Revision as of 20:04, 6 March 2021 view sourceSoibangla (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users26,496 edits →Wisconsin: “completes the implosion of each of our three branches of government into the rubble of a sinkhole of corruption.”← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:14, 10 January 2025 view source John of Reading (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers767,669 editsm Typo/quotemark fixes, replaced: instututions → institutions, ’t → 't (5)Tag: AWB | ||
(470 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{Short description|American lawyer and conspiracy theorist (born 1955)}} | ||
{{pp|small=yes}} | {{pp-semi-indef|small=yes}} | ||
{{ |
{{Use mdy dates|date=October 2023}} | ||
{{use American English|date=November 2020}} | {{use American English|date=November 2020}} | ||
{{Infobox person | {{Infobox person | ||
|name = Sidney Powell | | name = Sidney Powell | ||
|image |
| image = | ||
| caption = | |||
|birth_date = {{birth year and age|1955}} | |||
| birth_date = {{birth date and age|1955|05|01}} | |||
|birth_place = {{nowrap|]}}, U.S. | |||
| birth_place = {{nowrap|]}}, U.S. | |||
|occupation = Attorney | |||
| occupation = Attorney | |||
|years_active = 1978–present | |||
| years_active = 1978–present | |||
|education = ] (], ]) | |||
| education = ] (], ]) | |||
|website = {{url|sidneypowell.com|Official website}} | |||
| criminal_charges = Felonies: {{plainlist| | |||
* 1 count of ] | |||
* 2 counts of ] | |||
* 3 counts of computer crimes | |||
* 1 count of ]}}<ref>]</ref> | |||
| criminal_status = ] to misdemeanors: <br /> | |||
6 counts: conspiracy to commit intentional interference with the performance of election duties | |||
| criminal_penalty = {{plainlist| | |||
* 6 years' ] | |||
* $6,000 fine | |||
* $2,700 restitution}} | |||
| website = {{URL|sidneypowell.com}} | |||
}} | }} | ||
'''Sidney Katherine Powell''' (born May 1, 1955) is an American ] and former ]<!-- Per the RFC in the talk page archives, do not add "conspiracy theorist" to the first sentence. -->. In August 2023, she was indicted along with ] and eighteen others in the ]. In October 2023, she pleaded guilty to six misdemeanor counts of conspiring to intentionally interfere with the performance of election duties. She was sentenced to six years of probation and agreed to ]. | |||
'''Sidney Katherine Powell''' (born 1955)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://worldcat.org/identities/lccn-n96002132|title=Powell, Sidney K.|access-date=16 November 2020|archive-date=November 20, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201120033535/http://worldcat.org/identities/lccn-n96002132/|url-status=live}}</ref> is an American attorney and former ], best known for her promotion of conspiracy theories in ]. | |||
Prior to her political involvement, Powell served as an ] in the ]. She was best known for prosecuting high-profile drug smuggler ] and, as private counsel, defending ] executives in proceedings related to the ]. | |||
After graduating from law school in 1978, Powell began her career as an ] in the ]. During her tenure she prosecuted ], who was implicated in the May 1979 assassination of ] ]<ref name=dallasnews>{{Cite news|first=Elizabeth|last=Thompson|url=https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2020/11/20/5-things-to-know-about-sidney-powell-the-dallas-lawyer-on-trumps-legal-team-alleging-election-fraud/|title=5 things to know about Sidney Powell, the Dallas lawyer formerly on Trump's legal team|date=November 23, 2020|newspaper=]}}</ref> She ceased working as a prosecutor in 1988 and established her own firm in 1993. She has acted in ] matters as a prosecutor and defense counsel.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/article/who-is-sidney-powell.html|title=What We Know About Sidney Powell, the Lawyer Behind Wild Voting Conspiracy Theories|first1=Jeremy W.|last1=Peters|first2=Alan|last2=Feuer|date=November 23, 2020|work=]}}</ref><ref name=dallasnews/> She represented executives in the ],<ref name=":6" /> and in 2019, defended retired lieutenant general ] in '']''.<ref name="maga" /> | |||
Later in her career, Powell began promoting conspiracy theories. Powell defended retired lieutenant general ] in ''],'' claiming that he was framed by a covert "]" operation, and has promoted personalities and slogans associated with ]. After the 2020 election, she claimed that there had been a global conspiracy to tamper with voting machines, despite lacking evidence. After she accused the election technology companies ] and ] of engaging in a conspiracy to rig the election, both companies sued her for ]. | |||
In 2020, Powell joined the legal team of then-President ] in an ] President ]'s victory over Trump in the ]. After several interviews in which Powell spread increasingly outlandish ] conspiracy theories, Trump's legal team formally distanced itself from her, stating she was "practicing law on her own" and was not a member of the team, though she continued to meet with the president in the White House.<ref name="wolfe">{{Cite web|last=Wolfe|first=Jan|date=November 22, 2020|title=Trump campaign says Sidney Powell not a member of legal team|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-powell-idUSKBN2820UB|work=]}}</ref><ref name=":5">{{Cite news|last=Bowden|first=John|date=November 22, 2020|title=Giuliani distances Trump campaign from attorney Sidney Powell|url=https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/527105-giuliani-distances-trump-campaign-from-sidney-powell|access-date=November 22, 2020|newspaper=]|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/19/politics/trump-oval-office-meeting-special-counsel-martial-law/index.html|title=Heated Oval Office meeting included talk of special counsel, martial law as Trump advisers clash|author=Kevin Liptak and Pamela Brown|website=CNN}}</ref><ref>https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1341138750085206016</ref> Powell continued filing election lawsuits independently in district courts, and ultimately lost four federal lawsuits in ], ], ], and ]. | |||
In 2020, Powell joined the legal team of then-President Trump in an ] ]'s victory in the ]. Powell continued filing lawsuits independently and ultimately lost four federal lawsuits in ], ], ], and ]. In August 2021, Michigan federal judge ] formally sanctioned Powell and eight other pro-Trump lawyers for their ] seeking to overturn Trump's election loss. The attorneys were ordered repay the legal expenses incurred by the defense and recommended for ]. The ]' Texas Commission for Lawyer Discipline brought a disciplinary action against Powell, alleging that she violated the rules of professional conduct governing lawyers; that proceeding is pending. | |||
Powell has promoted numerous ]. She has claimed that Flynn was framed by a covert "]" operation,<ref name="maga" /><ref name=":0">{{Cite news|date=June 12, 2019|title=Michael Flynn hires Dallas lawyer Sidney Powell, a conspiracy theorist who calls Mueller a 'creep'|url=https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2019/06/12/michael-flynn-hires-dallas-lawyer-sidney-powell-a-conspiracy-theorist-who-calls-mueller-a-creep/|access-date=November 20, 2020|newspaper=]|language=en|archive-date=November 17, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201117193736/https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2019/06/12/michael-flynn-hires-dallas-lawyer-sidney-powell-a-conspiracy-theorist-who-calls-mueller-a-creep/|url-status=live}}</ref> and has also promoted personalities and slogans associated with the ] conspiracy theory. Powell alleges that a secret international cabal involving communists, "]", ], ], the ], the ], and thousands of Democratic and Republican officials—including Trump ally and ] ]—used voting machines to transfer millions of votes away from Trump to Biden in the ].<ref>{{Cite news|last=Walsh|first=Joe|date=November 20, 2020|title=Who Is Sidney Powell? Meet Trump's New Top Conspiracy Theorist|work=]|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/joewalsh/2020/11/20/who-is-sidney-powell-meet-trumps-new-top-conspiracy-theorist/?sh=2ed589a51f9d|url-status=live|access-date=November 21, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201121172738/https://www.forbes.com/sites/joewalsh/2020/11/20/who-is-sidney-powell-meet-trumps-new-top-conspiracy-theorist/?sh=2ed589a51f9d|archive-date=November 21, 2020}}</ref><ref name=":8">{{Cite news|last=Bump|first=Philip|title=Here's how seriously you should take the Trump legal team's conspiracy theories|language=en-US|work=]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/19/heres-how-seriously-you-should-take-trump-legal-teams-conspiracy-theories/|url-status=live|access-date=November 20, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201120033602/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/19/heres-how-seriously-you-should-take-trump-legal-teams-conspiracy-theories/|archive-date=November 20, 2020|issn=0190-8286}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite news|last=Qiu|first=Linda|date=November 19, 2020|title=How Sidney Powell inaccurately cited Venezuela's elections as evidence of U.S. fraud.|language=en-US|work=]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/19/technology/sidney-powell-venezuela.html|url-status=live|access-date=November 20, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201119232027/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/19/technology/sidney-powell-venezuela.html|archive-date=November 19, 2020|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> After Powell baselessly accused the election technology companies ] and ] of engaging in a conspiracy to rig the election against Trump, Dominion and Smartmatic each sued Powell for ].<ref>{{Cite news|last=Feuer|first=Alan|date=2021-01-08|title=Dominion Voting Systems files defamation lawsuit against pro-Trump attorney Sidney Powell.|language=en-US|work=]|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/08/us/politics/dominion-voting-systems-files-defamation-lawsuit-against-pro-trump-attorney-sidney-powell.html|url-status=live|access-date=2021-01-14|issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|last=Vella|first=Lauren|date=November 19, 2020|title=Ernst: Trump lawyer claim that candidates pay to rig elections 'absolutely outrageous'|newspaper=]|url=https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/526798-ernst-trump-lawyer-claim-that-candidates-pay-to-rig-elections-absolutely|url-status=live|access-date=February 2, 2021}}</ref><ref name="auto1">{{Cite web|last=Naham|first=Matt|date=December 17, 2020|title=Days After Smartmatic's Legal Threat, Dominion Voting Systems Follows Suit with Demand Letter to Sidney Powell|url=https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/days-after-smartmatics-legal-threat-dominion-voting-systems-follows-suit-with-demand-letter-to-sidney-powell/|url-status=live|access-date=February 2, 2021|website=]}}</ref><ref name=":12" /> Michigan attorney general ] and the city of ] filed separate motions in federal court seeking to sanction Powell for attempting to overturn Biden's victory in Michigan.<ref name=NesselSanctions>{{cite news |last1=Foster |first1=Wells |last2=Darling |first2=Tom |title=AG Nessel seeks sanctions on Sidney Powell, other lawyers over election lawsuits |url=https://www.wlns.com/news/ag-nessel-seeks-sanctions-on-sidney-powell-other-lawyers-over-election-lawsuits/ |access-date=January 29, 2021 |work=] |date=January 28, 2021}}</ref><ref name=DetroitSanctions>{{cite news |last1=Polus |first1=Sarah |title=Detroit asks federal judge to disbar 'Kraken' team that fought in court to overturn election results |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/news/532824-detroit-calls-on-federal-judge-to-disbar-kraken-team-that-fought-in-court-to |access-date=January 29, 2021 |work=] |date=January 5, 2021}}</ref> | |||
Powell, along with Michael Flynn, was banned by Twitter on January 8, 2021, for promoting the QAnon conspiracy theory "in line with our policy on Coordinated Harmful Activity."<ref name="PowellTwitterBan">{{cite news |last1=Del Rosario |first1=Nicole |title=Twitter suspends Michael Flynn, Sidney Powell's accounts for QAnon conspiracy theories |url=https://www.wsls.com/news/local/2021/01/08/twitter-suspends-michael-flynn-sidney-powells-accounts-for-qanon-conspiracy-theories/ |access-date=11 January 2021 |agency=WSLS |date=8 January 2021}}</ref> | |||
==Early life== | ==Early life and education== | ||
Sidney Katherine Powell was born in ], grew up in the city of ], and knew from an early age that she wanted to be a lawyer.<ref name="maga" /><ref name=":122">{{cite news|last1=Morill|first1=Jim|date=November 21, 2020|title=Sidney Powell's road from UNC to defending Trump's supposed 'landslide' reelection|work=Charlotte Observer|url=https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/politics-government/election/article247313859.html}}</ref |
Sidney Katherine Powell was born on May 1, 1955<ref>{{cite web|url=http://worldcat.org/identities/lccn-n96002132|title=Powell, Sidney K.|access-date=November 16, 2020|archive-date=November 20, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201120033535/http://worldcat.org/identities/lccn-n96002132/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=FultonCertificate>{{cite web |url=https://www.fultonclerk.org/DocumentCenter/View/1403/CERTIFICATE-OF-MATERIAL-WITNESS-SIDNEY--KATHERINE-POWELL |date=August 22, 2022 |title=Certificate of material witness pursuant to uniform act to secure the attendance of witnesses from without the state, codified in the state of Georgia as O.C.G.A. §24-13-90 ''et. seq.'' |via=Clerk of Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia |first=Robert C. I. |last=McBurney}}</ref> in ], grew up in the city of ], and knew from an early age that she wanted to be a lawyer.<ref name="maga" /><ref name=":122">{{cite news|last1=Morill|first1=Jim|date=November 21, 2020|title=Sidney Powell's road from UNC to defending Trump's supposed 'landslide' reelection|work=Charlotte Observer|url=https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/politics-government/election/article247313859.html}}</ref> | ||
She graduated from ] and attended the ], where she earned a ].<ref name="maga" /> At the age of 19, she was accepted into the ], where she graduated in 1978 with a ] degree.<ref name="maga" /><ref>{{cite web|url=https://archive.org/stream/commencement19781978univ/commencement19781978univ_djvu.txt|title=Commencement 1978 – University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill|date=May 14, 1978 |publisher=University of North Carolina Library digital archive|access-date=November 15, 2020}}</ref> She began her legal career as one of the youngest federal prosecutors in the U.S.<ref name=":122" /> | |||
==Career== | ==Career== | ||
From 1978 through 1988, Powell was an ] for the ] and ] Districts of Texas and the ], where she handled civil and criminal trial work. She was appointed Appellate Section Chief for the Western District of Texas and then the Northern District of Texas.<ref name="dallasnews" /><ref name=fedapp>{{cite web|url=https://www.federalappeals.com/attorneys/sidney-powell|title=Sidney Powell P.C.|access-date= |
From 1978 through 1988, Powell was an ] for the ] and ] Districts of Texas and the ], where she handled civil and criminal trial work. She was appointed Appellate Section Chief for the Western District of Texas and then the Northern District of Texas.<ref name="dallasnews" /><ref name=fedapp>{{cite web|url=https://www.federalappeals.com/attorneys/sidney-powell|title=Sidney Powell P.C.|access-date=November 14, 2020|archive-date=November 16, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201116033358/https://www.federalappeals.com/|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
Powell established her own law firm in 1993 in Dallas, Texas.<ref name=dallasnews/> Around 2002,{{vague|date=December 2020}} she began to practice in Asheville, North Carolina,<ref name=":122" /> but moved back to Texas later.<ref>{{cite web|last=Boyle|first=John|title=Answer Man: Is Trump lawyer Sidney Powell an Asheville resident?|url=https://www.citizen-times.com/story/news/local/2020/12/03/answer-man-trump-lawyer-sidney-powell-asheville-resident/3793310001/|access-date=December 4, 2020|website=The Asheville Citizen Times|language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
===Prosecution for assassination of Judge John H. Wood=== | |||
Powell established her own law firm in 1993 in Dallas, Texas.<ref name=dallasnews/> Around 2002{{vague|date=December 2020}}, she began to practice in Asheville, North Carolina,<ref name=":122" /> but moved back to Texas later.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Boyle|first=John|title=Answer Man: Is Trump lawyer Sidney Powell an Asheville resident?|url=https://www.citizen-times.com/story/news/local/2020/12/03/answer-man-trump-lawyer-sidney-powell-asheville-resident/3793310001/|access-date=2020-12-04|website=The Asheville Citizen Times|language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
Powell was best known as one of the prosecutors in the 1979 trial of ]<ref name=dallasnews>{{Cite news|first=Elizabeth|last=Thompson|url=https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2020/11/20/5-things-to-know-about-sidney-powell-the-dallas-lawyer-on-trumps-legal-team-alleging-election-fraud/|title=5 things to know about Sidney Powell, the Dallas lawyer formerly on Trump's legal team|date=November 23, 2020|newspaper=]}}</ref><ref name="dallasnews2">{{cite web|date=November 23, 2020|title=5 things to know about Sidney Powell, the Dallas lawyer formerly on Trump's legal team|url=https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2020/11/20/5-things-to-know-about-sidney-powell-the-dallas-lawyer-on-trumps-legal-team-alleging-election-fraud/|website=Dallas News}},</ref><ref name="WaPoConspir" /> who was accused in the assassination of ], a federal judge from Texas. He was acquitted of involvement in the assassination but convicted on other charges.<ref>{{Cite news|last=McKinley|first=James C. Jr.|date=July 29, 2008|title=Jamiel A. Chagra, 63, Drug Kingpin, Dies (Published 2008)|language=en-US|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/29/us/29chagra.html|access-date=December 4, 2020|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> He later admitted to his role in the conspiracy to murder the judge.<ref>{{cite news|last=Contreras|first=Guillermo|date=August 26, 2017|title=Judge's 1979 slaying was 'crime of the century'|url=https://www.expressnews.com/sa300/article/Judge-s-1979-slaying-was-crime-of-the-11962060.php|access-date=December 5, 2020|newspaper=San Antonio Express-News|language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
=== |
===Defense of Enron=== | ||
In the 2000s, Powell represented firms and executives involved in the ], including the accounting firm ] and former ] executive Jim Brown.<ref name=":6">{{cite web|url=https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/whitecollarcrime_blog/2014/10/too-much-skin-in-the-game-a-review-of-sydney-powells-licensed-to-lie.html|date=October 27, 2014|title=Too Much Skin in the Game? A Review of Sidney Powell's Licensed To Lie|last=Wisenberg |first=S.L.|access-date=November 20, 2020|archive-date=November 12, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112013705/https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/whitecollarcrime_blog/2014/10/too-much-skin-in-the-game-a-review-of-sydney-powells-licensed-to-lie.html|url-status=live}}</ref> She was an outspoken critic of the Enron Task Force prosecutions, and accused prosecutor ] of overreach.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.providencejournal.com/news/20190612/michael-flynns-new-lawyer-is-firebrand-doj-critic-sidney-powell|title=Michael Flynn's new lawyer is firebrand DOJ critic Sidney Powell|first1=Andrew|last1=Harris|first2=Greg|last2=Farrell|date=June 12, 2019|work=Providence Journal|access-date=November 24, 2020}}</ref> After that, Powell wrote extensively about prosecutorial abuses in the 2014 book ''Licensed to Lie''.<ref name=maga /> The book was noticed by then-], who described it as "powerful".<ref name="WaPoConspir" /> The experience contributed to her distrust of government institutions.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Wickert |first=David |title=Sidney Powell's journey: From prosecutor to prosecuted |url=https://www.ajc.com/politics/sidney-powells-journey-from-prosecutor-to-prosecuted/4TOGCMJBRVCI3FBUEXIAJOSLF4/ |access-date=2024-09-30 |work=The Atlanta Journal-Constitution |language=English |issn=1539-7459}}</ref> | |||
Powell was one of the prosecutors in the 1979 trial of ].<ref name="dallasnews2">{{Cite web|date=November 23, 2020|title=5 things to know about Sidney Powell, the Dallas lawyer formerly on Trump's legal team|url=https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2020/11/20/5-things-to-know-about-sidney-powell-the-dallas-lawyer-on-trumps-legal-team-alleging-election-fraud/|website=Dallas News}}</ref><ref name="WaPoConspir" /> He was accused in the assassination of ], a federal judge from Texas. Chagra was acquitted for involvement in the assassination but convicted on other charges.<ref>{{Cite news|last=Jr|first=James C. McKinley|date=2008-07-29|title=Jamiel A. Chagra, 63, Drug Kingpin, Dies (Published 2008)|language=en-US|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/29/us/29chagra.html|access-date=2020-12-04|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> He later admitted to his role in the conspiracy to murder the judge.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Contreras|first=Guillermo|date=2017-08-26|title=Judge's 1979 slaying was 'crime of the century'|url=https://www.expressnews.com/sa300/article/Judge-s-1979-slaying-was-crime-of-the-11962060.php|access-date=2020-12-05|website=ExpressNews.com|language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
===Comments regarding Ted Stevens=== | |||
===Enron scandal=== | |||
In ''Licensed to Lie'', Powell contended that prosecutors in the ] of U.S. senator ] of Alaska, held in 2008, before federal judge ]<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.cnbc.com/2019/06/12/ex-trump-aide-michael-flynn-hires-lawyer-sidney-powell-in-mueller-case.html|title=Michael Flynn hires new lawyer, Sidney Powell, who had urged him to withdraw guilty plea in Mueller case|first1=Kevin|last1=Breuninger|first2=Dan|last2=Mangan|date=June 12, 2019|access-date=March 24, 2021|website=CNBC}}</ref> in the ], intentionally withheld "]" they should have disclosed to the defense and that they returned Rocky Williams, a terminally ill witness, to Alaska, ostensibly so that his testimony would not exonerate Stevens. The senator was subsequently convicted of seven felony counts of corruption for failing to annually declare gifts from VECO owner ]. However, due to numerous instances of prosecutorial misconduct, Attorney General ] moved to dismiss the indictment prior to sentencing, effectively vacating the conviction.<ref>{{cite news|author=Neil A. Lewis |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/02/us/politics/02stevens.html |title=Justice Dept. Moves to Void Stevens Case |work=The New York Times |date=October 27, 2008 |access-date=March 24, 2021}}</ref> | |||
Powell in the 2000s represented firms and executives involved in the ], including the accounting firm ] and former ] executive Jim Brown.<ref name=":6">{{cite web|url=https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/whitecollarcrime_blog/2014/10/too-much-skin-in-the-game-a-review-of-sydney-powells-licensed-to-lie.html|date=27 October 2014|title=Too Much Skin in the Game? A Review of Sidney Powell's Licensed To Lie|author=Wisenberg, S.L.|access-date=20 November 2020|archive-date=November 12, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112013705/https://lawprofessors.typepad.com/whitecollarcrime_blog/2014/10/too-much-skin-in-the-game-a-review-of-sydney-powells-licensed-to-lie.html|url-status=live}}</ref> She was an outspoken critic of the Enron Task Force prosecutions, and accused prosecutor ] of overreach.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.providencejournal.com/news/20190612/michael-flynns-new-lawyer-is-firebrand-doj-critic-sidney-powell|title=Michael Flynn's new lawyer is firebrand DOJ critic Sidney Powell|first1=Andrew|last1=Harris|first2=Greg|last2=Farrell|date=12 June 2019|work=Providence Journal|access-date=24 November 2020}}</ref> After that, Powell wrote extensively about prosecutorial abuses in the 2014 book ''Licensed to Lie''.<ref name=maga /> The book was noticed by then-], who described it as "powerful".<ref name="WaPoConspir" /> | |||
===Defense of Michael Flynn <span class="anchor" id="Post-conviction defense of Michael Flynn"></span> === | |||
=== Michael Flynn === | |||
{{Main|United States v. Flynn}} | {{Main|United States v. Flynn}} | ||
After publishing her first book, Powell continued writing ]s for right-leaning websites.<ref name=":13" /><ref name=":14" /><ref name="WaPoConspir" /> In 2017, Weissmann joined ]'s ], reviving interest in ''Licensed to Lie'' from ] and ].<ref name="WaPoConspir" /> Using her status as a former federal prosecutor, Powell became a leading voice against the Mueller investigation;<ref name="WaPoConspir" /> in a February 2018 op-ed, Powell wrote that retired lieutenant general ] should "withdraw his guilty plea" for ], alleging "egregious government misconduct".<ref name=":0" /> Powell's appearances on ] to discuss the Flynn case were noticed by President ], and the two spoke on several occasions. To raise money for Flynn's defense, Powell spoke at a November 2018 conference, where she met Flynn's siblings.<ref name="maga" /> They agreed that Flynn was the victim of a "deep state plot" and had only pleaded guilty because he was coerced.<ref name="maga" /> | After publishing her first book, Powell continued writing ]s for right-leaning websites.<ref name=":13" /><ref name=":14" /><ref name="WaPoConspir" /> In 2017, Weissmann joined ]'s ], reviving interest in ''Licensed to Lie'' from ] and ].<ref name="WaPoConspir" /> Using her status as a former federal prosecutor, Powell became a leading voice against the Mueller investigation;<ref name="WaPoConspir" /> in a February 2018 op-ed, Powell wrote that retired lieutenant general ] should "withdraw his guilty plea" for ], alleging "egregious government misconduct".<ref name=":0" /> Powell's appearances on ] to discuss the Flynn case were noticed by President ], and the two spoke on several occasions. To raise money for Flynn's defense, Powell spoke at a November 2018 conference, where she met Flynn's siblings.<ref name="maga" /> They agreed that Flynn was the victim of a "deep state plot" and had only pleaded guilty because he was coerced.<ref name="maga" /><ref name=":0">{{Cite news|date=June 12, 2019|title=Michael Flynn hires Dallas lawyer Sidney Powell, a conspiracy theorist who calls Mueller a 'creep'|url=https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2019/06/12/michael-flynn-hires-dallas-lawyer-sidney-powell-a-conspiracy-theorist-who-calls-mueller-a-creep/|access-date=November 20, 2020|newspaper=]|language=en|archive-date=November 17, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201117193736/https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2019/06/12/michael-flynn-hires-dallas-lawyer-sidney-powell-a-conspiracy-theorist-who-calls-mueller-a-creep/|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
Flynn released his law firm of ] and retained Powell to serve as his lead attorney in June 2019.<ref name="maga" /> On the same day this was disclosed, Powell sent a letter to Attorney General ] requesting the "utmost confidentiality" and argued that Flynn's prosecution was due to "corruption of our beloved government institutions for what appears to be political purposes".<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/28/us/politics/michael-flynn-sidney-powell.html|title=How Michael Flynn's Defense Team Found Powerful Allies|first1=Mark|last1=Mazzetti|first2=Charlie|last2=Savage|first3=Adam|last3=Goldman|date=June 28, 2020|newspaper=]}}</ref><ref name="Letter to Barr">{{cite web |url=https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.122.2.pdf |title=Letter to William Barr re Internal review, ''Brady'', IG Report, Declassification, and Lt. General Michael Flynn (retired) |publisher=Sidney Powell, P.C. |date=June 6, 2019 |access-date=November 15, 2020 |first=Sidney|last=Powell|archive-date=October 4, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191004032102/https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.122.2.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> Among other things, she requested that Barr appoint an outsider to investigate. Six months later, Barr appointed ] to conduct an investigation.<ref>{{ |
Flynn released his law firm of ] and retained Powell to serve as his lead attorney in June 2019.<ref name="maga" /> On the same day this was disclosed, Powell sent a letter to Attorney General ] requesting the "utmost confidentiality" and argued that Flynn's prosecution was due to "corruption of our beloved government institutions for what appears to be political purposes".<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/28/us/politics/michael-flynn-sidney-powell.html|title=How Michael Flynn's Defense Team Found Powerful Allies|first1=Mark|last1=Mazzetti|first2=Charlie|last2=Savage|first3=Adam|last3=Goldman|date=June 28, 2020|newspaper=]}}</ref><ref name="Letter to Barr">{{cite web |url=https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.122.2.pdf |title=Letter to William Barr re Internal review, ''Brady'', IG Report, Declassification, and Lt. General Michael Flynn (retired) |publisher=Sidney Powell, P.C. |date=June 6, 2019 |access-date=November 15, 2020 |first=Sidney|last=Powell|archive-date=October 4, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191004032102/https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.122.2.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> Among other things, she requested that Barr appoint an outsider to investigate. Six months later, Barr appointed ] to conduct an investigation.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/28/us/politics/michael-flynn-sidney-powell.html|title=How Michael Flynn's Defense Team Found Powerful Allies|first1=Mark|last1=Mazzetti|first2=Charlie|last2=Savage|first3=Adam|last3=Goldman|date=June 28, 2020|work=]|access-date=November 15, 2020|archive-date=November 15, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201115211222/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/28/us/politics/michael-flynn-sidney-powell.html|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
The Justice Department filed a motion to drop Flynn's prosecution with presiding federal judge ] in May 2020.<ref>{{ |
The Justice Department filed a motion to drop Flynn's prosecution with presiding federal judge ] in May 2020.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/07/politics/michael-flynn-prosecution/index.html|title=Justice Department drops criminal case against Michael Flynn|first=Katelyn|last=Polantz|website=]|date=May 7, 2020|access-date=November 15, 2020|archive-date=November 15, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201115190722/https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/07/politics/michael-flynn-prosecution/index.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Sullivan did not immediately grant the motion; Powell later requested a ] from the ] to compel Sullivan to drop the case. After an initial ruling in favor of Powell by a three-judge panel of the court, the case was appealed to the full court, which denied the mandamus request in an 8–2 ruling and returned the case to Sullivan's court.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/full-d-c-circuit-court-rejects-michael-flynns-emergency-petition-for-immediate-dismissal-of-criminal-case/|title=Full D.C. Circuit Court Rejects Michael Flynn's Emergency Petition for Immediate Dismissal of Criminal Case|website=Lawandcrime.com|date=August 31, 2020 |access-date=November 15, 2020|archive-date=November 18, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201118002308/https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/full-d-c-circuit-court-rejects-michael-flynns-emergency-petition-for-immediate-dismissal-of-criminal-case/|url-status=live}}</ref> Powell had argued to the full court that Sullivan's role was "]", giving him no discretion but to comply with the Justice Department motion, to which judge ] replied: "It's not ministerial and you know it's not. So it's not ministerial, so that means that the judge has to do some thinking about it, right?"<ref>{{Cite news|first=Eric|last=Tucker|url=https://www.startribune.com/appeals-court-seems-wary-of-ordering-dismissal-of-flynn-case/572077712/|title=Appeals court seems wary of ordering dismissal of Flynn case|newspaper=]|date=August 11, 2020|access-date=November 15, 2020|archive-date=November 16, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201116173645/https://www.startribune.com/appeals-court-seems-wary-of-ordering-dismissal-of-flynn-case/572077712/|url-status=live}}</ref> Other judges on the court also pushed back on Powell's characterization of a federal judge's role.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.courthousenews.com/flynn-argument-against-judge-falls-flat-for-full-dc-circuit/|title='That's Not True and You Know It,' Federal Judge Tells DOJ Lawyer in Flynn Matter|date=August 11, 2020|website=Courthousenews.com|access-date=November 15, 2020|archive-date=November 17, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201117142405/https://www.courthousenews.com/flynn-argument-against-judge-falls-flat-for-full-dc-circuit/|url-status=live}}</ref> After Trump pardoned Flynn in November 2020, Sullivan dismissed the case as moot, though he stated he probably would have denied the Justice Department motion had the case proceeded.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/legal-issues/michael-flynn-case-dismissed/2020/12/08/31abb5de-0975-11eb-a166-dc429b380d10_story.html|title=Michael Flynn judge says pardon doesn't mean ex-national security adviser is innocent|first1=Spencer S.|last1=Hsu|first2=Ann E.|last2=Marimow|via=www.washingtonpost.com}}</ref> According to a Justice Department official, the Justice Department was not consulted about the pardon.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-pardon-michael-flynn-russia-aeef585b08ba6f2c763c8c37bfd678ed|work=Associated Press|title=Trump pardons Flynn despite guilty plea in Russia probe|author=Tucker, Eric|date=November 25, 2020|access-date=November 26, 2020}}</ref> | ||
Soon after taking the Flynn case, Powell had accused the Justice Department of ] against Flynn; in a footnote to a June 2020 court brief, the department described Powell's allegations as "unfounded and provide no basis for impugning the prosecutors from the D.C. United States Attorney's Office".<ref name="maga">{{ |
Soon after taking the Flynn case, Powell had accused the Justice Department of ] against Flynn; in a footnote to a June 2020 court brief, the department described Powell's allegations as "unfounded and provide no basis for impugning the prosecutors from the D.C. United States Attorney's Office".<ref name="maga">{{cite web|url=https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/01/17/maga-lawyer-behind-michael-flynn-legal-strategy-098712|title=The #MAGA Lawyer Behind Michael Flynn's Scorched-Earth Legal Strategy|first=Keith|last=Kloor|website=]|date=January 17, 2020|access-date=November 15, 2020|archive-date=November 15, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201115032301/https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/01/17/maga-lawyer-behind-michael-flynn-legal-strategy-098712|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.politico.com/news/2020/06/17/michael-flynn-prosecutors-justice-department-326240|title=Justice Department defends prosecutors in Flynn case|website=]|date=June 17, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.227.0_10.pdf |title=United States v. Michael T. Flynn, Crim. No. 17-232 (D.D.C. 2020) – Government's Response to Court-Appointed Amicus Curiae, the Honorable John Gleeson (Ret.) |access-date=November 17, 2020 |archive-date=November 20, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201120033525/https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592/gov.uscourts.dcd.191592.227.0_10.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> | ||
Powell has been described as a proponent of conspiracy theories about Flynn, namely that he was framed by members of the "]" who were trying to eject President Donald Trump from office.<ref name="maga" /><ref name=":0" /><ref name="WaPoConspir">{{cite news|last1=Davis|first1=Aaron C.|last2=Dawsey|first2=Josh|last3=Brown|first3=Emma|last4=Swaine|first4=Jon|date=November 28, 2020|title=For Trump advocate Sidney Powell, a playbook steeped in conspiracy theories|newspaper=The Washington Post|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/sidney-powell-trump-kraken-lawsuit/2020/11/28/344d0b12-2e78-11eb-96c2-aac3f162215d_story.html|access-date=November 30, 2020}}</ref> | |||
Ultimately, President Trump pardoned Flynn in November 2020. According to a Justice Department official, the Justice Department was not consulted about the pardon.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-pardon-michael-flynn-russia-aeef585b08ba6f2c763c8c37bfd678ed|publisher=AP|title=Trump pardons Flynn despite guilty plea in Russia probe|author=Tucker, Eric|date=25 November 2020|access-date=26 November 2020}}</ref> | |||
===2020 presidential election=== | |||
Powell has been described as a proponent of conspiracy theories about Flynn, namely that he was framed by members of the "]" who were trying to eject President Donald Trump from office.<ref name="maga" /><ref name=":0" /><ref name="WaPoConspir">{{cite news|last1=Davis|first1=Aaron C.|last2=Dawsey|first2=Josh|last3=Brown|first3=Emma|last4=Swaine|first4=Jon|date=November 28, 2020|title=For Trump advocate Sidney Powell, a playbook steeped in conspiracy theories|work=The Washington Post|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/sidney-powell-trump-kraken-lawsuit/2020/11/28/344d0b12-2e78-11eb-96c2-aac3f162215d_story.html|access-date=November 30, 2020}}</ref> | |||
=== 2020 presidential election === | |||
{{Main|Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 United States presidential election|2020 United States presidential election#Controversies}} | {{Main|Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 United States presidential election|2020 United States presidential election#Controversies}} | ||
Days before the ], ], a software designer with a history of making dubious claims, asserted that a government supercomputer program would be used to switch votes from Trump to Biden on voting machines. Powell promoted the conspiracy theory on '']'' on November 6,<ref>{{Cite news|date= |
Days before the ], ], a software designer with a history of making dubious claims, asserted that a government supercomputer program would be used to switch votes from Trump to Biden on voting machines. Powell promoted the conspiracy theory on '']'' on November 6,<ref>{{Cite news|date=November 10, 2020|title=Fact check: TV news clip does not show 'live computerized fraud' on Election Day 2020|language=en|work=Reuters|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-cnn-not-evidence-vote-fraud-idUSKBN27P2TI|access-date=November 15, 2020|archive-date=November 16, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201116100851/https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-cnn-not-evidence-vote-fraud-idUSKBN27P2TI|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last1=Fichera|first1=Angelo|last2=Spencer|first2=Saranac Hale|date=November 13, 2020|title=Bogus Theory Claims Supercomputer Switched Votes in Election|url=https://www.factcheck.org/2020/11/bogus-theory-claims-supercomputer-switched-votes-in-election/|access-date=November 15, 2020|website=FactCheck.org|language=en-US|archive-date=November 15, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201115032246/https://www.factcheck.org/2020/11/bogus-theory-claims-supercomputer-switched-votes-in-election/|url-status=live}}</ref> and again on November 8, 2020, on ]'s ] program, ...claiming to have "evidence that that is exactly what happened". | ||
On December 10, – long after other hosts had started to push her for more evidence – Dobbs continued to praise her. | |||
In the wake of the election, Trump established a legal team to ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.foxnews.com/transcript/trump-legal-team-to-file-new-ballot-lawsuits|title=Trump legal team to file new ballot lawsuits|date=8 November 2020|work=Fox News|access-date=14 November 2020|archive-date=November 15, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201115005625/https://www.foxnews.com/transcript/trump-legal-team-to-file-new-ballot-lawsuits|url-status=live}}</ref> On November 14, Trump named ] to lead the team, with ], ], ], and Powell as members of this team.<ref name=":7">{{cite tweet |user=realDonaldTrump |author=Donald Trump |author-link=Donald Trump |number=1327811527123103746 |date=2020-11-14 |access-date=2020-11-23 |title=I look forward to Mayor Giuliani spearheading the legal effort to defend OUR RIGHT to FREE and FAIR ELECTIONS! Rudy Giuliani, Joseph diGenova, Victoria Toensing, Sidney Powell, and Jenna Ellis, a truly great team, added to our other wonderful lawyers and representatives!}}</ref> The team proceeded to file numerous lawsuits in several states over alleged ], illegal votes, machine errors, vote dumps, and late-counted votes. Precisely how Powell gained prominence in the legal team is unknown, even to some campaign officials. One official claimed Powell "simply showed up at headquarters".<ref name="WaPoConspir" /> | |||
<blockquote>"Sidney Powell, thank you for all you're doing," "It is the Lord's work."<ref>{{cite web|last1=Fichera|first1=Angelo|last2=Spencer|first2=Saranac Hale|date=November 13, 2020 |title=Bogus Theory Claims Supercomputer Switched Votes in Election|url=https://www.factcheck.org/2020/11/bogus-theory-claims-supercomputer-switched-votes-in-election/|access-date=November 22, 2020|website=]|language=en-US}}</ref><ref name=WP/></blockquote> | |||
'']'' indicated Bartiromo asked Powell for proof of specifics of voting fraud made by her, supposedly including dead voters casting ballots, ballots lacking Trump's name, and a postal employee's confession that he had postdated mailed ballots. She said "Sidney, we talked about the Dominion software." "I know that there were voting irregularities. Tell me about that."<ref name=WP>Sarah Ellison and Amy Gardner (March 16, 2023). , '']''. Retrieved March 18, 2023.</ref> Powell alleged that a secret international cabal involving communists, "]", ], ] (who died in 2013), the ], the ], and thousands of Democratic and Republican officials—including then-Trump ally and ] ]—used voting machines to transfer millions of votes away from Trump in the ].<ref>{{Cite news |last=Walsh |first=Joe |date=November 20, 2020 |title=Who Is Sidney Powell? Meet Trump's New Top Conspiracy Theorist |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/joewalsh/2020/11/20/who-is-sidney-powell-meet-trumps-new-top-conspiracy-theorist/?sh=2ed589a51f9d |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201121172738/https://www.forbes.com/sites/joewalsh/2020/11/20/who-is-sidney-powell-meet-trumps-new-top-conspiracy-theorist/?sh=2ed589a51f9d |archive-date=November 21, 2020 |access-date=November 21, 2020 |work=]}}</ref><ref name=":8">{{Cite news |last=Bump |first=Philip |title=Here's how seriously you should take the Trump legal team's conspiracy theories |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/19/heres-how-seriously-you-should-take-trump-legal-teams-conspiracy-theories/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201120033602/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/19/heres-how-seriously-you-should-take-trump-legal-teams-conspiracy-theories/ |archive-date=November 20, 2020 |access-date=November 20, 2020 |newspaper=] |language=en-US |issn=0190-8286}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite news |last=Qiu |first=Linda |date=November 19, 2020 |title=How Sidney Powell inaccurately cited Venezuela's elections as evidence of U.S. fraud. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/19/technology/sidney-powell-venezuela.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201119232027/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/19/technology/sidney-powell-venezuela.html |archive-date=November 19, 2020 |access-date=November 20, 2020 |work=] |language=en-US |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> She also asserted that the ] ignored warnings about the software, and urged Trump to fire director ].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/20/us/politics/trump-lawsuits-election.html|title=Trump's Legal Team Sets a Precedent for Lowering the Bar|first=Mark|last=Leibovich|date=November 20, 2020|work=The New York Times}}</ref> ], director of the ] (CISA), characterized the supercomputer claim as "nonsense" and a "hoax".<ref name="auto">{{cite web|url=https://www.factcheck.org/2020/11/bogus-theory-claims-supercomputer-switched-votes-in-election/|title=Bogus Theory Claims Supercomputer Switched Votes in Election|first1=Angelo|last1=Fichera|first2=Saranac Hale|last2=Spencer|date=November 13, 2020|website=FactCheck.org|access-date=November 15, 2020|archive-date=November 15, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201115032246/https://www.factcheck.org/2020/11/bogus-theory-claims-supercomputer-switched-votes-in-election/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="auto2">{{cite web|url=https://apnews.com/article/top-officials-elections-most-secure-66f9361084ccbc461e3bbf42861057a5|title=Repudiating Trump, officials say election 'most secure'|date=November 13, 2020|website=AP NEWS|access-date=November 15, 2020|archive-date=November 15, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201115030026/https://apnews.com/article/top-officials-elections-most-secure-66f9361084ccbc461e3bbf42861057a5|url-status=live}}</ref> CISA described the 2020 election as "the most secure in American history", with "no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes or was in any way compromised".<ref name="auto" /><ref name="auto2" /> | |||
Giuliani and Powell alleged multiple instances of ] in key states at a November 19 press conference.<ref name=":3">{{Cite news|last=Blake|first=Aaron|date=November 20, 2020|title=The Trump campaign's much-hyped affidavit features a big, glaring error|work=]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/20/trump-campaigns-much-hyped-affidavit-features-big-glaring-error/|url-status=live|access-date=November 20, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201120171553/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/20/trump-campaigns-much-hyped-affidavit-features-big-glaring-error/|archive-date=November 20, 2020}}</ref> They cited an ]—filed by Russell Ramsland and ] on behalf of the Trump campaign<ref name=":10">{{Cite web|title=Giuliani cites affidavit with crucial errors in press conference|url=https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/nov/20/rudy-giuliani/giuliani-cites-affidavit-crucial-errors-press-conf/|access-date=2020-11-23|website=PolitiFact|language=en-US}}</ref>—as evidence of manipulated results. In their comparison of votes cast against total voters registered in ], Powell asserted that they found over-voting of "up to 350 percent in some places".<ref name=":3" /> However, the affidavit's conclusion was erroneous since it compared the Michigan vote tallies against population data from ] (whose respective abbreviations are MI and MN, a possible source of the error).<ref name=":10" /><ref>{{Cite web|last=Williams|first=Jordan|date=2020-11-20|title=Trump lawyers cited Minnesota counties in affidavit about Michigan: report|url=https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/526926-trump-lawyers-cited-minnesota-counties-in-affidavit-about-michigan-report|access-date=2020-11-23|website=The Hill|language=en}}</ref> When '']'' independently checked the numbers, no voter discrepancies were found.<ref name=":3" /> When questioned the next day, Wood described this as "a simple mistake" and said the affidavit "will be corrected if it hasn't been already".<ref name=":10" /> | |||
====2020 Election Legitimacy Team==== | |||
After Giuliani's segment ended, Powell took the lectern and alleged, without evidence, that an international ] plot to rig the 2020 election had been engineered by Cuba, China, Venezuela, ] (who died in 2013), ], the ] and ].<ref name=":8" /><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://politi.co/3kUvpS9|title=POLITICO Playbook PM: Rudy.|first1=Jake|last1=Sherman|first2=Anna|last2=Palmer|first3=Garrett|last3=Ross|first4=Eli|last4=Okun|website=POLITICO|access-date=November 19, 2020|archive-date=November 20, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201120033527/https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook-pm/2020/11/19/rudy-490945|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/article/who-is-sidney-powell.html|title=What We Know About Sidney Powell, the Lawyer Behind Wild Voting Conspiracy Theories|first1=Jeremy W.|last1=Peters|first2=Alan|last2=Feuer|date=December 8, 2020|via=NYTimes.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/19/fact-checking-craziest-news-conference-trump-presidency/|title=Analysis | Fact-checking the craziest news conference of the Trump presidency|first=Glenn|last=Kessler|via=www.washingtonpost.com}}</ref> She also alleged that ] "can set and run an algorithm that probably ran all over the country to take a certain percentage of votes from President Trump and flip them to President Biden".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/19/politics/giuliani-trump-legal-team-press-briefing-fact-check/index.html|title=Fact checking Giuliani and the Trump legal team's wild, fact-free press conference|first1=Tara|last1=Subramaniam|first2=Holmes|last2=Lybrand|website=CNN|access-date=November 20, 2020|archive-date=November 20, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201120015606/https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/19/politics/giuliani-trump-legal-team-press-briefing-fact-check/index.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The source for many of these claims appeared to be ] news organization ] (OANN).<ref name=":8" /> She also repeated a conspiracy theory<ref>{{Cite web|last=Darcy|first=Oliver|title=Company debunks conspiracy theory that its server showed a landslide for Trump|url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/17/media/scytl-debunks-conspiracy-theory/index.html|access-date=2020-11-23|website=CNN}}</ref>—spread by Congressman ], OANN and others<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/20/technology/trump-allies-are-among-the-frequent-purveyors-of-election-misinformation.html|title=Trump allies are among the frequent purveyors of election misinformation.|first=Linda|last=Qiu|date=November 20, 2020|work=The New York Times}}</ref>—that election results showing a landslide victory for Trump had been transmitted to the German office of the Spanish ] firm ], after which a company server was supposedly seized in a raid by the United States Army.<ref name=":8" /> The US Army and Scytl refuted these claims;<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Joffe-Block|first1=Jude|url=https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-afs:Content:9754011363|title=False reports claim election servers were seized in Germany|date=November 14, 2020|work=]|access-date=November 22, 2020|archive-date=November 15, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201115091412/https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-afs:Content:9754011363|url-status=live}}</ref> Scytl has not had any offices in Germany since September 2019 and does not tabulate US votes.<ref name="scytl-pr-13-nov">{{cite web |title=Scytl strongly denies the false information related to the U.S. elections |url=https://www.scytl.com/en/fact-checking-regarding-us-elections-debunking-fake-news/ |website=Scytl |access-date=21 November 2020 |date=13 November 2020 |archive-date=November 20, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201120201610/https://www.scytl.com/en/fact-checking-regarding-us-elections-debunking-fake-news/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="nyt-scytl">{{cite web |last1=Roose |first1=Kevin |title=No, the Army didn't seize a German server showing a Trump landslide |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/18/technology/scytl-trump.html |work=The New York Times |access-date=21 November 2020 |date=18 November 2020 |archive-date=November 21, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201121025922/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/18/technology/scytl-trump.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
In the wake of the election, Trump established a legal team to ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.foxnews.com/transcript/trump-legal-team-to-file-new-ballot-lawsuits|title=Trump legal team to file new ballot lawsuits|date=November 8, 2020|work=Fox News|access-date=November 14, 2020|archive-date=November 15, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201115005625/https://www.foxnews.com/transcript/trump-legal-team-to-file-new-ballot-lawsuits|url-status=live}}</ref> On November 14, Trump named ] to lead the team, with ], her husband ], ], and Powell as members of this team.<ref name=":7">{{cite tweet |last=Trump |first=Donald |author-link=Donald Trump |user=realDonaldTrump |number=1327811527123103746 |date=November 15, 2020 |title=I look forward to Mayor Giuliani spearheading the legal effort to defend OUR RIGHT to FREE and FAIR ELECTIONS! Rudy Giuliani, Joseph diGenova, Victoria Toensing, Sidney Powell, and Jenna Ellis, a truly great team, added to our other wonderful lawyers and representatives! |language=en |access-date=December 8, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220816010600/http://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/1327811527123103746 |archive-date=August 16, 2022 |url-status=live}}</ref> The team proceeded to file numerous lawsuits in several states over alleged ], illegal votes, machine errors, vote dumps, and late-counted votes. Precisely how Powell gained prominence in the legal team is unknown, even to some campaign officials. One official claimed Powell "simply showed up at headquarters".<ref name="WaPoConspir" /> | |||
Giuliani and Powell alleged multiple instances of ] in key states at a November 19 press conference.<ref name=":3">{{Cite news|last=Blake|first=Aaron|date=November 20, 2020|title=The Trump campaign's much-hyped affidavit features a big, glaring error|newspaper=]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/20/trump-campaigns-much-hyped-affidavit-features-big-glaring-error/|url-status=live|access-date=November 20, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201120171553/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/20/trump-campaigns-much-hyped-affidavit-features-big-glaring-error/|archive-date=November 20, 2020}}</ref> They cited an ]—filed by Russell Ramsland<ref>{{cite news |title=The making of a myth |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/interactive/2021/trump-election-fraud-texas-businessman-ramsland-asog/ |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=May 9, 2021|author1=Emma Brown|author2=Aaron C. Davis|author3=Jon Swaine|author4=Josh Dawsey}}</ref> and ] on behalf of the Trump campaign<ref name=":10">{{cite web|title=Giuliani cites affidavit with crucial errors in press conference|url=https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/nov/20/rudy-giuliani/giuliani-cites-affidavit-crucial-errors-press-conf/|access-date=November 23, 2020|website=PolitiFact|language=en-US}}</ref>—as evidence of manipulated results. In their comparison of votes cast against total voters registered in ], Powell asserted that they found over-voting of "up to 350 percent in some places".<ref name=":3" /> However, the affidavit's conclusion was erroneous since it compared the Michigan vote tallies against population data from ] (whose respective abbreviations are MI and MN, a possible source of the error).<ref name=":10" /><ref>{{cite web|last=Williams|first=Jordan|date=November 20, 2020|title=Trump lawyers cited Minnesota counties in affidavit about Michigan: report|url=https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/526926-trump-lawyers-cited-minnesota-counties-in-affidavit-about-michigan-report|access-date=November 23, 2020|website=The Hill|language=en}}</ref> When '']'' independently checked the numbers, no voter discrepancies were found.<ref name=":3" /> When questioned the next day, Wood described this as "a simple mistake" and said the affidavit "will be corrected if it hasn't been already".<ref name=":10" /> | |||
Later that evening on his Fox News program '']'', conservative commentator ] said he had invited Powell onto the show to provide proof of her allegations. After repeated requests, Powell became angry and said to "stop contacting her", Carlson stated. Carlson's team contacted other figures in the Trump campaign who said that Powell had given them no evidence for her allegations.<ref name=":11">{{Cite web|last=Carlson|first=Tucker|date=2020-11-19|title=Tucker Carlson: Time for Sidney Powell to show us her evidence|url=https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-rudy-giuliani-sidney-powell-election-fraud|access-date=2020-11-23|website=Fox News|language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
After Giuliani's segment ended, Powell took the lectern and alleged, without evidence, that an international ] plot to rig the 2020 election had been engineered by Cuba, China, Venezuela, ] (who died in 2013), ], the ] and ].<ref name=":8" /><ref>{{cite web|url=https://politi.co/3kUvpS9|title=POLITICO Playbook PM: Rudy.|first1=Jake|last1=Sherman|first2=Anna|last2=Palmer|first3=Garrett|last3=Ross|first4=Eli|last4=Okun|website=POLITICO|date=November 19, 2020 |access-date=November 19, 2020|archive-date=November 20, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201120033527/https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook-pm/2020/11/19/rudy-490945|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/article/who-is-sidney-powell.html|title=What We Know About Sidney Powell, the Lawyer Behind Wild Voting Conspiracy Theories|first1=Jeremy W.|last1=Peters|first2=Alan|last2=Feuer|work=The New York Times |date=December 8, 2020|via=NYTimes.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/19/fact-checking-craziest-news-conference-trump-presidency/|title=Analysis | Fact-checking the craziest news conference of the Trump presidency|first=Glenn|last=Kessler|via=www.washingtonpost.com}}</ref> She also alleged that ] "can set and run an algorithm that probably ran all over the country to take a certain percentage of votes from President Trump and flip them to President Biden".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/19/politics/giuliani-trump-legal-team-press-briefing-fact-check/index.html|title=Fact checking Giuliani and the Trump legal team's wild, fact-free press conference|first1=Tara|last1=Subramaniam|first2=Holmes|last2=Lybrand|website=CNN|access-date=November 20, 2020|archive-date=November 20, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201120015606/https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/19/politics/giuliani-trump-legal-team-press-briefing-fact-check/index.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The source for many of these claims appeared to be ] news organization ] (OANN).<ref name=":8" /> She also repeated a conspiracy theory<ref>{{cite news|last=Darcy|first=Oliver|title=Company debunks conspiracy theory that its server showed a landslide for Trump|url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/17/media/scytl-debunks-conspiracy-theory/index.html|access-date=November 23, 2020|website=CNN}}</ref>—spread by Congressman ], OANN and others<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/20/technology/trump-allies-are-among-the-frequent-purveyors-of-election-misinformation.html|title=Trump allies are among the frequent purveyors of election misinformation.|first=Linda|last=Qiu|date=November 20, 2020|work=The New York Times}}</ref>—that election results showing a landslide victory for Trump had been transmitted to the German office of the Spanish ] firm ], after which a company server was supposedly seized in a raid by the United States Army.<ref name=":8" /> The US Army and Scytl refuted these claims;<ref>{{cite news|last1=Joffe-Block|first1=Jude|url=https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-afs:Content:9754011363|title=False reports claim election servers were seized in Germany|date=November 14, 2020|work=Associated Press|access-date=November 22, 2020|archive-date=November 15, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201115091412/https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-afs:Content:9754011363|url-status=live}}</ref> Scytl has not had any offices in Germany since September 2019 and does not tabulate US votes.<ref name="scytl-pr-13-nov">{{cite web |title=Scytl strongly denies the false information related to the U.S. elections |url=https://www.scytl.com/en/fact-checking-regarding-us-elections-debunking-fake-news/ |website=Scytl |access-date=November 21, 2020 |date=November 13, 2020 |archive-date=November 20, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201120201610/https://www.scytl.com/en/fact-checking-regarding-us-elections-debunking-fake-news/ |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="nyt-scytl">{{cite news |last1=Roose |first1=Kevin |title=No, the Army didn't seize a German server showing a Trump landslide |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/18/technology/scytl-trump.html |work=The New York Times |access-date=November 21, 2020 |date=November 18, 2020 |archive-date=November 21, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201121025922/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/18/technology/scytl-trump.html |url-status=live }}</ref> In a March 2021 report, the Justice and Homeland Security Departments flatly rejected accusations of voting fraud conducted by foreign nations.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/16/us/politics/election-interference-russia-2020-assessment.html|title=Russian Interference in 2020 Included Influencing Trump Associates, Report Says|first=Julian E.|last=Barnes|work=The New York Times |date=March 16, 2021|via=NYTimes.com}}</ref> ], former ABC News chief White House correspondent for the duration of the Trump presidency, wrote in his November 2021 book, ''Betrayal'', that Powell told Defense Department official ] that CIA director ] had been injured and detained in Germany while attempting to retrieve the alleged server and destroy the purported evidence. She asked Cohen-Watnick, who previously worked under Flynn in the government, to launch a special operations mission to physically seize Haspel and compel her to confess.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Steakin |first1=Will |title=Trump allies pressed Defense Department to help overturn election, new book says |url=https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-allies-pressed-defense-department-overturn-election-book/story?id=81182008 |publisher=ABC News |date=November 16, 2021}}</ref> | |||
In a subsequent interview with ] on November 21,<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-11-22|title=Trump lawyer Sidney Powell says Georgia election lawsuit "will be biblical," suggests GOP governor helped Biden|url=https://www.newsweek.com/trump-lawyer-sidney-powell-says-georgia-election-lawsuit-will-biblical-suggests-gop-governor-1549333|access-date=2020-11-23|website=Newsweek|language=en}}</ref> Powell accused ] Republican governor, ], of being "in on the Dominion scam" and suggested financial impropriety.<ref>{{Cite web|agency=Associated Press|date=2020-11-23|title=Trump campaign cuts ties with attorney Sidney Powell after bizarre election fraud claims|url=http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/nov/23/trump-campaign-cuts-ties-with-attorney-sidney-powell-after-bizarre-election-claims|access-date=2020-11-23|website=The Guardian|language=en}}</ref> Powell additionally alleged that fraud had cost ] the ] against incumbent ] in the ].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Haberman |first1=Maggie |last2=Feuer |first2=Alan |title=Trump Team Disavows Lawyer Who Peddled Conspiracy Theories on Voting |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/22/us/politics/sidney-powell-trump.html |access-date=November 26, 2020 |work=] |date=November 22, 2020 |archive-url=https://archive.ph/5fSxF |archive-date=November 23, 2020}}</ref> She also claimed the ] had used rigged Dominion machines to defeat ] in the 2016 primary, and that Sanders learned of this but "sold out".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.mediaite.com/election-2020/trump-lawyer-sidney-powell-accuses-georgia-gov-brian-kemp-and-bernie-sanders-of-complicity-in-bonkers-voting-machine-conspiracy/|title=Sidney Powell Goes After Brian Kemp Over Election Conspiracy|date=November 22, 2020|publisher=Mediaite|access-date=November 22, 2020|archive-date=November 22, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201122191809/https://www.mediaite.com/election-2020/trump-lawyer-sidney-powell-accuses-georgia-gov-brian-kemp-and-bernie-sanders-of-complicity-in-bonkers-voting-machine-conspiracy/|url-status=live}}</ref> She said she would "blow up" Georgia with a "biblical" court filing.<ref>{{Cite news|date=2020-11-23|title=Sidney Powell: Trump team cuts ties with lawyer who peddled bizarre fraud claims|language=en-GB|work=]|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-55040756|access-date=2020-11-24}}</ref> Powell suggested that candidates "paid to have the system rigged to work for them".<ref>{{Cite web|last=Vella|first=Lauren|date=November 19, 2020|title=Ernst: Trump lawyer claim that candidates pay to rig elections 'absolutely outrageous'|url=https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/526798-ernst-trump-lawyer-claim-that-candidates-pay-to-rig-elections-absolutely|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201120033548/https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/526798-ernst-trump-lawyer-claim-that-candidates-pay-to-rig-elections-absolutely|archive-date=November 20, 2020|access-date=November 20, 2020|website=The Hill}}</ref> On the basis of these claims, Powell called for Republican-controlled ] in swing states to disregard the election results and appoint a ] of "loyal" ] who would vote to re-elect Trump,<ref>{{Cite web|last=Smith|first=David|date=2020-11-21|title=Trump makes futile last stand to overturn results as Georgia certifies Biden win|url=http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/nov/20/trump-michigan-republicans-election|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201121060545/https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/nov/20/trump-michigan-republicans-election|archive-date=November 21, 2020|access-date=2020-11-21|website=]|language=en}}</ref> based on authority supposedly resting in ].<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://twitter.com/JasonSCampbell/status/1329549873516048387 |title=Sidney Powell: "The entire election, frankly, in all the swing states should be overturned and the legislatures should make sure that the electors are selected for Trump" |access-date=November 20, 2020 |archive-date=November 20, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201120033548/https://twitter.com/JasonSCampbell/status/1329549873516048387 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Later on the evening of November 14, on his Fox News program '']'', conservative commentator ] said he had invited Powell onto his show to provide proof of her allegations. After repeated requests, he said Powell became angry with him and said he should "stop contacting her." Carlson's team contacted other figures in the Trump campaign who said that Powell had not given them evidence of her allegations.<ref name=":11">{{cite web|last=Carlson|first=Tucker|date=November 19, 2020|title=Tucker Carlson: Time for Sidney Powell to show us her evidence|url=https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-rudy-giuliani-sidney-powell-election-fraud|access-date=November 23, 2020|website=Fox News|language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
Giuliani and Ellis issued a November 22 statement that Powell was "practicing law on her own" and was not (or was no longer) a part of the Trump legal team.<ref name=":4">{{Cite web|date=2020-11-23|title=Trump campaign legal team distances itself from Powell|url=https://apnews.com/article/georgia-c74165d465cf28b5478a65bd267fde29|access-date=2020-11-23|website=AP NEWS}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Trump legal team disavows association with lawyer Sidney Powell|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sidney-powell-trump-legal-team-disavows-association/|access-date=2020-11-23|website=CBS News|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/22/trump-campaign-sidney-powell-legal-439357|title=Trump campaign cuts Sidney Powell from president's legal team|website=POLITICO}}</ref> According to ''The Washington Post'', the Trump campaign cut ties with Powell because she was seen as harming Trump's broader legal efforts, and because Trump disliked the coverage she received from ''Tucker Carlson Tonight''.<ref name=":9">{{Cite news|last1=Sonmez|first1=Felicia|last2=Dawsey|first2=Josh|date=November 22, 2020|title=Giuliani releases statement distancing Trump campaign from lawyer Sidney Powell|work=]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/22/giuliani-releases-statement-distancing-trump-campaign-lawyer-sidney-powell/|access-date=November 22, 2020}}</ref> Shortly after the announcement, her client Michael Flynn tweeted that ] had suspended her account for twelve hours, and that she agreed with the campaign's announcement and was "staying the course" to prove election fraud.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-powell-idUSKBN2820UB|title=Trump campaign parts ways with Powell after vote-switching claim|first=Jan|last=Wolfe|date=November 23, 2020|publisher=Reuters}}</ref> Dominion Voting Systems released a statement refuting Powell's claims of fraud on November 26.<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Buchanan|first1=Christopher|date=2020-11-27|title=Dominion Voting Systems responds to 'wild and reckless' claims by Sidney Powell on website|url=https://www.fox61.com/article/news/politics/elections/dominion-voting-systems-response-to-sidney-powell/85-af899a76-7a47-4d9c-8d1b-1a891dee2104|access-date=2020-11-29|publisher=]|language=en-US}}</ref><ref name =WaPoConspir/> | |||
In an interview with ] on November 21,<ref>{{cite web|date=November 22, 2020|title=Trump lawyer Sidney Powell says Georgia election lawsuit "will be biblical," suggests GOP governor helped Biden|url=https://www.newsweek.com/trump-lawyer-sidney-powell-says-georgia-election-lawsuit-will-biblical-suggests-gop-governor-1549333|access-date=November 23, 2020|website=Newsweek|language=en}}</ref> Powell accused ] Republican governor, ], of being "in on the Dominion scam" and suggested financial impropriety.<ref>{{cite news|agency=Associated Press|date=November 23, 2020|title=Trump campaign cuts ties with attorney Sidney Powell after bizarre election fraud claims|url=http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/nov/23/trump-campaign-cuts-ties-with-attorney-sidney-powell-after-bizarre-election-claims|access-date=November 23, 2020|website=The Guardian|language=en}}</ref> Powell additionally alleged that fraud had cost ] the ] against incumbent ] in the ].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Haberman |first1=Maggie |last2=Feuer |first2=Alan |title=Trump Team Disavows Lawyer Who Peddled Conspiracy Theories on Voting |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/22/us/politics/sidney-powell-trump.html |access-date=November 26, 2020 |work=] |date=November 22, 2020 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20201123043554/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/22/us/politics/sidney-powell-trump.html |archive-date=November 23, 2020}}</ref> She also claimed the ] had used rigged Dominion machines to defeat ] in the 2016 primary, and that Sanders learned of this but "sold out".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.mediaite.com/election-2020/trump-lawyer-sidney-powell-accuses-georgia-gov-brian-kemp-and-bernie-sanders-of-complicity-in-bonkers-voting-machine-conspiracy/|title=Sidney Powell Goes After Brian Kemp Over Election Conspiracy|date=November 22, 2020|publisher=Mediaite|access-date=November 22, 2020|archive-date=November 22, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201122191809/https://www.mediaite.com/election-2020/trump-lawyer-sidney-powell-accuses-georgia-gov-brian-kemp-and-bernie-sanders-of-complicity-in-bonkers-voting-machine-conspiracy/|url-status=live}}</ref> She said she would "blow up" Georgia with a "biblical" court filing.<ref>{{Cite news|date=November 23, 2020|title=Sidney Powell: Trump team cuts ties with lawyer who peddled bizarre fraud claims|language=en-GB|work=]|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-55040756|access-date=November 24, 2020}}</ref> Powell suggested that candidates "paid to have the system rigged to work for them".<ref>{{cite web|last=Vella|first=Lauren|date=November 19, 2020|title=Ernst: Trump lawyer claim that candidates pay to rig elections 'absolutely outrageous'|url=https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/526798-ernst-trump-lawyer-claim-that-candidates-pay-to-rig-elections-absolutely|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201120033548/https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/526798-ernst-trump-lawyer-claim-that-candidates-pay-to-rig-elections-absolutely|archive-date=November 20, 2020|access-date=November 20, 2020|website=The Hill}}</ref> On the basis of these claims, Powell called for Republican-controlled ] in swing states to disregard the election results and appoint a ] of "loyal" ] who would vote to re-elect Trump,<ref>{{cite web|last=Smith|first=David|date=November 21, 2020|title=Trump makes futile last stand to overturn results as Georgia certifies Biden win|url=http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/nov/20/trump-michigan-republicans-election|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201121060545/https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/nov/20/trump-michigan-republicans-election|archive-date=November 21, 2020|access-date=November 21, 2020|website=]|language=en}}</ref> based on authority supposedly resting in ].<ref>{{cite web |url=https://twitter.com/JasonSCampbell/status/1329549873516048387 |title=Sidney Powell: "The entire election, frankly, in all the swing states should be overturned and the legislatures should make sure that the electors are selected for Trump" |access-date=November 20, 2020 |archive-date=November 20, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201120033548/https://twitter.com/JasonSCampbell/status/1329549873516048387 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
During an Oval Office meeting with Powell, Giuliani, Flynn, and ] on December 18, Trump suggested naming Powell as a ] to investigate allegations of election fraud. Most Trump advisors opposed the idea, while Powell characterized them as quitters.<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Haberman|first1=Maggie|author-link1=Maggie Haberman|last2=Kanno-Youngs|first2=Zolan|author-link2=Zolan Kanno-Youngs|date=2020-12-19|title=Trump Discussed Naming Campaign Lawyer as Special Counsel on Election Fraud|language=en-US|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/19/us/politics/trump-discussed-naming-campaign-lawyer-as-special-counsel-on-election-fraud.html|access-date=2020-12-19|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> The meeting was reportedly heated and included Flynn's proposal for the president to declare ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/19/politics/trump-oval-office-meeting-special-counsel-martial-law/index.html|title=Heated Oval Office meeting included talk of special counsel, martial law as Trump advisers clash|author1=Kevin Liptak |author2= Pamela Brown|website=CNN}}</ref> Powell had previously called on the president to invoke the ] to deploy military forces.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/19/sidney-powell-trump-special-counsel-448694|title=Trump sought to tap Sidney Powell as special counsel for election fraud|website=POLITICO}}</ref> | |||
Giuliani and Ellis issued a November 22 statement that Powell was "practicing law on her own" and was not (or was no longer) a part of the Trump legal team.<ref name=":4">{{cite web|date=November 23, 2020|title=Trump campaign legal team distances itself from Powell|url=https://apnews.com/article/georgia-c74165d465cf28b5478a65bd267fde29|access-date=November 23, 2020|website=AP NEWS}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Trump legal team disavows association with lawyer Sidney Powell|url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/sidney-powell-trump-legal-team-disavows-association/|access-date=November 23, 2020|website=CBS News|date=November 23, 2020 |language=en-US}}</ref><ref name=WP/><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/22/trump-campaign-sidney-powell-legal-439357|title=Trump campaign cuts Sidney Powell from president's legal team|website=POLITICO|date=November 22, 2020 }}</ref> According to ''The Washington Post'', the Trump campaign cut ties with Powell because she was seen as harming Trump's broader legal efforts, and because Trump disliked the coverage she received from ''Tucker Carlson Tonight''.<ref name=":9">{{Cite news|last1=Sonmez|first1=Felicia|last2=Dawsey|first2=Josh|date=November 22, 2020|title=Giuliani releases statement distancing Trump campaign from lawyer Sidney Powell|newspaper=]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/22/giuliani-releases-statement-distancing-trump-campaign-lawyer-sidney-powell/|access-date=November 22, 2020}}</ref> However, she continued to meet with the president in the ].<ref name="wolfe">{{cite web |last=Wolfe |first=Jan |date=November 22, 2020 |title=Trump campaign says Sidney Powell not a member of legal team |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-powell-idUSKBN2820UB |work=]}}</ref><ref name=":5">{{Cite news |last=Bowden |first=John |date=November 22, 2020 |title=Giuliani distances Trump campaign from attorney Sidney Powell |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/527105-giuliani-distances-trump-campaign-from-sidney-powell |access-date=November 22, 2020 |newspaper=] |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |author=Kevin Liptak and Pamela Brown |title=Heated Oval Office meeting included talk of special counsel, martial law as Trump advisers clash |url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/19/politics/trump-oval-office-meeting-special-counsel-martial-law/index.html |website=CNN}}</ref><ref>{{Cite tweet |number=1341138750085206016 |user=maggieNYT |title=Four people briefed on events said Sidney Powell was back at the White House again today, for third time in four days. |author=Maggie Haberman |author-link=Maggie Haberman |date=December 21, 2020 |access-date=June 2, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210425041435/https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1341138750085206016 |archive-date=April 25, 2021 |url-status=live}}</ref> Shortly after the announcement, her client Michael Flynn tweeted that ] had suspended her account for twelve hours, and that she agreed with the campaign's announcement and was "staying the course" to prove election fraud.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-powell-idUSKBN2820UB|title=Trump campaign parts ways with Powell after vote-switching claim|first=Jan|last=Wolfe|date=November 23, 2020|publisher=Reuters}}</ref> | |||
Dominion Voting Systems sent a letter to Powell on December 16, 2020 demanding she publicly retract her baseless allegations about the company.<ref name="auto1"/><ref>{{cite letter | |||
On November 23, Fox executive Raj Shah informed his superiors that Fox staff had entreated numerous of its sources within Trump's administration "...to inform reporters that Powell offered no evidence for her claims and didn't speak for the president."<ref name=WP/> Despite this, on November 24 she joined host ] to tell his viewers that in Arizona, "...there were 35,000 votes added to every Democrat candidate just to start their voting off. It's like getting your $500 of Monopoly money to begin with when you haven't done anything, and it was only for Democrats."<ref name=WP/> | |||
Dominion Voting Systems released a statement refuting Powell's fraud claims on November 26.<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Buchanan|first1=Christopher|date=November 27, 2020|title=Dominion Voting Systems responds to 'wild and reckless' claims by Sidney Powell on website|url=https://www.fox61.com/article/news/politics/elections/dominion-voting-systems-response-to-sidney-powell/85-af899a76-7a47-4d9c-8d1b-1a891dee2104|access-date=November 29, 2020|publisher=]|language=en-US}}</ref><ref name =WaPoConspir/> | |||
A draft executive order dated December 16 called for Trump to order a military seizure of voting machines and the appointment of a special counsel; when it surfaced a year later, it was not immediately clear who drafted it.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Woodruff Swan |first1=Betsy |date=January 21, 2022 |title=Read the never-issued Trump order that would have seized voting machines |work=Politico |url=https://www.politico.com/news/2022/01/21/read-the-never-issued-trump-order-that-would-have-seized-voting-machines-527572}}</ref> Trump ally ] testified to the ] that Michael Flynn associate ] originated the idea of a military seizure of voting machines.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Woodruff Swan |first1=Betsy |date=January 24, 2022 |title=Kerik told Jan. 6 panel that former Army colonel came up with idea to seize voting machines |work=Politico |url=https://www.politico.com/news/2022/01/24/kerik-jan-6-voting-machines-00001552}}</ref> | |||
Powell, who had previously called on the president to invoke the ] to deploy military forces,<ref>{{cite web |date=December 19, 2020 |title=Trump sought to tap Sidney Powell as special counsel for election fraud |url=https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/19/sidney-powell-trump-special-counsel-448694 |website=POLITICO}}</ref> joined an Oval Office meeting on December 18, with Giuliani, Flynn, and ].<ref name="WP" /> There, Trump suggested naming Powell as a ] to investigate allegations of election fraud. Most Trump advisors opposed the idea, while Powell characterized them as quitters.<ref>{{Cite news|last1=Haberman|first1=Maggie|author-link1=Maggie Haberman|last2=Kanno-Youngs|first2=Zolan|author-link2=Zolan Kanno-Youngs|date=December 19, 2020|title=Trump Discussed Naming Campaign Lawyer as Special Counsel on Election Fraud|language=en-US|work=The New York Times|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/19/us/politics/trump-discussed-naming-campaign-lawyer-as-special-counsel-on-election-fraud.html|access-date=December 19, 2020|issn=0362-4331}}</ref> The meeting was reportedly heated and included Flynn's proposal for the president to declare ].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/19/politics/trump-oval-office-meeting-special-counsel-martial-law/index.html|title=Heated Oval Office meeting included talk of special counsel, martial law as Trump advisers clash|author1=Kevin Liptak |author2= Pamela Brown|website=CNN}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Blake |first=Aaron |date=2023-10-19 |title=Analysis {{!}} What could Sidney Powell testify to now that she's pleaded guilty? |language=en-US |newspaper=Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/10/19/sidney-powell-guilty-trump-fulton/ |access-date=2023-10-19 |issn=0190-8286 |quote='I think that it got to the point where the screaming was completely, completely out there,' Trump White House lawyer Eric Herschmann testified to the House Jan. 6 committee.}}</ref> | |||
By December 2020 over 4,000 attorneys had signed an open letter asking ] disciplinary authorities to condemn and investigate Powell's behavior.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.axios.com/sidney-powell-dismiss-dominion-lawsuit-cf25a9bd-5aed-4908-959e-c5f9ea9aa425.html|title=Pro-Trump lawyer Sidney Powell moves to dismiss Dominion defamation suit|first=Shawna|last=Chen|website=Axios|date=March 22, 2021 }}</ref> | |||
In May 2021, Powell continued to express the hope that the election result would be reversed. She spoke at a QAnon conference in ] over ] weekend, where she falsely asserted Trump "can simply be reinstated, that a new Inauguration Day is set", eliciting cheers from the crowd. The date for this was supposedly August 13, however this date passed and Trump was not reinstated.<ref>{{cite web| url = https://www.newsweek.com/sidney-powell-claims-trump-can-simply-reinstated-biden-told-leave-white-house-1596207| title = Sidney Powell Claims Trump 'Can Simply Be Reinstated,' Biden Told to Leave White House | last = Lemon| first = Jason | date = May 30, 2021 | website = newsweek.com | publisher = ]| access-date = May 30, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Relman|first=Eliza|date=May 31, 2021|title=Ex-Trump lawyer Sidney Powell showed up to a QAnon conference in a biker vest and falsely claimed Trump could be 'reinstated' as president|url=https://www.businessinsider.com/ex-trump-lawyer-sidney-powell-tells-qanon-crowd-trump-can-be-reinstated-as-president-2021-5|access-date=June 1, 2021|website=]|language=en-US}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/01/politics/powell-trump-inauguration-fact-check/index.html|title=Fact check: No, Trump can't 'simply be reinstated' as president|author=Tara Subramaniam|website=CNN}}</ref> | |||
Powell was subpoenaed in January 2022 to testify before the ].<ref>{{cite news |title=January 6 committee subpoenas Giuliani and 3 others |url=https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/18/politics/rudy-giuliani-january-6-subpoena/index.html |publisher=CNN |date=January 18, 2022|author1=Zachary Cohen|author2=Annie Grayer}}</ref><ref>{{cite letter |title=Letter to Sidney Powell |recipient = Sidney Powell|url=https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/2022-1-18.BGT%20Letter%20to%20Powell_Redacted.pdf |author=January 6 Committee |date=January 18, 2022}}</ref> | |||
She sued to block release of her phone records.<ref>{{cite news|last=Murdock|first=Sebastian|date=February 19, 2022|title=Sidney Powell Sues To Block Subpoena By Jan. 6 Committee For Phone Records|url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/sidney-powell-sues-subpoena-capitol-riot-house-committee_n_6211147ae4b0f2c343f51669|access-date=February 21, 2022|work=HuffPost|language=en}}</ref> | |||
====Independent election lawsuits==== | |||
While working for Trump, Powell stated she would "release the ]", a catchphrase from the 1981 film '']'', and the expression spread across Twitter.<ref name="KrakenTwitter" /> After the Trump campaign cut ties with Powell, she continued to file independent election lawsuits in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Brumback |first1=Kate |title=Sidney Powell unrelenting in legal battle on Trump's behalf |url=https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-joe-biden-donald-trump-georgia-lawsuits-0ed38af7f94b596308475aa8b28c871c |access-date=December 24, 2020 |work=Associated Press |date=December 10, 2020}}</ref> | |||
Sources described Powell's election-related filings as filled with significant "sloppy mistakes".<ref name=Montellaro/> In her Georgia lawsuit, she claimed that a computer algorithm took votes from Biden and flipped them to Trump, later amending the filing.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Breuninger |first1=Kevin |title=Sidney Powell amends court filing that mistakenly said Georgia votes were flipped from Biden to Trump |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/04/sidney-powell-amends-court-filing-that-said-georgia-votes-were-flipped-to-trump.html |access-date=December 5, 2020 |work=] |date=December 4, 2020}}</ref> In Powell's submissions to district courts in Georgia and Michigan, ''district'' was misspelled three different ways on the first pages.<ref name=Blake2>{{cite news |last1=Blake |first1=Aaron |title=Trump allies' sloppy, error-riddled legal effort |newspaper=] |access-date=December 4, 2020 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/12/03/trump-allies-sloppy-error-riddled-legal-effort/ |date=December 3, 2020 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20201203175750/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/12/03/trump-allies-sloppy-error-riddled-legal-effort/ |archive-date=December 3, 2020}}</ref> Powell's Michigan filing also had numerous formatting errors and misidentified one of her experts.<ref name=Blake2/><ref>{{cite news |last1=Aarons |first1=Tony |title=Ex-Trump Lawyer Sidney Powell Files Election Suits in '{{as written|DISTR|COICT}}' Court |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-26/ex-trump-lawyer-files-election-lawsuits-in-distrcoict-court |access-date=December 4, 2020 |work=] |date=November 26, 2020}}</ref> Two Republicans said they had been named as a plaintiff in the Georgia and Wisconsin lawsuits despite not having given permission to be included (although one later agreed to remain as a plaintiff).<ref name=Montellaro/> | |||
Powell's lawsuits cited an anonymous witness, referred to as "Spyder" or "Spider", who alleged that American voting systems were "certainly compromised by rogue actors, such as Iran and China". Spyder's real name was redacted from submitted documents; however, a bookmark in the file revealed his identity to be Joshua Merritt, an IT consultant. Although Powell's filings describe Merritt as a former "military intelligence expert", the ] stated that he never worked in military intelligence and had not finished a training course in military intelligence. Merritt acknowledged that the description was wrong and attributed the error to Powell's clerks. However, Merritt claimed he did finish the training, producing an "unofficial transcript" as evidence.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Brown |first1=Emma |last2=Davis |first2=Aaron |last3=Crites |first3=Alice |title=Sidney Powell's secret 'military intelligence expert,' key to fraud claims in election lawsuits, never worked in military intelligence |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/sidney-powell-spider-spyder-witness/2020/12/11/0cd567e6-3b2a-11eb-98c4-25dc9f4987e8_story.html |access-date=December 13, 2020 |newspaper=] |date=December 11, 2020}}</ref> | |||
Powell also presented an affidavit from an individual she described as a former intelligence contractor with knowledge of a foreign conspiracy to subvert democracy, who Powell said needed to remain anonymous to protect their "reputation, professional career and personal safety". ''The Washington Post'' identified the individual as pro-Trump podcaster Terpsichore Maras-Lindeman, and that parts of the affidavit matched a blog post she had written in November 2019. Maras-Lindeman had served in the Navy for less than a year over two decades earlier, and in a November 2018 civil suit the attorney general of North Dakota accused her of misappropriating funds for personal use from a charitable event she tried to organize. State attorneys asserted that she exaggerated her credentials and used multiple aliases and Social Security numbers in "a persistent effort...to deceive others". Asked about Maras-Lindeman, Powell told the ''Post'': "I don't have the same information you do."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/sidney-powells-secret-intelligence-contractor-witness-is-a-pro-trump-podcaster/2020/12/24/d5a1ab9e-4403-11eb-a277-49a6d1f9dff1_story.html|title=Sidney Powell's secret intelligence contractor witness is a pro-Trump podcaster|first=Jon|last=Swaine|via=www.washingtonpost.com}}</ref> | |||
====Arizona==== | |||
Powell filed a federal lawsuit against ] ], ] ] and other Arizona election officials on December 2, alleging that "poll watchers failed to adequately verify signatures on ballots, that Maricopa County ballot dispute referees were partisan, that Dominion backups had no chain of custody, and the Dominion machines themselves suffered from errors during state evaluations." The plaintiffs asked the court to decertify Arizona's election results or order that Arizona certify Trump electors.<ref>{{cite web|title=Bowyer v. Ducey|url=https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=409|website=Stanford-MIT Healthy Elections Project}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Docket for Bowyer v. Ducey, 2:20-cv-02321|url=https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18707812/bowyer-v-ducey/|access-date=December 6, 2020|website=CourtListener|language=en-us}}</ref> On December 9, U.S. district judge ] dismissed the case due to plaintiffs' lack of ], and ruled that the allegations of impropriety were "sorely wanting of relevant or reliable evidence", instead being "largely based on anonymous witnesses, hearsay, and irrelevant analysis of unrelated elections". The judge singled out the fraud allegations being put forth, writing that they "fail in their particularity and plausibility" and that there would be "extreme, and entirely unprecedented" harm to Arizona's more than 3 million voters to entertain Powell's lawsuit "at this late date".<ref>{{cite news |last1=Fischer |first1=Howard |title=Federal judge tosses last lawsuit that remained against Arizona's election results |url=https://tucson.com/news/local/federal-judge-tosses-last-lawsuit-that-remained-against-arizonas-election-results/article_e2e4ed09-f0f5-51db-992c-676483d116de.html |access-date=December 10, 2020 |work=] |agency=Capitol Media Services |date=December 9, 2020}}</ref><ref name=ArizonaAP1>{{cite news |last1=Billeaud |first1=Jacques |title=Powell trying to resurrect bid to undo Biden's Arizona win |url=https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-donald-trump-arizona-phoenix-lawsuits-b423468ac2233344275452679a59f165 |access-date=January 12, 2021 |work=Associated Press |date=December 10, 2020}}</ref> Powell filed an appeal of the lawsuit's dismissal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in December, which scheduled the due date for the opening brief to be two months after the ].<ref name=ArizonaAP1/> That month, Powell also filed an emergency petition with the ] seeking an extraordinary writ of mandamus for intervention in the case. The petition was denied without comment on March 1, 2021, ending the matter.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://lawandcrime.com/supreme-court/supreme-court-rejects-sidney-powells-election-fraud-petitions-without-further-comment/|title=Supreme Court Rejects Sidney Powell's Election Fraud Petitions without Further Comment|date=March 1, 2021}}</ref> | |||
====Georgia==== | |||
Powell and ] filed a lawsuit against ] Brian Kemp and other state officials on November 25, alleging that Dominion Voting Systems was used to rig votes for Biden. The plaintiffs asked the court to halt the certification of elections results and order Kemp to certify Trump as the winner in Georgia.<ref name=":843">{{Cite news|title=Trump supporters file lawsuit asking Georgia to decertify election, declare Trump the winner|language=en-US|website=WSBTV|url=https://www.wsbtv.com/news/politics/trump-lawyers-file-suit-asking-georgia-de-certify-election-declare-trump-winner/I4EONEJXNVAUHKLKRTFGYXGHV4/|url-status=live|access-date=November 28, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201128063916/https://www.wsbtv.com/news/politics/trump-lawyers-file-suit-asking-georgia-de-certify-election-declare-trump-winner/I4EONEJXNVAUHKLKRTFGYXGHV4/|archive-date=November 28, 2020}}</ref> U.S. district judge ] issued a temporary restraining order on November 29 that voting machines in Georgia's Cobb, Gwinnett, and Cherokee counties were to preserve their data, after Wood had argued to retain "this information on a very limited basis". Powell appealed to the ] to expand the restraining order. A three-judge panel unanimously dismissed Powell's appeal on December 4, citing a failure to prove that the restraining order caused serious harm. The panel also indicated that the original lawsuit, in which Powell also sought to have voting machines inspected, was "considerably delayed" by the appeal.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Gerstein |first1=Josh |title=Judge: 'Precious little proof' in Georgia election fraud suit |url=https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/30/proof-georgia-election-fraud-case-441701 |access-date=December 5, 2020 |work=] |date=December 1, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Cheney |first1=Kyle |last2=Gerstein |first2=Josh |title=Donald Trump's brutal day in court |url=https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/04/donald-trump-in-court-443010 |access-date=December 5, 2020 |work=] |date=December 4, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Larson |first1=Erik |title=Georgia Says Ex-Trump Lawyer Suit Could Hinder Senate Runoff |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-04/georgia-says-sidney-powell-s-lawsuit-could-hinder-senate-runoff |access-date=December 5, 2020 |work=] |date=December 5, 2020 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20201205070154/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-04/georgia-says-sidney-powell-s-lawsuit-could-hinder-senate-runoff |archive-date=December 5, 2020 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Powell's evidence in the Georgia lawsuit included an affidavit from ], a former administrator of ]/8kun, the online home of ]. In his affidavit, Watkins stated that his reading of an online user guide for Dominion Voting Systems software led him to conclude that election fraud might be "within the realm of possibility". Watkins did not provide any legitimate evidence of fraud.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Harwell |first1=Drew |title=To boost voter-fraud claims, Trump advocate Sidney Powell turns to unusual source: The longtime operator of QAnon's Internet home |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/12/01/powell-cites-qanon-watkins/ |access-date=December 2, 2020 |newspaper=] |date=December 1, 2020 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20201202013516/https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/12/01/powell-cites-qanon-watkins/ |archive-date=December 2, 2020 |url-status=live }}</ref> Powell also claimed that "a certificate from the Secretary of State was awarded to Dominion Voting Systems but is undated." However, the attached certificate had apparently been edited to remove the date; the actual certificate is dated and available publicly.<ref name="Montellaro">{{cite news |last1=Montellaro |first1=Zach |last2=Cheney |first2=Kyle |title=Pro-Trump legal crusade peppered with bizarre blunders |url=https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/03/sidney-powell-trump-election-lawsuit-442472 |access-date=December 3, 2020 |work=] |date=December 3, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Hohmann |first1=James |last2=Alfaro |first2=Mariana |title=The Daily 202: Trump's threat to veto NDAA follows pattern of tenuously invoking 'National Security' |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/12/02/daily-202-trumps-threat-veto-ndaa-follows-pattern-tenuously-invoking-national-security/ |access-date=December 3, 2020 |newspaper=] |date=December 2, 2020 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20201202224853/https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/12/02/daily-202-trumps-threat-veto-ndaa-follows-pattern-tenuously-invoking-national-security/ |archive-date=December 2, 2020 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Batten dismissed the case in a ruling from the bench on December 7.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Fowler |first1=Stephen |title=Judge Finds 'Kraken' Election Challenge Lacking, Dismisses Lawsuit |url=https://www.gpb.org/news/2020/12/07/judge-finds-kraken-election-challenge-lacking-dismisses-lawsuit |access-date=December 8, 2020 |work=] |date=December 7, 2020}}</ref> The judge ruled that the plaintiffs did not have legal standing to bring the case, filed the case too late (as the Dominion machines were adopted months earlier), and filed the case in the wrong venue, the appropriate venue being a state court.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Carr |first1=Nicole |title=Federal judge dismisses Sidney Powell lawsuit seeking to decertify Georgia's elections |url=https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/federal-judge-dismisses-sidney-powell-lawsuit-seeking-decertify-georgias-elections/N7Z5MDKYRJAIZKCPQAXXEEP35Q/ |access-date=December 10, 2020 |work=] |date=December 7, 2020}}</ref> Batten also stated that the relief sought by Powell was impossible to grant.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Breuninger |first1=Kevin |last2=Mangan |first2=Dan |title=Federal judge dismisses Sidney Powell lawsuit that sought to overturn Trump loss in Georgia |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/07/judge-dismisses-sidney-powell-lawsuit-challenging-trump-georgia-loss.html |access-date=December 10, 2020 |work=] |date=December 7, 2020}}</ref> The plaintiffs filed an appeal (Case No. 20-14579)<ref>{{cite web|title=Court of Appeals Docket #: 20-14579|url=https://ecf.ca11.uscourts.gov/n/beam/servlet/TransportRoom?servlet=CaseSummary.jsp&caseNum=20-14579&incOrigDkt=Y&incDktEntries=Y|access-date=December 8, 2020}}</ref> of Batten's decision in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit on December 8.<ref>{{cite web|last=Choi|first=Joseph|date=December 8, 2020|title=Sidney Powell appeals dismissal of lawsuit to overturn Georgia election result|url=https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/529238-powell-appeals-dismissal-of-lawsuit-to-overturn-georgia-election-result|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201208190842/https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/529238-powell-appeals-dismissal-of-lawsuit-to-overturn-georgia-election-result|archive-date=December 8, 2020|access-date=December 8, 2020|website=TheHill|language=en}}</ref> Powell also appealed the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, which denied a motion to expedite the case.<ref name=PowellSCOTUS>{{cite news |last1=Stohr |first1=Greg |title=Ex-Trump Lawyer Asks Supreme Court to Nullify Two Biden Wins |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-16/ex-trump-lawyer-powell-asks-high-court-to-nullify-two-biden-wins |access-date=January 12, 2021 |work=] |date=December 15, 2020}}</ref><ref name=SCOTUSDenial>{{cite news |last1=Durkee |first1=Alison |title=Supreme Court Refuses To Consider GOP Post-Election Cases Before Biden Takes Office |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2021/01/11/supreme-court-refuses-to-consider-gop-trump-post-election-cases-before-biden-takes-office/?sh=43cd52522fcb |access-date=January 12, 2021 |work=] |date=January 11, 2021}}</ref> She dropped the lawsuit on January 19, 2021, one day before Biden's inauguration.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Durkee |first1=Alison |title=Sidney Powell Drops Georgia Kracken Lawsuit On Eve Of Biden's Inauguration |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2021/01/19/sidney-powell-drops-georgia-kracken-lawsuit-on-eve-of-bidens-inauguration/ |access-date=January 19, 2021 |work=] |date=January 19, 2021}}</ref> | |||
In August 2022, Fulton County district attorney ] sought to have Powell testify before a special grand jury seated for the investigation into possible illegal election interference. Powell was involved in arranging for the collection of data from election systems and voting machines at the county's elections office in rural ] in January 2021.<ref>{{Cite news |date=August 26, 2022 |title=Trump election probe in Georgia cites voting system breach |url=https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-voting-donald-trump-georgia-6c5483c82b47cf402136b39e72326309 |access-date=August 27, 2022 |work=AP News |language=en}}</ref> | |||
On October 19, 2023, Powell pleaded guilty to six misdemeanor charges for her role in the attempt by the former president and his allies to alter the outcome of the election in the State of Georgia and other states. She was sentenced to serve six years' probation (one year for each charge) and pay a $6,000 fine, and agreed to testify against the other defendants.<ref name="Forbes-Plea">{{cite news |last1=Durkee |first1=Alison |title=Sidney Powell Pleads Guilty In Georgia Election Case |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2023/10/19/sidney-powell-pleads-guilty-in-georgia-election-case/ |work=Forbes |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Trump's ex-lawyer Sidney Powell pleads guilty in Georgia election case |url=https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/oct/19/sidney-powell-guilty-plea-trump-georgia-elections |work=The Guardian |date=October 19, 2023}}</ref><ref name=APGuiltyPlea>{{Cite news |date=October 19, 2023 |title=Sidney Powell pleads guilty in case over efforts to overturn Trump's Georgia loss and gets probation|url=https://apnews.com/article/sidney-powell-plea-deal-georgia-election-indictment-ec7dc601ad78d756643aa2544028e9f5 |access-date=October 19, 2023 |work=AP News |language=en}}</ref> | |||
On October 31, 2023, the Georgia secretary of state's chief operating officer, ], displayed the final payment check from Powell at a press conference where he said that the check represented an admission that Powell's claims against Georgia's voting machines were false. He said, "If you didn't believe the three recounts, if you didn't believe the investigations, if you didn't believe the court cases, this check shows you she says, yes, I lied."<ref>{{cite news |last1=Gray |first1=Justin |title=Former Trump attorney, election denier Sidney Powell pays restitution to Ga. Secretary of State |url=https://www.wsbtv.com/news/former-trump-attorney-election-denier-sidney-powell-pays-restitution-ga-secretary-state/FXW7ELKYPBBVJNBYQBTF5T3FDI/ |access-date=November 3, 2023 |work=] |date=November 1, 2023}}</ref> | |||
====Michigan==== | |||
Powell filed a lawsuit against ] ] and other state officials on November 25, alleging a variety of violations of the election code and asking the court to decertify the state's election results or certify them for Trump.<ref name="Case 2:20-cv-13134-LVP-RSW2">{{cite web|date=November 25, 2020|title=King v. Whitmer|url=https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Michigan-Complaint.pdf|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201126053616/https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Michigan-Complaint.pdf|archive-date=November 26, 2020|access-date=November 25, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=King v. Whitmer|url=https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=410|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201209163222/https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=410|archive-date=December 9, 2020|access-date=December 9, 2020|website=Stanford-MIT Healthy Elections Project}}</ref> In the lawsuit, Powell submitted a witness's declaration that Joe Biden had "received more than 100% of the votes" in Edison County; however, there is no Edison County in Michigan or any other U.S. state.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Mikkelson |first1=David |title=Sidney Powell Lawsuit Cites Election Fraud in Non-Existent Michigan County |url=https://www.snopes.com/news/2020/12/01/sidney-powell-election-fraud/ |access-date=December 2, 2020 |work=] |date=December 1, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Pierce |first1=Charles P. |title=Sidney Powell Is the Elite Legal Strike Force's Elite Legal Kraken Keeper Trump's legal eagle flies into Edison County, Michigan, which does not exist. |url=https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a34838373/sidney-powell-trump-lawsuit-edison-county-michigan/ |access-date=December 2, 2020 |publisher=Esquire |date=December 1, 2020}}</ref> There <em>is</em> an ] in Minnesota, leading to speculation that the information was again taken from a list of Minnesota precincts.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Halpert |first1=Madeline |last2=Oosting |first2=Jonathan |last3=Shaheen |first3=Mansur |title=Weeks after vote, 13 fake fraud claims persist in Michigan. Here's the truth. |url=https://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-government/weeks-after-vote-13-fake-fraud-claims-persist-michigan-heres-truth |access-date=December 2, 2020 |publisher=Bridge Michigan |date=December 1, 2020}}</ref> | |||
U.S. district judge ] denied the requested relief on December 7, stating that the plaintiffs had only offered "theories, conjecture, and speculation" of potential vote switching. The judge also declared that the "ship has sailed" for most of the relief requested by the plaintiffs, while the rest "is beyond the power of any court". Furthermore, Parker wrote that the relief requested would "greatly harm the public interest" and felt that the plaintiffs' motive for filing the case was not to win, but rather to shake "people's faith in the democratic process and their trust in our government".<ref>{{cite news |last1=Mauger |first1=Craig |title=Federal judge upholds Michigan election: 'The people have spoken' |url=https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2020/12/07/federal-judge-upholds-michigan-election-the-people-have-spoken/3854998001 |access-date=December 8, 2020 |work=] |date=December 7, 2020}}</ref> Powell has filed an appeal of the decision in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit,<ref>{{cite news |title=Fact check: Six Michigan areas did not have voter turnouts of more than 100% |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-michigan-voter-turnout-idUSKBN28R20M |access-date=December 24, 2020 |work=Reuters |date=December 17, 2020}}</ref> as well as the U.S. Supreme Court, which denied a motion for expedited review of the case.<ref name=PowellSCOTUS/><ref name=SCOTUSDenial/> The city of ] has called for sanctions against the plaintiffs in the case as well as their counsel, requesting that Powell and the other attorneys be disbarred for "trying to use this court's processes to validate their conspiracy theories".<ref name=DetroitSanctions>{{cite news |last1=Polus |first1=Sarah |title=Detroit asks federal judge to disbar 'Kraken' team that fought in court to overturn election results |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/news/532824-detroit-calls-on-federal-judge-to-disbar-kraken-team-that-fought-in-court-to |access-date=January 29, 2021 |work=] |date=January 5, 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=McEvoy |first1=Jemima |title=Detroit Files Request To Sanction, Potentially Disbar Sidney Powell And Other 'Kraken' Lawyers |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/jemimamcevoy/2021/01/06/detroit-files-request-to-sanction-potentially-disbar-sidney-powell-and-other-kraken-lawyers/?sh=2907e6435a24 |access-date=January 29, 2021 |work=] |date=January 6, 2021}}</ref> Michigan attorney general ] filed a similar motion on January 28, 2021, accusing Powell and three Michigan lawyers of violating their oaths by attempting to overturn Biden's victory.<ref name=NesselSanctions>{{cite news |last1=Foster |first1=Wells |last2=Darling |first2=Tom |title=AG Nessel seeks sanctions on Sidney Powell, other lawyers over election lawsuits |url=https://www.wlns.com/news/ag-nessel-seeks-sanctions-on-sidney-powell-other-lawyers-over-election-lawsuits/ |access-date=January 29, 2021 |work=] |date=January 28, 2021}}</ref> On February 1, 2021, Nessel, along with Michigan governor Whitmer and Michigan secretary of state ], filed complaints with the ] seeking Powell's ].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Mauger |first1=Craig |last2=LeBlanc |first2=Beth |title=Whitmer, Nessel seek disbarment of lawyers in election challenge |url=https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2021/02/01/whitmer-nessel-seek-disbarment-lawyers-election-challenge/4348375001//?sh=2907e6435a24 |access-date=January 29, 2021 |work=] |date=February 1, 2021}}</ref> | |||
During a July 2021 hearing to consider sanctions against Powell and other attorneys for their activities in Michigan, Parker discussed the hundreds of pages of allegations by others that the attorneys had submitted to courts, which included an individual claiming to have witnessed poll workers changing votes from Trump to Biden. None of the attorneys responded when Parker asked if they had spoken to the witness to vet their allegation.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Helderman |first1=Rosalind |title='This is really fantastical': Federal judge in Michigan presses Trump-allied lawyers on 2020 election fraud claims in sanctions hearing |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/sidney-powell-disciplinary-hearing/2021/07/12/61d44ac4-e0c9-11eb-9f54-7eee10b5fcd2_story.html |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=July 12, 2021}}</ref> | |||
On August 25, 2021, Judge Parker ruled that Powell, ], and seven other pro-Trump lawyers had filed the suit "in bad faith and for an improper purpose"; that their litigation was "a historic and profound abuse of the judicial process"; and that they had filed "baseless and frivolous lawsuits in order to undermine public confidence in the democratic process." The court ordered that they pay attorney's fees to the City of Detroit and State of Michigan to reimburse them for the costs of defending against the suit, and referred them to their respective state bars for investigation into ethical violations, which could lead to ].<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/25/politics/judge-sanctions-powell-wood-kraken-lawsuits/index.html|title=Judge sanctions pro-Trump lawyers who brought 'frivolous' election fraud lawsuits|last=Sneed|first=Tierney|date=August 25, 2021|work=CNN|access-date=August 25, 2021}}</ref><ref name="o325">{{cite web |title= Civil Case No. 20-13134 |url=https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mied.350905/gov.uscourts.mied.350905.172.0_10.pdf }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/25/us/politics/sidney-powell-election-sanctions.html |title=Judge Orders Sanctions Against Pro-Trump Lawyers Over Election Lawsuit |newspaper=] |first=Alan |last=Feuer |date=August 25, 2021 |access-date=March 18, 2023}}</ref><ref name="WolfeAugust2021">Jan Wolfe, , Reuters (August 25, 2021).</ref><ref name="FeuerAugust2021">Alan Feuer, , ''New York Times'' (August 25, 2021).</ref> | |||
On November 4, 2021, a closed-door investigatory hearing was held by the ] to begin the process of determining possible sanctions or disbarment for Powell.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Durkee|first1=Alison|title=Sidney Powell To Face Texas State Bar Investigation—Potentially Leading To Her Disbarment|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2021/08/26/sidney-powell-to-face-texas-state-bar-investigation-potentially-leading-to-her-disbarment/|website=Forbes|date=August 26, 2021}}</ref> On December 2, 2021, Judge Parker ordered Powell, Wood and the other "Kraken" attorneys to pay $175,250 to the city of ] and the state of Michigan.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2021/12/02/sidney-powell-team-ordered-pay-175-250-fees-michigan-case/8843056002/|title = Sidney Powell, team ordered to pay $175,250 in fees for Michigan election case}}</ref> | |||
====Wisconsin==== | |||
Powell filed a federal lawsuit against the ] on December 1, claiming that Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic were used to conduct electronic ballot-stuffing and rig votes for Joe Biden. The lawsuit asked the court to decertify the state's election results or declare Donald Trump the winner of the state.<ref name=":26">{{cite web|title=Complaint for Declaratory, Emergency, and Permanent Injunctive Relief|url=https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/Feehan-ED-WI-Lawsuit-Complaint1.pdf|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201201233226/https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/Feehan-ED-WI-Lawsuit-Complaint1.pdf|archive-date=December 1, 2020|access-date=December 4, 2020|website=Democracy Docket}}</ref> The lawsuit mistakenly demanded the release of video footage from a voting center in Michigan and made erroneous references to the election in Georgia and the Georgia state legislature.<ref name=Montellaro/> U.S. district judge ] filed a December 2 order noting that while an "expedited" injunction was sought, the initial filings did not "indicate whether the plaintiffs are asking the court to act more quickly or why", and did not request a hearing or propose a briefing schedule.<ref name=Montellaro/> Pepper dismissed the case on December 9, writing that the "federal court has no authority or jurisdiction to grant the relief the remaining plaintiff seeks", and that the litigation on behalf of the plaintiff was "sometimes odd and often harried" and ultimately failed to establish why a federal case was appropriate. Pepper also repeatedly stated that the plaintiff did not have legal standing to bring the case and concluded that granting the relief would be unconstitutional.<ref>{{cite news |title=Election lawsuit involving La Crosse Co. GOP chair dismissed in federal court |url=https://wxow.com/2020/12/10/election-lawsuit-involving-la-crosse-co-gop-chair-dismissed/ |access-date=December 10, 2020 |work=] |date=December 10, 2020}}</ref> Powell then applied for a ] from the U.S. Supreme Court, which rejected her petition on March 1, 2021, to end the lawsuit; Powell said the court's decision "completes the implosion of each of our three branches of government into the rubble of a sinkhole of corruption".<ref name="Weigel">{{cite news |last1=Weigel |first1=David |title=The Trailer: Why Republicans keep running against trans rights |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/03/02/trailer-why-republicans-keep-running-against-trans-rights/ |access-date=March 6, 2021 |newspaper=] |date=March 3, 2021}}</ref> | |||
====Defamation lawsuits against Powell==== | |||
Dominion Voting Systems sent a letter to Powell on December 16, 2020, demanding she publicly retract her baseless allegations about the company.<ref name="auto1"/><ref>{{cite letter | |||
| first1 = Thomas A. | | first1 = Thomas A. | ||
| last1 = Clare | | last1 = Clare | ||
Line 78: | Line 151: | ||
| recipient = Sidney Powell | | recipient = Sidney Powell | ||
| subject = Re: Defamatory Falsehoods About Dominion | | subject = Re: Defamatory Falsehoods About Dominion | ||
| date = |
| date = December 16, 2020 | ||
| url = https://www.dominionvoting.com/download/demand-letter-to-sidney-powell/?wpdmdl=68156&masterkey=5fdb7ac4ae729 | | url = https://www.dominionvoting.com/download/demand-letter-to-sidney-powell/?wpdmdl=68156&masterkey=5fdb7ac4ae729 | ||
| url-status = live | | url-status = live | ||
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20201217154437/https://www.dominionvoting.com/download/demand-letter-to-sidney-powell/?wpdmdl=68156&masterkey=5fdb7ac4ae729 | | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20201217154437/https://www.dominionvoting.com/download/demand-letter-to-sidney-powell/?wpdmdl=68156&masterkey=5fdb7ac4ae729 | ||
| archive-date = |
| archive-date = December 17, 2020 | ||
| language=en-us | | language=en-us | ||
| quote=Your false accusations about Dominion are defamatory ''per se'' and have exposed you, the entities you control, and the Trump Campaign to substantial legal risk for defamation. As a result of your false accusations, Dominion has suffered enormous harm, and its employees have been stalked, have been harassed, and have received death threats. For the safety of Dominion's employees and for the sake of the truth and confidence in American democracy, we demand that you immediately and publicly retract your false accusations and set the record straight. If you refuse to do so and instead choose to stand by your defamatory falsehoods, that will be viewed as additional evidence of actual malice. | | quote=Your false accusations about Dominion are defamatory ''per se'' and have exposed you, the entities you control, and the Trump Campaign to substantial legal risk for defamation. As a result of your false accusations, Dominion has suffered enormous harm, and its employees have been stalked, have been harassed, and have received death threats. For the safety of Dominion's employees and for the sake of the truth and confidence in American democracy, we demand that you immediately and publicly retract your false accusations and set the record straight. If you refuse to do so and instead choose to stand by your defamatory falsehoods, that will be viewed as additional evidence of actual malice. | ||
}}</ref> Shortly thereafter, the Trump legal team instructed dozens of staff members to preserve all documents relating to Dominion, Powell and others for any future litigation.<ref>{{ |
}}</ref> Shortly thereafter, the Trump legal team instructed dozens of staff members to preserve all documents relating to Dominion, Powell and others for any future litigation.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/12/19/politics/trump-campaign-sidney-powell-dominion-voting-systems/index.html|title=Trump campaign told to preserve all documents related to Sidney Powell and Dominion Voting Systems|author=Kaitlan Collins, Kevin Liptak and Pamela Brown|website=CNN}}</ref> Smartmatic sent a similar ] to conservative television outlets and within days Fox News, its sister network Fox Business, as well as Newsmax broadcast segments walking back conspiracy allegations they had previously promoted.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2020/12/19/lou-dobbs-debunk-fact-check-smartmatic/|title=Lou Dobbs debunks his own claims of election fraud — after a legal demand from Smartmatic|first=Jeremy|last=Barr|via=www.washingtonpost.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/media/2020/12/21/newsmax-clarification-smartmatic/|title=Newsmax issues sweeping 'clarification' debunking its own coverage of election misinformation|first=Jeremy|last=Barr|via=www.washingtonpost.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.mediaite.com/tv/maria-bartiromo-airs-same-fact-check-of-election-conspiracies-as-fox-colleagues-adds-we-will-keep-investigating/|title=Maria Bartiromo Airs Fact-Check, Adds 'We Will Keep Investigating'|date=December 20, 2020}}</ref> | ||
On January 8, 2021, Dominion sued Powell for defamation and asked for over $1.3 billion in damages.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Feuer |first=Alan |date=January 8, 2021 |title=Dominion Voting Systems files defamation lawsuit against pro-Trump attorney Sidney Powell. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/08/us/politics/dominion-voting-systems-files-defamation-lawsuit-against-pro-trump-attorney-sidney-powell.html |access-date=January 14, 2021 |work=] |language=en-US |issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Vella |first=Lauren |date=November 19, 2020 |title=Ernst: Trump lawyer claim that candidates pay to rig elections 'absolutely outrageous' |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/526798-ernst-trump-lawyer-claim-that-candidates-pay-to-rig-elections-absolutely |access-date=February 2, 2021 |newspaper=]}}</ref><ref name="auto1">{{cite web |last=Naham |first=Matt |date=December 17, 2020 |title=Days After Smartmatic's Legal Threat, Dominion Voting Systems Follows Suit with Demand Letter to Sidney Powell |url=https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/days-after-smartmatics-legal-threat-dominion-voting-systems-follows-suit-with-demand-letter-to-sidney-powell/ |access-date=February 2, 2021 |website=]}}</ref><ref name=":12" /><ref>{{Cite news|last=Brown|first=Emma|date=January 8, 2021|title=Dominion sues pro-Trump lawyer Sidney Powell, seeking more than $1.3 billion|newspaper=]|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/dominion-sues-pro-trump-lawyer-sidney-powell-seeking-more-than-13-billion/2021/01/08/ebe5dbe0-5106-11eb-b96e-0e54447b23a1_story.html|access-date=January 9, 2021}}</ref><ref name="cnn20210811">{{cite news|url=https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/11/politics/defamation-lawsuits-sidney-powell-rudy-giuliani-mike-lindell/index.html|title=Judge allows defamation lawsuits against Sidney Powell, Rudy Giuliani and MyPillow CEO to go forward|first=Katelyn|last=Polantz|website=CNN|date=August 11, 2021}}</ref> On February 4, 2021, Smartmatic filed a defamation lawsuit that accused Powell, Fox News, some hosts at Fox News, and Rudy Giuliani of engaging in a "disinformation campaign" against the company, and asked for $2.7 billion in damages.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Feuer |first=Alan |date=January 8, 2021 |title=Dominion Voting Systems files defamation lawsuit against pro-Trump attorney Sidney Powell. |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/08/us/politics/dominion-voting-systems-files-defamation-lawsuit-against-pro-trump-attorney-sidney-powell.html |access-date=January 14, 2021 |work=] |language=en-US |issn=0362-4331}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Vella |first=Lauren |date=November 19, 2020 |title=Ernst: Trump lawyer claim that candidates pay to rig elections 'absolutely outrageous' |url=https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/526798-ernst-trump-lawyer-claim-that-candidates-pay-to-rig-elections-absolutely |access-date=February 2, 2021 |newspaper=]}}</ref><ref name="auto1">{{cite web |last=Naham |first=Matt |date=December 17, 2020 |title=Days After Smartmatic's Legal Threat, Dominion Voting Systems Follows Suit with Demand Letter to Sidney Powell |url=https://lawandcrime.com/2020-election/days-after-smartmatics-legal-threat-dominion-voting-systems-follows-suit-with-demand-letter-to-sidney-powell/ |access-date=February 2, 2021 |website=]}}</ref><ref name=":12">{{cite news|last=Darcy|first=Oliver|date=February 4, 2021|title=Voting technology company Smartmatic files $2.7 billion lawsuit against Fox News, Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell over 'disinformation campaign'|url=https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/04/media/smartmatic-fox-news-giuliani-powell-lawsuit/index.html|access-date=February 5, 2021|website=]}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Coster |first1=Helen |title=Smartmatic sues Fox News, Giuliani over election-rigging claims |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-smartmatic-lawsuit-fox-corp-idUSKBN2A42JO |access-date=March 23, 2021 |work=] |date=February 5, 2021}}</ref> In March 2022 a New York State Supreme Court judge dismissed the Smartmatic allegations against Powell on jurisdictional grounds;<ref>{{cite news |last1=Stempel |first1=Jonathan |title=Smartmatic can pursue election-rigging claims against Fox News, Giuliani |url=https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/smartmatic-can-pursue-election-rigging-claims-against-fox-news-giuliani-2022-03-08/ |publisher=Reuters |date=March 8, 2022}}</ref> however, the company had already filed a second lawsuit in Washington, D.C. in anticipation of the New York ruling.<ref>{{cite web |author-first=Jacob |author-last=Shamsian |date=March 10, 2022 |title=Smartmatic says it's continuing to press its defamation lawsuit against Sidney Powell after a judge dismissed the case |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/smartmatic-continues-sidney-powell-defamation-lawsuit-2022-3 |website=Business Insider }}</ref> | |||
=== Independent election lawsuits === | |||
While working for Trump, Powell stated she would "release the ]", a catchphrase from the 1981 film '']'', and the expression spread across Twitter.<ref name="KrakenTwitter" /> After the Trump campaign cut ties with Powell, she continued to file independent election lawsuits in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Brumback |first1=Kate |title=Sidney Powell unrelenting in legal battle on Trump's behalf |url=https://apnews.com/article/election-2020-joe-biden-donald-trump-georgia-lawsuits-0ed38af7f94b596308475aa8b28c871c |access-date=24 December 2020 |work=Associated Press |date=10 December 2020}}</ref> | |||
On March 22, 2021, lawyers defending Powell against Dominion's lawsuit filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. They argued that "no reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact". Instead, "it was clear to reasonable persons that Powell's claims were her opinions and legal theories", argued the lawyers.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Thomsen |first1=Jacqueline |title=Facing Defamation, Sidney Powell Says 'No Reasonable Person' Thought Her Election Fraud Claims Were Fact |url=https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2021/03/22/facing-defamation-sidney-powell-says-no-reasonable-person-thought-her-election-fraud-claims-were-fact/?slreturn=20210223032256 |access-date=March 23, 2021 |work=] |date=March 22, 2021}}</ref> Furthermore, the lawyers claimed that Dominion could not prove that Powell took action with "actual malice", because "she believed the allegations then and she believes them now".<ref>{{cite news |last1=Tillman |first1=Zoe |title=Sidney Powell Now Argues "No Reasonable Person" Would Believe Her Voter Fraud Lies Were "Fact" |url=https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetillman/trump-lawyer-sidney-powell-dominion-lawsuit |access-date=March 23, 2021 |work=] |date=March 22, 2021}}</ref> On August 11, 2021, ] denied this motion to dismiss the lawsuit.<ref name="cnn20210811" /> A scheduling order filed March 1, 2022, for Dominion's suit against Powell and parallel lawsuits against Rudy Giuliani and ], calls for depositions and pretrial motions through September 2023.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.226485/gov.uscourts.dcd.226485.47.0.pdf |title=Scheduling Order |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=March 1, 2022 |publisher=United States District Court for the District of Columbia |access-date=May 1, 2023 }}</ref> | |||
Sources described Powell's election-related filings as filled with significant "sloppy mistakes".<ref name=Montellaro/> In her Georgia lawsuit, she claimed that a computer algorithm took votes from Biden and flipped them to Trump, later amending the filing.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Breuninger |first1=Kevin |title=Sidney Powell amends court filing that mistakenly said Georgia votes were flipped from Biden to Trump |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/04/sidney-powell-amends-court-filing-that-said-georgia-votes-were-flipped-to-trump.html |access-date=December 5, 2020 |work=] |date=December 4, 2020}}</ref> In Powell's submissions to district courts in Georgia and Michigan, ''district'' was misspelled three different ways on the first pages.<ref name=Blake2>{{cite news |last1=Blake |first1=Aaron |title=Trump allies' sloppy, error-riddled legal effort |work=] |access-date=December 4, 2020 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/12/03/trump-allies-sloppy-error-riddled-legal-effort/ |date=December 3, 2020 |archive-url=https://archive.ph/F5Eco |archive-date=December 3, 2020}}</ref> Powell's Michigan filing also had numerous formatting errors and misidentified one of her experts.<ref name=Blake2/><ref>{{cite news |last1=Aarons |first1=Tony |title=Ex-Trump Lawyer Sidney Powell Files Election Suits in 'DISTRCOICT' Court |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-11-26/ex-trump-lawyer-files-election-lawsuits-in-distrcoict-court |access-date=December 4, 2020 |work=] |date=November 26, 2020}}</ref> Two Republicans said they had been named as a plaintiff in the Georgia and Wisconsin lawsuits despite not having given permission to be included (although one later agreed to remain as a plaintiff).<ref name=Montellaro/> | |||
Venezuelan businessman Majed Khalil sued Powell, Fox News, and ] for $250 million in December 2021, alleging they had falsely implicated him in rigging Dominion and Smartmatic machines.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Shamsian |first1=Jacob |title=Venezuelan man files $250 million lawsuit against Fox News and Sidney Powell after baseless accusations that he rigged 2020 election results |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/venezuelan-man-sues-fox-news-sidney-powell-for-conspiracy-theories-2021-12 |work=Business Insider |date=December 28, 2021}}</ref> The lawsuit was settled out of court for an undisclosed amount in April 2023.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Farrell |first1=Maureen |title=Fox News Settles Defamation Case With Venezuelan Businessman |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/09/business/fox-news-venezuela-dominion.html|work=New York Times |date=April 9, 2023}}</ref> | |||
Powell's lawsuits cited an anonymous witness, referred to as "Spyder" or "Spider", who alleged that American voting systems were "certainly compromised by rogue actors, such as Iran and China". Spyder's real name was redacted from submitted documents; however, a bookmark in the file revealed his identity to be Joshua Merritt, an IT consultant. Although Powell's filings describe Merritt as a former "military intelligence expert", the ] stated that he never worked in military intelligence and had not finished a training course in military intelligence. Merritt acknowledged that the description was wrong and attributed the error to Powell's clerks. However, Merritt claimed he did finish the training, producing an "unofficial transcript" as evidence.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Brown |first1=Emma |last2=Davis |first2=Aaron |last3=Crites |first3=Alice |title=Sidney Powell's secret 'military intelligence expert,' key to fraud claims in election lawsuits, never worked in military intelligence |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/sidney-powell-spider-spyder-witness/2020/12/11/0cd567e6-3b2a-11eb-98c4-25dc9f4987e8_story.html |access-date=December 13, 2020 |work=] |date=December 11, 2020}}</ref> | |||
===QAnon=== | |||
Powell also presented an affidavit from an individual she described as a former intelligence contractor with knowledge of a foreign conspiracy to subvert democracy, who Powell said needed to remain anonymous to protect their "reputation, professional career and personal safety". ''The Washington Post'' identified the individual as pro-Trump podcaster Terpsichore Maras-Lindeman, and that parts of the affidavit matched a blog post she had written in November 2019. Maras-Lindeman had served in the Navy for less than a year over two decades earlier, and in a November 2018 civil suit the attorney general of North Dakota accused her of misappropriating funds for personal use from a charitable event she tried to organize. State attorneys asserted that she exaggerated her credentials and used multiple aliases and Social Security numbers in "a persistent effort...to deceive others". Asked about Maras-Lindeman, Powell told the ''Post'': "I don't have the same information you do."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/sidney-powells-secret-intelligence-contractor-witness-is-a-pro-trump-podcaster/2020/12/24/d5a1ab9e-4403-11eb-a277-49a6d1f9dff1_story.html|title=Sidney Powell's secret intelligence contractor witness is a pro-Trump podcaster|first=Jon|last=Swaine|via=www.washingtonpost.com}}</ref> | |||
Powell has been described by some sources as a supporter of the ] conspiracy theory,<ref name=":2">{{cite web|last=Porter|first=Tom|title=An attorney leading Trump's attempt to subvert the election results is a longtime QAnon supporter|url=https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-election-lawyer-sidney-powell-is-longtime-qanon-supporter-2020-11|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201120191010/https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-election-lawyer-sidney-powell-is-longtime-qanon-supporter-2020-11|archive-date=November 20, 2020|access-date=November 20, 2020|website=Business Insider}}</ref><ref name="auto3">{{cite web|last=Gilbert|first=David|date=November 20, 2020|title=Trump's Lawyer Sidney Powell Is Hardcore QAnon|url=https://www.vice.com/en/article/wx8n8w/trumps-lawyer-sidney-powell-is-hardcore-qanon|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201120175449/https://www.vice.com/en/article/wx8n8w/trumps-lawyer-sidney-powell-is-hardcore-qanon|archive-date=November 20, 2020|access-date=November 20, 2020|website=]|language=en}}</ref> a ] conspiracy theory which alleges that a ] of ] ] is running a global child ] ring and plotting against former president Donald Trump, who is fighting the cabal.<ref>{{cite news|last=Roose|first=Kevin|date=August 28, 2020|title=What Is QAnon, the Viral Pro-Trump Conspiracy Theory?|url=https://www.nytimes.com/article/what-is-qanon.html|access-date=October 4, 2020|website=The New York Times|archive-date=September 22, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200922192821/https://www.nytimes.com/article/what-is-qanon.html|url-status=live}}</ref> In January 2020, Powell denied knowledge of QAnon or Q;<ref name="maga" /> later that year, she retweeted major QAnon accounts and catchphrases and appeared on QAnon shows on YouTube.<ref name="auto3"/> Upon leaving Trump's legal team, Powell was embraced by QAnon followers, many of whom had become discouraged that years of predictions of a Trump landslide victory and coming revelations about his enemies had not materialized.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/24/business/sidney-powell-qanon/index.html|title=Sidney Powell is a beacon of hope to sad Qanon supporters|first=Donie|last=O'Sullivan|website=CNN}}</ref><ref name="KrakenTwitter">{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/17/technology/release-the-kraken-a-catchphrase-for-unfounded-conspiracy-theory-trends-on-twitter.html|title='Release the Kraken,' a catchphrase for unfounded conspiracy theory, trends on Twitter.|first=Davey|last=Alba|author-link=Davey Alba|date=November 17, 2020|work=The New York Times}}</ref> | |||
On January 8, 2021, Twitter permanently suspended the accounts of Powell, Michael Flynn and others. A statement from Twitter said this development was in line with their policies on "coordinated harmful activity".<ref>{{cite news|last1=Collins|first1=Ben|last2=Zadrozny|first2=Brandy|author-link2=Brandy Zadrozny|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/twitter-bans-michael-flynn-sidney-powell-qanon-account-purge-n1253550|title=Twitter bans Michael Flynn, Sidney Powell in QAnon account purge|work=NBC News|date=January 8, 2021|access-date=January 8, 2021}}</ref> | |||
In May 2021, Powell (alongside ] and ]) was a keynote speaker at what was essentially a QAnon conference in ].<ref>{{cite web|last=Palmer|first=Ewan|date=April 7, 2021|title=QAnon couple are behind 3-day Dallas event billing Michael Flynn and Sidney Powell|url=https://www.newsweek.com/qanon-memorial-weekend-dallas-texas-1581539|access-date=October 25, 2021|website=Newsweek|language=en}}</ref> | |||
==== Arizona ==== | |||
===Texas Bar petition against Powell=== | |||
Powell filed a federal lawsuit against ] ], ] ] and other Arizona election officials on December 2, alleging that "poll watchers failed to adequately verify signatures on ballots, that Maricopa County ballot dispute referees were partisan, that Dominion backups had no chain of custody, and the Dominion machines themselves suffered from errors during state evaluations." The plaintiffs asked the court to decertify Arizona's election results or order that Arizona certify Trump electors.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Bowyer v. Ducey|url=https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=409|website=Stanford-MIT Healthy Elections Project}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=Docket for Bowyer v. Ducey, 2:20-cv-02321|url=https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18707812/bowyer-v-ducey/|access-date=December 6, 2020|website=CourtListener|language=en-us}}</ref> On December 9, U.S. District Judge ] ruled that Powell's plaintiffs lacked legal standing and that the allegations of impropriety were "sorely wanting of relevant or reliable evidence", instead being "largely based on anonymous witnesses, hearsay, and irrelevant analysis of unrelated elections". The judge singled out the fraud allegations being put forth, writing that they "fail in their particularity and plausibility" and that there would be "extreme, and entirely unprecedented" harm to Arizona's more than 3 million voters to entertain Powell's lawsuit "at this late date".<ref>{{cite news |last1=Fischer |first1=Howard |title=Federal judge tosses last lawsuit that remained against Arizona's election results |url=https://tucson.com/news/local/federal-judge-tosses-last-lawsuit-that-remained-against-arizonas-election-results/article_e2e4ed09-f0f5-51db-992c-676483d116de.html |access-date=December 10, 2020 |work=] |agency=Capitol Media Services |date=December 9, 2020}}</ref><ref name=ArizonaAP1>{{cite news |last1=Billeaud |first1=Jacques |title=Powell trying to resurrect bid to undo Biden's Arizona win |url=https://apnews.com/article/joe-biden-donald-trump-arizona-phoenix-lawsuits-b423468ac2233344275452679a59f165 |access-date=January 12, 2021 |work=] |date=December 10, 2020}}</ref> Powell filed an appeal of the lawsuit's dismissal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in December, which scheduled the due date for the opening brief to be two months after the ].<ref name=ArizonaAP1/> That month, Powell also filed an emergency petition with the ] seeking an extraordinary ] for intervention in the case. The petition was denied without comment on March 1, 2021, ending the matter.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://lawandcrime.com/supreme-court/supreme-court-rejects-sidney-powells-election-fraud-petitions-without-further-comment/|title=Supreme Court Rejects Sidney Powell's Election Fraud Petitions without Further Comment|date=March 1, 2021}}</ref> | |||
On March 1, 2022, the State Bar of Texas’ Commission for Lawyer Discipline submitted in court a disciplinary ] against Powell<ref name=petext>{{cite web |url=https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21399082-powell-disciplinary-petition |title=Commission for Lawyer Discipline |publisher=District Court of ] |date=March 1, 2022 |website=] |access-date=February 27, 2023}}</ref> alleging that she had violated several rules of professional conduct, such as those about making false statements to a tribunal, using evidence known to be false, and engaging in dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.<ref>{{cite news |last=Sneed|first=Tierney|date=March 10, 2022 |title=Inside the effort to disbar attorneys who backed bogus election lawsuits |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2022/03/10/politics/ethics-complaints-attorney-misconduct-trump-election-reversal/index.html |work=]|access-date=February 27, 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |first=Krista M. |last=Torralva |url=https://www.dallasnews.com/news/courts/2022/06/22/case-to-rebuke-sidney-powell-for-pushing-donald-trumps-election-narrative-to-continue/ |title=Case to rebuke Sidney Powell for pushing Donald Trump's election narrative to continue |publisher=Dallasnews.com |date=June 22, 2022 |access-date=June 24, 2022}}</ref> On February 23, 2023, judge Andrea Bouressa of the 471st District Court, dismissed the petition, on the grounds of the commission failing to meet the ] that Powell had indeed violated the Texas' attorney code of conduct. In her decision, the judge also admonished the commission for not "properly labeling" the exhibits in its filing, which led to the consideration of only two of them.<ref name=gambit>{{cite news |last=Sneed|first=Tierney |date=February 24, 2023|title=Judge tosses out disciplinary action against Sidney Powell for work on Trump election reversal bid|url=http://edition.cnn.com/2023/02/23/politics/sidney-powell-disciplinary-action-tossed/index.html?dicbo=v2-0i8pyrv|work=] |access-date=February 27, 2023}}</ref> | |||
==Political fundraising== | |||
==== Georgia ==== | |||
In November 2020, Powell established Legal Defense Fund for the American Republic, a 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization with stated purpose to collect funds to help prosecute fraud in U.S. elections.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.motherjones.com/2020-elections/2020/11/michael-flynns-lawyer-wants-to-raise-millions-of-dollars-to-overturn-the-election|title=Michael Flynn's Lawyer Wants to Raise "Millions of Dollars" to Overturn the Election|last1=Friedman|first1=Dan|date=November 17, 2020|access-date=November 23, 2020|work=]}}</ref> | |||
Powell and ] filed a lawsuit against ] ] and other state officials on November 25, alleging that ] was used to rig votes for Biden. The plaintiffs asked the court to halt the certification of elections results and order Kemp to certify Trump as the winner in Georgia.<ref name=":843">{{Cite news|title=Trump supporters file lawsuit asking Georgia to decertify election, declare Trump the winner|language=en-US|website=WSBTV|url=https://www.wsbtv.com/news/politics/trump-lawyers-file-suit-asking-georgia-de-certify-election-declare-trump-winner/I4EONEJXNVAUHKLKRTFGYXGHV4/|url-status=live|access-date=November 28, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201128063916/https://www.wsbtv.com/news/politics/trump-lawyers-file-suit-asking-georgia-de-certify-election-declare-trump-winner/I4EONEJXNVAUHKLKRTFGYXGHV4/|archive-date=November 28, 2020}}</ref> U.S. District Judge ] issued a temporary restraining order on November 29 that voting machines in Georgia's Cobb, Gwinnett, and Cherokee Counties were to preserve their data, after Wood had argued to retain "this information on a very limited basis". Powell appealed to the ] to expand the restraining order. A three-judge panel unanimously dismissed Powell's appeal on December 4, citing a failure to prove that the restraining order caused serious harm. The panel also indicated that the original lawsuit, in which Powell also sought to have voting machines inspected, was "considerably delayed" by the appeal.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Gerstein |first1=Josh |title=Judge: 'Precious little proof' in Georgia election fraud suit |url=https://www.politico.com/news/2020/11/30/proof-georgia-election-fraud-case-441701 |access-date=December 5, 2020 |work=] |date=December 1, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Cheney |first1=Kyle |last2=Gerstein |first2=Josh |title=Donald Trump's brutal day in court |url=https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/04/donald-trump-in-court-443010 |access-date=December 5, 2020 |work=] |date=December 4, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Larson |first1=Erik |title=Georgia Says Ex-Trump Lawyer Suit Could Hinder Senate Runoff |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-04/georgia-says-sidney-powell-s-lawsuit-could-hinder-senate-runoff |access-date=December 5, 2020 |work=] |date=December 5, 2020 |archive-url=https://archive.ph/CoxW8 |archive-date=December 5, 2020}}</ref> | |||
Powell launched Restore the Republic, a ], in January 2021.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Reimann |first1=Nicholas |title=Sidney Powell Has Started A Super PAC |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicholasreimann/2021/01/22/sidney-powell-has-started-a-super-pac/ |access-date=January 24, 2021 |work=] |date=January 22, 2021}}</ref> In November 2021, ''The Washington Post'' reported that the preceding September federal prosecutors had issued a subpoena for the financial records of groups Powell had formed, including Defending the Republic, which was registered as a ], and a ] by the same name. Days after the election, Powell created a website to raise funds for her new organization, referring to "Sidney Powell's Legal Defense Fund," asking donors to make checks payable to her law firm.<ref>{{cite news |title=Prosecutors demanded records of Sidney Powell's fundraising groups as part of criminal probe |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/11/30/sidney-powell-defend-the-republic-criminal-probe/ |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=November 30, 2021|author1=Isaac Stanley-Becker|author2=Emma Brown|author3=Rosalind S. Helderman}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Company: Ex-Trump lawyer raiding nonprofit for personal use |url=https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-lifestyle-election-2020-business-government-and-politics-d50cc5f0240279800f7053797a12b2d1 |work=Associated Press |date=May 15, 2021|author=Michael Kunselman}}</ref> ''The Daily Beast'' reported that the organization's board of directors initially included ] and ], and ] as CEO. All left the organization in April 2021 after Powell refused to allow it to be audited. In a recorded phone call with Wood that Byrne confirmed as authentic, Byrne asserted Powell was diverting donations to pay for her legal defense against defamation lawsuits.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.thedailybeast.com/feds-are-asking-questions-about-sidney-powell-and-her-pro-trump-group|title=Feds Are Asking Questions About Sidney Powell and Her Pro-Trump Group|author1=Adam Rawnsley|author2=Asawin Suebsaeng|author3=Will Sommer|date=November 30, 2021|work=The Daily Beast}}</ref> Defending the Republic raised $16.4 million in the year following the election.<ref>{{cite news |title=Sidney Powell group raised more than $14 million spreading election falsehoods |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/sidney-powell-defending-republic-donations/2021/12/06/61bdb004-53ef-11ec-8769-2f4ecdf7a2ad_story.html |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=December 6, 2021|author1=Emma Brown|author2=Rosalind S. Helderman|author3=Isaac Stanley-Becker|author4=Josh Dawsey }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last1=Swaine |first1=Jon |last2=Brown |first2=Emma |date=October 14, 2022 |title=Sidney Powell's nonprofit raised $16 million as she spread election falsehoods |language=en-US |newspaper=Washington Post |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2022/10/14/sidney-powell-defending-republic-tax-filings/ |access-date=October 17, 2022 |issn=0190-8286}}</ref> The group spent millions to fund the legal defense of the January 6 defendants; its expenditures, as well as reduced donations, substantially reduced DTR's cash on hand, but it still has more than $5 million as of November 2022.<ref name=Newsham>Jack Newsham, , ''Insider'' (October 19, 2023).</ref> As a ] group, Defending the Republic is not required to disclose its donors.<ref name=Newsham/> | |||
Powell's evidence in the Georgia lawsuit included an affidavit from ], a former administrator of ]/8kun, the online home of ]. In his affidavit, Watkins stated that his reading of an online user guide for Dominion Voting Systems software led him to conclude that election fraud might be "within the realm of possibility". Watkins did not provide any legitimate evidence of fraud.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Harwell |first1=Drew |title=To boost voter-fraud claims, Trump advocate Sidney Powell turns to unusual source: The longtime operator of QAnon's Internet home |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/12/01/powell-cites-qanon-watkins/ |access-date=December 2, 2020 |work=] |date=December 1, 2020 |archive-url=https://archive.is/9FANc |archive-date=December 2, 2020}}</ref> Powell also claimed that "a certificate from the Secretary of State was awarded to Dominion Voting Systems but is undated." However, the attached certificate had apparently been edited to remove the date; the actual certificate is dated and available publicly.<ref name="Montellaro">{{cite news |last1=Montellaro |first1=Zach |last2=Cheney |first2=Kyle |title=Pro-Trump legal crusade peppered with bizarre blunders |url=https://www.politico.com/news/2020/12/03/sidney-powell-trump-election-lawsuit-442472 |access-date=December 3, 2020 |work=] |date=December 3, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Hohmann |first1=James |last2=Alfaro |first2=Mariana |title=The Daily 202: Trump's threat to veto NDAA follows pattern of tenuously invoking 'National Security' |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/12/02/daily-202-trumps-threat-veto-ndaa-follows-pattern-tenuously-invoking-national-security/ |access-date=December 3, 2020 |work=] |date=December 2, 2020 |archive-url=https://archive.ph/QdqhG |archive-date=December 2, 2020}}</ref> | |||
== Criminal charges and guilty plea == | |||
Batten dismissed the case in a ruling from the bench on December 7.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Fowler |first1=Stephen |title=Judge Finds 'Kraken' Election Challenge Lacking, Dismisses Lawsuit |url=https://www.gpb.org/news/2020/12/07/judge-finds-kraken-election-challenge-lacking-dismisses-lawsuit |access-date=December 8, 2020 |work=] |date=December 7, 2020}}</ref> The judge ruled that the plaintiffs did not have legal standing to bring the case, filed the case too late (as the Dominion machines were adopted months earlier), and filed the case in the wrong venue, the appropriate venue being a state court.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Carr |first1=Nicole |title=Federal judge dismisses Sidney Powell lawsuit seeking to decertify Georgia's elections |url=https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/federal-judge-dismisses-sidney-powell-lawsuit-seeking-decertify-georgias-elections/N7Z5MDKYRJAIZKCPQAXXEEP35Q/ |access-date=December 10, 2020 |work=] |date=December 7, 2020}}</ref> Batten also stated that the relief sought by Powell was impossible to grant.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Breuninger |first1=Kevin |last2=Mangan |first2=Dan |title=Federal judge dismisses Sidney Powell lawsuit that sought to overturn Trump loss in Georgia |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/07/judge-dismisses-sidney-powell-lawsuit-challenging-trump-georgia-loss.html |access-date=December 10, 2020 |work=] |date=December 7, 2020}}</ref> The plaintiffs filed an appeal (Case No. 20-14579)<ref>{{Cite web|title=Court of Appeals Docket #: 20-14579|url=https://ecf.ca11.uscourts.gov/n/beam/servlet/TransportRoom?servlet=CaseSummary.jsp&caseNum=20-14579&incOrigDkt=Y&incDktEntries=Y|access-date=December 8, 2020}}</ref> of Batten's decision in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit on December 8.<ref>{{Cite web|last=Choi|first=Joseph|date=December 8, 2020|title=Sidney Powell appeals dismissal of lawsuit to overturn Georgia election result|url=https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/529238-powell-appeals-dismissal-of-lawsuit-to-overturn-georgia-election-result|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201208190842/https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/529238-powell-appeals-dismissal-of-lawsuit-to-overturn-georgia-election-result|archive-date=December 8, 2020|access-date=December 8, 2020|website=TheHill|language=en}}</ref> Powell also appealed the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, which denied a motion to expedite the case.<ref name=PowellSCOTUS>{{cite news |last1=Stohr |first1=Greg |title=Ex-Trump Lawyer Asks Supreme Court to Nullify Two Biden Wins |url=https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-12-16/ex-trump-lawyer-powell-asks-high-court-to-nullify-two-biden-wins |access-date=January 12, 2021 |work=] |date=December 15, 2020}}</ref><ref name=SCOTUSDenial>{{cite news |last1=Durkee |first1=Alison |title=Supreme Court Refuses To Consider GOP Post-Election Cases Before Biden Takes Office |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2021/01/11/supreme-court-refuses-to-consider-gop-trump-post-election-cases-before-biden-takes-office/?sh=43cd52522fcb |access-date=January 12, 2021 |work=] |date=January 11, 2021}}</ref> She dropped the lawsuit on January 19, 2021, one day before Biden's inauguration.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Durkee |first1=Alison |title=Sidney Powell Drops Georgia Kracken Lawsuit On Eve Of Biden's Inauguration |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/alisondurkee/2021/01/19/sidney-powell-drops-georgia-kracken-lawsuit-on-eve-of-bidens-inauguration/ |access-date=January 19, 2021 |work=] |date=January 19, 2021}}</ref> | |||
<!-- Deleted image removed: ] --> | |||
As part of the ], on August 14, 2023, she was indicted by a ] for violating Georgia's ] (RICO) statute along with 18 other alleged co-conspirators, including Trump himself. She was also charged with two counts of ] to commit election fraud; and one count of each of the following conspiracies to commit: computer theft, computer trespass, computer invasion of privacy, and defraud the state—for a total of seven ] counts.<ref name="Georgia v Trump et al">{{Cite news |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/documents/1ccdf52e-1ba2-434c-93f8-2a7020293967.pdf |title=The People of the State of Georgia v. Donald J. Trump, et al. |date=August 14, 2023 |publisher=] |via=] |access-date=August 14, 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last1=Cole |first1=Devan |last2=Murray |first2=Sara |last3=Morris |first3=Jason |last4=Cohen |first4=Marshall |date=August 14, 2023 |title=Here are the names and titles of all 19 people charged in Georgia case |url=https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-fulton-county-georgia-08-14-23/h_c519d109a844b5c9932d605662e9066d |access-date=August 14, 2023 |website=CNN |language=en}}</ref> Powell turned herself in at the Fulton County jail on August 23, 2023.<ref name="hill-23aug2023">{{cite news |last1=Lee |first1=Ella |title=Trump campaign attorney Sidney Powell surrenders in Georgia election case |url=https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4166380-trump-campaign-attorney-sidney-powell-granted-100k-bond-in-georgia/ |access-date=August 23, 2023 |work=] |date=August 23, 2023}}</ref> | |||
On October 19, 2023, Powell pleaded guilty to six ] counts related to her role in Trump's attempts to overturn the election and her own role in breaching electoral equipment security in Coffee County, Georgia. She agreed to a sentence of six years' probation, a $6,000 fine and $2,700 in restitution, and to write a letter of apology to the people of Georgia.<ref name="Forbes-Plea" /><ref name="powell pled guilty">{{cite news |last1=Fausset|first1=Richard |last2=Hakim| first2=Danny|title=Sidney Powell Pleads Guilty in Georgia Trump Case |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/19/us/sidney-powell-pleads-guilty-in-georgia-trump-case.html |access-date=October 19, 2023 |work=] |date=October 19, 2023}}</ref> She will also testify in other cases.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Cohen |first1=Marshall |title=Trump attorney Sidney Powell pleads guilty in Georgia election subversion case {{!}} CNN Politics |url=https://edition.cnn.com/2023/10/19/politics/sidney-powell-fulton-county-georgia-2020-election-subversion/index.html |work=CNN |date=October 19, 2023 |language=en}}</ref> Within a week, Trump claimed that Powell was "not my attorney, and never was", despite his November 2020 Twitter statement that "Sidney Powell ... added to our other wonderful lawyers and representatives".<ref>{{cite news |last1=Medsger |first1=Matthew |title=Trump denies 'Kraken' lawyer Sidney Powell ever worked for him |url=https://www.bostonherald.com/2023/10/22/trump-denies-kraken-lawyer-sidney-powell-ever-worked-for-him/ |access-date=October 23, 2023 |work=] |date=October 22, 2023 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20231023094140/https://www.bostonherald.com/2023/10/22/trump-denies-kraken-lawyer-sidney-powell-ever-worked-for-him/ |archive-date=October 23, 2023}}</ref> | |||
==== Michigan ==== | |||
Powell's guilty plea was generally analyzed in American news media as a major victory for prosecutors against Trump and his associates. ''The New York Times''<nowiki/>' Alan Feuer and Maggie Haberman noted Powell as the first time that prosecutors collaborated with a major co-conspirator of Trump's attempts to overturn the election. Both also noted the potential for Powell's guilty plea to legitimize other criminal charges against other figures involved in both Georgia's racketeering cases and ]'s federal charges against Trump and his associates.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Feurer |first1=Alan |last2=Haberman |first2=Maggie |date=2022-10-19 |title=Sidney Powell's Plea Deal Could Be a Threat to Trump |work=] |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/19/us/politics/sidney-powell-donald-trump-plea-deal.html}}</ref> '']'' echoed these concerns, with journalist David A. Graham comparing the relationship between Powell's plea and the other figures charged in the Georgia racketeering case to the ].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Graham |first=David A. |date=2023-10-19 |title=What Sidney Powell's Deal Could Mean for the Fulton County Case Against Trump |url=https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/10/sidney-powell-guilty-plea-trump-fulton-county-case/675698/ |access-date=2023-10-20 |website=The Atlantic |language=en}}</ref> Likewise, ] analyst Marshall Cohen viewed the Powell plea as having the potential to incriminate anyone who worked with Powell during the attempts to overturn the election, though Cohen said that the plea deal in Georgia could open up Powell to prosecution by Jack Smith and a potential second plea deal with him, where she is alluded to as an ].<ref>{{Cite web |last=Cohen |first=Marshall |date=2023-10-19 |title=How Sidney Powell's guilty plea may impact Donald Trump |url=https://www.cnn.com/2023/10/19/politics/sidney-powell-plea-takeaways/index.html |access-date=2023-10-20 |website=CNN |language=en}}</ref> Alternatively, PBS News Georgia correspondent Stephen Fowler said Powell's testimony was potentially unreliable, and cited Trump's lawyer's assertion that Powell's testimony would exonerate the former president.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-10-19 |title=What Sidney Powell's guilty plea means for Trump in his Georgia election subversion case |url=https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/what-sidney-powells-guilty-plea-means-for-trump-in-his-georgia-election-subversion-case |access-date=2023-10-20 |website=PBS NewsHour |language=en-us}}</ref> | |||
Powell filed a lawsuit against ] ] and other state officials on November 25, alleging a variety of violations of the election code and asking the court to decertify the state's election results or certify them for Trump.<ref name="Case 2:20-cv-13134-LVP-RSW2">{{cite web|date=November 25, 2020|title=King v. Whitmer|url=https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Michigan-Complaint.pdf|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201126053616/https://defendingtherepublic.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Michigan-Complaint.pdf|archive-date=November 26, 2020|access-date=November 25, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|title=King v. Whitmer|url=https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=410|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201209163222/https://healthyelections-case-tracker.stanford.edu/detail?id=410|archive-date=December 9, 2020|access-date=December 9, 2020|website=Stanford-MIT Healthy Elections Project}}</ref> In the lawsuit, Powell submitted a witness's declaration that Joe Biden had "received more than 100% of the votes" in Edison County; however, there is no Edison County in Michigan or any other U.S. state.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Mikkelson |first1=David |title=Sidney Powell Lawsuit Cites Election Fraud in Non-Existent Michigan County |url=https://www.snopes.com/news/2020/12/01/sidney-powell-election-fraud/ |access-date=December 2, 2020 |work=] |date=December 1, 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Pierce |first1=Charles P. |title=Sidney Powell Is the Elite Legal Strike Force's Elite Legal Kraken Keeper Trump's legal eagle flies into Edison County, Michigan, which does not exist. |url=https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a34838373/sidney-powell-trump-lawsuit-edison-county-michigan/ |access-date=December 2, 2020 |publisher=Esquire |date=1 December 2020}}</ref> There <em>is</em> an ] in Minnesota, leading to speculation that the information was again taken from a list of Minnesota precincts.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Halpert |first1=Madeline |last2=Oosting |first2=Jonathan |last3=Shaheen |first3=Mansur |title=Weeks after vote, 13 fake fraud claims persist in Michigan. Here's the truth. |url=https://www.bridgemi.com/michigan-government/weeks-after-vote-13-fake-fraud-claims-persist-michigan-heres-truth |access-date=2 December 2020 |publisher=Bridge Michigan |date=December 1, 2020}}</ref> | |||
U.S. District Judge ] denied the requested relief on December 7, stating that the plaintiffs had only offered "theories, conjecture, and speculation" of potential vote switching. The judge also declared that the "ship has sailed" for most of the relief requested by the plaintiffs, while the rest "is beyond the power of any court". Furthermore, Parker wrote that the relief requested would "greatly harm the public interest" and felt that the plaintiffs' motive for filing the case was not to win, but rather to shake "people's faith in the democratic process and their trust in our government".<ref>{{cite news |last1=Mauger |first1=Craig |title=Federal judge upholds Michigan election: 'The people have spoken' |url=https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2020/12/07/federal-judge-upholds-michigan-election-the-people-have-spoken/3854998001 |access-date=December 8, 2020 |work=] |date=December 7, 2020}}</ref> Powell has filed an appeal of the decision in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit,<ref>{{cite news |title=Fact check: Six Michigan areas did not have voter turnouts of more than 100% |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-michigan-voter-turnout-idUSKBN28R20M |access-date=24 December 2020 |work=Reuters |date=17 December 2020}}</ref> as well as the U.S. Supreme Court, which denied a motion for expedited review of the case.<ref name=PowellSCOTUS/><ref name=SCOTUSDenial/> The city of ] has called for sanctions against the plaintiffs in the case as well as their counsel, requesting that Powell and the other attorneys be disbarred for "trying to use this court’s processes to validate their conspiracy theories".<ref name=DetroitSanctions/><ref>{{cite news |last1=McEvoy |first1=Jemima |title=Detroit Files Request To Sanction, Potentially Disbar Sidney Powell And Other ‘Kraken’ Lawyers |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/jemimamcevoy/2021/01/06/detroit-files-request-to-sanction-potentially-disbar-sidney-powell-and-other-kraken-lawyers/?sh=2907e6435a24 |access-date=January 29, 2021 |work=] |date=January 6, 2021}}</ref> Michigan attorney general ] filed a similar motion on January 28, 2021, accusing Powell and three Michigan lawyers of violating their oaths by attempting to overturn Biden's victory.<ref name=NesselSanctions/> On February 1, 2021, Nessel, along with Michigan Governor ] and Michigan Secretary of State ], filed complaints with the ] seeking Powell's ].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Mauger |first1=Craig |last2=LeBlanc |first2=Beth |title=Whitmer, Nessel seek disbarment of lawyers in election challenge |url=https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2021/02/01/whitmer-nessel-seek-disbarment-lawyers-election-challenge/4348375001//?sh=2907e6435a24 |access-date=January 29, 2021 |work=] |date=February 1, 2021}}</ref> | |||
==== Wisconsin ==== | |||
Powell filed a federal lawsuit against the Wisconsin Elections Commission on December 1, claiming that Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic were used to conduct electronic ballot-stuffing and rig votes for Joe Biden. The lawsuit asked the court to decertify the state's election results or declare Donald Trump the winner of the state.<ref name=":26">{{Cite web|title=Complaint for Declaratory, Emergency, and Permanent Injunctive Relief|url=https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/Feehan-ED-WI-Lawsuit-Complaint1.pdf|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201201233226/https://www.democracydocket.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/2020/12/Feehan-ED-WI-Lawsuit-Complaint1.pdf|archive-date=December 4, 2020|access-date=December 4, 2020|website=Democracy Docket}}</ref> The lawsuit mistakenly demanded the release of video footage from a voting center in Michigan and made erroneous references to the election in Georgia and the Georgia state legislature.<ref name=Montellaro/> U.S. District Judge ] filed a December 2 order noting that while an "expedited" injunction was sought, the initial filings did not "indicate whether the plaintiffs are asking the court to act more quickly or why", and did not request a hearing or propose a briefing schedule.<ref name=Montellaro/> Pepper dismissed the case on December 9, writing that the "federal court has no authority or jurisdiction to grant the relief the remaining plaintiff seeks", and that the litigation on behalf of the plaintiff was "sometimes odd and often harried" and ultimately failed to establish why a federal case was appropriate. Pepper also repeatedly stated that the plaintiff did not have legal standing to bring the case and concluded that granting the relief would be unconstitutional.<ref>{{cite news |title=Election lawsuit involving La Crosse Co. GOP chair dismissed in federal court |url=https://wxow.com/2020/12/10/election-lawsuit-involving-la-crosse-co-gop-chair-dismissed/ |access-date=December 10, 2020 |work=] |date=December 10, 2020}}</ref> Powell then applied for a ] from the U.S. Supreme Court, which rejected her petition on March 1, 2021 to end the lawsuit; Powell said the court’s decision “completes the implosion of each of our three branches of government into the rubble of a sinkhole of corruption.”<ref name="Weigel">{{cite news |last1=Weigel |first1=David |title=The Trailer: Why Republicans keep running against trans rights |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/03/02/trailer-why-republicans-keep-running-against-trans-rights/ |access-date=March 6, 2021 |work=] |date=March 3, 2021}}</ref> | |||
=== QAnon === | |||
Powell has been described by some sources as a supporter of the ],<ref name=":2">{{Cite web|last=Porter|first=Tom|title=An attorney leading Trump's attempt to subvert the election results is a longtime QAnon supporter|url=https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-election-lawyer-sidney-powell-is-longtime-qanon-supporter-2020-11|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201120191010/https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-election-lawyer-sidney-powell-is-longtime-qanon-supporter-2020-11|archive-date=November 20, 2020|access-date=2020-11-20|website=Business Insider}}</ref><ref name="auto3">{{Cite web|last=Gilbert|first=David|date=November 20, 2020|title=Trump's Lawyer Sidney Powell Is Hardcore QAnon|url=https://www.vice.com/en/article/wx8n8w/trumps-lawyer-sidney-powell-is-hardcore-qanon|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201120175449/https://www.vice.com/en/article/wx8n8w/trumps-lawyer-sidney-powell-is-hardcore-qanon|archive-date=November 20, 2020|access-date=2020-11-20|website=]|language=en}}</ref> a ] conspiracy theory which alleges that a ] of ] ] is running a global child ] ring and plotting against former President Donald Trump, who is fighting the cabal.<ref>{{cite web|last=Roose|first=Kevin|date=August 28, 2020|title=What Is QAnon, the Viral Pro-Trump Conspiracy Theory?|url=https://www.nytimes.com/article/what-is-qanon.html|access-date=October 4, 2020|website=The New York Times|archive-date=September 22, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200922192821/https://www.nytimes.com/article/what-is-qanon.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Upon leaving Trump's legal team, Powell was embraced by QAnon followers, many of whom had become discouraged that years of predictions of a Trump landslide victory and coming revelations about his enemies had not materialized.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/24/business/sidney-powell-qanon/index.html|title=Sidney Powell is a beacon of hope to sad Qanon supporters|first=Donie|last=O'Sullivan|website=CNN}}</ref><ref name="KrakenTwitter">{{Cite web|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/17/technology/release-the-kraken-a-catchphrase-for-unfounded-conspiracy-theory-trends-on-twitter.html|title='Release the Kraken,' a catchphrase for unfounded conspiracy theory, trends on Twitter.|first=Davey|last=Alba|date=November 17, 2020|work=The New York Times}}</ref> Powell has retweeted major QAnon accounts and catchphrases and appeared on QAnon shows on YouTube,<ref name="auto3"/> but has denied knowledge of QAnon.<ref name="maga" /> | |||
On January 8, 2021, Twitter permanently suspended the accounts of Powell, Michael Flynn and others. A statement from Twitter said this development was in line with their policies on "Coordinated Harmful Activity".<ref>{{cite news|last1=Collins|first1=Ben|last2=Zadrozny|first2=Brandy|url=https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/twitter-bans-michael-flynn-sidney-powell-qanon-account-purge-n1253550|title=Twitter bans Michael Flynn, Sidney Powell in QAnon account purge|work=NBC News|date=January 8, 2021|access-date=January 8, 2021}}</ref> | |||
==Political fundraising== | |||
In November 2020, Powell established Legal Defense Fund for the American Republic, a 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization with stated purpose to collect funds to help prosecute fraud in U.S. elections.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.motherjones.com/2020-elections/2020/11/michael-flynns-lawyer-wants-to-raise-millions-of-dollars-to-overturn-the-election|title=Michael Flynn's Lawyer Wants to Raise "Millions of Dollars" to Overturn the Election|last1=Friedman|first1=Dan|date=17 November 2020|access-date=23 November 2020|work=]}}</ref> | |||
Powell launched Restore the Republic, a ], in January 2021.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Reimann |first1=Nicholas |title=Sidney Powell Has Started A Super PAC |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicholasreimann/2021/01/22/sidney-powell-has-started-a-super-pac/ |access-date=January 24, 2021 |work=] |date=January 22, 2021}}</ref> | |||
==Writing== | ==Writing== | ||
Powell has written opinion pieces for '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'',<ref name=":13">{{cite web |url=https://www.nationalreview.com/author/sidney-powell/|title=Sidney Powell|work=National Review|access-date= |
Powell has written opinion pieces for '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'',<ref name=":13">{{cite web |url=https://www.nationalreview.com/author/sidney-powell/|title=Sidney Powell|work=National Review|access-date=November 23, 2020}}</ref> Fox News, and media organizations and conservative content producers.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2020/11/16/who-is-sidney-powell|title=Who is Sidney Powell?|last=Mustafa |first=Filiz |work=HITC|access-date=November 20, 2020|archive-date=November 17, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201117002627/https://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2020/11/16/who-is-sidney-powell/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=":14">{{cite web|url=https://observer.com/author/sidney-powell|title=Sidney Powell|work=Observer|access-date=November 14, 2020|archive-date=November 14, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201114223434/https://observer.com/author/sidney-powell/|url-status=live}}</ref> She has written two published books: | ||
*{{Cite book|last1=Powell|first1=Sidney K.|date=2014 |
*{{Cite book|last1=Powell|first1=Sidney K.|date=May 1, 2014|title=Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice|isbn=978-1-61254-149-5|publisher=Brown Books|oclc=870288205}}<ref>{{cite web|date=April 29, 2014|title=Review of ''Licensed to Lie''|url=https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/sidney-powell/licensed-to-lie/|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200526053542/https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/sidney-powell/licensed-to-lie/|archive-date=May 26, 2020|access-date=November 20, 2020|website=]}}</ref> | ||
*{{Cite book|last1=Powell|first1=Sidney K.|last2=Silverglate|first2=Harvey A.|author-link2=Harvey Silverglate|title=Conviction Machine: Standing Up to Federal Prosecutorial Abuse|isbn=978-1-59403-803-7|publisher=]|date= |
*{{Cite book|last1=Powell|first1=Sidney K.|last2=Silverglate|first2=Harvey A.|author-link2=Harvey Silverglate|title=Conviction Machine: Standing Up to Federal Prosecutorial Abuse|isbn=978-1-59403-803-7|publisher=]|date=February 18, 2020|oclc=1104857327}} | ||
In addition, she has published several journal articles on law practice. Examples include: | In addition, she has published several journal articles on law practice. Examples include: | ||
Line 140: | Line 200: | ||
*{{Cite book|last1=Gabriel|first1=Henry D|title=Federal Appellate Practice Guide: Fifth Circuit|last2=Powell|first2=Sidney|publisher=Lawyers Cooperative Publishing|year=1994|location=Rochester, New York|language=en|oclc=30772185}} | *{{Cite book|last1=Gabriel|first1=Henry D|title=Federal Appellate Practice Guide: Fifth Circuit|last2=Powell|first2=Sidney|publisher=Lawyers Cooperative Publishing|year=1994|location=Rochester, New York|language=en|oclc=30772185}} | ||
== |
==Personal life and other ventures== | ||
Powell has a son from a marriage that ended in divorce "decades ago". In 2004, she founded a ] for victims of ]. |
Powell has a son from a marriage that ended in divorce "decades ago".<ref name=":122" /> In 2004, she founded a ] for victims of ]. She has participated in volunteer work for ]s and other charities. Powell was not recalled as "being a staunch conservative or even very political" by people who interacted with her in those organizations.<ref name=":122" /> Powell served as executive producer on the 2013 drama '']'', providing guidance to help bring the film to a commercial release. The film tells the story of Annie Parker<ref>{{cite magazine|url=http://insidemovies.ew.com/2014/05/02/decoding-annie-parker/|title=Meet the woman behind 'Decoding Annie Parker'|first=Samantha|last=Highfill|date=May 2, 2014|magazine=Entertainment Weekly|access-date=November 15, 2020|archive-date=December 27, 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141227190833/http://insidemovies.ew.com/2014/05/02/decoding-annie-parker/|url-status=live}}</ref> and the discovery of the ] breast cancer gene. Powell oversaw fundraising screenings for the film that raised approximately $1 million for breast cancer charities.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://variety.com/2013/film/news/samantha-morton-helen-hunts-decoding-annie-parker-gets-u-s-distribution-exclusive-1200919748|title=Samantha Morton-Helen Hunt's 'Decoding Annie Parker' Gets U.S. Distribution|author=McNary, Dave|work=Variety|date=December 4, 2013|access-date=November 19, 2020|archive-date=August 17, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200817204122/https://variety.com/2013/film/news/samantha-morton-helen-hunts-decoding-annie-parker-gets-u-s-distribution-exclusive-1200919748/|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
==See also== | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Line 147: | Line 211: | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
{{commons category}} | |||
*{{Official website}} | *{{Official website}} | ||
*{{C-SPAN}} | *{{C-SPAN}} | ||
*{{IMDb name}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | {{Authority control}} | ||
Line 162: | Line 226: | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 13:14, 10 January 2025
American lawyer and conspiracy theorist (born 1955)
Sidney Powell | |
---|---|
Born | (1955-05-01) May 1, 1955 (age 69) Durham, North Carolina, U.S. |
Education | University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (BA, JD) |
Occupation | Attorney |
Years active | 1978–present |
Criminal charges | Felonies:
|
Criminal penalty |
|
Criminal status | Pleaded guilty to misdemeanors: 6 counts: conspiracy to commit intentional interference with the performance of election duties |
Website | sidneypowell |
Sidney Katherine Powell (born May 1, 1955) is an American attorney and former federal prosecutor. In August 2023, she was indicted along with Donald Trump and eighteen others in the Georgia election case. In October 2023, she pleaded guilty to six misdemeanor counts of conspiring to intentionally interfere with the performance of election duties. She was sentenced to six years of probation and agreed to testify against the other defendants.
Prior to her political involvement, Powell served as an assistant United States attorney in the Western District of Texas. She was best known for prosecuting high-profile drug smuggler Jimmy Chagra and, as private counsel, defending Merrill Lynch executives in proceedings related to the Enron scandal.
Later in her career, Powell began promoting conspiracy theories. Powell defended retired lieutenant general Michael Flynn in United States v. Flynn, claiming that he was framed by a covert "deep state" operation, and has promoted personalities and slogans associated with QAnon. After the 2020 election, she claimed that there had been a global conspiracy to tamper with voting machines, despite lacking evidence. After she accused the election technology companies Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic of engaging in a conspiracy to rig the election, both companies sued her for defamation.
In 2020, Powell joined the legal team of then-President Trump in an attempt to overturn Joe Biden's victory in the 2020 presidential election. Powell continued filing lawsuits independently and ultimately lost four federal lawsuits in Michigan, Georgia, Arizona, and Wisconsin. In August 2021, Michigan federal judge Linda Vivienne Parker formally sanctioned Powell and eight other pro-Trump lawyers for their frivolous suit seeking to overturn Trump's election loss. The attorneys were ordered repay the legal expenses incurred by the defense and recommended for disbarment. The State Bar of Texas' Texas Commission for Lawyer Discipline brought a disciplinary action against Powell, alleging that she violated the rules of professional conduct governing lawyers; that proceeding is pending.
Early life and education
Sidney Katherine Powell was born on May 1, 1955 in Durham, North Carolina, grew up in the city of Raleigh, and knew from an early age that she wanted to be a lawyer.
She graduated from Needham Broughton High School and attended the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, where she earned a Bachelor of Arts. At the age of 19, she was accepted into the University of North Carolina School of Law, where she graduated in 1978 with a Juris Doctor degree. She began her legal career as one of the youngest federal prosecutors in the U.S.
Career
From 1978 through 1988, Powell was an assistant United States attorney for the Western and Northern Districts of Texas and the Eastern District of Virginia, where she handled civil and criminal trial work. She was appointed Appellate Section Chief for the Western District of Texas and then the Northern District of Texas.
Powell established her own law firm in 1993 in Dallas, Texas. Around 2002, she began to practice in Asheville, North Carolina, but moved back to Texas later.
Prosecution for assassination of Judge John H. Wood
Powell was best known as one of the prosecutors in the 1979 trial of Jimmy Chagra who was accused in the assassination of John H. Wood Jr., a federal judge from Texas. He was acquitted of involvement in the assassination but convicted on other charges. He later admitted to his role in the conspiracy to murder the judge.
Defense of Enron
In the 2000s, Powell represented firms and executives involved in the Enron scandal, including the accounting firm Arthur Andersen and former Merrill Lynch executive Jim Brown. She was an outspoken critic of the Enron Task Force prosecutions, and accused prosecutor Andrew Weissmann of overreach. After that, Powell wrote extensively about prosecutorial abuses in the 2014 book Licensed to Lie. The book was noticed by then-Senator Orrin Hatch, who described it as "powerful". The experience contributed to her distrust of government institutions.
Comments regarding Ted Stevens
In Licensed to Lie, Powell contended that prosecutors in the corruption trial of U.S. senator Ted Stevens of Alaska, held in 2008, before federal judge Emmet G. Sullivan in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, intentionally withheld "Brady material" they should have disclosed to the defense and that they returned Rocky Williams, a terminally ill witness, to Alaska, ostensibly so that his testimony would not exonerate Stevens. The senator was subsequently convicted of seven felony counts of corruption for failing to annually declare gifts from VECO owner Bill Allen. However, due to numerous instances of prosecutorial misconduct, Attorney General Eric Holder moved to dismiss the indictment prior to sentencing, effectively vacating the conviction.
Defense of Michael Flynn
Main article: United States v. FlynnAfter publishing her first book, Powell continued writing opinion pieces for right-leaning websites. In 2017, Weissmann joined Robert Mueller's Special Counsel investigation, reviving interest in Licensed to Lie from Newt Gingrich and Sean Hannity. Using her status as a former federal prosecutor, Powell became a leading voice against the Mueller investigation; in a February 2018 op-ed, Powell wrote that retired lieutenant general Michael Flynn should "withdraw his guilty plea" for making false statements to the FBI, alleging "egregious government misconduct". Powell's appearances on Fox News to discuss the Flynn case were noticed by President Donald Trump, and the two spoke on several occasions. To raise money for Flynn's defense, Powell spoke at a November 2018 conference, where she met Flynn's siblings. They agreed that Flynn was the victim of a "deep state plot" and had only pleaded guilty because he was coerced.
Flynn released his law firm of Covington & Burling and retained Powell to serve as his lead attorney in June 2019. On the same day this was disclosed, Powell sent a letter to Attorney General William Barr requesting the "utmost confidentiality" and argued that Flynn's prosecution was due to "corruption of our beloved government institutions for what appears to be political purposes". Among other things, she requested that Barr appoint an outsider to investigate. Six months later, Barr appointed Jeffrey Jensen to conduct an investigation.
The Justice Department filed a motion to drop Flynn's prosecution with presiding federal judge Emmet G. Sullivan in May 2020. Sullivan did not immediately grant the motion; Powell later requested a writ of mandamus from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to compel Sullivan to drop the case. After an initial ruling in favor of Powell by a three-judge panel of the court, the case was appealed to the full court, which denied the mandamus request in an 8–2 ruling and returned the case to Sullivan's court. Powell had argued to the full court that Sullivan's role was "ministerial", giving him no discretion but to comply with the Justice Department motion, to which judge Thomas Griffith replied: "It's not ministerial and you know it's not. So it's not ministerial, so that means that the judge has to do some thinking about it, right?" Other judges on the court also pushed back on Powell's characterization of a federal judge's role. After Trump pardoned Flynn in November 2020, Sullivan dismissed the case as moot, though he stated he probably would have denied the Justice Department motion had the case proceeded. According to a Justice Department official, the Justice Department was not consulted about the pardon.
Soon after taking the Flynn case, Powell had accused the Justice Department of prosecutorial misconduct against Flynn; in a footnote to a June 2020 court brief, the department described Powell's allegations as "unfounded and provide no basis for impugning the prosecutors from the D.C. United States Attorney's Office".
Powell has been described as a proponent of conspiracy theories about Flynn, namely that he was framed by members of the "deep state" who were trying to eject President Donald Trump from office.
2020 presidential election
Main articles: Post-election lawsuits related to the 2020 United States presidential election and 2020 United States presidential election § ControversiesDays before the 2020 presidential election, Dennis Montgomery, a software designer with a history of making dubious claims, asserted that a government supercomputer program would be used to switch votes from Trump to Biden on voting machines. Powell promoted the conspiracy theory on Lou Dobbs Tonight on November 6, and again on November 8, 2020, on Maria Bartiromo's Fox Business program, ...claiming to have "evidence that that is exactly what happened".
On December 10, – long after other hosts had started to push her for more evidence – Dobbs continued to praise her.
"Sidney Powell, thank you for all you're doing," "It is the Lord's work."
The Washington Post indicated Bartiromo asked Powell for proof of specifics of voting fraud made by her, supposedly including dead voters casting ballots, ballots lacking Trump's name, and a postal employee's confession that he had postdated mailed ballots. She said "Sidney, we talked about the Dominion software." "I know that there were voting irregularities. Tell me about that." Powell alleged that a secret international cabal involving communists, "globalists", George Soros, Hugo Chávez (who died in 2013), the Clinton Foundation, the CIA, and thousands of Democratic and Republican officials—including then-Trump ally and Georgia governor Brian Kemp—used voting machines to transfer millions of votes away from Trump in the 2020 presidential election. She also asserted that the CIA ignored warnings about the software, and urged Trump to fire director Gina Haspel. Christopher Krebs, director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), characterized the supercomputer claim as "nonsense" and a "hoax". CISA described the 2020 election as "the most secure in American history", with "no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes or was in any way compromised".
2020 Election Legitimacy Team
In the wake of the election, Trump established a legal team to challenge the legitimacy of the results. On November 14, Trump named Rudy Giuliani to lead the team, with Victoria Toensing, her husband Joseph diGenova, Jenna Ellis, and Powell as members of this team. The team proceeded to file numerous lawsuits in several states over alleged vote harvesting, illegal votes, machine errors, vote dumps, and late-counted votes. Precisely how Powell gained prominence in the legal team is unknown, even to some campaign officials. One official claimed Powell "simply showed up at headquarters".
Giuliani and Powell alleged multiple instances of voter fraud in key states at a November 19 press conference. They cited an affidavit—filed by Russell Ramsland and L. Lin Wood on behalf of the Trump campaign—as evidence of manipulated results. In their comparison of votes cast against total voters registered in Michigan, Powell asserted that they found over-voting of "up to 350 percent in some places". However, the affidavit's conclusion was erroneous since it compared the Michigan vote tallies against population data from Minnesota (whose respective abbreviations are MI and MN, a possible source of the error). When The Washington Post independently checked the numbers, no voter discrepancies were found. When questioned the next day, Wood described this as "a simple mistake" and said the affidavit "will be corrected if it hasn't been already".
After Giuliani's segment ended, Powell took the lectern and alleged, without evidence, that an international communist plot to rig the 2020 election had been engineered by Cuba, China, Venezuela, Hugo Chávez (who died in 2013), George Soros, the Clinton Foundation and antifa. She also alleged that Dominion Voting Systems "can set and run an algorithm that probably ran all over the country to take a certain percentage of votes from President Trump and flip them to President Biden". The source for many of these claims appeared to be far right news organization One America News Network (OANN). She also repeated a conspiracy theory—spread by Congressman Louie Gohmert, OANN and others—that election results showing a landslide victory for Trump had been transmitted to the German office of the Spanish electronic voting firm Scytl, after which a company server was supposedly seized in a raid by the United States Army. The US Army and Scytl refuted these claims; Scytl has not had any offices in Germany since September 2019 and does not tabulate US votes. In a March 2021 report, the Justice and Homeland Security Departments flatly rejected accusations of voting fraud conducted by foreign nations. Jonathan Karl, former ABC News chief White House correspondent for the duration of the Trump presidency, wrote in his November 2021 book, Betrayal, that Powell told Defense Department official Ezra Cohen-Watnick that CIA director Gina Haspel had been injured and detained in Germany while attempting to retrieve the alleged server and destroy the purported evidence. She asked Cohen-Watnick, who previously worked under Flynn in the government, to launch a special operations mission to physically seize Haspel and compel her to confess.
Later on the evening of November 14, on his Fox News program Tucker Carlson Tonight, conservative commentator Carlson said he had invited Powell onto his show to provide proof of her allegations. After repeated requests, he said Powell became angry with him and said he should "stop contacting her." Carlson's team contacted other figures in the Trump campaign who said that Powell had not given them evidence of her allegations.
In an interview with Newsmax on November 21, Powell accused Georgia's Republican governor, Brian Kemp, of being "in on the Dominion scam" and suggested financial impropriety. Powell additionally alleged that fraud had cost Doug Collins the nonpartisan blanket primary against incumbent Kelly Loeffler in the Senate race in Georgia. She also claimed the Democratic Party had used rigged Dominion machines to defeat Bernie Sanders in the 2016 primary, and that Sanders learned of this but "sold out". She said she would "blow up" Georgia with a "biblical" court filing. Powell suggested that candidates "paid to have the system rigged to work for them". On the basis of these claims, Powell called for Republican-controlled state legislatures in swing states to disregard the election results and appoint a slate of "loyal" electors who would vote to re-elect Trump, based on authority supposedly resting in Article Two of the Constitution.
Giuliani and Ellis issued a November 22 statement that Powell was "practicing law on her own" and was not (or was no longer) a part of the Trump legal team. According to The Washington Post, the Trump campaign cut ties with Powell because she was seen as harming Trump's broader legal efforts, and because Trump disliked the coverage she received from Tucker Carlson Tonight. However, she continued to meet with the president in the White House. Shortly after the announcement, her client Michael Flynn tweeted that Twitter had suspended her account for twelve hours, and that she agreed with the campaign's announcement and was "staying the course" to prove election fraud.
On November 23, Fox executive Raj Shah informed his superiors that Fox staff had entreated numerous of its sources within Trump's administration "...to inform reporters that Powell offered no evidence for her claims and didn't speak for the president." Despite this, on November 24 she joined host Lou Dobbs to tell his viewers that in Arizona, "...there were 35,000 votes added to every Democrat candidate just to start their voting off. It's like getting your $500 of Monopoly money to begin with when you haven't done anything, and it was only for Democrats."
Dominion Voting Systems released a statement refuting Powell's fraud claims on November 26.
A draft executive order dated December 16 called for Trump to order a military seizure of voting machines and the appointment of a special counsel; when it surfaced a year later, it was not immediately clear who drafted it. Trump ally Bernard Kerik testified to the January 6 committee that Michael Flynn associate Phil Waldron originated the idea of a military seizure of voting machines.
Powell, who had previously called on the president to invoke the Insurrection Act to deploy military forces, joined an Oval Office meeting on December 18, with Giuliani, Flynn, and Pat Cipollone. There, Trump suggested naming Powell as a special counsel to investigate allegations of election fraud. Most Trump advisors opposed the idea, while Powell characterized them as quitters. The meeting was reportedly heated and included Flynn's proposal for the president to declare martial law.
By December 2020 over 4,000 attorneys had signed an open letter asking bar disciplinary authorities to condemn and investigate Powell's behavior.
In May 2021, Powell continued to express the hope that the election result would be reversed. She spoke at a QAnon conference in Dallas over Memorial Day weekend, where she falsely asserted Trump "can simply be reinstated, that a new Inauguration Day is set", eliciting cheers from the crowd. The date for this was supposedly August 13, however this date passed and Trump was not reinstated.
Powell was subpoenaed in January 2022 to testify before the House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack. She sued to block release of her phone records.
Independent election lawsuits
While working for Trump, Powell stated she would "release the Kraken", a catchphrase from the 1981 film Clash of the Titans, and the expression spread across Twitter. After the Trump campaign cut ties with Powell, she continued to file independent election lawsuits in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin.
Sources described Powell's election-related filings as filled with significant "sloppy mistakes". In her Georgia lawsuit, she claimed that a computer algorithm took votes from Biden and flipped them to Trump, later amending the filing. In Powell's submissions to district courts in Georgia and Michigan, district was misspelled three different ways on the first pages. Powell's Michigan filing also had numerous formatting errors and misidentified one of her experts. Two Republicans said they had been named as a plaintiff in the Georgia and Wisconsin lawsuits despite not having given permission to be included (although one later agreed to remain as a plaintiff).
Powell's lawsuits cited an anonymous witness, referred to as "Spyder" or "Spider", who alleged that American voting systems were "certainly compromised by rogue actors, such as Iran and China". Spyder's real name was redacted from submitted documents; however, a bookmark in the file revealed his identity to be Joshua Merritt, an IT consultant. Although Powell's filings describe Merritt as a former "military intelligence expert", the United States Army Intelligence Center stated that he never worked in military intelligence and had not finished a training course in military intelligence. Merritt acknowledged that the description was wrong and attributed the error to Powell's clerks. However, Merritt claimed he did finish the training, producing an "unofficial transcript" as evidence.
Powell also presented an affidavit from an individual she described as a former intelligence contractor with knowledge of a foreign conspiracy to subvert democracy, who Powell said needed to remain anonymous to protect their "reputation, professional career and personal safety". The Washington Post identified the individual as pro-Trump podcaster Terpsichore Maras-Lindeman, and that parts of the affidavit matched a blog post she had written in November 2019. Maras-Lindeman had served in the Navy for less than a year over two decades earlier, and in a November 2018 civil suit the attorney general of North Dakota accused her of misappropriating funds for personal use from a charitable event she tried to organize. State attorneys asserted that she exaggerated her credentials and used multiple aliases and Social Security numbers in "a persistent effort...to deceive others". Asked about Maras-Lindeman, Powell told the Post: "I don't have the same information you do."
Arizona
Powell filed a federal lawsuit against Arizona governor Doug Ducey, Arizona secretary of state Katie Hobbs and other Arizona election officials on December 2, alleging that "poll watchers failed to adequately verify signatures on ballots, that Maricopa County ballot dispute referees were partisan, that Dominion backups had no chain of custody, and the Dominion machines themselves suffered from errors during state evaluations." The plaintiffs asked the court to decertify Arizona's election results or order that Arizona certify Trump electors. On December 9, U.S. district judge Diane Humetewa dismissed the case due to plaintiffs' lack of legal standing, and ruled that the allegations of impropriety were "sorely wanting of relevant or reliable evidence", instead being "largely based on anonymous witnesses, hearsay, and irrelevant analysis of unrelated elections". The judge singled out the fraud allegations being put forth, writing that they "fail in their particularity and plausibility" and that there would be "extreme, and entirely unprecedented" harm to Arizona's more than 3 million voters to entertain Powell's lawsuit "at this late date". Powell filed an appeal of the lawsuit's dismissal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in December, which scheduled the due date for the opening brief to be two months after the inauguration. That month, Powell also filed an emergency petition with the United States Supreme Court seeking an extraordinary writ of mandamus for intervention in the case. The petition was denied without comment on March 1, 2021, ending the matter.
Georgia
Powell and Lin Wood filed a lawsuit against Georgia governor Brian Kemp and other state officials on November 25, alleging that Dominion Voting Systems was used to rig votes for Biden. The plaintiffs asked the court to halt the certification of elections results and order Kemp to certify Trump as the winner in Georgia. U.S. district judge Timothy Batten issued a temporary restraining order on November 29 that voting machines in Georgia's Cobb, Gwinnett, and Cherokee counties were to preserve their data, after Wood had argued to retain "this information on a very limited basis". Powell appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit to expand the restraining order. A three-judge panel unanimously dismissed Powell's appeal on December 4, citing a failure to prove that the restraining order caused serious harm. The panel also indicated that the original lawsuit, in which Powell also sought to have voting machines inspected, was "considerably delayed" by the appeal.
Powell's evidence in the Georgia lawsuit included an affidavit from Ron Watkins, a former administrator of 8chan/8kun, the online home of QAnon. In his affidavit, Watkins stated that his reading of an online user guide for Dominion Voting Systems software led him to conclude that election fraud might be "within the realm of possibility". Watkins did not provide any legitimate evidence of fraud. Powell also claimed that "a certificate from the Secretary of State was awarded to Dominion Voting Systems but is undated." However, the attached certificate had apparently been edited to remove the date; the actual certificate is dated and available publicly.
Batten dismissed the case in a ruling from the bench on December 7. The judge ruled that the plaintiffs did not have legal standing to bring the case, filed the case too late (as the Dominion machines were adopted months earlier), and filed the case in the wrong venue, the appropriate venue being a state court. Batten also stated that the relief sought by Powell was impossible to grant. The plaintiffs filed an appeal (Case No. 20-14579) of Batten's decision in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit on December 8. Powell also appealed the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, which denied a motion to expedite the case. She dropped the lawsuit on January 19, 2021, one day before Biden's inauguration.
In August 2022, Fulton County district attorney Fani Willis sought to have Powell testify before a special grand jury seated for the investigation into possible illegal election interference. Powell was involved in arranging for the collection of data from election systems and voting machines at the county's elections office in rural Coffee County in January 2021.
On October 19, 2023, Powell pleaded guilty to six misdemeanor charges for her role in the attempt by the former president and his allies to alter the outcome of the election in the State of Georgia and other states. She was sentenced to serve six years' probation (one year for each charge) and pay a $6,000 fine, and agreed to testify against the other defendants.
On October 31, 2023, the Georgia secretary of state's chief operating officer, Gabriel Sterling, displayed the final payment check from Powell at a press conference where he said that the check represented an admission that Powell's claims against Georgia's voting machines were false. He said, "If you didn't believe the three recounts, if you didn't believe the investigations, if you didn't believe the court cases, this check shows you she says, yes, I lied."
Michigan
Powell filed a lawsuit against Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer and other state officials on November 25, alleging a variety of violations of the election code and asking the court to decertify the state's election results or certify them for Trump. In the lawsuit, Powell submitted a witness's declaration that Joe Biden had "received more than 100% of the votes" in Edison County; however, there is no Edison County in Michigan or any other U.S. state. There is an Edison Township in Minnesota, leading to speculation that the information was again taken from a list of Minnesota precincts.
U.S. district judge Linda V. Parker denied the requested relief on December 7, stating that the plaintiffs had only offered "theories, conjecture, and speculation" of potential vote switching. The judge also declared that the "ship has sailed" for most of the relief requested by the plaintiffs, while the rest "is beyond the power of any court". Furthermore, Parker wrote that the relief requested would "greatly harm the public interest" and felt that the plaintiffs' motive for filing the case was not to win, but rather to shake "people's faith in the democratic process and their trust in our government". Powell has filed an appeal of the decision in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, as well as the U.S. Supreme Court, which denied a motion for expedited review of the case. The city of Detroit has called for sanctions against the plaintiffs in the case as well as their counsel, requesting that Powell and the other attorneys be disbarred for "trying to use this court's processes to validate their conspiracy theories". Michigan attorney general Dana Nessel filed a similar motion on January 28, 2021, accusing Powell and three Michigan lawyers of violating their oaths by attempting to overturn Biden's victory. On February 1, 2021, Nessel, along with Michigan governor Whitmer and Michigan secretary of state Jocelyn Benson, filed complaints with the State Bar of Texas seeking Powell's disbarment.
During a July 2021 hearing to consider sanctions against Powell and other attorneys for their activities in Michigan, Parker discussed the hundreds of pages of allegations by others that the attorneys had submitted to courts, which included an individual claiming to have witnessed poll workers changing votes from Trump to Biden. None of the attorneys responded when Parker asked if they had spoken to the witness to vet their allegation.
On August 25, 2021, Judge Parker ruled that Powell, L. Lin Wood, and seven other pro-Trump lawyers had filed the suit "in bad faith and for an improper purpose"; that their litigation was "a historic and profound abuse of the judicial process"; and that they had filed "baseless and frivolous lawsuits in order to undermine public confidence in the democratic process." The court ordered that they pay attorney's fees to the City of Detroit and State of Michigan to reimburse them for the costs of defending against the suit, and referred them to their respective state bars for investigation into ethical violations, which could lead to disbarment.
On November 4, 2021, a closed-door investigatory hearing was held by the State Bar of Texas to begin the process of determining possible sanctions or disbarment for Powell. On December 2, 2021, Judge Parker ordered Powell, Wood and the other "Kraken" attorneys to pay $175,250 to the city of Detroit and the state of Michigan.
Wisconsin
Powell filed a federal lawsuit against the Wisconsin Elections Commission on December 1, claiming that Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic were used to conduct electronic ballot-stuffing and rig votes for Joe Biden. The lawsuit asked the court to decertify the state's election results or declare Donald Trump the winner of the state. The lawsuit mistakenly demanded the release of video footage from a voting center in Michigan and made erroneous references to the election in Georgia and the Georgia state legislature. U.S. district judge Pamela Pepper filed a December 2 order noting that while an "expedited" injunction was sought, the initial filings did not "indicate whether the plaintiffs are asking the court to act more quickly or why", and did not request a hearing or propose a briefing schedule. Pepper dismissed the case on December 9, writing that the "federal court has no authority or jurisdiction to grant the relief the remaining plaintiff seeks", and that the litigation on behalf of the plaintiff was "sometimes odd and often harried" and ultimately failed to establish why a federal case was appropriate. Pepper also repeatedly stated that the plaintiff did not have legal standing to bring the case and concluded that granting the relief would be unconstitutional. Powell then applied for a writ of mandamus from the U.S. Supreme Court, which rejected her petition on March 1, 2021, to end the lawsuit; Powell said the court's decision "completes the implosion of each of our three branches of government into the rubble of a sinkhole of corruption".
Defamation lawsuits against Powell
Dominion Voting Systems sent a letter to Powell on December 16, 2020, demanding she publicly retract her baseless allegations about the company. Shortly thereafter, the Trump legal team instructed dozens of staff members to preserve all documents relating to Dominion, Powell and others for any future litigation. Smartmatic sent a similar demand letter to conservative television outlets and within days Fox News, its sister network Fox Business, as well as Newsmax broadcast segments walking back conspiracy allegations they had previously promoted.
On January 8, 2021, Dominion sued Powell for defamation and asked for over $1.3 billion in damages. On February 4, 2021, Smartmatic filed a defamation lawsuit that accused Powell, Fox News, some hosts at Fox News, and Rudy Giuliani of engaging in a "disinformation campaign" against the company, and asked for $2.7 billion in damages. In March 2022 a New York State Supreme Court judge dismissed the Smartmatic allegations against Powell on jurisdictional grounds; however, the company had already filed a second lawsuit in Washington, D.C. in anticipation of the New York ruling.
On March 22, 2021, lawyers defending Powell against Dominion's lawsuit filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. They argued that "no reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact". Instead, "it was clear to reasonable persons that Powell's claims were her opinions and legal theories", argued the lawyers. Furthermore, the lawyers claimed that Dominion could not prove that Powell took action with "actual malice", because "she believed the allegations then and she believes them now". On August 11, 2021, Judge Carl Nichols denied this motion to dismiss the lawsuit. A scheduling order filed March 1, 2022, for Dominion's suit against Powell and parallel lawsuits against Rudy Giuliani and My Pillow, Inc., calls for depositions and pretrial motions through September 2023.
Venezuelan businessman Majed Khalil sued Powell, Fox News, and Lou Dobbs for $250 million in December 2021, alleging they had falsely implicated him in rigging Dominion and Smartmatic machines. The lawsuit was settled out of court for an undisclosed amount in April 2023.
QAnon
Powell has been described by some sources as a supporter of the QAnon conspiracy theory, a far-right conspiracy theory which alleges that a cabal of Satan-worshipping pedophiles is running a global child sex-trafficking ring and plotting against former president Donald Trump, who is fighting the cabal. In January 2020, Powell denied knowledge of QAnon or Q; later that year, she retweeted major QAnon accounts and catchphrases and appeared on QAnon shows on YouTube. Upon leaving Trump's legal team, Powell was embraced by QAnon followers, many of whom had become discouraged that years of predictions of a Trump landslide victory and coming revelations about his enemies had not materialized. On January 8, 2021, Twitter permanently suspended the accounts of Powell, Michael Flynn and others. A statement from Twitter said this development was in line with their policies on "coordinated harmful activity".
In May 2021, Powell (alongside Lin Wood and Michael Flynn) was a keynote speaker at what was essentially a QAnon conference in Dallas, Texas.
Texas Bar petition against Powell
On March 1, 2022, the State Bar of Texas’ Commission for Lawyer Discipline submitted in court a disciplinary petition against Powell alleging that she had violated several rules of professional conduct, such as those about making false statements to a tribunal, using evidence known to be false, and engaging in dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation. On February 23, 2023, judge Andrea Bouressa of the 471st District Court, dismissed the petition, on the grounds of the commission failing to meet the burden of proof that Powell had indeed violated the Texas' attorney code of conduct. In her decision, the judge also admonished the commission for not "properly labeling" the exhibits in its filing, which led to the consideration of only two of them.
Political fundraising
In November 2020, Powell established Legal Defense Fund for the American Republic, a 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization with stated purpose to collect funds to help prosecute fraud in U.S. elections.
Powell launched Restore the Republic, a super PAC, in January 2021. In November 2021, The Washington Post reported that the preceding September federal prosecutors had issued a subpoena for the financial records of groups Powell had formed, including Defending the Republic, which was registered as a social welfare organization, and a political action committee by the same name. Days after the election, Powell created a website to raise funds for her new organization, referring to "Sidney Powell's Legal Defense Fund," asking donors to make checks payable to her law firm. The Daily Beast reported that the organization's board of directors initially included Michael Flynn and Lin Wood, and Patrick Byrne as CEO. All left the organization in April 2021 after Powell refused to allow it to be audited. In a recorded phone call with Wood that Byrne confirmed as authentic, Byrne asserted Powell was diverting donations to pay for her legal defense against defamation lawsuits. Defending the Republic raised $16.4 million in the year following the election. The group spent millions to fund the legal defense of the January 6 defendants; its expenditures, as well as reduced donations, substantially reduced DTR's cash on hand, but it still has more than $5 million as of November 2022. As a dark money group, Defending the Republic is not required to disclose its donors.
Criminal charges and guilty plea
As part of the prosecution of Donald Trump in Georgia, on August 14, 2023, she was indicted by a grand jury for violating Georgia's Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) statute along with 18 other alleged co-conspirators, including Trump himself. She was also charged with two counts of conspiracy to commit election fraud; and one count of each of the following conspiracies to commit: computer theft, computer trespass, computer invasion of privacy, and defraud the state—for a total of seven felony counts. Powell turned herself in at the Fulton County jail on August 23, 2023.
On October 19, 2023, Powell pleaded guilty to six misdemeanor counts related to her role in Trump's attempts to overturn the election and her own role in breaching electoral equipment security in Coffee County, Georgia. She agreed to a sentence of six years' probation, a $6,000 fine and $2,700 in restitution, and to write a letter of apology to the people of Georgia. She will also testify in other cases. Within a week, Trump claimed that Powell was "not my attorney, and never was", despite his November 2020 Twitter statement that "Sidney Powell ... added to our other wonderful lawyers and representatives".
Powell's guilty plea was generally analyzed in American news media as a major victory for prosecutors against Trump and his associates. The New York Times' Alan Feuer and Maggie Haberman noted Powell as the first time that prosecutors collaborated with a major co-conspirator of Trump's attempts to overturn the election. Both also noted the potential for Powell's guilty plea to legitimize other criminal charges against other figures involved in both Georgia's racketeering cases and Jack Smith's federal charges against Trump and his associates. The Atlantic echoed these concerns, with journalist David A. Graham comparing the relationship between Powell's plea and the other figures charged in the Georgia racketeering case to the prisoner's dilemma. Likewise, CNN analyst Marshall Cohen viewed the Powell plea as having the potential to incriminate anyone who worked with Powell during the attempts to overturn the election, though Cohen said that the plea deal in Georgia could open up Powell to prosecution by Jack Smith and a potential second plea deal with him, where she is alluded to as an unindicted co-conspirator. Alternatively, PBS News Georgia correspondent Stephen Fowler said Powell's testimony was potentially unreliable, and cited Trump's lawyer's assertion that Powell's testimony would exonerate the former president.
Writing
Powell has written opinion pieces for The New York Observer, The Daily Caller, The Hill, National Review, Fox News, and media organizations and conservative content producers. She has written two published books:
- Powell, Sidney K. (May 1, 2014). Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice. Brown Books. ISBN 978-1-61254-149-5. OCLC 870288205.
- Powell, Sidney K.; Silverglate, Harvey A. (February 18, 2020). Conviction Machine: Standing Up to Federal Prosecutorial Abuse. Encounter Books. ISBN 978-1-59403-803-7. OCLC 1104857327.
In addition, she has published several journal articles on law practice. Examples include:
- Powell, Sidney (1988). "Federal Jurisdiction in Criminal Appeals—Appealable Orders in the Fifth Circuit". Texas Tech Law Review. 19 (3): 1003–1028.
- Powell, Sidney (1990). "Federal Appeals in the Fifth Circuit: Tips for the Texas Practitioner". Baylor Law Review. 42 (1): 97–140.
- Gabriel, Henry D; Powell, Sidney (1994). Federal Appellate Practice Guide: Fifth Circuit. Rochester, New York: Lawyers Cooperative Publishing. OCLC 30772185.
Personal life and other ventures
Powell has a son from a marriage that ended in divorce "decades ago". In 2004, she founded a non-profit for victims of domestic violence. She has participated in volunteer work for women's shelters and other charities. Powell was not recalled as "being a staunch conservative or even very political" by people who interacted with her in those organizations. Powell served as executive producer on the 2013 drama Decoding Annie Parker, providing guidance to help bring the film to a commercial release. The film tells the story of Annie Parker and the discovery of the BRCA1 breast cancer gene. Powell oversaw fundraising screenings for the film that raised approximately $1 million for breast cancer charities.
See also
References
- File:Donald Trump Indictment in Georgia.pdf
- "Powell, Sidney K." Archived from the original on November 20, 2020. Retrieved November 16, 2020.
- McBurney, Robert C. I. (August 22, 2022). "Certificate of material witness pursuant to uniform act to secure the attendance of witnesses from without the state, codified in the state of Georgia as O.C.G.A. §24-13-90 et. seq." – via Clerk of Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia.
- ^ Kloor, Keith (January 17, 2020). "The #MAGA Lawyer Behind Michael Flynn's Scorched-Earth Legal Strategy". Politico. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020. Retrieved November 15, 2020.
- ^ Morill, Jim (November 21, 2020). "Sidney Powell's road from UNC to defending Trump's supposed 'landslide' reelection". Charlotte Observer.
- "Commencement 1978 – University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill". University of North Carolina Library digital archive. May 14, 1978. Retrieved November 15, 2020.
- ^ Thompson, Elizabeth (November 23, 2020). "5 things to know about Sidney Powell, the Dallas lawyer formerly on Trump's legal team". Dallas News.
- "Sidney Powell P.C." Archived from the original on November 16, 2020. Retrieved November 14, 2020.
- Boyle, John. "Answer Man: Is Trump lawyer Sidney Powell an Asheville resident?". The Asheville Citizen Times. Retrieved December 4, 2020.
- "5 things to know about Sidney Powell, the Dallas lawyer formerly on Trump's legal team". Dallas News. November 23, 2020.,
- ^ Davis, Aaron C.; Dawsey, Josh; Brown, Emma; Swaine, Jon (November 28, 2020). "For Trump advocate Sidney Powell, a playbook steeped in conspiracy theories". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 30, 2020.
- McKinley, James C. Jr. (July 29, 2008). "Jamiel A. Chagra, 63, Drug Kingpin, Dies (Published 2008)". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved December 4, 2020.
- Contreras, Guillermo (August 26, 2017). "Judge's 1979 slaying was 'crime of the century'". San Antonio Express-News. Retrieved December 5, 2020.
- Wisenberg, S.L. (October 27, 2014). "Too Much Skin in the Game? A Review of Sidney Powell's Licensed To Lie". Archived from the original on November 12, 2020. Retrieved November 20, 2020.
- Harris, Andrew; Farrell, Greg (June 12, 2019). "Michael Flynn's new lawyer is firebrand DOJ critic Sidney Powell". Providence Journal. Retrieved November 24, 2020.
- Wickert, David. "Sidney Powell's journey: From prosecutor to prosecuted". The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. ISSN 1539-7459. Retrieved September 30, 2024.
- Breuninger, Kevin; Mangan, Dan (June 12, 2019). "Michael Flynn hires new lawyer, Sidney Powell, who had urged him to withdraw guilty plea in Mueller case". CNBC. Retrieved March 24, 2021.
- Neil A. Lewis (October 27, 2008). "Justice Dept. Moves to Void Stevens Case". The New York Times. Retrieved March 24, 2021.
- ^ "Sidney Powell". National Review. Retrieved November 23, 2020.
- ^ "Sidney Powell". Observer. Archived from the original on November 14, 2020. Retrieved November 14, 2020.
- ^ "Michael Flynn hires Dallas lawyer Sidney Powell, a conspiracy theorist who calls Mueller a 'creep'". Dallas News. June 12, 2019. Archived from the original on November 17, 2020. Retrieved November 20, 2020.
- Mazzetti, Mark; Savage, Charlie; Goldman, Adam (June 28, 2020). "How Michael Flynn's Defense Team Found Powerful Allies". The New York Times.
- Powell, Sidney (June 6, 2019). "Letter to William Barr re Internal review, Brady, IG Report, Declassification, and Lt. General Michael Flynn (retired)" (PDF). Sidney Powell, P.C. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 4, 2019. Retrieved November 15, 2020.
- Mazzetti, Mark; Savage, Charlie; Goldman, Adam (June 28, 2020). "How Michael Flynn's Defense Team Found Powerful Allies". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020. Retrieved November 15, 2020.
- Polantz, Katelyn (May 7, 2020). "Justice Department drops criminal case against Michael Flynn". CNN. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020. Retrieved November 15, 2020.
- "Full D.C. Circuit Court Rejects Michael Flynn's Emergency Petition for Immediate Dismissal of Criminal Case". Lawandcrime.com. August 31, 2020. Archived from the original on November 18, 2020. Retrieved November 15, 2020.
- Tucker, Eric (August 11, 2020). "Appeals court seems wary of ordering dismissal of Flynn case". Star Tribune. Archived from the original on November 16, 2020. Retrieved November 15, 2020.
- "'That's Not True and You Know It,' Federal Judge Tells DOJ Lawyer in Flynn Matter". Courthousenews.com. August 11, 2020. Archived from the original on November 17, 2020. Retrieved November 15, 2020.
- Hsu, Spencer S.; Marimow, Ann E. "Michael Flynn judge says pardon doesn't mean ex-national security adviser is innocent" – via www.washingtonpost.com.
- Tucker, Eric (November 25, 2020). "Trump pardons Flynn despite guilty plea in Russia probe". Associated Press. Retrieved November 26, 2020.
- "Justice Department defends prosecutors in Flynn case". Politico. June 17, 2020.
- "United States v. Michael T. Flynn, Crim. No. 17-232 (D.D.C. 2020) – Government's Response to Court-Appointed Amicus Curiae, the Honorable John Gleeson (Ret.)" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on November 20, 2020. Retrieved November 17, 2020.
- "Fact check: TV news clip does not show 'live computerized fraud' on Election Day 2020". Reuters. November 10, 2020. Archived from the original on November 16, 2020. Retrieved November 15, 2020.
- Fichera, Angelo; Spencer, Saranac Hale (November 13, 2020). "Bogus Theory Claims Supercomputer Switched Votes in Election". FactCheck.org. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020. Retrieved November 15, 2020.
- Fichera, Angelo; Spencer, Saranac Hale (November 13, 2020). "Bogus Theory Claims Supercomputer Switched Votes in Election". FactCheck.org. Retrieved November 22, 2020.
- ^ Sarah Ellison and Amy Gardner (March 16, 2023). At center of Fox News lawsuit, Sidney Powell and a 'wackadoodle' email, The Washington Post. Retrieved March 18, 2023.
- Walsh, Joe (November 20, 2020). "Who Is Sidney Powell? Meet Trump's New Top Conspiracy Theorist". Forbes. Archived from the original on November 21, 2020. Retrieved November 21, 2020.
- ^ Bump, Philip. "Here's how seriously you should take the Trump legal team's conspiracy theories". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on November 20, 2020. Retrieved November 20, 2020.
- Qiu, Linda (November 19, 2020). "How Sidney Powell inaccurately cited Venezuela's elections as evidence of U.S. fraud". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on November 19, 2020. Retrieved November 20, 2020.
- Leibovich, Mark (November 20, 2020). "Trump's Legal Team Sets a Precedent for Lowering the Bar". The New York Times.
- ^ Fichera, Angelo; Spencer, Saranac Hale (November 13, 2020). "Bogus Theory Claims Supercomputer Switched Votes in Election". FactCheck.org. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020. Retrieved November 15, 2020.
- ^ "Repudiating Trump, officials say election 'most secure'". AP NEWS. November 13, 2020. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020. Retrieved November 15, 2020.
- "Trump legal team to file new ballot lawsuits". Fox News. November 8, 2020. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020. Retrieved November 14, 2020.
- Trump, Donald (November 15, 2020). "I look forward to Mayor Giuliani spearheading the legal effort to defend OUR RIGHT to FREE and FAIR ELECTIONS! Rudy Giuliani, Joseph diGenova, Victoria Toensing, Sidney Powell, and Jenna Ellis, a truly great team, added to our other wonderful lawyers and representatives!" (Tweet). Archived from the original on August 16, 2022. Retrieved December 8, 2022 – via Twitter.
- ^ Blake, Aaron (November 20, 2020). "The Trump campaign's much-hyped affidavit features a big, glaring error". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on November 20, 2020. Retrieved November 20, 2020.
- Emma Brown; Aaron C. Davis; Jon Swaine; Josh Dawsey (May 9, 2021). "The making of a myth". The Washington Post.
- ^ "Giuliani cites affidavit with crucial errors in press conference". PolitiFact. Retrieved November 23, 2020.
- Williams, Jordan (November 20, 2020). "Trump lawyers cited Minnesota counties in affidavit about Michigan: report". The Hill. Retrieved November 23, 2020.
- Sherman, Jake; Palmer, Anna; Ross, Garrett; Okun, Eli (November 19, 2020). "POLITICO Playbook PM: Rudy". POLITICO. Archived from the original on November 20, 2020. Retrieved November 19, 2020.
- Peters, Jeremy W.; Feuer, Alan (December 8, 2020). "What We Know About Sidney Powell, the Lawyer Behind Wild Voting Conspiracy Theories". The New York Times – via NYTimes.com.
- Kessler, Glenn. "Analysis | Fact-checking the craziest news conference of the Trump presidency" – via www.washingtonpost.com.
- Subramaniam, Tara; Lybrand, Holmes. "Fact checking Giuliani and the Trump legal team's wild, fact-free press conference". CNN. Archived from the original on November 20, 2020. Retrieved November 20, 2020.
- Darcy, Oliver. "Company debunks conspiracy theory that its server showed a landslide for Trump". CNN. Retrieved November 23, 2020.
- Qiu, Linda (November 20, 2020). "Trump allies are among the frequent purveyors of election misinformation". The New York Times.
- Joffe-Block, Jude (November 14, 2020). "False reports claim election servers were seized in Germany". Associated Press. Archived from the original on November 15, 2020. Retrieved November 22, 2020.
- "Scytl strongly denies the false information related to the U.S. elections". Scytl. November 13, 2020. Archived from the original on November 20, 2020. Retrieved November 21, 2020.
- Roose, Kevin (November 18, 2020). "No, the Army didn't seize a German server showing a Trump landslide". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 21, 2020. Retrieved November 21, 2020.
- Barnes, Julian E. (March 16, 2021). "Russian Interference in 2020 Included Influencing Trump Associates, Report Says". The New York Times – via NYTimes.com.
- Steakin, Will (November 16, 2021). "Trump allies pressed Defense Department to help overturn election, new book says". ABC News.
- Carlson, Tucker (November 19, 2020). "Tucker Carlson: Time for Sidney Powell to show us her evidence". Fox News. Retrieved November 23, 2020.
- "Trump lawyer Sidney Powell says Georgia election lawsuit "will be biblical," suggests GOP governor helped Biden". Newsweek. November 22, 2020. Retrieved November 23, 2020.
- "Trump campaign cuts ties with attorney Sidney Powell after bizarre election fraud claims". The Guardian. Associated Press. November 23, 2020. Retrieved November 23, 2020.
- Haberman, Maggie; Feuer, Alan (November 22, 2020). "Trump Team Disavows Lawyer Who Peddled Conspiracy Theories on Voting". The New York Times. Archived from the original on November 23, 2020. Retrieved November 26, 2020.
- "Sidney Powell Goes After Brian Kemp Over Election Conspiracy". Mediaite. November 22, 2020. Archived from the original on November 22, 2020. Retrieved November 22, 2020.
- "Sidney Powell: Trump team cuts ties with lawyer who peddled bizarre fraud claims". BBC News. November 23, 2020. Retrieved November 24, 2020.
- Vella, Lauren (November 19, 2020). "Ernst: Trump lawyer claim that candidates pay to rig elections 'absolutely outrageous'". The Hill. Archived from the original on November 20, 2020. Retrieved November 20, 2020.
- Smith, David (November 21, 2020). "Trump makes futile last stand to overturn results as Georgia certifies Biden win". The Guardian. Archived from the original on November 21, 2020. Retrieved November 21, 2020.
- "Sidney Powell: "The entire election, frankly, in all the swing states should be overturned and the legislatures should make sure that the electors are selected for Trump"". Archived from the original on November 20, 2020. Retrieved November 20, 2020.
- "Trump campaign legal team distances itself from Powell". AP NEWS. November 23, 2020. Retrieved November 23, 2020.
- "Trump legal team disavows association with lawyer Sidney Powell". CBS News. November 23, 2020. Retrieved November 23, 2020.
- "Trump campaign cuts Sidney Powell from president's legal team". POLITICO. November 22, 2020.
- Sonmez, Felicia; Dawsey, Josh (November 22, 2020). "Giuliani releases statement distancing Trump campaign from lawyer Sidney Powell". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 22, 2020.
- Wolfe, Jan (November 22, 2020). "Trump campaign says Sidney Powell not a member of legal team". Reuters.
- Bowden, John (November 22, 2020). "Giuliani distances Trump campaign from attorney Sidney Powell". The Hill. Retrieved November 22, 2020.
- Kevin Liptak and Pamela Brown. "Heated Oval Office meeting included talk of special counsel, martial law as Trump advisers clash". CNN.
- Maggie Haberman (December 21, 2020). "Four people briefed on events said Sidney Powell was back at the White House again today, for third time in four days" (Tweet). Archived from the original on April 25, 2021. Retrieved June 2, 2021 – via Twitter.
- Wolfe, Jan (November 23, 2020). "Trump campaign parts ways with Powell after vote-switching claim". Reuters.
- Buchanan, Christopher (November 27, 2020). "Dominion Voting Systems responds to 'wild and reckless' claims by Sidney Powell on website". WTIC-TV. Retrieved November 29, 2020.
- Woodruff Swan, Betsy (January 21, 2022). "Read the never-issued Trump order that would have seized voting machines". Politico.
- Woodruff Swan, Betsy (January 24, 2022). "Kerik told Jan. 6 panel that former Army colonel came up with idea to seize voting machines". Politico.
- "Trump sought to tap Sidney Powell as special counsel for election fraud". POLITICO. December 19, 2020.
- Haberman, Maggie; Kanno-Youngs, Zolan (December 19, 2020). "Trump Discussed Naming Campaign Lawyer as Special Counsel on Election Fraud". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved December 19, 2020.
- Kevin Liptak; Pamela Brown. "Heated Oval Office meeting included talk of special counsel, martial law as Trump advisers clash". CNN.
- Blake, Aaron (October 19, 2023). "Analysis | What could Sidney Powell testify to now that she's pleaded guilty?". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved October 19, 2023.
'I think that it got to the point where the screaming was completely, completely out there,' Trump White House lawyer Eric Herschmann testified to the House Jan. 6 committee.
- Chen, Shawna (March 22, 2021). "Pro-Trump lawyer Sidney Powell moves to dismiss Dominion defamation suit". Axios.
- Lemon, Jason (May 30, 2021). "Sidney Powell Claims Trump 'Can Simply Be Reinstated,' Biden Told to Leave White House". newsweek.com. Newsweek. Retrieved May 30, 2021.
- Relman, Eliza (May 31, 2021). "Ex-Trump lawyer Sidney Powell showed up to a QAnon conference in a biker vest and falsely claimed Trump could be 'reinstated' as president". Business Insider. Retrieved June 1, 2021.
- Tara Subramaniam. "Fact check: No, Trump can't 'simply be reinstated' as president". CNN.
- Zachary Cohen; Annie Grayer (January 18, 2022). "January 6 committee subpoenas Giuliani and 3 others". CNN.
- January 6 Committee (January 18, 2022). "Letter to Sidney Powell" (PDF). Letter to Sidney Powell.
{{cite press release}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - Murdock, Sebastian (February 19, 2022). "Sidney Powell Sues To Block Subpoena By Jan. 6 Committee For Phone Records". HuffPost. Retrieved February 21, 2022.
- ^ Alba, Davey (November 17, 2020). "'Release the Kraken,' a catchphrase for unfounded conspiracy theory, trends on Twitter". The New York Times.
- Brumback, Kate (December 10, 2020). "Sidney Powell unrelenting in legal battle on Trump's behalf". Associated Press. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- ^ Montellaro, Zach; Cheney, Kyle (December 3, 2020). "Pro-Trump legal crusade peppered with bizarre blunders". Politico. Retrieved December 3, 2020.
- Breuninger, Kevin (December 4, 2020). "Sidney Powell amends court filing that mistakenly said Georgia votes were flipped from Biden to Trump". CNBC. Retrieved December 5, 2020.
- ^ Blake, Aaron (December 3, 2020). "Trump allies' sloppy, error-riddled legal effort". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on December 3, 2020. Retrieved December 4, 2020.
- Aarons, Tony (November 26, 2020). "Ex-Trump Lawyer Sidney Powell Files Election Suits in 'DISTRCOICT' Court". Bloomberg News. Retrieved December 4, 2020.
- Brown, Emma; Davis, Aaron; Crites, Alice (December 11, 2020). "Sidney Powell's secret 'military intelligence expert,' key to fraud claims in election lawsuits, never worked in military intelligence". The Washington Post. Retrieved December 13, 2020.
- Swaine, Jon. "Sidney Powell's secret intelligence contractor witness is a pro-Trump podcaster" – via www.washingtonpost.com.
- "Bowyer v. Ducey". Stanford-MIT Healthy Elections Project.
- "Docket for Bowyer v. Ducey, 2:20-cv-02321". CourtListener. Retrieved December 6, 2020.
- Fischer, Howard (December 9, 2020). "Federal judge tosses last lawsuit that remained against Arizona's election results". Arizona Daily Star. Capitol Media Services. Retrieved December 10, 2020.
- ^ Billeaud, Jacques (December 10, 2020). "Powell trying to resurrect bid to undo Biden's Arizona win". Associated Press. Retrieved January 12, 2021.
- "Supreme Court Rejects Sidney Powell's Election Fraud Petitions without Further Comment". March 1, 2021.
- "Trump supporters file lawsuit asking Georgia to decertify election, declare Trump the winner". WSBTV. Archived from the original on November 28, 2020. Retrieved November 28, 2020.
- Gerstein, Josh (December 1, 2020). "Judge: 'Precious little proof' in Georgia election fraud suit". Politico. Retrieved December 5, 2020.
- Cheney, Kyle; Gerstein, Josh (December 4, 2020). "Donald Trump's brutal day in court". Politico. Retrieved December 5, 2020.
- Larson, Erik (December 5, 2020). "Georgia Says Ex-Trump Lawyer Suit Could Hinder Senate Runoff". Bloomberg News. Archived from the original on December 5, 2020. Retrieved December 5, 2020.
- Harwell, Drew (December 1, 2020). "To boost voter-fraud claims, Trump advocate Sidney Powell turns to unusual source: The longtime operator of QAnon's Internet home". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on December 2, 2020. Retrieved December 2, 2020.
- Hohmann, James; Alfaro, Mariana (December 2, 2020). "The Daily 202: Trump's threat to veto NDAA follows pattern of tenuously invoking 'National Security'". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on December 2, 2020. Retrieved December 3, 2020.
- Fowler, Stephen (December 7, 2020). "Judge Finds 'Kraken' Election Challenge Lacking, Dismisses Lawsuit". Georgia Public Broadcasting. Retrieved December 8, 2020.
- Carr, Nicole (December 7, 2020). "Federal judge dismisses Sidney Powell lawsuit seeking to decertify Georgia's elections". WSB-TV. Retrieved December 10, 2020.
- Breuninger, Kevin; Mangan, Dan (December 7, 2020). "Federal judge dismisses Sidney Powell lawsuit that sought to overturn Trump loss in Georgia". CNBC. Retrieved December 10, 2020.
- "Court of Appeals Docket #: 20-14579". Retrieved December 8, 2020.
- Choi, Joseph (December 8, 2020). "Sidney Powell appeals dismissal of lawsuit to overturn Georgia election result". TheHill. Archived from the original on December 8, 2020. Retrieved December 8, 2020.
- ^ Stohr, Greg (December 15, 2020). "Ex-Trump Lawyer Asks Supreme Court to Nullify Two Biden Wins". Bloomberg News. Retrieved January 12, 2021.
- ^ Durkee, Alison (January 11, 2021). "Supreme Court Refuses To Consider GOP Post-Election Cases Before Biden Takes Office". Forbes. Retrieved January 12, 2021.
- Durkee, Alison (January 19, 2021). "Sidney Powell Drops Georgia Kracken Lawsuit On Eve Of Biden's Inauguration". Forbes. Retrieved January 19, 2021.
- "Trump election probe in Georgia cites voting system breach". AP News. August 26, 2022. Retrieved August 27, 2022.
- ^ Durkee, Alison. "Sidney Powell Pleads Guilty In Georgia Election Case". Forbes.
- "Trump's ex-lawyer Sidney Powell pleads guilty in Georgia election case". The Guardian. October 19, 2023.
- "Sidney Powell pleads guilty in case over efforts to overturn Trump's Georgia loss and gets probation". AP News. October 19, 2023. Retrieved October 19, 2023.
- Gray, Justin (November 1, 2023). "Former Trump attorney, election denier Sidney Powell pays restitution to Ga. Secretary of State". WSB-TV. Retrieved November 3, 2023.
- "King v. Whitmer" (PDF). November 25, 2020. Archived (PDF) from the original on November 26, 2020. Retrieved November 25, 2020.
- "King v. Whitmer". Stanford-MIT Healthy Elections Project. Archived from the original on December 9, 2020. Retrieved December 9, 2020.
- Mikkelson, David (December 1, 2020). "Sidney Powell Lawsuit Cites Election Fraud in Non-Existent Michigan County". Snopes. Retrieved December 2, 2020.
- Pierce, Charles P. (December 1, 2020). "Sidney Powell Is the Elite Legal Strike Force's Elite Legal Kraken Keeper Trump's legal eagle flies into Edison County, Michigan, which does not exist". Esquire. Retrieved December 2, 2020.
- Halpert, Madeline; Oosting, Jonathan; Shaheen, Mansur (December 1, 2020). "Weeks after vote, 13 fake fraud claims persist in Michigan. Here's the truth". Bridge Michigan. Retrieved December 2, 2020.
- Mauger, Craig (December 7, 2020). "Federal judge upholds Michigan election: 'The people have spoken'". The Detroit News. Retrieved December 8, 2020.
- "Fact check: Six Michigan areas did not have voter turnouts of more than 100%". Reuters. December 17, 2020. Retrieved December 24, 2020.
- Polus, Sarah (January 5, 2021). "Detroit asks federal judge to disbar 'Kraken' team that fought in court to overturn election results". The Hill. Retrieved January 29, 2021.
- McEvoy, Jemima (January 6, 2021). "Detroit Files Request To Sanction, Potentially Disbar Sidney Powell And Other 'Kraken' Lawyers". Forbes. Retrieved January 29, 2021.
- Foster, Wells; Darling, Tom (January 28, 2021). "AG Nessel seeks sanctions on Sidney Powell, other lawyers over election lawsuits". WLNS. Retrieved January 29, 2021.
- Mauger, Craig; LeBlanc, Beth (February 1, 2021). "Whitmer, Nessel seek disbarment of lawyers in election challenge". Detroit News. Retrieved January 29, 2021.
- Helderman, Rosalind (July 12, 2021). "'This is really fantastical': Federal judge in Michigan presses Trump-allied lawyers on 2020 election fraud claims in sanctions hearing". The Washington Post.
- Sneed, Tierney (August 25, 2021). "Judge sanctions pro-Trump lawyers who brought 'frivolous' election fraud lawsuits". CNN. Retrieved August 25, 2021.
- "Civil Case No. 20-13134" (PDF).
- Feuer, Alan (August 25, 2021). "Judge Orders Sanctions Against Pro-Trump Lawyers Over Election Lawsuit". The New York Times. Retrieved March 18, 2023.
- Jan Wolfe, 'Profound abuse': Judge disciplines pro-Trump lawyers over election lawsuit, Reuters (August 25, 2021).
- Alan Feuer, Judge Orders Sanctions Against Pro-Trump Lawyers Over Election Lawsuit, New York Times (August 25, 2021).
- Durkee, Alison (August 26, 2021). "Sidney Powell To Face Texas State Bar Investigation—Potentially Leading To Her Disbarment". Forbes.
- "Sidney Powell, team ordered to pay $175,250 in fees for Michigan election case".
- "Complaint for Declaratory, Emergency, and Permanent Injunctive Relief" (PDF). Democracy Docket. Archived (PDF) from the original on December 1, 2020. Retrieved December 4, 2020.
- "Election lawsuit involving La Crosse Co. GOP chair dismissed in federal court". WXOW. December 10, 2020. Retrieved December 10, 2020.
- Weigel, David (March 3, 2021). "The Trailer: Why Republicans keep running against trans rights". The Washington Post. Retrieved March 6, 2021.
- ^ Naham, Matt (December 17, 2020). "Days After Smartmatic's Legal Threat, Dominion Voting Systems Follows Suit with Demand Letter to Sidney Powell". Law & Crime. Retrieved February 2, 2021.
- Clare, Thomas A.; Meier, Megan L.; Clare Locke LLP (December 16, 2020). "Re: Defamatory Falsehoods About Dominion". Letter to Sidney Powell. Dominion Voting Systems. Archived from the original on December 17, 2020.
Your false accusations about Dominion are defamatory per se and have exposed you, the entities you control, and the Trump Campaign to substantial legal risk for defamation. As a result of your false accusations, Dominion has suffered enormous harm, and its employees have been stalked, have been harassed, and have received death threats. For the safety of Dominion's employees and for the sake of the truth and confidence in American democracy, we demand that you immediately and publicly retract your false accusations and set the record straight. If you refuse to do so and instead choose to stand by your defamatory falsehoods, that will be viewed as additional evidence of actual malice.
- Kaitlan Collins, Kevin Liptak and Pamela Brown. "Trump campaign told to preserve all documents related to Sidney Powell and Dominion Voting Systems". CNN.
- Barr, Jeremy. "Lou Dobbs debunks his own claims of election fraud — after a legal demand from Smartmatic" – via www.washingtonpost.com.
- Barr, Jeremy. "Newsmax issues sweeping 'clarification' debunking its own coverage of election misinformation" – via www.washingtonpost.com.
- "Maria Bartiromo Airs Fact-Check, Adds 'We Will Keep Investigating'". December 20, 2020.
- Feuer, Alan (January 8, 2021). "Dominion Voting Systems files defamation lawsuit against pro-Trump attorney Sidney Powell". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 14, 2021.
- Vella, Lauren (November 19, 2020). "Ernst: Trump lawyer claim that candidates pay to rig elections 'absolutely outrageous'". The Hill. Retrieved February 2, 2021.
- ^ Darcy, Oliver (February 4, 2021). "Voting technology company Smartmatic files $2.7 billion lawsuit against Fox News, Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell over 'disinformation campaign'". CNN. Retrieved February 5, 2021.
- Brown, Emma (January 8, 2021). "Dominion sues pro-Trump lawyer Sidney Powell, seeking more than $1.3 billion". Washington Post. Retrieved January 9, 2021.
- ^ Polantz, Katelyn (August 11, 2021). "Judge allows defamation lawsuits against Sidney Powell, Rudy Giuliani and MyPillow CEO to go forward". CNN.
- Feuer, Alan (January 8, 2021). "Dominion Voting Systems files defamation lawsuit against pro-Trump attorney Sidney Powell". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved January 14, 2021.
- Vella, Lauren (November 19, 2020). "Ernst: Trump lawyer claim that candidates pay to rig elections 'absolutely outrageous'". The Hill. Retrieved February 2, 2021.
- Coster, Helen (February 5, 2021). "Smartmatic sues Fox News, Giuliani over election-rigging claims". Reuters. Retrieved March 23, 2021.
- Stempel, Jonathan (March 8, 2022). "Smartmatic can pursue election-rigging claims against Fox News, Giuliani". Reuters.
- Shamsian, Jacob (March 10, 2022). "Smartmatic says it's continuing to press its defamation lawsuit against Sidney Powell after a judge dismissed the case". Business Insider.
- Thomsen, Jacqueline (March 22, 2021). "Facing Defamation, Sidney Powell Says 'No Reasonable Person' Thought Her Election Fraud Claims Were Fact". The National Law Journal. Retrieved March 23, 2021.
- Tillman, Zoe (March 22, 2021). "Sidney Powell Now Argues "No Reasonable Person" Would Believe Her Voter Fraud Lies Were "Fact"". Buzzfeed News. Retrieved March 23, 2021.
- "Scheduling Order" (PDF). United States District Court for the District of Columbia. March 1, 2022. Retrieved May 1, 2023.
- Shamsian, Jacob (December 28, 2021). "Venezuelan man files $250 million lawsuit against Fox News and Sidney Powell after baseless accusations that he rigged 2020 election results". Business Insider.
- Farrell, Maureen (April 9, 2023). "Fox News Settles Defamation Case With Venezuelan Businessman". New York Times.
- Porter, Tom. "An attorney leading Trump's attempt to subvert the election results is a longtime QAnon supporter". Business Insider. Archived from the original on November 20, 2020. Retrieved November 20, 2020.
- ^ Gilbert, David (November 20, 2020). "Trump's Lawyer Sidney Powell Is Hardcore QAnon". Vice. Archived from the original on November 20, 2020. Retrieved November 20, 2020.
- Roose, Kevin (August 28, 2020). "What Is QAnon, the Viral Pro-Trump Conspiracy Theory?". The New York Times. Archived from the original on September 22, 2020. Retrieved October 4, 2020.
- O'Sullivan, Donie. "Sidney Powell is a beacon of hope to sad Qanon supporters". CNN.
- Collins, Ben; Zadrozny, Brandy (January 8, 2021). "Twitter bans Michael Flynn, Sidney Powell in QAnon account purge". NBC News. Retrieved January 8, 2021.
- Palmer, Ewan (April 7, 2021). "QAnon couple are behind 3-day Dallas event billing Michael Flynn and Sidney Powell". Newsweek. Retrieved October 25, 2021.
- "Commission for Lawyer Discipline". DocumentCloud. District Court of Dallas County, Texas. March 1, 2022. Retrieved February 27, 2023.
- Sneed, Tierney (March 10, 2022). "Inside the effort to disbar attorneys who backed bogus election lawsuits". CNN. Retrieved February 27, 2023.
- Torralva, Krista M. (June 22, 2022). "Case to rebuke Sidney Powell for pushing Donald Trump's election narrative to continue". Dallasnews.com. Retrieved June 24, 2022.
- Sneed, Tierney (February 24, 2023). "Judge tosses out disciplinary action against Sidney Powell for work on Trump election reversal bid". CNN. Retrieved February 27, 2023.
- Friedman, Dan (November 17, 2020). "Michael Flynn's Lawyer Wants to Raise "Millions of Dollars" to Overturn the Election". Mother Jones. Retrieved November 23, 2020.
- Reimann, Nicholas (January 22, 2021). "Sidney Powell Has Started A Super PAC". Forbes. Retrieved January 24, 2021.
- Isaac Stanley-Becker; Emma Brown; Rosalind S. Helderman (November 30, 2021). "Prosecutors demanded records of Sidney Powell's fundraising groups as part of criminal probe". The Washington Post.
- Michael Kunselman (May 15, 2021). "Company: Ex-Trump lawyer raiding nonprofit for personal use". Associated Press.
- Adam Rawnsley; Asawin Suebsaeng; Will Sommer (November 30, 2021). "Feds Are Asking Questions About Sidney Powell and Her Pro-Trump Group". The Daily Beast.
- Emma Brown; Rosalind S. Helderman; Isaac Stanley-Becker; Josh Dawsey (December 6, 2021). "Sidney Powell group raised more than $14 million spreading election falsehoods". The Washington Post.
- Swaine, Jon; Brown, Emma (October 14, 2022). "Sidney Powell's nonprofit raised $16 million as she spread election falsehoods". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved October 17, 2022.
- ^ Jack Newsham, Sidney Powell could finally be disbarred after pleading guilty, but she has a dark money org to fall back on, Insider (October 19, 2023).
- "The People of the State of Georgia v. Donald J. Trump, et al" (PDF). Fulton County Superior Court. August 14, 2023. Retrieved August 14, 2023 – via The Washington Post.
- Cole, Devan; Murray, Sara; Morris, Jason; Cohen, Marshall (August 14, 2023). "Here are the names and titles of all 19 people charged in Georgia case". CNN. Retrieved August 14, 2023.
- Lee, Ella (August 23, 2023). "Trump campaign attorney Sidney Powell surrenders in Georgia election case". The Hill. Retrieved August 23, 2023.
- Fausset, Richard; Hakim, Danny (October 19, 2023). "Sidney Powell Pleads Guilty in Georgia Trump Case". The New York Times. Retrieved October 19, 2023.
- Cohen, Marshall (October 19, 2023). "Trump attorney Sidney Powell pleads guilty in Georgia election subversion case | CNN Politics". CNN.
- Medsger, Matthew (October 22, 2023). "Trump denies 'Kraken' lawyer Sidney Powell ever worked for him". Boston Herald. Archived from the original on October 23, 2023. Retrieved October 23, 2023.
- Feurer, Alan; Haberman, Maggie (October 19, 2022). "Sidney Powell's Plea Deal Could Be a Threat to Trump". The New York Times.
- Graham, David A. (October 19, 2023). "What Sidney Powell's Deal Could Mean for the Fulton County Case Against Trump". The Atlantic. Retrieved October 20, 2023.
- Cohen, Marshall (October 19, 2023). "How Sidney Powell's guilty plea may impact Donald Trump". CNN. Retrieved October 20, 2023.
- "What Sidney Powell's guilty plea means for Trump in his Georgia election subversion case". PBS NewsHour. October 19, 2023. Retrieved October 20, 2023.
- Mustafa, Filiz. "Who is Sidney Powell?". HITC. Archived from the original on November 17, 2020. Retrieved November 20, 2020.
- "Review of Licensed to Lie". Kirkus Reviews. April 29, 2014. Archived from the original on May 26, 2020. Retrieved November 20, 2020.
- Highfill, Samantha (May 2, 2014). "Meet the woman behind 'Decoding Annie Parker'". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on December 27, 2014. Retrieved November 15, 2020.
- McNary, Dave (December 4, 2013). "Samantha Morton-Helen Hunt's 'Decoding Annie Parker' Gets U.S. Distribution". Variety. Archived from the original on August 17, 2020. Retrieved November 19, 2020.
External links
Categories:- 1955 births
- Living people
- 20th-century American lawyers
- 20th-century American women writers
- 21st-century American lawyers
- 21st-century American women writers
- American conspiracy theorists
- American political writers
- Lawyers from Dallas
- People associated with the 2020 United States presidential election
- People from Durham, North Carolina
- Lawyers from Raleigh, North Carolina
- Texas Republicans
- University of North Carolina alumni
- University of North Carolina School of Law alumni
- Needham B. Broughton High School alumni
- Writers from North Carolina
- The State of Georgia v. Donald J. Trump, et al. defendants
- Donald Trump attorneys
- 21st-century American criminals