| Revision as of 20:50, 20 January 2007 editBbatsell (talk | contribs)8,873 edits →Three-revert rule: comment← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:17, 8 August 2022 edit undoBD2412bot (talk | contribs)Bots724,684 editsm →top: IP talk page template fix., replaced: {{OW}} → {{Blanked IP talk}}Tag: AWB | ||
| (101 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{Blanked IP talk}} | |||
| {{SharedIPEDU|]}} | |||
| Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Test0 (first level warning) --> --]\<sup>]</sup> 23:01, 31 October 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Thanks for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use ] for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the ] if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.<!-- Test (first level warning) --> --] 14:30, 21 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == Lack of Balance == | |||
| I intend to add sections to this page concerning the history of this organisation, it's current operations, the view of many observers that it operates as a cult and the reports of former members on the effects on their mental and spiritual health. Any attempt to change this page results in reversion and a claim of vandalism (although I was successful in getting you to remove copyright claims). My aim is a balanced view so to that end I have contacted former members who may also wish to improve the content. | |||
| If after the previous edit war you attempt to exert further editorial control I will ask for arbitration. I believe I am working within the policies and the spirit of Misplaced Pages and I strongly believe that you are not. | |||
| I suggest you take the opportunity to discuss. | |||
| Regards, Paul | |||
| --panpaniscus | |||
| ==Imbalance in GGWO== | |||
| After reading through the article, and the links provided, I have reverted the article back to a balanced version. The edits you are inserting make it sound like an advertisement, and do not reflect any critisicism which the church/organisation has received. Please don't remove references to cults, or blindly revert. I've also noted that some comments say that your version 'is the version approved by the GGWO'. The GGWO has '''absolutely no say''' in Misplaced Pages articles. Any further blind reverts will be considered as '''vandalism'''. Consider this a first-level warning. Thankyou. ] 10:46, 13 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :Please don't remove material detrimental to the GGWO. Thanks. ] 18:04, 13 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| :: Please stop. If you continue to remove this information contrary to ], you will be ]. Also note that removing messages and warning from yor talk page is considered vandalism. By all means edi the article, but '''do not''' remove negative comments about the organisation. ] 18:11, 13 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ::: ] This is your '''last warning.''' The next time you remove content from a page, you ''will'' be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages.<!-- Template:Test4a (Fourth level warning) --> ] 18:14, 13 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Edit warring == | |||
| ] Hello, please refrain from edit warring and from making inflammatory edit summaries as you are doing at ]. Misplaced Pages adheres to a strict policy. Please discuss on the articles talk page if you disagree. Additionally, please refrain from making prejudicial comments based on the nationality of your fellow editors. Thank you. ] 18:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == NPOV tag == | |||
| You have not given adequate reasons as to why the ] article is POV. Stating that information about one subject is missing does not make the article POV. Please respond to my comments on the page. Also, please read our policies and guidelines on reliable sources and verifiability (linked on the talk page) as these will help clear up some of this.-]<sup>]</sup> 19:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock-auto reviewed|193.219.28.146|Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Vernyhora". The reason given for Vernyhora's block is: "3RR vio. Repeat offense.".|CSTAR|decline=Please wait for the autoblock on the IP to expire, thanks. -- ] <sup>(])</sup> 02:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)}} | |||
| == Criticism on Firefox article == | |||
| What do you mean by 'here is no real criticism in the article, it is removed in no-time'? There is copious amounts of criticism in the article. Anything that is unsourced, POV, poorly sourced or original research is removed quickly as you will see from the history and the hours of discussion on the talk page. If you believe there are other criticisms that should be added, please do so but ensure you comply with all our policies. Just stating 'we need more criticism' is pointless because unless there are external, reliable, sources making such criticisms it is just a request that will sit there with no end to it. I will remove it as I have not seen any suggestions for criticism being put forward which have been accompanied by reliable sources and written in a NPOV way. Please re-add it if you do think there are criticisms. Just a simple list of them would help - even if you can't find sources, it will help us find sources. Thanks -]<sup>]</sup> 23:00, 6 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Indeed, I think the privacy policy item is important to include and will look at including it. | |||
| :However, I think the historic calling of it as 'the best browser' is slightly more important to the article than a security issue from a version long ago as it is indicative of how the product was received by the world whereas a security issue from a long time ago is only a security issue. | |||
| :The problem on the talk page is that the arguments have become so cyclical and repetitive that it seems we have all lost sight of the purpose of the article. | |||
| :We now have a section dedicated to google and their relationship, what is missing from it with regards to the anti-phishing feature?-]<sup>]</sup> 23:10, 7 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ==Removal of graphs== | |||
| Please stop your editing in a disruptive manner. There has been discussion on the issue of the graphs and you are simply now ignoring it in order to push your own POV. The information is being presented, in the cumulative graph, in a sensible way. What is wrong with this?-]<sup>]</sup> 23:18, 6 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Three-revert rule == | |||
| I should warn you you're also in danger of violating the ]. Please refrain from edit wars. Could you instead discuss your proposed changes first if you think they may be controversial? Thanks. -- ] 02:00, 7 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ---- | |||
| Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Talk:Ass to mouth|, as you are doing in ]}}. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for ], even if they do not technically violate the ]. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR --> =] | |||
| If you would like to contribute constructively to Misplaced Pages, you are more than welcome. If you would prefer to continue along your current path, making non-constructive and trolling comments on talk pages of articles, then you are not welcome, and we can ] if you'd prefer. If you'd like to read more about ], please feel free. Misplaced Pages ]; if you would prefer to frequent a website that is, then I recommend moving along. Regards, —] <font color="#C46100" size="1">]</font> 20:50, 20 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:17, 8 August 2022
Unregistered editors using this IP address received messages on this talk page years ago. Since users of the IP address have likely changed, these messages have been removed. They can be viewed in the page history.