| Revision as of 07:16, 16 January 2021 editAnonQuixote (talk | contribs)287 edits OneClickArchiver archived Deleting others' talk page comments at Misplaced Pages:Main Page/Errors to User talk:AnonQuixote/Archive 1← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 02:29, 12 June 2023 edit undoJibal (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,852 edits →Arbitration enforcement action appeal: ReplyTag: Reply | ||
| (25 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| {{Archives}} | {{Archives}} | ||
| == |
== Links to draft articles == | ||
| ] Please do not introduce ] in actual articles to ] articles, as you did to ]. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the ]. {{#ifeq:{{lc:}}|yes|An edit has converted these links, into links to the not-currently-existing page (redlinks) where the draft will be placed if it is eventually accepted. Thus the links will automatically become valid links aimed at the correct target when and if the draft is accepted.|These links have been removed.}} Thank you.<!-- Template:Uw-draft-link --> - ] (]) 11:05, 18 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
| I just wanted to say that I really like your username {{smiley|:)}} Happy editing! ] <small>]</small> 17:46, 8 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | :Sorry, wasn't aware of that guideline. Thanks for letting me know. I will wait for the draft to be reviewed. ] (]) 12:45, 18 January 2021 (UTC) | ||
| ==Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction== | |||
| == January 2021 == | |||
| {{Ivmbox | |||
| |2=Commons-emblem-hand.svg | |||
| |imagesize=50px | |||
| |1=The following sanction now applies to you: | |||
| {{Talkquote|1=You are banned from editing or discussing anything to do with the post-1932 American politics topic area (]) for 3 months, ].}} | |||
| ] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors ] while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at ]. Here is Misplaced Pages's ], and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Misplaced Pages''!'' ''Please do not accuse me of edit warring. I did not, and I do not. You changed the infobox information without first gaining consensus on talk, and I left a friendly note in my edit summary, "How about waiting until others weigh in on talk for consensus before making this change?" Changing infobox information on the ] without first seeking consensus could be considered a controversial change, which is why I undid your edit. We are all volunteers here, and it sometimes takes time for others to add their comments to article talk pages. Thank you.''<!-- Template:uw-agf1 --> ] (]) 21:40, 14 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :{{replyto|Netherzone}} Hi, my intent was not to accuse anyone of edit warring but to ask editors not to do so and to use the talk page to discuss instead. Since the point of contention was an unsourced claim in a BLP article, my belief is that the potentially libelous information must be removed first, then discussed to determine if a source can be found to justify its reinstatement. Apologies if my comment came across as hostile. ] (]) 21:47, 14 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ::You may wish to think about the fact that you were the person who reverted the wikilink three times within an hour or so. That link has been stable in the article for some time before you decided to change it without first gaining consensus. Please consider reading about the ] process. You can always add a "citation needed" maintenance template instead of serial reverts. Be well. ] (]) 21:59, 14 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :::Misplaced Pages has a policy that unsourced, potentially libelous statements must be removed immediately, even if it means exceeding three reverts: ]. This reflects the policy that that Misplaced Pages must rely on ], especially in ] where there may be additional legal concerns. If you want to advocate for adding back the claim, with a reliable source, feel free to discuss on the ]. ] (]) 01:02, 15 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
| You have been sanctioned per a . Clearly you have not heeded the warning issued in that AE report, especially that "greater care is expected." | |||
| ==Accusation of edit warring== | |||
| This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an ] under the authority of the ]'s decision at ] and, if applicable, the procedure described at ]. This sanction has been recorded in the ]. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the ] to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be ] for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions. | |||
| You may appeal this sanction using the process described ]. I recommend that you use the ] if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you.<!-- Template:AE sanction.--> <nowiki></nowiki> ] 00:18, 20 January 2021 (UTC)}} | |||
| :I have appealed this decision at ]. ] (]) 01:39, 20 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
| === Arbitration enforcement action appeal === | |||
| AnonQuixote, your arbitration enforcement action appeal has been declined at {{slink|Special:Permalink/1001789570#Arbitration enforcement action appeal by AnonQuixote}}. Please review the ], the ], and the ], which outline some of the expectations for editing Misplaced Pages articles in controversial topic areas. — ''''']''' <small>]</small>'' 10:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
| :This is blatantly unfair. I have decided to stop editing Misplaced Pages as I believe it is not worth dealing with this toxicity. Congratulations on driving away yet another contributor. ] (]) 11:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ::LOL | |||
| ::Toxicity was indeed the problem. ] (]) 02:29, 12 June 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Username == | |||
| Just as a note, I closed that AN discussion that involved a (very brief) discussion of your username. Those who commented (and myself) felt that your username is closer to "Don Quixote" than anything QAnon related, so I do not think you ''must'' rename your account (unless you want to, of course). ] (]) 20:53, 20 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| == Your submission at ]: ] has been accepted == | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] 06:11, 15 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
| <div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em; width: 90%;">] '''], which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br /> | |||
| :{{replyto|Vincentvikram}} Misplaced Pages has a clear policy that unsourced material must be removed from biographies of living persons. If you want to suggest getting rid of Misplaced Pages's sourcing, BLP, or neutrality policies my talk page is not the right place to do so. ] (]) 06:13, 16 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
| Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Misplaced Pages! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br /> | |||
| ::{{u|AnonQuixote}} that is a fast moving page and I dont have the time to go back and check but I did see you revert at least two things multiple times. However, I find your question to me rather a straw man argument. I would suggest looking up logical fallacies. Best! ] 06:20, 16 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| The article has been assessed as '''Start-Class''', which is recorded on its ]. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they ] over time. You may like to take a look at the ] to see how you can improve the article. | |||
| ::::LOL for the "harassment" phrase. I am aware of what is going on and can see how fast the edits are moving. I just have a day and night job which is outside Misplaced Pages and don't have the time right now to provide diff's. However, if you prefer, I can look it up when I can free myself. Have a great day! ] 06:55, 16 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now ] without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to ] if you prefer.</div> | |||
| == American politics discretionary sanctions alert == | |||
| If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks"></span>'''.<span class="unconfirmed-show"> Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to ] without posting a request to ].</span> | |||
| {{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' | |||
| If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}. | |||
| You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called ] is in effect. Any administrator may impose ] on editors who do not strictly follow ], or the ], when making edits related to the topic. | |||
| Thanks again, and happy editing! | |||
| For additional information, please see the ] and the ] decision ]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. | |||
| ] (]) 08:52, 3 February 2021 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc talk--> | |||
| }}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> ― ] <sup>]</sup> 06:43, 16 January 2021 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 02:29, 12 June 2023
 Archives | |
|
|
Links to draft articles
Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Don C. Talayesva. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:05, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, wasn't aware of that guideline. Thanks for letting me know. I will wait for the draft to be reviewed. AnonQuixote (talk) 12:45, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction
The following sanction now applies to you:
You are banned from editing or discussing anything to do with the post-1932 American politics topic area (WP:AP2) for 3 months, broadly construed.
You have been sanctioned per a complaint at the AE noticeboard. Clearly you have not heeded the warning issued in that AE report, especially that "greater care is expected."
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at WP:ARBAP2#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. El_C 00:18, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
- I have appealed this decision at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Arbitration_enforcement_action_appeal_by_AnonQuixote. AnonQuixote (talk) 01:39, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Arbitration enforcement action appeal
AnonQuixote, your arbitration enforcement action appeal has been declined at Special:Permalink/1001789570 § Arbitration enforcement action appeal by AnonQuixote. Please review the policy on consensus, the guideline on disruptive editing, and the guide to dispute resolution, which outline some of the expectations for editing Misplaced Pages articles in controversial topic areas. — Newslinger talk 10:19, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- This is blatantly unfair. I have decided to stop editing Misplaced Pages as I believe it is not worth dealing with this toxicity. Congratulations on driving away yet another contributor. AnonQuixote (talk) 11:37, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- LOL
- Toxicity was indeed the problem. Jibal (talk) 02:29, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Username
Just as a note, I closed that AN discussion that involved a (very brief) discussion of your username. Those who commented (and myself) felt that your username is closer to "Don Quixote" than anything QAnon related, so I do not think you must rename your account (unless you want to, of course). Primefac (talk) 20:53, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Albert Yava has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Misplaced Pages! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Devonian Wombat (talk) 08:52, 3 February 2021 (UTC)