |last= |title=Krievijas mediji nosoda komisiju Krievijas aizstāvēšanai pret vēstures "viltojumiem" (in Latvian)|url=http://www.nra.lv/zinas/22980-krievijas-mediji-nosoda-komisiju-krievijas-aizstavesanai-pret-vestures-viltojumiem.htm |work=Mediju Nams | date=20 May 2009|accessdate=30 May 2009}}</ref>   Professor Steven Blank of the ] found the formation of the commission to be a further regress toward Soviet and ] practices, glorifying Soviet empire and its crimes.<ref name="panel">{{cite web |last=Frolov |first=Vladimir |url=http://www.russiaprofile.org/page.php?pageid=Experts'%20Panel&articleid=a1243619983 |title=Russia Profile Weekly Experts Panel: Russia's Historical Truth Commission |publisher=Russia Profile |date=29 May 2009 |accessdate=2 June 2009 }}{{Dead link|date=January 2020 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> '']'' found the commission and the law to be a demand "that other countries abandon complexity and fit their history into the Soviet straitjacket" and notes that although it was hard to explain Stalin's crimes convincingly during Soviet era, the same work for Russian propagandists is even harder.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.economist.com/world/europe/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13726216 |title=Magistra vitae? |date=28 May 2009 |newspaper=] |accessdate=3 June 2009}}</ref> Some critics, like Heorhiy Kasyanov from Ukraine's National Academy of Sciences, say the Kremlin is trying to whitewash Soviet history in order to justify its denial of human rights: ''"It's part of the Russian Federation's policy to create an ideological foundation for what is happening in Russia right now."''<ref>{{cite news |title=Russia panel to 'protect history' |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8058087.stm |publisher=] |date= |accessdate=24 May 2009}}</ref> Historian and author ], a professor at the ], who views the new commission is part of a clampdown on historical scholarship, stated: ''"They're idiots if they think they can change the discussion of Soviet history internationally, but they can make it hard for Russian historians to teach and publish. It's like we're back to the old days."''<ref name="wsj1">{{cite news |first=Andrew |last=Osborn |title=Medvedev Creates History Commission |url=http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124277297306236553.html |work=] |date=20 May 2009 |accessdate=24 May 2009}}</ref>   == Kremlin responses to critics == According to the Kremlin, the History Commission was needed as there were increasingly aggressive attempts to rewrite history to Russia's disadvantage. ], a pro-Kremlin lawmaker and member of the commission, said the new body would not imprison people or blacklist historians whose analyses it disagrees with. Its priority, he said, was to challenge what he said were distorted interpretations of the Soviet Union's role in World War II.{{cn|date=September 2021}}   '']'' published the responses of historian ], who said "they try to convince us that it was not we who won the ], that it was Americans." Regarding attempts at equating the Communism imposed on Eastern Europe with Nazism, she claimed that "agrarian peoples: Czechs, Poles, Romanians, Hungarians left us with violins, professors, academicians, cinematographers, whereas Hitler planned for them fates of pig herders and janitors."<ref name="rp.pl"/><!-- original reference to NG would be way better -->   ==Dissolution of the Commission==   A presidential decree issued on 14 February 2012, invalidated all the prior legislation concerning the commission, thus dismantling it.<ref name=dissolution/> Its former member historian ] said that the commission had fulfilled its task leaving a certain legacy behind,<ref name="Kantor">Юлия Кантор. {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120324071833/http://mn.ru/society_history/20120319/313741427.html |date=24 March 2012 }}. Московские новости, № 238, 19 марта 2012 г.</ref> whereas the ] director ] and historian Viktor Pleshkov commented that it had been ineffective and useless.<ref name="Kantor"/>   ==Members==   {{also|Category:Members of the Historical Truth Commission}} *Commission Chairman ], Chief of Staff of the Russian president *], former president of the Chechen Republic, Deputy Justice Minister of Russia *Andrey Artizov, historian, PhD, the head of the Federal Archive Agency *Alexander Chubaryan, historian, PhD, the head of the Institute of World History of the ] *Ivan Demidov, ideologist of ] and leader of ]; head of the Department for Humanitarian Policies and Public Relations of the Domestic Politics Directorate of the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation<ref>{{cite web |last=Umland |first=Andreas |title=Fascist Tendencies in Russia's Political Establishment... The Rise of the International Eurasian Movement |url=http://hnn.us/roundup/entries/88134.html | date=29 May 2009 |publisher=] |accessdate=7 June 2009 }}</ref> *Vasily Khristoforov, ] General *], General, Chief of the General Staff *], politologist, State Duma and United Russia party member *], historian and former State Duma member *], Historian and former State Duma member{{mdash}}"''The time has long been ripe to reconsider the interpretation of world politics in the 20th Century as a fight between the liberal West and Communist USSR.''"<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/question_time/4856290.stm This week's panel from Moscow, regarding *], historian, PhD, before 2010 the head of the Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences a special edition of Question Time, the BBC's premier political programme, airing from Moscow on Thursday, 30 March 2006.</ref> *], historian, TV and radio host *], State Duma member; head of task force in the State Duma Committee for the CIS Affairs and Contacts with Compatriots *V. Zimakov, chief of a department of the ] :and others   ==See also== *] *] *] *] *] *] *], a similar organ in medieval ] *], the ancient crime of insulting the majesty of the sovereign   ==References== {{reflistReflist|30em}}     == External links == * {{ruin iconlang|ru}} * {{ruin iconlang|ru}} * {{cite news |title=An anti-denial law of our own |url=http://www.russiatoday.com/Politics/2009-02-24/An_anti-denial_law_of_our_own.html |publisher=] |date=24 February 2009 |accessdate=24 May 2009}}   {{Decommunization in Europe since 1989}} {{government-stub}} ] ] ]   ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ]

Latest revision as of 04:24, 9 December 2024

The Presidential Commission of the Russian Federation to Counter Attempts to Falsify History to the Detriment of Russia's Interests (Russian: комиссия при президенте Российской Федерации по противодействию попыткам фальсификации истории в ущерб интересам России) was a commission in the Russian Federation that was set up by a decree issued by president Dmitry Medvedev on 15 May 2009, officially to "defend Russia against falsifiers of history and those who would deny Soviet contribution to the victory in World War II". The commission was headed by Medvedev's Chief of staff Sergey Naryshkin. The decree establishing the commission was invalidated on 14 February 2012, and the commission thus ceased to exist. The commission has been described as a further regress toward Soviet and Stalinist practices, glorifying the Soviet Union and its crimes.

Origins, tasks and related legislation

Concerns had been raised in Russia for some time regarding the alleged attempts in some former Soviet countries to revise the outcome of the Nuremberg Trials and rewrite the history of World War II, before the suggestion of the federal Minister of Emergency Situations, Sergey Shoygu, finally raised the issue to that of a state political matter in February 2009.

According to commission chairman Sergey Naryshkin, the tasks of the commission would not be to "re-write" or "politicise" history in the manner of countries like Latvia and Lithuania. Instead, the commission would analyse alleged falsifications of historical facts aimed at tarnishing Russia's international reputation, and advise the Russian president on the ways in which such alleged falsifications can be countered. It was foreseen that the commission would meet at least twice per year.

The commission was staffed by then current and former State Duma members, such as Natalia Narochnitskaya, Sergey Markov and Konstantin Zatulin, and officials of Russia's armed forces and FSB, including General of the army Nikolay Makarov. Among the twenty-eight members were five professional historians: Andrey Artizov (the head of the Federal Archive Agency), Alexander Chubaryan (the head of the Institute of World History of the Russian Academy of Sciences) Natalia Narochnitskaya, Andrey Sakharov (before 2010 the head of the Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences) and Nikolai Svanidze.

Reception

In Russia

In an interview with the website Liberty.ru, historian Alexander Dyukov has said that "only those who falsify history need fear the work of the commission".

Russian opposition politicians attacked the commission as effectively reintroducing state ideology for the first time since the fall of the Soviet Union, which was explicitly forbidden by the Constitution of Russia of that time. According to former Duma deputy, Vladimir Ryzhkov of the Russian Republican Party, the commission and new legislation criminalizing criticism of the Soviet Union allows the state to impose its own idea of political will and ideology and was also part of a continuing rehabilitation of Stalin and the former Soviet dictator's policies. Human rights activist and former lawmaker Lev Ponomaryov dubbed the decree openly totalitarian and claimed that it discredited President Medvedev as a lawyer. Mikhail Gorbachev has also expressed disapproval of Medvedev's decree.

Some Russian media and individual opposition journalists also criticised the developments. The business daily Vedomosti noted the name of the commission leaves the way clear for the falsification of history in favor of Russia, establishing a "cult of victory"—similar to the civil religions upon which authoritarian and totalitarian states have been built in the past. Journalist and author Yulia Latynina compared the commission to George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four: "The whole idea was copied from Orwell's 1984 and from the famous phrase about Russia as a country with unpredictable past." According to the newspaper Vremya Novostei, the struggle over historical truth in Russia declared at the highest level has taken grotesque form as an article by historian Sergey Kovalyov published on the official website of the Russian Ministry of Defence blamed Poland for starting World War II.

Historian Roy Medvedev criticized the commission for the numbers of professional historians there; he counted three members as historians out of actual five, stating "even they are not recognized among professionals."

Outside Russia

The legislation received criticism in many countries, mainly former Warsaw Pact and former Soviet republics. The Baltic states argue about the recognition of the occupation, Ukraine disputes the famine in 1930s, and Poland argues the massacre in Katyn. Critics said the official view from Moscow glossed over Soviet-era crimes. In many countries the years of the Soviet Union are seen as hostile Soviet occupations.

Some critics, like Heorhiy Kasyanov from the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, said the Kremlin was trying to whitewash Soviet history in order to justify its denial of human rights: "It's part of the Russian Federation's policy to create an ideological foundation for what is happening in Russia right now." Historian and author Orlando Figes, a professor at the University of London, who views the new commission is part of a clampdown on historical scholarship, stated: "They're idiots if they think they can change the discussion of Soviet history internationally, but they can make it hard for Russian historians to teach and publish. It's like we're back to the old days."

Professor Steven Blank of the U.S. Army War College found the formation of the commission to be a further regress toward Soviet and Stalinist practices, glorifying Soviet empire and its crimes. The Economist found the commission and the law to be a demand "that other countries abandon complexity and fit their history into the Soviet straitjacket" and notes that although it was hard to explain Stalin's crimes convincingly during Soviet era, the same work for Russian propagandists is even harder.

Kremlin responses to critics

According to the Kremlin, the History Commission was needed as there were increasingly aggressive attempts to rewrite history to Russia's disadvantage. Sergei Markov, a pro-Kremlin lawmaker and member of the commission, said the new body would not imprison people or blacklist historians whose analyses it disagrees with. Its priority, he said, was to challenge what he said were distorted interpretations of the Soviet Union's role in World War II.

Nezavisimaya Gazeta published the responses of historian Natalya Narochnitskaya, who said "they try to convince us that it was not we who won the Great Patriotic War, that it was Americans." Regarding attempts at equating the Communism imposed on Eastern Europe with Nazism, she claimed that "agrarian peoples: Czechs, Poles, Romanians, Hungarians left us with violins, professors, academicians, cinematographers, whereas Hitler planned for them fates of pig herders and janitors."

Dissolution of the Commission

A presidential decree issued on 14 February 2012, invalidated all the prior legislation concerning the commission, thus dismantling it. Its former member historian Alexander Chubarian said that the commission had fulfilled its task leaving a certain legacy behind, whereas the State Hermitage director Mikhail Piotrovsky and historian Viktor Pleshkov commented that it had been ineffective and useless.

Members

  • Commission Chairman Sergey Naryshkin, Chief of Staff of the Russian president
  • Alu Alkhanov, former president of the Chechen Republic, Deputy Justice Minister of Russia
  • Andrey Artizov, historian, PhD, the head of the Federal Archive Agency
  • Alexander Chubaryan, historian, PhD, the head of the Institute of World History of the Russian Academy of Sciences
  • Ivan Demidov, ideologist of United Russia and leader of its youth wing; head of the Department for Humanitarian Policies and Public Relations of the Domestic Politics Directorate of the Presidential Administration of the Russian Federation
  • Vasily Khristoforov, Federal Security Service General
  • Nikolay Makarov, General, Chief of the General Staff
  • Sergey Markov, politologist, State Duma and United Russia party member
  • Natalia Narochnitskaya, historian and former State Duma member
  • Andrey Sakharov, historian, PhD, before 2010 the head of the Institute of Russian History of the Russian Academy of Sciences
  • Nikolai Svanidze, historian, TV and radio host
  • Konstantin Zatulin, State Duma member; head of task force in the State Duma Committee for the CIS Affairs and Contacts with Compatriots
  • V. Zimakov, chief of a department of the Foreign Intelligence Service
and others

See also

References

  1. Медведев создал комиссию при президенте РФ по противодействию попыткам фальсификации истории в ущерб интересам России (in Russian). Interfax. 19 May 2009. Retrieved 24 May 2009.
  2. УКАЗ Президента РФ от 15.05.2009 N 549 Archived 23 May 2009 at the Wayback Machine (in Russian)
  3. ^ Указом Президента Российской Федерации от 14 февраля 2012 г. № 183—Presidential decree of February 14, 2012 No. 183 repealed ("abrogated") the original decree: May 15, 2009 No. 549 (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2009, No. 21, p. 2541); and amendments: January 22, 2010 No. 97 (Collected Legislation Russian Federation, 2010, No. 4, p. 372); and September 8, 2010 No. 1103 (Collected Legislation Russian Federation, 2010, No. 37, article 4644).
  4. ^ Frolov, Vladimir (29 May 2009). "Russia Profile Weekly Experts Panel: Russia's Historical Truth Commission". Russia Profile. Retrieved 2 June 2009.
  5. E.g.: Russian Federation, Permanent Mission to the UN. "Involvement of the Lettish SS Legion in War Crimes in 1941–1945 and the Attempts to Revise the Verdict of the Nuremberg Tribunal in Latvia". United Nations website. Archived from the original on 23 November 2005. Retrieved 2 December 2005. Also: Russian Federation, Permanent Mission to the UN. "Involvement of the Estonian SS Legion in War Crimes in 1941–1945 and the Attempts to Revise the Verdict of the Nuremberg Tribunal in Estonia". United Nations website. Archived from the original on 11 May 2009. Retrieved 23 June 2009.
  6. Комиссия против фальсификации истории обещает не переписывать книги и не учить ученых (in Russian). NEWSru. 17 June 2009. Retrieved 18 June 2009.
  7. Artizov biography Archived 25 April 2012 at the Wayback Machine at arhidelo.ru (in Russian)
  8. Chubaryan biography at planetguide.info (in Russian)
  9. Данилов, Вячеслав. Тема: Александр Дюков: Бояться деятельности Комиссии по борьбе с фальсификацией истории могут только те, кто эту историю фальсифицируют (in Russian). Liberty.ru. Archived from the original on 27 May 2009. Retrieved 24 May 2009.
  10. ^ Blomfield, Adrian (19 May 2009). "Russia threatens to bar Europeans who deny Red Army 'liberated' them". The Daily Telegraph. London. Retrieved 24 May 2009.
  11. Иванова, Ульяна; Урсулов, Дмитрий (19 May 2009). Медведев создал комиссию по борьбе с искажением истории (in Russian). ИА Собкор®ru. Retrieved 6 June 2009.
  12. "Gorbachev blasts Kremlin 'managed' democracy in Russia". Daily News and Analysis. Press Trust of India. 22 May 2009. Retrieved 6 June 2009.
  13. От редакции: Наша борьба. Vedomosti (in Russian). 20 May 2009. Retrieved 24 May 2009.
  14. ^ "Rosyjska prasa o "komisji Miedwiediewa"". Rzeczpospolita (in Polish). 20 May 2009. Retrieved 24 May 2009.
  15. Gutterman, Steve (19 May 2009). "Russian commission to guard against false history". The Washington Post. Retrieved 1 June 2009.
  16. Сухов, Иван (4 June 2009). "Ради исторической правды": На сайте Минобороны Польшу обвинили в начале второй мировой войны. Vremya Novostei (in Russian). Retrieved 6 June 2009. Kovalyov's article has since been removed from the Ministry's website mil.ru, but the text is still available via Google's cached HTML version: (as of 8 June 2009).
  17. История все стерпит?. Kommersant (in Russian). 20 May 2009. Retrieved 7 June 2009. Там всего лишь три историка, да и то не имеющих авторитета среди профессионалов.
  18. Felgenhauer, Pavel (21 May 2009). "Medvedev Forms a Commission to Protect Russian History". Eurasia Daily Monitor. The Jamestown Foundation. Retrieved 1 June 2009.
  19. ^ Osborn, Andrew (20 May 2009). "Medvedev Creates History Commission". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 24 May 2009.
  20. "Russia panel to 'protect history'". BBC News. 19 May 2009. Retrieved 24 May 2009.
  21. "Magistra vitae?". The Economist. 28 May 2009. Retrieved 3 June 2009.
  22. ^ Юлия Кантор. Без фальсификаций Archived 24 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine. Московские новости, № 238, 19 марта 2012 г.
  23. Umland, Andreas (29 May 2009). "Fascist Tendencies in Russia's Political Establishment... The Rise of the International Eurasian Movement". History News Network. Retrieved 7 June 2009.

External links

Anti-communism in Europe since 1989
European hearings,
resolutions and
declarations
Legislation
Institutions
Media
Opposition
Categories: