Revision as of 03:05, 15 January 2007 editWLU (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers52,243 editsm →Reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:36, 1 January 2024 edit undoZinnober9 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers52,033 editsm Fixed Lint errors on this page (table tag errors) | ||
(62 intermediate revisions by 31 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{not around|3=29 July 2008}} | |||
{{user WikiProject Sword of Truth}} | {{user WikiProject Sword of Truth}} | ||
{{clear}} | |||
==T. Goodkind== | |||
==T. Goodkind== | |||
I would like to extend a welcome. I see you have taken a good look at Goodkind’s page. Some good work I see. Although Terry has no Internet, he would like some to add some content and pertinent facts. Can you help? Mystar 05:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
{| id="usertags" class="noprint" style="border: 1px solid #999; background: #fff; margin: 0 0 .5em 1em; text-align: center; padding: 5px; float: {{{float|right}}}; clear: {{{clear|right}}}; " | |||
| | |||
{|style="border:0px solid #e6e1ff; background-color:transparent;" align=right | |||
|{{WM|center|User:Mystar|05}} | |||
|} | |||
|} | |||
: I am giving you this award for your worka on the barnstar project. on Sword of truth. ] 02:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC) ] 02:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC) ] 02:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
I would like to extend a welcome. I see you have taken a good look at Goodkind’s page. Some good work I see. Although Terry has no Internet, he would like some to add some content '''and''' pertinent facts. Can you help? Mystar 05:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Sure, I'd love to help. I'm always looking to improve the status and quality of articles on Terry Goodkind and his books. Let me know what you need help with, and I'll see if I can be of assistance. - ] 14:40, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | :Sure, I'd love to help. I'm always looking to improve the status and quality of articles on Terry Goodkind and his books. Let me know what you need help with, and I'll see if I can be of assistance. - ] 14:40, 11 July 2006 (UTC) | ||
==Plot Introductions== | ==Plot Introductions== | ||
Line 10: | Line 20: | ||
Ok, take it easy. - ] 15:13, 6 September 2006 (UTC) | Ok, take it easy. - ] 15:13, 6 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
No offence, but the info contained within the Plot summery is fine, it is nothing more than would be found on any info site or any book description. They only give pertinent info and no spoilers. | No offence, but the info contained within the Plot summery is fine, it is nothing more than would be found on any info site or any book description. They only give pertinent info and no spoilers. | ||
Line 40: | Line 49: | ||
==Back== | |||
If you have something to discuss regarding page edits, please do so on talk pages of the articles, or on my own talk page. Using the edit summary gives me no chance to reply and does not allow you to disclose the full rationale for your edits. ] 18:13, 30 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Hi Mystar, glad to see you're back. I don't think you've missed much (as you can tell, I haven't made almost any edits recently, 'cause I've been busy focusing on other things). Lunch would be nice - but unfortunately I live in Ann Arbor, not Lansing :-) - so it's kinda far for lunch. Thanks for the offer though - ] 01:41, 18 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
== User notice: temporary 3RR block == | |||
<div style="background-color: #f9f9f9; border: 1px solid red; padding: 3px;"> | |||
==Regarding reversions made on ] ] to ]== | |||
{| class="user-block" | |||
|| ] | |||
|| You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. | |||
|}<!-- Template:3RR5 --> The duration of the is 12 hours. ] 09:13, 1 October 2006 (UTC)</div> | |||
My dear Mr. Connolley, I offer up my sincere regrets. I see your point and I will take my medicine, as a man should. | |||
After discussing it at length with several admins, I have come to see your point and heartily agree in my error. I was acting in Good Faith that what I saw as open contempt and vandalisms toward Terry Goodkind's page (see any contribs by WLU to assure your self of bad faith editing and edit warring), I was on the IRC channel while this was occurring and was asking for advise and help. Even they felt she was exerting overt ownership and was in the wrong. But that doesn’t make me right; I did err, and should be held accountable. I do appreciate your intervening and your insight. I am still relatively new to Misplaced Pages and not up to speed on all the guidelines and rules. I am learning and your efforts have added me in being a better editor. | |||
== Thanks for your well wishes == | |||
Today I spend a great deal of time with a couple of admins and most notably ]. JWSchmidt, helped me get a clear picture of my actions and what things I can do in the future to circumvent such actions again. As I told the Admins on the channel, I'll not disagree or postulate any unfairness. I’m a grown man as I will stand up and take my medicine. I will also not speak to WLU's actions as they speak for themselves ass do her contribs, nor will I presume to hypothesize on WLU's current torrent of attacks. | |||
Hi there, I'm sorry for not responding earlier. Thanks for your well wishes, and also allow me to offer my condolences for your daughter. Thanks again, --] 02:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
I am sorry for my actions, and shall endeavor to try harder. | |||
--] 00:54, 2 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
== |
==Smiley Award== | ||
Feel free to place this award on your user page, as a token of appreciation for your contributions. If you're willing to help spread the good cheer to others, please see the project page for the Random Smiley Award at: ] | |||
<div style="clear:right; float:right; width:300px; background-color:#f9f0C9; border: 1px solid #888850; padding:2px;">]<small>For your contributions to Misplaced Pages and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted <b>]</b><br/>originated by ] <br/>(])</small></div> | |||
--] <small>('']'')</small> 21:52, 31 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
==Sword of Truth Wiki Invite== | |||
Thanks for the invite. I have joined the SOT wiki project. I will do what I can to improve the pages, mostly with plot summaries / character pages. ] 23:03, 20 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
==AfD notice== | |||
I guess youleave me no choice but to lower myself to your petty squable and post such thens as your attacks, bad faith, page ownership admissions, removing other posters comments etc. how truly OCD petty...--] 01:46, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
I notice that you have edited the Sword of Truth pages, and are a member of the Sword of Truth project; as such, I felt that you should know that the pages are currently being considered for deletion ] | |||
And it was voted a Speedy Keep! ] 05:27, 27 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
This is not a rant, and this is not a petty squabble. This is the first step in a dispute mediation process in which both our conducts will be weighed against each other, and binding arbitration could result. I will end my request and not pursue this further if you stop stalking me and stop making tendentious, inflammatory edits. ] 03:02, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
==]== | |||
This arbitration case has closed and the decision is available at the link above. {{user|WLU}} and {{user|Mystar}} are prohibited from interacting with each other or commenting on each other, directly or indirectly, on any Misplaced Pages page, and may be blocked for up to one week for each violation. For the purpose of this remedy, any edit by either WLU or Mystar to one of the articles over which they had previously been in conflict (including, but not limited to, ] and ]) shall be considered an interaction with the other party. For the arbitration committee, ] 12:33, 23 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
Again kindly stop editing my talk page. You are wrong this is petty...on your part. Pot calling th eKettle black and all... While I am in no way completely innocent of past actions, they were in the past. I have conducted my actions with Good Faith, and most of them checking first with several Misplaced Pages people and admins before making them. Yeah I have proof don't worry :) | |||
== Thanks == | |||
You have removed other users comments, edited in bad faith, owned pages and attacked me as well as admitted you having an agenda against Goodkind where you started all this crapola.. It really is in your contribs you cannot hide it. Removing other users commentaries is not a very good thing to do. | |||
Thanks for your welcome and helpful links. I appreciate it. ] 07:20, 27 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
As I've said. Yours agenda is clear. You dislike Goodkind, haven't even read him, yet you feel totally knowledgeable in attempting to add content that you know nothing about. Simply allowing other to think for yourself and make your mind up for you. You read a rant and think it justified, when you haven’t even taken the time or initiative to verify it for yourself.... seems to me there is a huge problem with that. | |||
== ] == | |||
OH your "BFF Terry" also didn't earn you and brownie points. It is attacks and aggressive name calling/smearing that marks your agenda clearly. | |||
In the future please refrain from ugliness of that sort. It is very unbecoming of a lady. | |||
I just wanted to inform you that stubbiness of an article isn't a particularly good deletion argument, and the band clearly passes WP:MUSIC, as it has members from a number of famous, notable bands-<span style="font-family:stop; color:purple;">K</span>]<span style="font-family:stop; color:blue;">ng</span>]]] 03:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC) | |||
In short, you may well try and get an action taken against me, but you are causing a great deal of exasperation along the way, simply because you have an agenda (your admission), which doesn’t bode well for your position. I’ve been editing in good faith. I’ve made some good edits, you simply cannot stand to have them stand is the problem. I happen to know a great deal of many herbal remedies. Your attack against me for taking an interest in that page is an attack and unwarranted. Things like trying to stir up trouble also go against Wiki policy. Trying to incite angst among users is a no no… so an admin just told me. That is not my problem. Page ownership is an overall Wiki problem. | |||
== Have a good time == | |||
I know I’ve been aggressive in the past, with good reason. One of them was banned, and as I’ve stated I’ve plenty of outside proof of planed attacks on TG’s pages as well as sources out side Wiki that specifically incite people to do what was being done. | |||
I hope you have a good time at your summit. Hit me up when you get back, I have some ideas for a trans-wiki of Ice and Fire material that might also pertain to the Sword of Truth articles (and would get us both out from under wikipedia's rules.) ] 03:11, 2 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
BUT, my edits as of late are and have been good ones, and have also been discussed with seasoned Wikipedians before I made them. I spend a great deal of time on Misplaced Pages IRC discussing these things. I’d take a gooooood long look in the mirror | |||
:I'm sorry this relpy is so late in coming. As I was talking about before there was some discussion about taking the more superfluous Ice and Fire articles and moving them to a private wiki. We were going to tras-wiki them over to a dedicated wiki but the request was denied. I have some hope that this will change in the near future but if not there has been talk of hosting the software and domain by the folks. The main benefit to doing this is that we would be able to get as crufty and indepth with the material as we wanted to and we wouldn't be constrained by the vast host of rules that govern fictional (or any other) material here at wikipedia. | |||
before I moved forward were I you. The pot calling the kettle black isn’t going to sit well with anyone. | |||
:All this got me to thinking that you too might want to consider doing the same with the Sword of Truth material. I know that you admin/own the terrygoodkind.net site and so it would be really easy for you to host your own wiki over there! You and whom ever else you want could be the administrtors, you could set up your own rules and could restrict or open the ability to edit the wiki to a few people or anyone that would want to edit. The standard just requires registration which would make it easier to curb vandalism. | |||
Stop owning pages, stop with your agenda, be an honorable person of your word and act in good faith and we will be just fine. | |||
The choice is yours. --] 03:33, 9 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
:If I remember correctly there is already a Sword of Truth "themed" wikia over at wikia.com but I'm not sure who runs it, you migh want to get in touch with him, or just host one yourself. Anyway my plan was to try and get all the Song of Ice and Fire pages with the exception of the main ] article and all the individual novel pages trans wikied. Then we would just link to the seperate wiki in the external links sections of these articles. Hit me up and tell me what you think of the idea (both for Ice and Fire and Sword of Truth) when you get some time. Feel free to do so either on my talk page or personal email, whatever is easier for you. Cheers. ] 14:47, 20 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Hello, I'm sorry it's been awhile, and I'm not sure if all of you are still interested in formal mediation, but I recently agreed to mediate that case. Please either accept or reject me as a mediator there, and if you accept, please let me know if you would prefer public or ] mediation. If it's a stale issue, just say so. ] (]|]|]) 16:00, 14 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
== |
== Confessor == | ||
Heyyy thanks for the message. Yeah I'm a big fan of Goodkind... a new one, I'll admit, but I'm very compelled by the philosophy and have been forced to reconsider my opinion on Ayn Rand. hahaha. Yeah, I'm currently in the middle of Naked Empire. I'm seriously thinking about NOT reading Chainfire untill Confessor is out... so far the cliffhangers and such and just the general way the story compells me has been managable because I can always get the next book, and I won't have that luxury at the end of Phantom! | |||
Hi Mystar, glad to see you're back. I don't think you've missed much (as you can tell, I haven't made almost any edits recently, 'cause I've been busy focusing on other things). Lunch would be nice - but unfortunately I live in Ann Arbor, not Lansing :-) - so it's kinda far for lunch. Thanks for the offer though - ] 01:41, 18 October 2006 (UTC) | |||
<br><br> | |||
Thanks for your kind words, I know I'm pretty bad, hahaha, I just copied a lot of the coding from the other books' pages and filled in the proper info. Glad to know more experienced types are around to make everything right. | |||
<br><br> | |||
Anyway, see ya around the pages! | |||
<br>--] 09:09, 22 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Come on man == | |||
Please don't edit the SoT main page, I don't want anything to blow back up esp after the ArbCom case. If you need some minor changes made or anything I'll be more than happy to make them for you. Still waiting to hear back on the Transwiki deal too. Take care. ] 16:43, 27 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
By your own admission | |||
“WLU to Omnilord- | |||
'''I want to see Mystar banned''' 'cause he's been wikistalking me, 'cause he doesn't engage in actual discussion with anyone who disagrees with him, 'cause he uses wikipedia policies punitively (and improperly), ''''cause he's generally a crappy editor and 'cause he's generally disruptive.''' You could argue the same about me, but I don't think this holds in recent months. Anyway, I'm happy enough if he just ameliorates his conduct to civil and reasonable. '''As for wanting TG shamed, I'd say I've downgraded to wanting at least the fact that his books involve strong and explicit violence, torture, etc.''' It was my main reaction to reading WFR, and the reason I stopped reading at that point”. | |||
From . | |||
Actually the SOT page is well within my right to edit. As it was stated, I will refrain from the TG page. I clarified this with the arbcom team. As the SOT page was not in the area of contention, as well as WLU openly stating she/he had no problem with my editing that page. | |||
As for the Transwiki thing, I'm all for it. I've only had limited access as of late due to my heavy travel schedule. I just finished up my last speaking engagement for a bit, so I'll have more time to devote to working on it. ] 01:31, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
::Try this -> http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Sword_of_Truth&diff=89556990&oldid=88139333 ] 00:38, 23 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Okay, I had been under the impression from the ArbCom that the SoT main page was also included. There is no really stress on getting anything moved ''now'' so no worries about getting anything done right away. I'll talk to you about it when you get some extra time, later. ] 05:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC) | |||
::Again, familiarize yourself with the full scope of the material and don't edit until you do. | |||
== Thanks == | |||
See you’re the one with the problem… not me. Your own witch-hunt is disgusting. | |||
Thanks for your comments. I know what you mean about work, I have just had to finish up a few big projects, which has kept me, unfortunatly, occupied. I have begun to write up new pages for Kahlan and Richard Rahl, and will post them soon so they can be edited/torn apart. I cant decide wether to simply edit and update the existing pages on the characters and leave them where they are, or rewrite them and add them to the all encompassing characters page. Any thoughts? ] 14:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
WIkipedia police is to edit! BOLDLY! I've done that. Misplaced Pages is not your soapbox to call me a "crappy editor" | |||
] 02:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Back== | |||
Yup, I'm back. I probably won't be as active as I was once upon a time, but I'll be around to help with minor cleanups and projects. - ] 17:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
==AfD nomination of ]== | |||
::Thats the other thing, stop typing to sound like you're riding on a high horse, it is extremely condesending and is half the reason you and other like NeoFreak get almost no respect from people like mystar. ] 20:25, 22 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
]An article that you have been involved in editing, ], has been listed for ]. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:adw --> ] (]) 17:16, 20 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
== 3RR == | |||
It is with great trepidation that I even reply to you as most exchanges we've had in the past were less than constuctive. I'm not going to argue that validity of my 3RR entry as that will be decided there or the "bad faith" editing accusations because that's an argument that is going no where. As for the "long standing version" you are almost correct. The old version of the Goodkind page had the phrase in question removed for the same reasons I removed it this time. This version was accepted by everyone (check history and Talk logs) as acceptable. Not until I deployed for about a month was this phrase put back in. I took this corrective action after I got back by changing it back to the agreed upon version. The logs speak for themselves. ] 22:15, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
I've re-read the 3RR rules and you are in fact correct about the 3RR rules, my apologies. Still I'm letting my report stand for reasons you can see on the report board. ] 22:22, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
My response to you | |||
The sad fact is that I did violate the 3RR. I was wrong and I did apologize. I also explained myself and took my punishment like a man, as I was wrong. But as is Neofreak's fashion he uses past mistakes as a tool to try and beat down people with them. Sad indeed. | |||
Early on I edited his precious A song of Ice and Fire pages. They were good edits and his fellows even said so, yet Neofreak felt it nessary to retaliate and that he did. | |||
To that end we have since set up a Misplaced Pages project and it is going well. Sadly Neofreak feels it is nessary to pop in from time to time and revert something adding chiding remarks like “fanboy” to illicit retaliation. The fact is that we have a consensus on the terminology he keeps trying to remove what he doesn’t like. That being anything he thinks that puts Goodkind in a positive light. The wording he keeps removing is sourced, factual and proper. It was agreed upon by consensus and it has stood for some time. | |||
My edits have been in good faith and my long past attitude toward spite removed. | |||
As anyone reading my contribs can see I edit in good faith and with proper referenced material. I cannot help it if two wikistalkers are out to get me and they will do everything they can to make me look bad. Again fact is I edit as per protocols BOLDLY! And that is not a crime. Defending my work is not a crime. I never have any problems save with Neofreak and one other user. So to say I’m a bad person as Neofreak does would be a lie | |||
Well it is all to clear that NeoFreak has an issue the real problem is that it is with anyone who disagrees with him. Neofreak started editing Goodkind's pages in retaliation to an edit or two I made on his beloved A song of Ice and Fire, even his associates said they were good edits. So Neofreak mad a mad plunge into edit warring on the Goodkind pages..,but I digress... | |||
We have a Wiki project for these pages and are working to bring them into better standing. Neofreak is aware of this and as you can see has not joined. The wording we have has been there for a while and was agreed upon by consensus. It is all to clear in reading Neofreak's past contribs to these Goodkind pages he has a burr under his bonnet about Goodkind (as do a few ASOIAF fans) and as such seeks out every opportunity to disrupt the work being done and then also spits out a word or two like the "fanboy" comment trying to illicit retaliatory warring. | |||
I seek only to correct what we have as agreement with other people on the project. To that end Neofreak is the one who was the vandal.] 22:56, 21 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
:Are you talking to me or did you just want this rant on the record? ] 01:09, 22 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
==Your comment on my talk page== | |||
On lupus. I agree more needs to b e said. However, I fear that Oliver the very plastic surgeon will husttle over there and delete what I write, and replace it with promotional text. If you are interestied, you should look at the breast implant article, and the talkpage. The article was stunning in how Oliver misstated studies he cited to minimize ore ven trivialize a major risk with implants -rupture. Any input there on the talk page would be welcome. The article is locked at Oliver's version. It reads like a promo handout . Risks are minimal, we have a wealth of studies that show they are etc etc. Misrepresenting the rupture data; No mention of the lack of long term data to determine rupture rate over time (especially past 10 years) of what the effects are of migrated silicone. I could go on. I fear the article is hopeless since Oliver seems to 'own it' and must spend more time on WIkipedia promoting the things he sells, than is spent working, That may be a good thing, if it keeps even one woman from seeking his "services" - If his concern for his patients are consistent with his concern for the accuracy of the article....any woman should run, not walk, away from his office. I have a fear that nothing will happen with this artilce, unless more people come in to help with the 'mediation' - eg, give input on proposed versions. Oliver will probably not cooperate, since he has no incentive to do so. His interest is not accuracy.] 06:10, 1 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
Yeah I've been following that whole thing. My wife and I have great interest in that area and I agree Oliver is using his so-called "station of profession" to bully the page. The fact that it was locked is outrageous and less than fair. I don't think he would get away with changing the page, but we can try to work toward keeping that from happening. Having a wikistalker I'm more than familiar with people like that following you back to your edits and wreaking havoc with them for no more than their pleasure. I'm sure my wikienemy will also be on the prowl to Oliver to come over and edit. | |||
Take solace though, actions of people like them are not what bother me, on the contrary...I find them sad amusing little people, as it is the fact that they are clueless in their own delusion and think they get to people like me. While it is important information, don't let it attach to you, rather allow it to make you think. As a wise person once said "People are stupid! They are willing to believe a lie, either because they fear it to be true, or they want it to be true". So they bury themselves in their little world of delusion to the exclusion of all else. Think of the solution! Not the problem. The problem exists, only the solution will of value.] 13:48, 1 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Mediation == | |||
G'day Ron, | |||
Here is my rationale for why I wanted a reply from WikieZachl: | |||
# I wanted to make sure that I had followed proceedures properly and the case hadn't been closed because I had, or had not done something that resulted in it not moving forward. This is for my own learning goals and in case I faced a similar situation in the future. | |||
# I wanted to ascertain whether you had failed to engage in the mediation process, and this was why the case was closed. Were this the case, this means my next step, should you keep on wikistalking me (which you fortunately seem to have ceased beyond cat's claw, SLE, Barbara Hambly and eccentric contraction), would be arbitration, which could be unpleasant for both of us. | |||
You should know by now I don't do things idly (unless it's my own user page, that's my fun place). Hopefully you understand why I'm pursuing this to the extent I am, and won't bother putting anything else up on my talk page unless it's got something worthwhile to say. I removed your comment from my talk page because I don't really care what you have to say about the topic - the information I want is from WikieZachl, not more melodramatic histrionics where you get to play the poor martyred soul yet again. If you want me to change my opinion of you, and if you want to give your edits a better chance of standing on the more disputed pages, you might try laying out why you make the changes you do, specifically, with examples that make sense. Generally I find you either don't give any rationale at all, or your articulation is so poorly worded I have no idea what you're trying to say and why you want the changes you do. It makes your edits look like they are made purely out of malice rather than any reason that should remain in the article. Try proofreading, or have someone else do it for you. | |||
While we're talking: | |||
Though I resent the time it takes to give a point-by-point rationale for my changes, it fortunately seems to be keeping you at bay on the pages, and most of your recent relatively mild harassment is so spurious and absurd that it's pretty easy to keep in the edits I consider valuable. Also, other readers seem to appreciate it, I've got lots of positive feedback on the lupus page. | |||
So, please don't involve yourself further in the matter of mediation - I don't care what your opinion is, and it really doesn't concern you anymore. You had your chance to try and interact in a reasonable fashion, and now I'm expecting you to resume your usual inarticulate howling. | |||
By the way, you might consider if the negative reaction that Terry Goodkind gets on the internet isn't so much related to him, as it is related to how people are reacting to you, his ostensible internet representative. Myself, and apparently others on wikipedia at least, find interactions with you so aversive that I find myself disliking TG even more because of you. Think about it, but I doubt you will. | |||
Thanks, please don't bother replying unless it's actually helpful, I've had enough insult swapping to last me a while. | |||
== Minor edits == | |||
] 00:22, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
I noticed some recent changes you made to the article ] which, though they significantly changed the content of the paragraph, were marked as minor edits. Please reserve use of the minor edit checkbox for spelling, grammar, and punctuation fixes, layout changes, adding links, or other changes '''which do not change the meaning of the text.''' Marking major edits as minor is considered poor etiquette, and may cause some editors to take offense. See ] for more information. While I do not disagree with the changes you made, you should keep this in mind to avoid any problems in the future. I have made a ] to be sure anybody watching the page has a chance to review your changes. Have a nice day! ] 20:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
==Lupus & BI== | |||
Oliver has been relentless in slanting the BI article, to the extent of even misquoting studies. At this point, I do not care to do anything more to the lupus article. Read what I wrote on | |||
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:WLU. It appears that you have had some tiff with WLU, but he has offered to help with references to studies, or say something about there not being long-term longitudinal studies, etc. If he can do that, it would be great. The problem is that the FDA has approved silicone implants, without rupture studies that can even predict what the rupture rate is at 10 years and beyond. And the rupture rates or effects of rupture on women that had older styles of implants have never been studied, and there is no incentive to do so since they are no longer made.] 21:43, 5 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Invitation == | |||
{| class="messagebox standard-talk" cellpadding="5" style="background-color:#ffffff; padding: 0.5em; border: 2px solid #aaaaaa; -moz-border-radius:20px;" | |||
|- | |||
| style="width:90px;" | ] | |||
| <big>'''WikiProject Objectivism'''</big><br />Salutations, {{BASEPAGENAME}}. I notice you were once a participant in the inactive ] and I am excited to inform you that I have resuscitated the project. I was not active in the original project, so your experience and ideas would be most valuable. If you're interested in taking part, please consider changing your inactive status in the ] and joining the discussion on the ].<br/> | |||
Yours in enlightened self-interest, ] 00:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
|{{shortcut|WP:A=A|WP:AYN|WP:RAND}} | |||
|- | |||
|} | |||
== |
==]== | ||
No where near as funny as ], but does it deserve to be deleted? -] (]) 21:39, 10 August 2008 (UTC) | |||
Why don't you try reading a ''real'' series like the Wheel of Time. And me telling you this is really a good thing. Its really harmful for you to continue reading such filth. Make the right choice man, go WoT. | |||
==An Invite to join Novels WikiProject== | |||
read WoT! <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (]) 21:18, 14 January 2007 (UTC).</small><!-- HagermanBot Auto-Unsigned --> | |||
<div style="margin: 0.5em; border: 2px lightsteelblue solid; background: whitesmoke; padding: 1em;" > | |||
{| | |||
|- | |||
|] | |||
Hi, you are cordially invited to join the ]! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of topics related to fiction books often referred to as "Novels". We make no length distinction so all narrative prose fiction is of interest. This includes Novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories. Articles about the works themselves and the forms and genres. | |||
|- | |||
{{#if:Steven Erikson, The Sword of Truth| | |||
{{!}}As you have shown an interest in ''']''' we thought you might like to take an interest in this well established WikiProject. | |||
}} | |||
|- | |||
{{#ifeq:|yes| | |||
{{!}}You might like to take an extra interest in our ''']''' | |||
}} | |||
|- | |||
{{#ifeq:|yes| | |||
{{!}}You might like to take an extra interest in our ''']''' | |||
}} | |||
|- | |||
{{#ifeq:|yes| | |||
{{!}}You might like to take an extra interest in our ''']''' | |||
}} | |||
|- | |||
{{#ifeq:|yes| | |||
{{!}}You might like to take an extra interest in our ''']''' | |||
}} | |||
|- | |||
{{#ifeq:yes|yes| | |||
{{!}}You might like to take an extra interest in our ''']''' | |||
}} | |||
|- | |||
{{#ifeq:|yes| | |||
{{!}}You might like to take an extra interest in our ''']''' | |||
}} | |||
|- | |||
{{#ifeq:|yes| | |||
{{!}}You might like to take an extra interest in our ''']''' | |||
}} | |||
|- | |||
{{#ifeq:|yes| | |||
{{!}}You might like to take an extra interest in our ''']''' | |||
}} | |||
|- | |||
{{#ifeq:|yes| | |||
{{!}}You might like to take an extra interest in our ''']''' | |||
}} | |||
|- | |||
{{#ifeq:yes|yes| | |||
{{!}}You might like to take an extra interest in our ''']''' | |||
}} | |||
|- | |||
{{#ifeq:|yes| | |||
{{!}}You might like to take an extra interest in our ''']''' | |||
}} | |||
|- | |||
|We look forward to welcoming you to the project! ] (]) 18:05, 20 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
</div> | |||
== ''Atlas Shrugged'' Article == | |||
Hello! As a member of Wiki Project Objectivism would you please see ] on the excessive coverage of fictional technology, etc. in ''Atlas Shrugged'' and my proposal to replace it with more coverage of the meaning of the events in that novel. Thanks. —] (]) 03:44, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Ahhhh yes....lol...lmao... Here we have it! A real use of intelligence and aplomb! Yes indeed that user really seared my cookies! Taught me a lesson...my oh my... | |||
All I can say is that users like you and WLU continue to show such continued ignorance that proves what you lack. So you have an opinion... cool... every one does. They are just like rectums. Everyone has them and they all stink...lol... | |||
The real delight for others and me in all this is that you just show what total lack of maturity and honor you have. WLU’s, who has never read more than a few interviews, continues to amuse us all with her inability to coherently speak to the true nature of the series. As it would see you also fall into that category as well. | |||
See the real truth in all this is that no one cares what you think. By running your lil rant it only shows your ignorance. Your inability to be honorable. You are an embarrassment to RJ and your peers with your schoolyard antics. As does WLU. The truth of the matter is clearly shown in that you both cannot let people make up their own mind for themselves. You feel it is incumbent upon you to slander and lie to scare people off rather than having people read and decide for themselves… truly priceless indeed. Which only makes my point about your inabilities. How sad for you. ] 01:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
I am clearing the participant list at ] due to inactivity. Please add yourself again if you want to participate. --] (]) 22:20, 23 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Reply == | |||
== Trackers Task Force == | |||
According to the links you provided, there is no reason I can't keep the TG comment on my user page. WP:NPA applies to other contributors, not to content. To clarify, it means I can't make personal attacks about '''you''' anywhere on wikipedia, but I can keep my own opinions on the topic of TG's interview up. If you can provide policy saying I can't say I think Terry Goodkind is a moron on my user page, I'll think about taking it down after I read it myself. Be sure to provide the link, I don't feel like digging. | |||
{{mbox|image=]|text= | |||
To clarify (because I still find your talk postings difficult to understand), your post on my talk page is an effort to get me to remove the sentence "(check it out, that no-one wants to know about, sweet! He's a moron!)" from my user page, or at least the section where I call him a moron, specifically the sentence saying "] a moron". At its most basic, you want me to cease calling Terry Goodkind a moron on my user page. Provide me a link to the policy ''and section'' where it says I am unable to post the TG=Moron bit on my user page, after I read it, I'll think about taking it down. I'm keeping the "check it out, that no-one wants to know about, sweet!" bit no matter what. Doesn't attack anything. | |||
Hello, Mystar! I'd like to invite you to join the ]. If you are interested in ] series The Trackers, you are perfect for this Misplaced Pages Project! Just add your name to the ] to join! The task force is under construction, so maybe you can help. Goodbye!!! ] (]) 22:48, 22 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
}} | |||
== ] == | |||
Oh, and since the chat is now available and verifiable, isn't the now available for inclusion in the TG bio page? I believe that was what was keeping it from being included on the page. Boy, I bet the webmaster of that particular page is embarrassed they ''ever'' posted that self-daming little bit of nonsense. | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
] 03:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692013717 --> |
Latest revision as of 03:36, 1 January 2024
This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Mystar has not edited Misplaced Pages since 29 July 2008. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
This user is a member of the Sword of Truth task force. |
T. Goodkind
|
- I am giving you this award for your worka on the barnstar project. on Sword of truth. Smith Jones 02:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Smith Jones 02:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Smith Jones 02:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
I would like to extend a welcome. I see you have taken a good look at Goodkind’s page. Some good work I see. Although Terry has no Internet, he would like some to add some content and pertinent facts. Can you help? Mystar 05:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Sure, I'd love to help. I'm always looking to improve the status and quality of articles on Terry Goodkind and his books. Let me know what you need help with, and I'll see if I can be of assistance. - Runch 14:40, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Plot Introductions
Hi Mystar, I see you've been rewriting the plot introductions to the books in the SoT series. I'm not questioning the factual validity of your edits (after all, I have a feeling you know the series much better than I do), but I do think that in several instances you put too much information in the intros. After all, the introduction is supposed to give the reader a very general idea of the novel without (ideally) giving away any plot details from the novel itself. In that sense, I think the general gist of the original plot intros may have been better (in some instances).
That being said, when I have a chance, I might try and trim down some of the sections you've written to try and keep the sections accurate while removing anything that might be construed as "spoilers". It might take me a few days to get around to it though, I've been pretty busy lately.
Ok, take it easy. - Runch 15:13, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
No offence, but the info contained within the Plot summery is fine, it is nothing more than would be found on any info site or any book description. They only give pertinent info and no spoilers.
HOWEVER!!! The rest of the pages are abysmal! Sorry to have to say it, but the book plot summaries are so full of misinterpretation and supposition/conjecture they need to be redone. I've already started and will be doing all of them, so that they will reflect proper information and not people assuming that this or that happened.
I will be up front and lay it out, the people placing the whole criticism thing in Naked Empire and Pillars, are in the minority. They only so called criticism calling it too "preachy" are a select few. You will not find that on any professional review, nor will you find it on any thing other than a select few other authors message boards. I simply will not allow such smearing attempts to succeed. We can state the reality of the content and that it has some long discourses from Richard helping the Bandakar to understand what they are misunderstanding, and some directives of understanding to help the reader better understand and grasp the contextual inference of the book. We can make statements without using words that are placed there to demoralize someone reading it in an attempt to dissuade them from reading it and to pre condition them to what they would read. Further, it is acceptable to place information to assist a reader, but not to make up the mind of the one looking for information.....as we have seen.
As I've said, I've several pages of info and content from several people stating the fact they are openly asking people to make such posts on Goodkind's Wiki page, and egging them on. Not to mention these same people suggesting that negative content be placed etc. All you gotta do is ask. Mystar 22:57, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
- Just please keep in mind that they need to be written in an encyclopedic tone. This is not a fansite or an advertisement page. Please see the pillars of creation page for more information and links. NeoFreak 06:43, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
It is written as such. But also keep in mind that it needs to be written and worded properly.Mystar 11:29, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- Can I email you about that stuff you gathered together for me? NeoFreak 11:32, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
indeed. mystar@chartermi.net
Mystar 11:38, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks alot. I'll send you one soon. NeoFreak 11:56, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Sword of Truth
The Sword of Truth WikiProject is now up and running. Thought you might like to know. It still has a long way to go before it'll look truly respectable, but it's a start. - Runch 18:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Back
Hi Mystar, glad to see you're back. I don't think you've missed much (as you can tell, I haven't made almost any edits recently, 'cause I've been busy focusing on other things). Lunch would be nice - but unfortunately I live in Ann Arbor, not Lansing :-) - so it's kinda far for lunch. Thanks for the offer though - Runch 01:41, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your well wishes
Hi there, I'm sorry for not responding earlier. Thanks for your well wishes, and also allow me to offer my condolences for your daughter. Thanks again, --Kyoko 02:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Smiley Award
Feel free to place this award on your user page, as a token of appreciation for your contributions. If you're willing to help spread the good cheer to others, please see the project page for the Random Smiley Award at: User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward
For your contributions to Misplaced Pages and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Awardoriginated by Pedia-I
(Explanation and Disclaimer)
--TomasBat (Talk) 21:52, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Sword of Truth Wiki Invite
Thanks for the invite. I have joined the SOT wiki project. I will do what I can to improve the pages, mostly with plot summaries / character pages. Aericanwizard 23:03, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
AfD notice
I notice that you have edited the Sword of Truth pages, and are a member of the Sword of Truth project; as such, I felt that you should know that the pages are currently being considered for deletion MPoint
And it was voted a Speedy Keep! Mystar 05:27, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/WLU-Mystar
This arbitration case has closed and the decision is available at the link above. WLU (talk · contribs) and Mystar (talk · contribs) are prohibited from interacting with each other or commenting on each other, directly or indirectly, on any Misplaced Pages page, and may be blocked for up to one week for each violation. For the purpose of this remedy, any edit by either WLU or Mystar to one of the articles over which they had previously been in conflict (including, but not limited to, Terry Goodkind and Lupus Erythematosus) shall be considered an interaction with the other party. For the arbitration committee, Thatcher131 12:33, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for your welcome and helpful links. I appreciate it. Appleworm 07:20, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Sethian (band)
I just wanted to inform you that stubbiness of an article isn't a particularly good deletion argument, and the band clearly passes WP:MUSIC, as it has members from a number of famous, notable bands-K@ngie 03:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Have a good time
I hope you have a good time at your summit. Hit me up when you get back, I have some ideas for a trans-wiki of Ice and Fire material that might also pertain to the Sword of Truth articles (and would get us both out from under wikipedia's rules.) NeoFreak 03:11, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry this relpy is so late in coming. As I was talking about before there was some discussion about taking the more superfluous Ice and Fire articles and moving them to a private wiki. We were going to tras-wiki them over to a wikia dedicated wiki but the request was denied. I have some hope that this will change in the near future but if not there has been talk of hosting the software and domain by the westeros folks. The main benefit to doing this is that we would be able to get as crufty and indepth with the material as we wanted to and we wouldn't be constrained by the vast host of rules that govern fictional (or any other) material here at wikipedia.
- All this got me to thinking that you too might want to consider doing the same with the Sword of Truth material. I know that you admin/own the terrygoodkind.net site and so it would be really easy for you to host your own wiki over there! You and whom ever else you want could be the administrtors, you could set up your own rules and could restrict or open the ability to edit the wiki to a few people or anyone that would want to edit. The standard just requires registration which would make it easier to curb vandalism.
- If I remember correctly there is already a Sword of Truth "themed" wikia over at wikia.com but I'm not sure who runs it, you migh want to get in touch with him, or just host one yourself. Anyway my plan was to try and get all the Song of Ice and Fire pages with the exception of the main A Song of Ice and Fire article and all the individual novel pages trans wikied. Then we would just link to the seperate wiki in the external links sections of these articles. Hit me up and tell me what you think of the idea (both for Ice and Fire and Sword of Truth) when you get some time. Feel free to do so either on my talk page or personal email, whatever is easier for you. Cheers. NeoFreak 14:47, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Confessor
Heyyy thanks for the message. Yeah I'm a big fan of Goodkind... a new one, I'll admit, but I'm very compelled by the philosophy and have been forced to reconsider my opinion on Ayn Rand. hahaha. Yeah, I'm currently in the middle of Naked Empire. I'm seriously thinking about NOT reading Chainfire untill Confessor is out... so far the cliffhangers and such and just the general way the story compells me has been managable because I can always get the next book, and I won't have that luxury at the end of Phantom!
Thanks for your kind words, I know I'm pretty bad, hahaha, I just copied a lot of the coding from the other books' pages and filled in the proper info. Glad to know more experienced types are around to make everything right.
Anyway, see ya around the pages!
--DragonGuyver 09:09, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Come on man
Please don't edit the SoT main page, I don't want anything to blow back up esp after the ArbCom case. If you need some minor changes made or anything I'll be more than happy to make them for you. Still waiting to hear back on the Transwiki deal too. Take care. NeoFreak 16:43, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Actually the SOT page is well within my right to edit. As it was stated, I will refrain from the TG page. I clarified this with the arbcom team. As the SOT page was not in the area of contention, as well as WLU openly stating she/he had no problem with my editing that page.
As for the Transwiki thing, I'm all for it. I've only had limited access as of late due to my heavy travel schedule. I just finished up my last speaking engagement for a bit, so I'll have more time to devote to working on it. Mystar 01:31, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, I had been under the impression from the ArbCom that the SoT main page was also included. There is no really stress on getting anything moved now so no worries about getting anything done right away. I'll talk to you about it when you get some extra time, later. NeoFreak 05:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for your comments. I know what you mean about work, I have just had to finish up a few big projects, which has kept me, unfortunatly, occupied. I have begun to write up new pages for Kahlan and Richard Rahl, and will post them soon so they can be edited/torn apart. I cant decide wether to simply edit and update the existing pages on the characters and leave them where they are, or rewrite them and add them to the all encompassing characters page. Any thoughts? OptumusPatronus 14:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Back
Yup, I'm back. I probably won't be as active as I was once upon a time, but I'll be around to help with minor cleanups and projects. - Runch 17:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Confessor (Sword of Truth)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Confessor (Sword of Truth), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Confessor (Sword of Truth). Thank you. Freederick (talk) 17:16, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Minor edits
I noticed some recent changes you made to the article The Sword of Truth which, though they significantly changed the content of the paragraph, were marked as minor edits. Please reserve use of the minor edit checkbox for spelling, grammar, and punctuation fixes, layout changes, adding links, or other changes which do not change the meaning of the text. Marking major edits as minor is considered poor etiquette, and may cause some editors to take offense. See Help:Minor edit for more information. While I do not disagree with the changes you made, you should keep this in mind to avoid any problems in the future. I have made a dummy edit to be sure anybody watching the page has a chance to review your changes. Have a nice day! Dansiman 20:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Invitation
WikiProject Objectivism Salutations, Mystar. I notice you were once a participant in the inactive WikiProject Objectivism and I am excited to inform you that I have resuscitated the project. I was not active in the original project, so your experience and ideas would be most valuable. If you're interested in taking part, please consider changing your inactive status in the list of participants and joining the discussion on the talkpage. Yours in enlightened self-interest, Skomorokh 00:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC) |
Shortcuts |
May contain nuts
No where near as funny as The Truth, but does it deserve to be deleted? -HarryAlffa (talk) 21:39, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
An Invite to join Novels WikiProject
Hi, you are cordially invited to join the Novels WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of topics related to fiction books often referred to as "Novels". We make no length distinction so all narrative prose fiction is of interest. This includes Novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories. Articles about the works themselves and the forms and genres. |
As you have shown an interest in Steven Erikson, The Sword of Truth we thought you might like to take an interest in this well established WikiProject. |
You might like to take an extra interest in our Fantasy task force |
You might like to take an extra interest in our Sword of Truth task force |
We look forward to welcoming you to the project! Alan16 (talk) 18:05, 20 February 2009 (UTC) |
Atlas Shrugged Article
Hello! As a member of Wiki Project Objectivism would you please see my post on the excessive coverage of fictional technology, etc. in Atlas Shrugged and my proposal to replace it with more coverage of the meaning of the events in that novel. Thanks. —Blanchette (talk) 03:44, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Objectivism
I am clearing the participant list at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Objectivism due to inactivity. Please add yourself again if you want to participate. --Karbinski (talk) 22:20, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Trackers Task Force
Hello, Mystar! I'd like to invite you to join the Trackers Task Force. If you are interested in Patrick Carman's series The Trackers, you are perfect for this Misplaced Pages Project! Just add your name to the support list to join! The task force is under construction, so maybe you can help. Goodbye!!! Hidividedby5 (talk) 22:48, 22 June 2010 (UTC) |
ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)