Revision as of 00:48, 1 May 2021 editDonner60 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers235,996 editsm Reverted edits by Devopsreviewer (talk): original research (HG) (3.4.10)Tag: Rollback← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:00, 5 January 2025 edit undoKMaster888 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,519 edits ce | ||
(328 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|Set of software development practices}} | {{short description|Set of software development practices}} | ||
{{pp-pc1}} | {{pp-pc1}} | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2020}} | |||
{{unreliable sources|date=December 2018}} | |||
{{Software development process}} | |||
'''DevOps''' is a set of practices that combines ] (''Dev'') and ] (''Ops''). It aims to shorten the ] and provide ] with high ].<ref name="Mala 2019 p. 16">{{cite book | last=Mala | first=D.J. | title=Integrating the Internet of Things into Software Engineering Practices | publisher=IGI Global | series=Advances in Systems Analysis, Software Engineering, and High Performance Computing | year=2019 | isbn=978-1-5225-7791-1 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GPGCDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA16 | access-date=4 April 2019 | page=16}}</ref><ref name="loukides-2012">{{Cite web|url=http://radar.oreilly.com/2012/06/what-is-devops.html|title=What is DevOps?|last=Loukides|first=Mike|date=7 June 2012|publisher=]}}</ref> DevOps is complementary with ]; several DevOps aspects came from the Agile methodology. | |||
'''DevOps''' is a methodology integrating and automating the work of ] (''Dev'') and ] (''Ops''). It serves as a means for improving and shortening the ].<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Courtemanche |first1=Meredith |last2=Mell |first2=Emily |last3=Gills |first3=Alexander S. |title=What Is DevOps? The Ultimate Guide |url=https://www.techtarget.com/searchitoperations/definition/DevOps |access-date=2023-01-22 |website=TechTarget |language=en}}</ref> DevOps is complementary to ]; several DevOps aspects came from the ''agile'' approach. | |||
==Definition== | |||
Other than it being a cross-functional combination of the terms and concepts for "development" and "operations," academics and practitioners have not developed a unique definition for the term "DevOps".{{efn|Dyck et. al (2015) "To our knowledge, there is no uniform definition for the terms release engineering and DevOps. As a consequence, many people use their own definitions or rely on others, which results in confusion about those terms."<ref>{{cite journal |first1= Andrej |last1= Dyck |first2= Ralf |last2= Penners |first3= Horst |last3= Lichter |title= Towards Definitions for Release Engineering and DevOps |journal=Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/ACM 3rd International Workshop on Release Engineering |date=2015-05-19 |page= 3 |publisher=] |doi= 10.1109/RELENG.2015.10 |isbn= 978-1-4673-7070-7 |s2cid= 4659735 }}</ref>}}{{efn|Jabbari et. al (2016) "The research results of this study showed the need for a definition as individual studies do not consistently define DevOps."<ref>{{cite journal |first1=Ramtin |last1=Jabbari |first2=Nauman |last2=bin Ali |first3=Kai |last3=Petersen |first4=Binish |last4=Tanveer |journal=Proceedings of the 2016 Scientific Workshop |date=May 2016 |publisher=] |title=What is DevOps?: A Systematic Mapping Study on Definitions and Practices }}</ref>}}{{efn|Erich et. al (2017) "We noticed that there are various gaps in the study of DevOps: There is no consensus of what concepts DevOps covers, nor how DevOps is defined."<ref name="erich-2017">{{cite journal |title=A Qualitative Study of DevOps Usage in Practice |first1=F.M.A. |last1=Erich |first2=C. |last2=Amrit |first3=M. |last3=Daneva |journal=Journal of Software: Evolution and Process |volume=29 |issue=6 |date=June 2017 |pages=e1885 |doi=10.1002/smr.1885 |s2cid=35914007 }}</ref>}}{{efn|Erich et. al (2017) "We discovered that there exists little agreement about the characteristics of DevOps in the academic literature."<ref name="erich-2017"/>}} | |||
Automation is an important part of DevOps. ]s and ] should use "]" to keep their software in check.<ref>{{Cite book |title=Fundamentals of Software Architecture: An Engineering Approach |publisher=O'Reilly Media |year=2020 |isbn=978-1492043454}}</ref> | |||
From an academic perspective, ], ], and ]—three computer science researchers from the ] and the ]—suggested defining DevOps as "a set of practices intended to reduce the time between committing a change to a system and the change being placed into normal production, while ensuring high quality".<ref>{{cite book|title=DevOps: A Software Architect's Perspective|author1=Bass, Len|author2=Weber, Ingo|author3=Zhu, Liming|isbn=978-0134049847|year=2015}}</ref> | |||
According to Neal Ford, DevOps, particularly through ], employs the "Bring the pain forward" principle, tackling tough tasks early, fostering automation and swift issue detection. <ref name=":02">{{Cite book |title=Building Evolutionary Architectures: Automated Software Governance |isbn=978-1492097549}}</ref> | |||
The term DevOps, however, has been used in multiple contexts.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://devops.com/surprise-broad-agreement-on-the-definition-of-devops/|title=Surprise! Broad Agreement on the Definition of DevOps|date=2015-05-13|website=DevOps.com}}</ref>{{unreliable source?|date=February 2019}} | |||
==Definition== | |||
Other than it being a cross-functional combination (and a ]) of the terms and concepts for "development" and "operations", academics and practitioners have not developed a universal definition for the term "DevOps".{{efn|Dyck et al. (2015) "To our knowledge, there is no uniform definition for the terms release engineering and DevOps. As a consequence, many people use their own definitions or rely on others, which results in confusion about those terms."<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Dyck |first1=Andrej |last2=Penners |first2=Ralf |last3=Lichter |first3=Horst |chapter=Towards Definitions for Release Engineering and DevOps |date=2015-05-19 |title=2015 IEEE/ACM 3rd International Workshop on Release Engineering |publisher=] |page=3 |doi=10.1109/RELENG.2015.10 |isbn=978-1-4673-7070-7 |s2cid=4659735}}</ref>}}{{efn|Jabbari et al. (2016) "The research results of this study showed the need for a definition as individual studies do not consistently define DevOps."<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Jabbari |first1=Ramtin |last2=bin Ali |first2=Nauman |last3=Petersen |first3=Kai |last4=Tanveer |first4=Binish |date=May 2016 |title=What is DevOps?: A Systematic Mapping Study on Definitions and Practices |journal=Proceedings of the 2016 Scientific Workshop |publisher=]}}</ref>}}{{efn|Erich et al. (2017) "We noticed that there are various gaps in the study of DevOps: There is no consensus of what concepts DevOps covers, nor how DevOps is defined."<ref name="erich-2017">{{Cite journal |last1=Erich |first1=F.M.A. |last2=Amrit |first2=C. |last3=Daneva |first3=M. |date=June 2017 |title=A Qualitative Study of DevOps Usage in Practice |journal=Journal of Software: Evolution and Process |volume=29 |issue=6 |pages=e1885 |doi=10.1002/smr.1885 |s2cid=35914007|url=https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/files/19208022/Erich_et_al_2017_Journal_of_Software_Evolution_and_Process.pdf }}</ref>}}{{efn|Erich et al. (2017) "We discovered that there exists little agreement about the characteristics of DevOps in the academic literature."<ref name="erich-2017" />}} Most often, DevOps is characterized by key principles: shared ownership, workflow automation, and rapid feedback. | |||
From an academic perspective, ], Ingo Weber, and Liming Zhu—three computer science researchers from the ] and the ]—suggested defining DevOps as "a set of practices intended to reduce the time between committing a change to a system and the change being placed into normal production, while ensuring high quality".<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Bass, Len |title=DevOps: A Software Architect's Perspective |last2=Weber, Ingo |last3=Zhu, Liming |year=2015 |publisher=Addison-Wesley |isbn=978-0134049847}}</ref> | |||
However, the term is used in multiple contexts. At its most successful, DevOps is a combination of specific practices, culture change, and tools.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Muñoz, Mirna |last2=Negrete Rodríguez, Mario |date=April 2021 |title=A guidance to implement or reinforce a DevOps approach in organizations: A case study}}</ref> | |||
==History== | ==History== | ||
Proposals to combine software development methodologies with deployment and operations concepts began to appear in the late 80s and early 90s.<ref>Chapman, M., Gatti, N: A model of a service life cycle, Proceedings of TINA '93, pp. I-205–I-215, Sep., 1993.</ref> | |||
{{undue weight|section|date=December 2018}} | |||
Many of the ideas fundamental to DevOps practices are inspired by, or mirror, practices such as ] and ] ] cycle, through to ] and the ] approach of breaking down components and batch sizes. In 1993 the Telecommunications Information Networking Architecture Consortium (]) defined a Model of a Service Lifecycle that combined software development with (telecom) service operations.<ref>Chapman, M., Gatti, N: A model of a service life cycle, Proceedings of TINA '93, pp. I-205–I-215, Sep., 1993.</ref> Some say that DevOps emerged in part as a reaction to the "top-down" proscriptive approach of ] in the 1990s. DevOps, as a "bottom-up" approach, gained traction and persisted because it was created by software engineers for software engineers, and is a flexible practice rather than a rigid framework.<ref>{{Cite web|title=The History and Evolution of DevOps {{!}} Tom Geraghty|url=https://tomgeraghty.co.uk/index.php/the-history-and-evolution-of-devops/|access-date=2020-11-29|language=en-GB}}</ref> | |||
Around 2007 and 2008, concerns were raised by those within the software development and IT communities that the separation between the two industries, where one wrote and created software entirely separate from those that deploy and support the software was creating a fatal level of dysfunction within the industry.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Atlassian |title=History of DevOps |url=https://www.atlassian.com/devops/what-is-devops/history-of-devops |access-date=2023-02-23 |website=Atlassian |language=en}}</ref> | |||
In 2009, the first conference named devopsdays was held in ], ]. The conference was founded by Belgian consultant, project manager and agile practitioner Patrick Debois.<ref name="devops-name">{{cite web|last=Mezak|first=Steve|title=The Origins of DevOps: What's in a Name?|url=https://devops.com/the-origins-of-devops-whats-in-a-name/|publisher = devops.com|access-date=6 May 2019|date=25 January 2018}}</ref>{{who|date=December 2018}}<ref name="jediblog">{{cite web|last=Debois|first=Patrick|title=Agile 2008 Toronto|url=http://www.jedi.be/blog/2008/10/09/agile-2008-toronto-agile-infrastructure-and-operations-presentation/|publisher=Just Enough Documented Information|access-date=12 March 2015}}</ref> The conference has now spread to other countries.<ref name="devopsdays">{{cite web|last=Debois|first=Patrick|title=DevOps Days|url=http://www.devopsdays.org/|publisher = DevOps Days|access-date=31 March 2011}}</ref> | |||
In 2009, the first conference named DevOps Days was held in ], ]. The conference was founded by Belgian consultant, project manager and agile practitioner Patrick Debois.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Mezak |first=Steve |date=25 January 2018 |title=The Origins of DevOps: What's in a Name? |url=https://devops.com/the-origins-of-devops-whats-in-a-name/ |access-date=6 May 2019 |publisher=devops.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Debois |first=Patrick |date=9 October 2008 |title=Agile 2008 Toronto |url=http://www.jedi.be/blog/2008/10/09/agile-2008-toronto-agile-infrastructure-and-operations-presentation/ |access-date=12 March 2015 |publisher=Just Enough Documented Information}}</ref> The conference has now spread to other countries.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Debois |first=Patrick |title=DevOps Days |url=http://www.devopsdays.org/ |access-date=31 March 2011 |publisher=DevOps Days}}</ref> | |||
In 2012, the State of DevOps report was conceived and launched by Alanna Brown at Puppet.<ref name="2016 State of DevOps Report">{{cite web|url=https://devops-research.com/assets/state-of-devops-2016.pdf|title=2016 State of DevOps Report|author1=Alana Brown|author2=Nicole Forsgren|date=2016|publisher=Puppet Labs, DORA (DevOps Research|access-date=2019-05-06|author3=Jez Humble|author4=Nigel Kersten|author5=Gene Kim}}</ref><ref name="Alanna Brown">{{cite web|title=Puppet - Alanna Brown|url=https://puppet.com/blog/author/alanna-brown|publisher=Puppet Labs|access-date=2019-04-27}}</ref> | |||
As of 2014, the annual State of DevOps report was published by ], Gene Kim, Jez Humble and others.<ref name="2014 State of DevOps Report">{{cite web|author1=Nicole Forsgren|author2=Gene Kim|author3=Nigel Kersten |author4=Jez Humble|title=2014 State of DevOps Report|url=https://devops-research.com/assets/state-of-devops-2014.pdf|date=2014|publisher=Puppet Labs, IT Revolution Press and ThoughtWorks |access-date=2019-04-27}}</ref><ref name="2015 State of DevOps Report">{{cite web|title=2015 State of DevOps Report|url=https://devops-research.com/assets/state-of-devops-2015.pdf|date=2015|publisher=Puppet Labs, Pwc, IT Revolution Press|access-date=2019-05-06}}</ref> | |||
In 2014, they found that DevOps adoption was accelerating.<ref name="2014 State of DevOps Report"/> | |||
Also in 2014, Lisa Crispin and Janet Gregory wrote the book More Agile Testing, containing a chapter on testing and DevOps.<ref name="More Agile Testing - TOC">{{cite web|title=More Agile Testing|url=https://agiletester.ca/wp-content/uploads/sites/26/2014/09/TOC.pdf|date=October 2014|access-date=2019-05-06}}</ref><ref name="More Agile Testing">{{cite book|title=More Agile Testing|url=https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/more-agile-testing/9780133749571/|last1=Crispin|first1=Lisa|last2=Gregory|first2=Janet|date=October 2014|isbn=9780133749571 |access-date=2019-05-06}}</ref> | |||
In 2012, a report called "State of DevOps" was first published by Alanna Brown at ].<ref name="2016 State of DevOps Report">{{Cite web |last1=Alana Brown |last2=Nicole Forsgren |last3=Jez Humble |last4=Nigel Kersten |last5=Gene Kim |date=2016 |title=2016 State of DevOps Report |url=https://dora.dev/research/2017-and-earlier/2016-state-of-devops-report.pdf |access-date=2024-04-24 |publisher=Puppet Labs, DORA (DevOps Research}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Puppet - Alanna Brown |url=https://puppet.com/people/alanna-brown |access-date=2019-04-27 |publisher=Puppet Labs}}</ref> | |||
==Toolchains== | |||
{{unreliable sources|section|date=December 2018}} | |||
{{Main|DevOps toolchain}} | |||
As DevOps is intended to be a cross-functional mode of working, those who practice the methodology use different sets of tools—referred to as "]"—rather than a single one.<ref>{{cite report |title=Gartner Market Trends: DevOps – Not a Market, but Tool-Centric Philosophy That supports a Continuous Delivery Value Chain |publisher=Gartner |date=18 February 2015}}</ref> These toolchains are expected to fit into one or more of the following categories, reflective of key aspects of the development and delivery process:<ref>{{cite web| title=Integrating DevOps tools into a Service Delivery Platform|last=Edwards|first=Damon|url=http://dev2ops.org/2012/07/integrating-devops-tools-into-a-service-delivery-platform-video/|website=dev2ops.org}}</ref>{{unreliable source?|date=December 2018}}<ref>{{cite web|title=Exploring the ENTIRE DevOps Toolchain for (Cloud) Teams|last=Seroter|first=Richard|url= http://www.infoq.com/articles/devops-toolchain|website=infoq.com}}</ref>{{unreliable source?|date=December 2018}} | |||
# Coding – code development and review, ] tools, code merging. | |||
# Building – ] tools, build status. | |||
# Testing – ] tools that provide quick and timely feedback on business risks. | |||
# Packaging – ], application pre-deployment staging. | |||
# Releasing – change management, release approvals, ]. | |||
# Configuring – infrastructure configuration and management, ] tools. | |||
# Monitoring – ], end-user experience. | |||
As of 2014, the annual State of DevOps report was published by ], Gene Kim, Jez Humble and others. They stated that the adoption of DevOps was accelerating.<ref>{{Cite web |last1=Nicole Forsgren |last2=Gene Kim |last3=Nigel Kersten |last4=Jez Humble |date=2014 |title=2014 State of DevOps Report |url=https://dora.dev/research/2017-and-earlier/2014-state-of-devops-report.pdf |access-date=2024-04-24 |publisher=Puppet Labs, IT Revolution Press and ThoughtWorks}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2015 |title=2015 State of DevOps Report |url=https://dora.dev/research/2017-and-earlier/2015-state-of-devops-report.pdf | access-date=2024-04-24 |publisher=Puppet Labs, Pwc, IT Revolution Press}}</ref> Also in 2014, Lisa Crispin and Janet Gregory wrote the book More Agile Testing, containing a chapter on testing and DevOps.<ref>{{Cite web |date=October 2014 |title=More Agile Testing |url=https://agiletester.ca/wp-content/uploads/sites/26/2014/09/TOC.pdf |access-date=2019-05-06}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last1=Crispin |first1=Lisa |url=https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/more-agile-testing/9780133749571/ |title=More Agile Testing |last2=Gregory |first2=Janet |date=October 2014 |publisher=Addison-Wesley |isbn=9780133749571 |access-date=2019-05-06}}</ref> | |||
Some categories are more essential in a DevOps toolchain than others; especially continuous integration (e.g. ], ], ] pipelines) and infrastructure as code (e.g., ], ], ]).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://devops.com/2016/02/05/devops-stack-shoestring-budget/|title=DevOps Stack on a Shoestring Budget|last=Theakanath|first=Thomas|website=devops.com|date=2016-02-05|access-date=23 February 2016|archive-date=27 May 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160527090137/http://devops.com/2016/02/05/devops-stack-shoestring-budget/|url-status=dead}}</ref>{{unreliable source?|date=December 2018}}<ref>{{Cite web|title = Stronger DevOps Culture with Puppet and Vagrant|url = https://puppetlabs.com/blog/stronger-devops-culture-with-puppet-and-vagrant|website = Puppet Labs|access-date = 22 October 2015|archive-date = 29 January 2016|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160129110938/https://puppetlabs.com/blog/stronger-devops-culture-with-puppet-and-vagrant|url-status = dead}}</ref>{{unreliable source?|date=December 2018}} | |||
In 2016, the ] metrics for throughput (deployment frequency, lead time for changes), and stability (mean time to recover, change failure rate) were published in the State of DevOps report.<ref name="2016 State of DevOps Report" /> However, the research methodology and metrics were criticized by experts.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Turner |first=Graham |date=20 November 2023 |title=Report: Software Engineers Face Backlash for Reporting Wrongdoing |url=https://www.digit.fyi/report-software-engineers-facing-retaliation-for-reporting-wrongdoing/ |access-date=5 January 2024 |work=DIGIT |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Saran |first=Cliff |title=Software engineers worry about speaking out - Computer Weekly |url=https://www.computerweekly.com/news/366560292/Software-engineers-worry-about-speaking-out |access-date=5 January 2024 |work=ComputerWeekly.com |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |title=75% of software engineers faced retaliation the last time they reported wrongdoing - ETHRWorldSEA |url=https://hrsea.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/workplace/75-of-software-engineers-faced-retaliation-the-last-time-they-reported-wrongdoing/105335733 |work=ETHRWorld.com |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Cummins |first=Holly |title=Holly Cummins on X |url=https://twitter.com/holly_cummins/status/1448357917384744964 |access-date=5 January 2024 |website=X.com}}</ref> In response to these criticisms, the 2023 State of DevOps report <ref name="2023 State of DevOps Report">{{Cite web | last1=DeBellis | first1=Derek | title=2023 State of DevOps Report | url=https://cloud.google.com/devops/state-of-devops | access-date=2024-04-24 | last2=Lewis | first2=Amanda | last3=Villalba | first3=Daniella | last4=Farley | first4=Dave | publisher=Google Cloud DevOps Research and Assessment}}</ref> published changes that updated the stability metric "mean time to recover" to "failed deployment recovery time" acknowledging the confusion the former metric has caused.<ref name="Culture is everything">{{cite web |last1=DeBellis |first1=Derek |last2=Harvey |first2=Nathan |title=2023 State of DevOps Report: Culture is everything |url=https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/devops-sre/announcing-the-2023-state-of-devops-report |website=Google Cloud Blog |access-date=2024-04-24}}</ref> | |||
==Metrics== | |||
==Relevant metrics== | |||
{{See also|Accelerate (book)}} | |||
DORA metrics are a set of key metrics developed by ] (DORA) which can help to measure software development efficiency and reliability. These metrics include: <ref name=":0">{{Cite book |last=Forsgren |first=Nicole |title=Accelerate: The Science of Lean Software and DevOps: Building and Scaling High Performing Technology Organizations |isbn=978-1942788331}}</ref> | |||
* Deployment Frequency: Time between code deployments. | |||
Forsgren ''et al.'' found that IT performance is strongly correlated with DevOps practices like ] and ].<ref name="2014 State of DevOps Report"/> The authors later summarised their 4 year experience working with ] on the ''State of DevOps Report'' (SODR) in a book called ].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Linders |first1=Ben |last2=Humble |first2=Jez |title=Q&A on the Book Accelerate: Building and Scaling High Performance Technology Organizations |url=https://www.infoq.com/articles/book-review-accelerate/ |access-date=5 April 2021 |publisher=InfoQ |language=en}}</ref> The authors analysed 23,000 data points from a variety of companies of various different sizes (from start-up to enterprises), for-profit and not-for-profit and both those with legacy systems and those born digital.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Overby |first1=Stephanie |title=7 takeaways to "Accelerate" your DevOps |url=https://techbeacon.com/devops/7-takeaways-accelerate-your-devops |access-date=5 April 2021 |work=TechBeacon |language=en}}</ref> Their research identified four key metrics that are indicators of software delivery performance, which lead to higher rates of profitability, market share and customer satisfaction for their respective companies.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Colina |first1=Julian |title=Beginner's Guide to Software Delivery Metrics |url=https://www.usehaystack.io/blog/beginners-guide-to-software-delivery-metrics |website=www.usehaystack.io |access-date=5 April 2021}}</ref> The authors identified that “highest performers are twice as likely to meet or exceed their organizational performance goals.”<ref>{{cite news |last1=Mangot |first1=Dave |title=Get good at delivering software |url=https://www.cio.com/article/3611344/get-good-at-delivering-software.html |access-date=5 April 2021 |work=CIO |date=17 March 2021 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Colina |first1=Julian |title=Beginner's Guide to Software Delivery Metrics |url=https://www.usehaystack.io/blog/beginners-guide-to-software-delivery-metrics |website=www.usehaystack.io |access-date=7 April 2021}}</ref> | |||
* Mean Lead Time for Changes: Time between code commit and deployment. | |||
* Change Failure Rate: Percentage of deployments causing production issues. | |||
* Mean Time To Recovery: Time to resolve production issues. | |||
* Reliability (added in 2021): <ref>{{Cite journal |date=2021 |title=DORA Accelerate State of DevOps 2021 |journal=DevOps Research and Assessment |issue=2021}}</ref> Measures operational performance, focusing on availability and adherence to user expectations. | |||
These metrics, when applied appropriately and within relevant context, facilitate insights into DevOps performance, enabling teams to optimize deployment speed, reliability and quality, thereby informing data-driven decisions to enhance software development processes.<ref name=":0" /> | |||
The four metrics identified are as follows:<ref>{{cite web |last1=Colina |first1=Julian |title=Does engineering performance affect profitability? Here's what the data says |url=https://www.usehaystack.io/blog/does-engineering-performance-drive-profitability-heres-what-the-data-says |website=www.usehaystack.io |access-date=5 April 2021}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Are you an Elite DevOps performer? Find out with the Four Keys Project |url=https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/devops-sre/using-the-four-keys-to-measure-your-devops-performance |website=Google Cloud Blog |access-date=5 April 2021 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Drugeot |first1=Constance |title=Why is a DevOps assessment important, and how to do it right? |url=https://www.devopsonline.co.uk/why-is-a-devops-assessment-important-and-how-to-do-it-right/ |access-date=5 April 2021 |work=DevOps Online |date=30 March 2021}}</ref> | |||
* '''Change Lead Time''' or '''Cycle Time'''<ref>{{cite web |title=Measure Engineering Efficiency & Developer Experience with Haystack Metrics |url=https://support.usehaystack.io/en/articles/4523747-measure-engineering-efficiency-developer-experience-with-haystack-metrics |website=support.usehaystack.io |access-date=7 April 2021 |language=en}}</ref> - Time to implement, test, and deliver code for a feature (measured from first commit to deployment) | |||
* '''Deployment Frequency''' - Number of deployments in a given duration of time | |||
* '''Change Failure Rate''' (''CFR'') - Percentage of failed changes over all changes (regardless of success) | |||
* '''Mean Time to Recovery''' (''MTTR'') - Time it takes to restore service after production failure | |||
==Relationship to other approaches== | ==Relationship to other approaches== | ||
Many of the ideas fundamental to DevOps practices are inspired by, or mirror, other well known practices such as ] and ] ] cycle, through to ] and the ] approach of breaking down components and batch sizes.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Klein |first=Brandon Thorin |date=2021-05-01 |title=The DevOps: A Concise Understanding to the DevOps Philosophy and Science |url=https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1785164/ |language=English |doi=10.2172/1785164 |osti=1785164 |s2cid=236606284 |website=Osti.gov}}</ref> Contrary to the "top-down" prescriptive approach and rigid framework of ] in the 1990s, DevOps is "bottom-up" and flexible, having been created by software engineers for their own needs.<ref>{{Cite web |date=5 July 2020 |title=The History and Evolution of DevOps {{!}} Tom Geraghty |url=https://tomgeraghty.co.uk/index.php/the-history-and-evolution-of-devops/ |access-date=2020-11-29 |language=en-GB}}</ref> | |||
=== Agile === | |||
===Agile=== | |||
{{Main|Agile software development}} | {{Main|Agile software development}} | ||
The motivations for what has become modern DevOps and several standard DevOps practices such as automated build and test, ], and ] originated in the Agile world, which dates (informally) to the 1990s, and formally to 2001. Agile development teams using methods such as ] couldn't "satisfy the customer through early and continuous delivery of valuable software"<ref>{{Cite web|title=Principles behind the Agile Manifesto|url=https://agilemanifesto.org/principles.html|access-date=2020-12-06|website=agilemanifesto.org}}</ref> unless they |
The motivations for what has become modern DevOps and several standard DevOps practices such as automated build and test, ], and ] originated in the Agile world, which dates (informally) to the 1990s, and formally to 2001. Agile development teams using methods such as ] couldn't "satisfy the customer through early and continuous delivery of valuable software"<ref>{{Cite web |title=Principles behind the Agile Manifesto |url=https://agilemanifesto.org/principles.html |access-date=2020-12-06 |website=agilemanifesto.org}}</ref> unless they took responsibility for operations and infrastructure for their applications, automating much of that work. Because ] emerged as the dominant Agile framework in the early 2000s and it omitted the engineering practices that were part of many Agile teams, the movement to automate operations and infrastructure functions splintered from Agile and expanded into what has become modern DevOps. Today, DevOps focuses on the deployment of developed software, whether it is developed using Agile oriented methodologies or other methodologies. | ||
===ArchOps=== | ===ArchOps=== | ||
ArchOps presents an extension for DevOps practice, starting from ] artifacts, instead of source code, for operation deployment.<ref>{{ |
ArchOps presents an extension for DevOps practice, starting from ] artifacts, instead of source code, for operation deployment.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Castellanos |first1=Camilo |title=Software Architecture |last2=Correal |first2=Dario |date=15 September 2018 |isbn=978-3-030-00760-7 |series=Lecture Notes in Computer Science |volume=11048 |pages=364–371 |chapter=Executing Architectural Models for Big Data Analytics |doi=10.1007/978-3-030-00761-4_24}}</ref> ArchOps states that architectural models are first-class entities in software development, deployment, and operations. | ||
=== Continuous Integration and Delivery (CI/CD) === | |||
===TestOps=== | |||
{{ |
{{Main|CI/CD}} | ||
Automation is a core principle for achieving DevOps success and CI/CD is a critical component.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Humble |first1=Jez |title=Continuous Delivery: reliable software releases through build, test, and deployment automation |last2=Farley |first2=David |date=2011 |publisher=Pearson Education Inc. |isbn=978-0-321-60191-9}}</ref> Plus, improved collaboration and communication between and within teams helps achieve faster ], with reduced risks.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Chen |first=Lianping |year=2015 |title=Continuous Delivery: Huge Benefits, but Challenges Too |journal=IEEE Software |volume=32 |issue=2 |pages=50–54 |doi=10.1109/MS.2015.27 |s2cid=1241241}}</ref> | |||
TestOps is often considered a subset of DevOps, focusing on accelerating the practice of software testing within agile development methodologies. It includes the operations of test planning, managing test data, controlling changes to tests, organizing tests, managing test status, and gaining insights from testing activities to inform status and process improvements. <ref name="ostapov">{{Cite web | |||
| title = INTRODUCING TESTOPS: A NEW APPROACH TO QUALITY ASSURANCE | |||
| author = Infopulse | |||
| date = 2020-04-09 | |||
| access-date = 2021-02-16 | |||
| url = https://www.infopulse.com/blog/introducing-testops-quality-assurance/ | |||
| quote = TestOps is a methodology that promotes close collaboration between QA, Dev and Ops, in order to reduce development costs and ensure quality. | |||
}}</ref> | |||
=== |
=== Mobile DevOps === | ||
{{Main| |
{{Main|Mobile DevOps}} | ||
Continuous delivery and DevOps have common goals and are often used in conjunction, but there are subtle differences.<ref name="CD_HJ">{{cite book|title=Continuous Delivery: reliable software releases through build, test, and deployment automation|last1=Humble|first1=Jez|last2=Farley|first2=David|date=2011|publisher=Pearson Education Inc.|isbn=978-0-321-60191-9}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Hammond|first=Jeffrey|date=9 September 2011|title=The Relationship between DevOps and Continuous Delivery|url=http://blogs.forrester.com/jeffrey_hammond/11-09-09-the_relationship_between_dev_ops_and_continuous_delivery_a_conversation_with_jez_humble_of_thought|journal=Forrester Research}}</ref> | |||
Mobile DevOps is a set of practices that applies the principles of DevOps specifically to the development of mobile applications. Traditional DevOps focuses on streamlining the ] in general, but ] has its own unique challenges that require a tailored approach.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Tak |first1=Rohin |title=Mobile DevOps: Deliver continuous integration and deployment within your mobile applications |last2=Modi |first2=Jhalak |date=2018 |publisher=Packt Publishing |isbn=9781788296243 |pages=12–18}}</ref> Mobile DevOps is not simply as a branch of DevOps specific to mobile app development, instead an extension and reinterpretation of the DevOps philosophy due to very specific requirements of the mobile world. | |||
While continuous delivery is focused on automating the processes in ], DevOps also focuses on the organizational change to support great collaboration between the many functions involved.<ref name="CD_HJ" /> | |||
DevOps and continuous delivery share a common background in ] and ]: small and frequent changes with focused value to the end customer.<ref name="Agile Now">{{cite journal|last=Ambler|first=Scott W.|date=12 February 2014|title=We need more Agile IT Now!|url=http://www.drdobbs.com/architecture-and-design/we-need-more-agile-it-now/240169361?queryText=Release%2Bmanagement|journal=Dr. Dobb's the World of Software Development}}</ref>{{unreliable source?|date=March 2019}} | |||
] and continuous delivery are fundamental to delivering value faster, in a sustainable way.<ref name="2015 State of DevOps Report"/> | |||
Continuous delivery focuses on making sure the software is always in a releasable state throughout its lifecycle.<ref name="2014 State of DevOps Report"/> This makes it cheaper and less risky to deliver the software.<ref name="2014 State of DevOps Report"/> | |||
Improved collaboration and communication both between and within organizational teams can help achieve faster ], with reduced risks.<ref name="CD_LC">{{Cite journal |doi = 10.1109/MS.2015.27|title = Continuous Delivery: Huge Benefits, but Challenges Too|journal = IEEE Software|volume = 32|issue = 2|pages = 50–54|year = 2015|last1 = Chen|first1 = Lianping|s2cid = 1241241}}</ref><ref name="Micro_Chen">{{cite conference | |||
|url= https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323944215 | |||
|title= Microservices: Architecting for Continuous Delivery and DevOps | |||
|first= Lianping |last= Chen | |||
|date= 2018 | |||
|conference= The IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA 2018) | |||
|conference-url= http://icsa-conferences.org/2018/ | |||
|publisher= IEEE | |||
}} | |||
</ref> | |||
===DataOps=== | |||
{{unreliable sources|section|date=March 2019}} | |||
{{Main|DataOps}} | |||
The application of continuous delivery and DevOps to data analytics has been termed DataOps. DataOps seeks to integrate data engineering, data integration, data quality, data security, and data privacy with operations.<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.tamr.com/from-devops-to-dataops-by-andy-palmer/|title=From DevOps to DataOps, By Andy Palmer - Tamr Inc.|date=7 May 2015|work=Tamr Inc.|access-date=23 August 2017|language=en-US}}</ref>{{unreliable source?|date=March 2019}} It applies principles from DevOps, ] and the ], used in ], to improve the cycle time of extracting value from data analytics.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://medium.com/data-ops/how-to-become-a-rising-star-with-data-analytics-6e4f611e85dd|title=How to Become a Rising Star with Data Analytics|last=DataKitchen|date=15 March 2017|website=data-ops|access-date=23 August 2017}}</ref>{{unreliable source?|date=March 2019}} | |||
===Site-reliability engineering=== | ===Site-reliability engineering=== | ||
{{unreliable sources|section|date=March 2019}} | |||
{{Main|Site reliability engineering}} | {{Main|Site reliability engineering}} | ||
In 2003, ] developed ] (SRE), an approach for releasing new features continuously into large-scale high-availability systems while maintaining high-quality end-user experience.<ref>{{ |
In 2003, ] developed ] (SRE), an approach for releasing new features continuously into large-scale high-availability systems while maintaining high-quality end-user experience.<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Beyer |first1=Betsy |title=Site Reliability Engineering |last2=Jones |first2=Chris |last3=Petoff |first3=Jennifer |last4=Murphy |first4=Niall Richard |date=April 2016 |publisher=O'Reilly Media |isbn=978-1-4919-2909-4}}</ref> While SRE predates the development of DevOps, they are generally viewed as being related to each other. Some of the original authors of the discipline consider SRE as an implementation of DevOps.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://driftboatdave.com/2018/10/09/interview-with-betsy-beyer-stephen-thorne-of-google/ |title=Interview with Betsy Beyer, Stephen Thorne of Google |date=9 Oct 2018 |author=Dave Harrison |access-date=24 July 2024}}</ref> | ||
===Systems administration=== | |||
{{expand section|date=June 2018}} | |||
DevOps is often viewed as an approach to applying ] work to cloud technology.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://techbeacon.com/sysadmins-survival-guide-devops|title=How to stay relevant in the DevOps era: A SysAdmin's survival guide}}</ref> | |||
===WinOps=== | |||
{{main|WinOps}} | |||
] is the term used for DevOps practices for a Microsoft-centric view.{{Citation needed|reason=WinOps is the proper noun of a conference.|date=June 2019}} | |||
===Toyota production system, lean thinking, kaizen=== | ===Toyota production system, lean thinking, kaizen=== | ||
{{main|Toyota Production System}} | {{main|Toyota Production System}} | ||
Toyota production system, also known under the acronym TPS, was the inspiration for ] with its focus on ], ], flow and small batches. The ] to create fast feedback, swarm and solve problems stems from TPS.<ref>, Brent Aaron Reed, Willy Schaub, 2018-11-14.</ref><ref>The DevOps Handbook: How to Create World-Class Agility, Reliability, and Security in Technology Organizations |
Toyota production system, also known under the acronym TPS, was the inspiration for ] with its focus on ], ], flow and small batches. The ] to create fast feedback, swarm and solve problems stems from TPS.<ref>, Brent Aaron Reed, Willy Schaub, 2018-11-14.</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last1=Gene Kim |title=The DevOps Handbook: How to Create World-Class Agility, Reliability, and Security in Technology Organizations |last2=Patrick Debois |last3=John Willis |last4=Jezz Humble |date=2016}}</ref> | ||
===DevSecOps, |
===DevSecOps, shifting security left=== | ||
''DevSecOps'' is an augmentation of DevOps to allow for security practices to be integrated into the DevOps approach. Contrary to a traditional centralized security team model, each delivery team is empowered to factor in the correct security controls into their software delivery. Security practices and testing are performed earlier in the development lifecycle, hence the term "]". Security is tested in three main areas: static, software composition, and dynamic. | |||
Checking software statically via ] (SAST) is ] with special focus on security. Depending on the programming language, different tools are needed to do such static code analysis. The software composition is analyzed, especially libraries, and the version of each component is checked against vulnerability lists published by ] and other expert groups. When giving software to clients, library licenses and their match to the license of the software distributed are in focus, especially ] licenses. | |||
DevSecOps is an augmentation of DevOps to allow for security practices to be integrated into the DevOps approach. The traditional centralised security team model must adopt a federated model allowing each delivery team the ability to factor in the correct security controls into their DevOps practices. ] is an approach to software security whereby security practices and testing are performed earlier in the development lifecycle. | |||
In dynamic testing, also called ], software is tested without knowing its inner functions. In DevSecOps this practice may be referred to as ] (DAST) or penetration testing. The goal is early detection of defects including ] and ] vulnerabilities. Threat types are published by the ], e.g. its TOP10,<ref>{{Cite web |title=OWASP TOP10 |url=https://owasp.org/Top10/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230608171837/https://owasp.org/Top10/ |archive-date=June 8, 2023 |access-date=June 8, 2023}}</ref> and by other bodies. | |||
=== BizOps === | |||
{{Main|BizOps}} | |||
BizOps is contrasted with DevOps because of its more integrated approach. While DevOps is more focused on IT and software development, BizOps integrates technology into daily organizational decisions and business operations.<ref>{{Cite web|date=2020-10-09|title=Aligning business and IT: ‘BizOps Manifesto Unveiled’ focuses on software development and operations|url=https://siliconangle.com/2020/10/09/aligning-business-and-it-bizops-manifesto-unveiled-focuses-on-software-development-and-operations-bizopsmanifesto/|access-date=2021-03-26|website=SiliconANGLE|language=en-US}}</ref> | |||
DevSecOps has also been described as a cultural shift involving a holistic approach to producing secure software by integrating security education, security by design, and security automation.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Wilson |first=Glenn |title='DevSecOps: A leader's guide to producing secure software with compromising flow, feedback and continuous improvement' |date=December 2020 |publisher=Rethink Press |isbn=978-1781335024}}</ref> | |||
==Goals== | |||
{{unreliable sources|section|date=March 2019}} | |||
IT performance can be measured in terms of throughput and stability.<ref name="2014 State of DevOps Report" /> | |||
Throughput can be measured by deployment frequency and lead time for changes; stability can be measured by mean time to recover. The State of DevOps Reports found that investing in practices that increase these throughput and stability measures increase IT performance.<ref name="2014 State of DevOps Report"/><ref name="2015 State of DevOps Report"/> | |||
The goals of DevOps span the entire delivery pipeline. They include:{{citation needed|date=March 2019}} | |||
* Improved deployment frequency; | |||
* Faster ]; | |||
* Lower failure rate of new releases; | |||
* Shortened lead time between fixes; | |||
* Faster mean time to recovery (in the event of a new release crashing or otherwise disabling the current system). | |||
Simple processes become increasingly programmable and dynamic, using a DevOps approach.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://newrelic.com/devops/what-is-devops |title=What is DevOps? |publisher=NewRelic.com |access-date=21 October 2014}}</ref>{{unreliable source?|date=March 2019}} DevOps aims to maximize the predictability, efficiency, security, and maintainability of operational processes.{{citation needed|date=March 2019}} Very often, automation supports this objective. | |||
DevOps integration targets ], ], ], feature development, and ]s in order to improve reliability and security and provide faster ] and ] cycles.{{citation needed|date=March 2019}} Many of the ideas (and people) involved in DevOps came from the ] and ] movements.<ref name="AgileInf2010">{{cite web|last=Nasrat|first=Paul|title=Agile Infrastructure|url=http://www.infoq.com/presentations/agile-infrastructure|publisher=InfoQ|access-date=31 March 2011}}</ref>{{unreliable source?|date=March 2019}} | |||
Practices that correlate with deployment frequency are:<ref name="2014 State of DevOps Report"/> | |||
* Continuous delivery | |||
* Using version control for all production artifacts | |||
Practices that correlate with a lead time for change are:<ref name="2014 State of DevOps Report"/> | |||
* Using version control for all production artifacts | |||
* Automated testing | |||
Practices that correlate with a mean time to recovery for change are:<ref name="2014 State of DevOps Report"/> | |||
* Using version control for all production artifacts | |||
* Monitoring system and application health | |||
Companies {{failed verification span|that practice DevOps|date=February 2019}} have reported significant benefits, including: significantly shorter ], improved customer satisfaction, better product quality, more reliable releases, improved productivity and efficiency, and the increased ability to build the right product by fast experimentation.<ref name="CD_LC"/> | |||
The 2014 State of DevOps Report found that "IT performance strongly correlates with well-known DevOps practices such as the use of version | |||
control and continuous delivery."<ref name="2014 State of DevOps Report"/> | |||
==Cultural change== | ==Cultural change== | ||
DevOps initiatives can create cultural changes in companies<ref>{{ |
DevOps initiatives can create cultural changes in companies<ref>{{Cite report |title=Emerging Technology Analysis: DevOps a Culture Shift, Not a Technology |publisher=Gartner}}</ref> by transforming the way ], ], and ] collaborate during the development and delivery processes.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Loukides |first=Mike |date=7 June 2012 |title=What is DevOps? |url=http://radar.oreilly.com/2012/06/what-is-devops.html |publisher=]}}</ref> Getting these groups to work cohesively is a critical challenge in enterprise DevOps adoption.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Gartner IT Glossary {{ndash}} devops |url=http://www.gartner.com/it-glossary/devops/ |access-date=30 October 2015 |website=Gartner}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last1=Jones |first1=Stephen |url=https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/59131/4/Accepted_manuscript.pdf |title=Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Quality-Aware DevOps - QUDOS 2016 |last2=Noppen |first2=Joost |last3=Lettice |first3=Fiona |date=21 July 2016 |isbn=9781450344111 |pages=7–11 |doi=10.1145/2945408.2945410 |s2cid=515140}}</ref> DevOps is as much about culture as it is about the toolchain.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Mandi Walls |date=25 September 2015 |title=Building a DevOps culture |url=https://www.oreilly.com/ideas/building-a-devops-culture |publisher=O'Reilly}}</ref> | ||
===DevOps as a job title=== | |||
While DevOps describes an approach to work rather than a distinct role (like ]), job advertisements are increasingly using terms like "''DevOps Engineer''".<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://devops.com/is-devops-a-title/|title=Is DevOps a Title? - DevOps.com|date=20 March 2014|work=DevOps.com|access-date=22 July 2017|language=en-US}}</ref>{{unreliable source?|date=March 2019}}<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.monster.com/career-advice/article/devops-jobs|title=DevOps: A Job Title or a School of Thought?|work=Monster Career Advice|access-date=22 July 2017}}</ref> | |||
While DevOps reflects complex topics, the DevOps community uses analogies to communicate important concepts,{{relevant inline|date=March 2019}} much like "]" from the open-source community.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://devops.stackexchange.com/questions/1403/what-are-known-useful-and-misleading-memes-in-the-devops-culture|title=What are known useful and misleading memes in the DevOps culture?|website=devops.stackexchange.com|access-date=29 June 2017}}</ref> | |||
* Cattle not Pets: the paradigm of disposable server infrastructure.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/03/18/servers_pets_or_cattle_cern/|title=Are Your Servers Pets or Cattle?|last=Sharwood|first=Simon|website=]|access-date=2 July 2018}}</ref> | |||
* 10 deployments per day: the story of Flickr adopting DevOps. | |||
===Building a DevOps culture=== | |||
Organizational culture is a strong predictor of IT and organizational performance. Cultural practices such as information flow, collaboration, shared responsibilities, learning from failures and new ideas are central to DevOps.<ref name="2014 State of DevOps Report"/> , and is reflected in Gene Kim's . Team-building and other ] activities are often used to create an environment that fosters this communication and cultural change within an organization.<ref>{{cite book|last=Walls |first=Mandi | date= 15 April 2013 | title= Building a DevOps Culture| url= https://books.google.com/books?id=XO1So8BTj2wC | publisher=OReilly Media |isbn=9781449368364 }}</ref> Team-building activities can include ]s, trust activities, and employee engagement seminars.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Roach |first=Patrick | title= Dice Breakers: Using DevOps principles and nerdery to reimagine Team building | url= http://devops.com/2015/10/08/dice-breakers-using-devops-principles-nerdery-reimagine-team-building/| website=DevOps.com |date=2015-10-08 }}</ref>{{unreliable source?|date=March 2019}} | |||
DevOps as a service approach allows developers and operations teams to take greater control of their applications and infrastructure without hindering speed. | |||
The 2015 State of DevOps Report discovered that the top seven measures with the strongest correlation to organizational culture are: | |||
1. Organizational investment in DevOps:<ref name="2015 State of DevOps Report"/> | |||
2. Team leaders' experience and effectiveness. | |||
3. Continuous delivery. | |||
4. The ability of different disciplines (development, operations, and infosec) to achieve | |||
win-win outcomes. | |||
5. Organizational performance. | |||
6. Deployment pain. | |||
7. Lean management practices. | |||
==Deployment== | |||
{{unreliable sources|section|date=March 2019}} | |||
Companies with very frequent releases may require knowledge on DevOps.{{citation needed|date=March 2019}} For example, the company that operates image hosting website ] developed a DevOps approach to support ten deployments a day.<ref>{{Cite web | |||
| url = http://www.slideshare.net/jallspaw/10-deploys-per-day-dev-and-ops-cooperation-at-flickr | |||
| title = 10+ Deploys Per Day: Dev and Ops Cooperation at Flickr | |||
| date = 2009-06-23 | |||
}}</ref> Daily deployment cycles would be much higher at organizations producing multi-focus or multi-function applications.{{citation needed|date=March 2019}} Daily deployment is referred to as ]<ref>{{Cite web | |||
| url = http://www.svforum.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Calendar.eventDetail&eventID=13703 | |||
| work = SVForum | |||
| title = SAM SIG: Applied Lean Startup Ideas: Continuous Deployment at kaChing | |||
| access-date = 20 June 2011 | |||
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20121020133600/http://www.svforum.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Calendar.eventDetail&eventID=13703 | |||
| archive-date = 20 October 2012 | |||
| url-status = dead | |||
}}</ref>{{unreliable source?|date=March 2019}} or ]<ref>{{Cite web | |||
| url = https://www.cutter.com/article/why-enterprises-must-adopt-devops-enable-continuous-delivery-416516 | |||
| title = Why Enterprises Must Adopt Devops to Enable Continuous Delivery | |||
| work = ] | first = Jez | last = Humble | |||
}}</ref>{{unreliable source?|date=March 2019}} and has been associated with the ] methodology.<ref>{{Cite web | |||
| url = http://www.slideshare.net/pascallouis/applied-lean-startup-ideas-continuous-deployment-at-kaching | |||
| title = Applied Lean Startup Ideas: Continuous Deployment at kaChing | |||
| date = 2010-05-26 | |||
}}</ref>{{unreliable source?|date=March 2019}} ]s and ] have formed on the topic since 2009.<ref>{{Cite web | |||
| url = http://www.devopsdays.org/events/2009-ghent/ | |||
| title = DevOps Days 2009 Conference | |||
}}</ref>{{unreliable source?|date=March 2019}}<ref>{{Cite web | |||
| url = http://dev2ops.org/blog/2010/4/26/devops-meetup-recap.html | |||
| title = DevOps Meetup Recap | first = Damon | last = Edwards | |||
}} | |||
</ref>{{unreliable source?|date=March 2019}} | |||
===Architecturally significant requirements=== | |||
To practice DevOps effectively, software applications have to meet a set of ] (ASRs), such as: deployability, modifiability, testability, and monitorability.<ref name="ArchCD_LC">{{cite conference |title=Towards Architecting for Continuous Delivery|first=Lianping |last=Chen|year=2015|place=Montréal, Canada |conference=The 12th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture(WICSA 2015)|conference-url=http://wicsa2015.org/ |publisher=IEEE|doi=10.1109/WICSA.2015.23}}</ref> These ASRs require a high priority and cannot be traded off lightly. | |||
===Microservices=== | ===Microservices=== | ||
Although in principle it is possible to practice DevOps with any architectural style, the ] architectural style is becoming the standard for building continuously deployed systems. |
Although in principle it is possible to practice DevOps with any architectural style, the ] architectural style is becoming the standard for building continuously deployed systems. Small size service allows the architecture of an individual service to emerge through continuous refactoring.<ref>{{Cite conference |last1=Chen |first1=Lianping |last2=Ali Babar |first2=Muhammad |date=2014 |title=2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture |publisher=IEEE |pages=195–204 |doi=10.1109/WICSA.2014.45 |isbn=978-1-4799-3412-6 |chapter=Towards an Evidence-Based Understanding of Emergence of Architecture through Continuous Refactoring in Agile Software Development |book-title=The 11th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture(WICSA 2014)}}</ref> | ||
===DevOps automation=== | ===DevOps automation=== | ||
It also supports consistency, reliability, and efficiency within the organization, and is usually enabled by a shared code repository or version control. As DevOps researcher Ravi Teja Yarlagadda hypothesizes, "Through DevOps, there is an assumption that all functions can be carried out, controlled, and managed in a central place using a simple code."<ref>{{Cite SSRN |title=DevOps and Its Practices |last=Teja Yarlagadda |first=Ravi |date=9 March 2021 |ssrn=3798877}}</ref> | |||
DevOps automation can be achieved by repackaging platforms, systems, and applications into reusable building blocks<ref>{{Cite conference|title=DevOps: Images, Scripts, APIs, Oh my!|first1=Brandon |last1=Klein |first2=John |last2=Miner |date=2018 |conference=NLIT Summit 2018 |publisher=OSTI |osti=1512856 }}</ref> through the use of technologies such as ]s and ].<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.devopsdigest.com/full-potential-of-containerization-for-devops-1|title=Unleashing the Full Potential of Containerization for DevOps|date=20 September 2017|access-date=20 June 2018|language=en-US}}</ref>{{unreliable source?|date=March 2019}}<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.techrepublic.com/article/containers-vs-virtual-machines-a-simplified-answer-to-a-complex-question/|title=Containers vs. virtual machines: A simplified answer to a complex question}}</ref> | |||
==== Automation with version control ==== | |||
Implementation of DevOps automation in the IT-organization is heavily dependent on tools,<ref name="2014 State of DevOps Report"/><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://techbeacon.com/devops-automation-best-practices-how-much-too-much|title=DevOps best practices: How much automation do you need?|work=TechBeacon|access-date=2018-11-14|language=en}}</ref>{{unreliable source?|date=March 2019}} which are {{cn span|required|date=March 2019}} to cover different areas of the ] (SDLC): | |||
Many organizations use ] to power DevOps automation technologies like ], containerization (or ]), and ]. The paper "DevOps: development of a toolchain in the banking domain" notes that with teams of developers working on the same project, "All developers need to make changes to the same codebase and sometimes edit even the same files. For efficient working, there has to be a system that helps engineers avoid conflicts and retain the codebase history,"<ref>{{Cite thesis |last=Morisio |first=Maurizio |title=DevOps: development of a toolchain in the banking domain |date=16 April 2021 |access-date=16 August 2021 |degree=laurea |url=https://webthesis.biblio.polito.it/18120/ |journal=Politecnico di Torino}}</ref> with the ] version control system and the ] platform referenced as examples. | |||
==GitOps== | |||
# ] | |||
GitOps evolved from DevOps. The specific state of deployment configuration is ]led. Because the most popular ] is ], GitOps' approach has been named after ]. Changes to configuration can be managed using ] practices, and can be rolled back using version-controlling. Essentially, all of the changes to a code are tracked, bookmarked, and making any updates to the history can be made easier. As explained by ], ''"visibility to change means the ability to trace and reproduce issues quickly, improving overall security."''<ref>{{Cite web |title=What is GitOps? |url=https://www.redhat.com/en/topics/devops/what-is-gitops |access-date=2023-03-30 |website=www.redhat.com |language=en}}</ref> | |||
# ] | |||
# ] | |||
# ] | |||
# ] | |||
# ] | |||
# ] | |||
==Best practices for cloud systems== | |||
== Adoption == | |||
The following practices can enhance productivity of DevOps ], especially in systems hosted in the ]: <ref>{{Cite book |title=Serverless Architectures on AWS |publisher=Manning |isbn=978-1617295423}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |title=Pipeline as Code Continuous Delivery with Jenkins, Kubernetes, and Terraform |publisher=Manning |isbn=9781638350378}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |title=Continuous Delivery Reliable Software Releases Through Build, Test, and Deployment Automation |isbn=9780321670229}}</ref> | |||
{{unreliable sources|section|date=March 2019}} | |||
* '''Number of Pipelines''': Small teams can be more productive by having one ] and one pipeline. In contrast, larger organizations may have separate repositories and pipelines for each team or even separate repositories and pipelines for each service within a team. | |||
===DevOps practices and adoption=== | |||
* '''Permissions''': In the context of ] permissions, adhering to the ] can be challenging due to the dynamic nature of ]. Administrators may opt for more permissive permissions while implementing compensating ] to minimize the blast radius. | |||
Jabbari et al.<ref name="jabbari-2018">{{cite journal |last1=Jabbari |first1=Ramtin |last2=Ali |first2=Nauman bin |last3=Petersen |first3=Kai |last4=Tanveer |first4=Binish |title=Towards a benefits dependency network for DevOps based on a systematic literature review |journal=Journal of Software: Evolution and Process |date=November 2018 |volume=30 |issue=11 |pages=e1957 |doi=10.1002/smr.1957|s2cid=53951886 }}</ref> identified DevOps practices and their dependencies. They developed a benefits dependency network which connects potential benefits to an ordered chain of practices. Using this network organizations can choose a path that enables fulfillment of their goals. | |||
Some articles in the DevOps literature assume or recommend significant participation in DevOps initiatives from outside an organization's ] department, e.g.: "DevOps is just the ] principle, taken to the full enterprise."<ref>{{Cite web | url = http://devops.com/2015/03/04/devops-is-agile-for-the-rest-of-the-company/ | title = DevOps is Agile for the Rest of the Company | publisher = DevOps.com | date = 2015-03-04 | access-date = 11 October 2015 | archive-date = 13 September 2016 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20160913204818/http://devops.com/2015/03/04/devops-is-agile-for-the-rest-of-the-company/ | url-status = dead }}</ref>{{unreliable source?|date=March 2019}} | |||
In a survey published in January 2016 by the SaaS cloud-computing company ], DevOps adoption increased from 66 percent in 2015 to 74 percent in 2016.{{citation needed|date=March 2019}} And among larger enterprise organizations, DevOps adoption is even higher – 81 percent.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Harvey |first=Cynthia | date= 9 January 2017 | title= 10 Ways DevOps is Changing the Enterprise | url= http://www.datamation.com/data-center/slideshows/10-ways-devops-is-changing-enterprise-it.html | journal=Datamation }}</ref>{{unreliable source?|date=March 2019}} | |||
Adoption of DevOps is being driven by many factors – including:{{citation needed|date=March 2019}} | |||
# Use of agile and other ] and methods; | |||
# Demand for an increased rate of production releases – from application and business unit ]; | |||
# Wide availability of virtualized<ref>{{Cite web | url = http://www.it20.info/misc/virtualizationscomparison.htm | |||
| title = Virtual Infrastructure products: features comparison | work = Welcome to IT 2.0: Next Generation IT infrastructures}}</ref>{{unreliable source?|date=March 2019}} and ] – from internal and external providers; | |||
# Increased usage of ] automation<ref>{{Cite web | url = http://www.information-management.com/infodirect/20071026/10000120-1.html | title = Bringing Order to Chaos through Data Center Automation | first = Jennifer | last = Ellard | work = Information Management | publisher = SourceMedia | url-status = dead | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20100611073000/http://www.information-management.com/infodirect/20071026/10000120-1.html | archive-date = 11 June 2010 }}</ref>{{unreliable source?|date=March 2019}} and ] tools; | |||
# Increased focus on ]<ref>{{Cite web | url = http://devops.com/2015/08/21/impacts-devops-testing/ | title = Impact of DevOps on Testing | publisher = DevOps.com | date = 2015-08-21 | access-date = 26 August 2015 | archive-date = 21 August 2015 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20150821201806/http://devops.com/2015/08/21/impacts-devops-testing/ | url-status = dead }}</ref>{{unreliable source?|date=March 2019}} and ] methods; | |||
# A critical mass of publicly available best practices. | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
{{notelist}} | {{notelist}} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist|30em}} | |||
{{reflist|1=30em}} | |||
==Further reading== | ==Further reading== | ||
* {{Cite book|title=Effective DevOps : building a culture of collaboration, affinity, and tooling at scale|last1=Davis|first1=Jennifer|last2=Daniels|first2=Ryn|publisher=O'Reilly|isbn=9781491926437|location=Sebastopol, CA|oclc=951434424|date=2016-05-30}} | |||
* {{Cite book|title=The DevOps handbook : how to create world-class agility, reliability, and security in technology organizations|last1=Kim|first1=Gene|last2=Debois|first2=Patrick|last3=Willis|first3=John|last4=Humble|first4=Jez|last5=Allspaw|first5=John|isbn=9781942788003|edition=First|location=Portland, OR|oclc=907166314|date=2015-10-07}} | |||
* {{Cite book|title=Accelerate: The Science of Lean Software and DevOps: Building and Scaling High Performing Technology Organizations|last1=Forsgren|first1=Nicole|last2=Humble|first2=Jez|last3=Kim|first3=Gene|isbn=9781942788331|edition=First|publisher=IT Revolution Press|date=27 March 2018}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Davis |first1=Jennifer |title=Effective DevOps : building a culture of collaboration, affinity, and tooling at scale |last2=Daniels |first2=Ryn |date=2016-05-30 |publisher=O'Reilly |isbn=9781491926437 |location=Sebastopol, CA |oclc=951434424}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Kim |first1=Gene |title=The DevOps handbook : how to create world-class agility, reliability, and security in technology organizations |last2=Debois |first2=Patrick |last3=Willis |first3=John |last4=Humble |first4=Jez |last5=Allspaw |first5=John |date=2015-10-07 |isbn=9781942788003 |edition=First |location=Portland, OR |oclc=907166314}} | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Forsgren |first1=Nicole |title=Accelerate: The Science of Lean Software and DevOps: Building and Scaling High Performing Technology Organizations |last2=Humble |first2=Jez |last3=Kim |first3=Gene |date=27 March 2018 |publisher=IT Revolution Press |isbn=9781942788331 |edition=First}} | |||
{{Software engineering|state=expanded}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | {{Authority control}} | ||
Line 270: | Line 127: | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] |
Latest revision as of 03:00, 5 January 2025
Set of software development practices
DevOps is a methodology integrating and automating the work of software development (Dev) and information technology operations (Ops). It serves as a means for improving and shortening the systems development life cycle. DevOps is complementary to agile software development; several DevOps aspects came from the agile approach.
Automation is an important part of DevOps. Software programmers and architects should use "fitness functions" to keep their software in check.
According to Neal Ford, DevOps, particularly through continuous delivery, employs the "Bring the pain forward" principle, tackling tough tasks early, fostering automation and swift issue detection.
Definition
Other than it being a cross-functional combination (and a portmanteau) of the terms and concepts for "development" and "operations", academics and practitioners have not developed a universal definition for the term "DevOps". Most often, DevOps is characterized by key principles: shared ownership, workflow automation, and rapid feedback. From an academic perspective, Len Bass, Ingo Weber, and Liming Zhu—three computer science researchers from the CSIRO and the Software Engineering Institute—suggested defining DevOps as "a set of practices intended to reduce the time between committing a change to a system and the change being placed into normal production, while ensuring high quality". However, the term is used in multiple contexts. At its most successful, DevOps is a combination of specific practices, culture change, and tools.
History
Proposals to combine software development methodologies with deployment and operations concepts began to appear in the late 80s and early 90s.
Around 2007 and 2008, concerns were raised by those within the software development and IT communities that the separation between the two industries, where one wrote and created software entirely separate from those that deploy and support the software was creating a fatal level of dysfunction within the industry.
In 2009, the first conference named DevOps Days was held in Ghent, Belgium. The conference was founded by Belgian consultant, project manager and agile practitioner Patrick Debois. The conference has now spread to other countries.
In 2012, a report called "State of DevOps" was first published by Alanna Brown at Puppet Labs.
As of 2014, the annual State of DevOps report was published by Nicole Forsgren, Gene Kim, Jez Humble and others. They stated that the adoption of DevOps was accelerating. Also in 2014, Lisa Crispin and Janet Gregory wrote the book More Agile Testing, containing a chapter on testing and DevOps.
In 2016, the DORA metrics for throughput (deployment frequency, lead time for changes), and stability (mean time to recover, change failure rate) were published in the State of DevOps report. However, the research methodology and metrics were criticized by experts. In response to these criticisms, the 2023 State of DevOps report published changes that updated the stability metric "mean time to recover" to "failed deployment recovery time" acknowledging the confusion the former metric has caused.
Relevant metrics
DORA metrics are a set of key metrics developed by DevOps Research and Assessment (DORA) which can help to measure software development efficiency and reliability. These metrics include:
- Deployment Frequency: Time between code deployments.
- Mean Lead Time for Changes: Time between code commit and deployment.
- Change Failure Rate: Percentage of deployments causing production issues.
- Mean Time To Recovery: Time to resolve production issues.
- Reliability (added in 2021): Measures operational performance, focusing on availability and adherence to user expectations.
These metrics, when applied appropriately and within relevant context, facilitate insights into DevOps performance, enabling teams to optimize deployment speed, reliability and quality, thereby informing data-driven decisions to enhance software development processes.
Relationship to other approaches
Many of the ideas fundamental to DevOps practices are inspired by, or mirror, other well known practices such as Lean and Deming's Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle, through to The Toyota Way and the Agile approach of breaking down components and batch sizes. Contrary to the "top-down" prescriptive approach and rigid framework of ITIL in the 1990s, DevOps is "bottom-up" and flexible, having been created by software engineers for their own needs.
Agile
Main article: Agile software developmentThe motivations for what has become modern DevOps and several standard DevOps practices such as automated build and test, continuous integration, and continuous delivery originated in the Agile world, which dates (informally) to the 1990s, and formally to 2001. Agile development teams using methods such as extreme programming couldn't "satisfy the customer through early and continuous delivery of valuable software" unless they took responsibility for operations and infrastructure for their applications, automating much of that work. Because Scrum emerged as the dominant Agile framework in the early 2000s and it omitted the engineering practices that were part of many Agile teams, the movement to automate operations and infrastructure functions splintered from Agile and expanded into what has become modern DevOps. Today, DevOps focuses on the deployment of developed software, whether it is developed using Agile oriented methodologies or other methodologies.
ArchOps
ArchOps presents an extension for DevOps practice, starting from software architecture artifacts, instead of source code, for operation deployment. ArchOps states that architectural models are first-class entities in software development, deployment, and operations.
Continuous Integration and Delivery (CI/CD)
Main article: CI/CDAutomation is a core principle for achieving DevOps success and CI/CD is a critical component. Plus, improved collaboration and communication between and within teams helps achieve faster time to market, with reduced risks.
Mobile DevOps
Main article: Mobile DevOpsMobile DevOps is a set of practices that applies the principles of DevOps specifically to the development of mobile applications. Traditional DevOps focuses on streamlining the software development process in general, but mobile development has its own unique challenges that require a tailored approach. Mobile DevOps is not simply as a branch of DevOps specific to mobile app development, instead an extension and reinterpretation of the DevOps philosophy due to very specific requirements of the mobile world.
Site-reliability engineering
Main article: Site reliability engineeringIn 2003, Google developed site reliability engineering (SRE), an approach for releasing new features continuously into large-scale high-availability systems while maintaining high-quality end-user experience. While SRE predates the development of DevOps, they are generally viewed as being related to each other. Some of the original authors of the discipline consider SRE as an implementation of DevOps.
Toyota production system, lean thinking, kaizen
Main article: Toyota Production SystemToyota production system, also known under the acronym TPS, was the inspiration for lean thinking with its focus on continuous improvement, kaizen, flow and small batches. The andon cord principle to create fast feedback, swarm and solve problems stems from TPS.
DevSecOps, shifting security left
DevSecOps is an augmentation of DevOps to allow for security practices to be integrated into the DevOps approach. Contrary to a traditional centralized security team model, each delivery team is empowered to factor in the correct security controls into their software delivery. Security practices and testing are performed earlier in the development lifecycle, hence the term "shift left". Security is tested in three main areas: static, software composition, and dynamic.
Checking software statically via static application security testing (SAST) is white-box testing with special focus on security. Depending on the programming language, different tools are needed to do such static code analysis. The software composition is analyzed, especially libraries, and the version of each component is checked against vulnerability lists published by CERT and other expert groups. When giving software to clients, library licenses and their match to the license of the software distributed are in focus, especially copyleft licenses.
In dynamic testing, also called black-box testing, software is tested without knowing its inner functions. In DevSecOps this practice may be referred to as dynamic application security testing (DAST) or penetration testing. The goal is early detection of defects including cross-site scripting and SQL injection vulnerabilities. Threat types are published by the open web application security project, e.g. its TOP10, and by other bodies.
DevSecOps has also been described as a cultural shift involving a holistic approach to producing secure software by integrating security education, security by design, and security automation.
Cultural change
DevOps initiatives can create cultural changes in companies by transforming the way operations, developers, and testers collaborate during the development and delivery processes. Getting these groups to work cohesively is a critical challenge in enterprise DevOps adoption. DevOps is as much about culture as it is about the toolchain.
Microservices
Although in principle it is possible to practice DevOps with any architectural style, the microservices architectural style is becoming the standard for building continuously deployed systems. Small size service allows the architecture of an individual service to emerge through continuous refactoring.
DevOps automation
It also supports consistency, reliability, and efficiency within the organization, and is usually enabled by a shared code repository or version control. As DevOps researcher Ravi Teja Yarlagadda hypothesizes, "Through DevOps, there is an assumption that all functions can be carried out, controlled, and managed in a central place using a simple code."
Automation with version control
Many organizations use version control to power DevOps automation technologies like virtual machines, containerization (or OS-level virtualization), and CI/CD. The paper "DevOps: development of a toolchain in the banking domain" notes that with teams of developers working on the same project, "All developers need to make changes to the same codebase and sometimes edit even the same files. For efficient working, there has to be a system that helps engineers avoid conflicts and retain the codebase history," with the Git version control system and the GitHub platform referenced as examples.
GitOps
GitOps evolved from DevOps. The specific state of deployment configuration is version-controlled. Because the most popular version-control is Git, GitOps' approach has been named after Git. Changes to configuration can be managed using code review practices, and can be rolled back using version-controlling. Essentially, all of the changes to a code are tracked, bookmarked, and making any updates to the history can be made easier. As explained by Red Hat, "visibility to change means the ability to trace and reproduce issues quickly, improving overall security."
Best practices for cloud systems
The following practices can enhance productivity of DevOps pipelines, especially in systems hosted in the cloud:
- Number of Pipelines: Small teams can be more productive by having one repository and one pipeline. In contrast, larger organizations may have separate repositories and pipelines for each team or even separate repositories and pipelines for each service within a team.
- Permissions: In the context of pipeline-related permissions, adhering to the principle of least privilege can be challenging due to the dynamic nature of architecture. Administrators may opt for more permissive permissions while implementing compensating security controls to minimize the blast radius.
See also
- DataOps
- DevOps toolchain
- Twelve-Factor App methodology
- Infrastructure as code
- Lean software development
- Site reliability engineering
- Value stream
- List of build automation software
Notes
- Dyck et al. (2015) "To our knowledge, there is no uniform definition for the terms release engineering and DevOps. As a consequence, many people use their own definitions or rely on others, which results in confusion about those terms."
- Jabbari et al. (2016) "The research results of this study showed the need for a definition as individual studies do not consistently define DevOps."
- Erich et al. (2017) "We noticed that there are various gaps in the study of DevOps: There is no consensus of what concepts DevOps covers, nor how DevOps is defined."
- Erich et al. (2017) "We discovered that there exists little agreement about the characteristics of DevOps in the academic literature."
References
- Courtemanche, Meredith; Mell, Emily; Gills, Alexander S. "What Is DevOps? The Ultimate Guide". TechTarget. Retrieved 2023-01-22.
- Fundamentals of Software Architecture: An Engineering Approach. O'Reilly Media. 2020. ISBN 978-1492043454.
- Building Evolutionary Architectures: Automated Software Governance. ISBN 978-1492097549.
- Dyck, Andrej; Penners, Ralf; Lichter, Horst (2015-05-19). "Towards Definitions for Release Engineering and DevOps". 2015 IEEE/ACM 3rd International Workshop on Release Engineering. IEEE. p. 3. doi:10.1109/RELENG.2015.10. ISBN 978-1-4673-7070-7. S2CID 4659735.
- Jabbari, Ramtin; bin Ali, Nauman; Petersen, Kai; Tanveer, Binish (May 2016). "What is DevOps?: A Systematic Mapping Study on Definitions and Practices". Proceedings of the 2016 Scientific Workshop. Association for Computing Machinery.
- ^ Erich, F.M.A.; Amrit, C.; Daneva, M. (June 2017). "A Qualitative Study of DevOps Usage in Practice" (PDF). Journal of Software: Evolution and Process. 29 (6): e1885. doi:10.1002/smr.1885. S2CID 35914007.
- Bass, Len; Weber, Ingo; Zhu, Liming (2015). DevOps: A Software Architect's Perspective. Addison-Wesley. ISBN 978-0134049847.
- Muñoz, Mirna; Negrete Rodríguez, Mario (April 2021). "A guidance to implement or reinforce a DevOps approach in organizations: A case study".
{{cite journal}}
: Cite journal requires|journal=
(help) - Chapman, M., Gatti, N: A model of a service life cycle, Proceedings of TINA '93, pp. I-205–I-215, Sep., 1993.
- Atlassian. "History of DevOps". Atlassian. Retrieved 2023-02-23.
- Mezak, Steve (25 January 2018). "The Origins of DevOps: What's in a Name?". devops.com. Retrieved 6 May 2019.
- Debois, Patrick (9 October 2008). "Agile 2008 Toronto". Just Enough Documented Information. Retrieved 12 March 2015.
- Debois, Patrick. "DevOps Days". DevOps Days. Retrieved 31 March 2011.
- ^ Alana Brown; Nicole Forsgren; Jez Humble; Nigel Kersten; Gene Kim (2016). "2016 State of DevOps Report" (PDF). Puppet Labs, DORA (DevOps Research. Retrieved 2024-04-24.
- "Puppet - Alanna Brown". Puppet Labs. Retrieved 2019-04-27.
- Nicole Forsgren; Gene Kim; Nigel Kersten; Jez Humble (2014). "2014 State of DevOps Report" (PDF). Puppet Labs, IT Revolution Press and ThoughtWorks. Retrieved 2024-04-24.
- "2015 State of DevOps Report" (PDF). Puppet Labs, Pwc, IT Revolution Press. 2015. Retrieved 2024-04-24.
- "More Agile Testing" (PDF). October 2014. Retrieved 2019-05-06.
- Crispin, Lisa; Gregory, Janet (October 2014). More Agile Testing. Addison-Wesley. ISBN 9780133749571. Retrieved 2019-05-06.
- Turner, Graham (20 November 2023). "Report: Software Engineers Face Backlash for Reporting Wrongdoing". DIGIT. Retrieved 5 January 2024.
- Saran, Cliff. "Software engineers worry about speaking out - Computer Weekly". ComputerWeekly.com. Retrieved 5 January 2024.
- "75% of software engineers faced retaliation the last time they reported wrongdoing - ETHRWorldSEA". ETHRWorld.com.
- Cummins, Holly. "Holly Cummins on X". X.com. Retrieved 5 January 2024.
- DeBellis, Derek; Lewis, Amanda; Villalba, Daniella; Farley, Dave. "2023 State of DevOps Report". Google Cloud DevOps Research and Assessment. Retrieved 2024-04-24.
- DeBellis, Derek; Harvey, Nathan. "2023 State of DevOps Report: Culture is everything". Google Cloud Blog. Retrieved 2024-04-24.
- ^ Forsgren, Nicole. Accelerate: The Science of Lean Software and DevOps: Building and Scaling High Performing Technology Organizations. ISBN 978-1942788331.
- "DORA Accelerate State of DevOps 2021". DevOps Research and Assessment (2021). 2021.
- Klein, Brandon Thorin (2021-05-01). "The DevOps: A Concise Understanding to the DevOps Philosophy and Science". Osti.gov. doi:10.2172/1785164. OSTI 1785164. S2CID 236606284.
- "The History and Evolution of DevOps | Tom Geraghty". 5 July 2020. Retrieved 2020-11-29.
- "Principles behind the Agile Manifesto". agilemanifesto.org. Retrieved 2020-12-06.
- Castellanos, Camilo; Correal, Dario (15 September 2018). "Executing Architectural Models for Big Data Analytics". Software Architecture. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 11048. pp. 364–371. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00761-4_24. ISBN 978-3-030-00760-7.
- Humble, Jez; Farley, David (2011). Continuous Delivery: reliable software releases through build, test, and deployment automation. Pearson Education Inc. ISBN 978-0-321-60191-9.
- Chen, Lianping (2015). "Continuous Delivery: Huge Benefits, but Challenges Too". IEEE Software. 32 (2): 50–54. doi:10.1109/MS.2015.27. S2CID 1241241.
- Tak, Rohin; Modi, Jhalak (2018). Mobile DevOps: Deliver continuous integration and deployment within your mobile applications. Packt Publishing. pp. 12–18. ISBN 9781788296243.
- Beyer, Betsy; Jones, Chris; Petoff, Jennifer; Murphy, Niall Richard (April 2016). Site Reliability Engineering. O'Reilly Media. ISBN 978-1-4919-2909-4.
- Dave Harrison (9 Oct 2018). "Interview with Betsy Beyer, Stephen Thorne of Google". Retrieved 24 July 2024.
- Analyzing the DNA of DevOps, Brent Aaron Reed, Willy Schaub, 2018-11-14.
- Gene Kim; Patrick Debois; John Willis; Jezz Humble (2016). The DevOps Handbook: How to Create World-Class Agility, Reliability, and Security in Technology Organizations.
- "OWASP TOP10". Archived from the original on June 8, 2023. Retrieved June 8, 2023.
- Wilson, Glenn (December 2020). 'DevSecOps: A leader's guide to producing secure software with compromising flow, feedback and continuous improvement'. Rethink Press. ISBN 978-1781335024.
- Emerging Technology Analysis: DevOps a Culture Shift, Not a Technology (Report). Gartner.
- Loukides, Mike (7 June 2012). "What is DevOps?". O'Reilly Media.
- "Gartner IT Glossary – devops". Gartner. Retrieved 30 October 2015.
- Jones, Stephen; Noppen, Joost; Lettice, Fiona (21 July 2016). Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Quality-Aware DevOps - QUDOS 2016 (PDF). pp. 7–11. doi:10.1145/2945408.2945410. ISBN 9781450344111. S2CID 515140.
- Mandi Walls (25 September 2015). "Building a DevOps culture". O'Reilly.
- Chen, Lianping; Ali Babar, Muhammad (2014). "2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture". The 11th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture(WICSA 2014). IEEE. pp. 195–204. doi:10.1109/WICSA.2014.45. ISBN 978-1-4799-3412-6.
- Teja Yarlagadda, Ravi (9 March 2021). "DevOps and Its Practices". SSRN 3798877.
- Morisio, Maurizio (16 April 2021). DevOps: development of a toolchain in the banking domain. Politecnico di Torino (laurea thesis). Retrieved 16 August 2021.
- "What is GitOps?". www.redhat.com. Retrieved 2023-03-30.
- Serverless Architectures on AWS. Manning. ISBN 978-1617295423.
- Pipeline as Code Continuous Delivery with Jenkins, Kubernetes, and Terraform. Manning. ISBN 9781638350378.
- Continuous Delivery Reliable Software Releases Through Build, Test, and Deployment Automation. ISBN 9780321670229.
Further reading
- Davis, Jennifer; Daniels, Ryn (2016-05-30). Effective DevOps : building a culture of collaboration, affinity, and tooling at scale. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly. ISBN 9781491926437. OCLC 951434424.
- Kim, Gene; Debois, Patrick; Willis, John; Humble, Jez; Allspaw, John (2015-10-07). The DevOps handbook : how to create world-class agility, reliability, and security in technology organizations (First ed.). Portland, OR. ISBN 9781942788003. OCLC 907166314.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
- Forsgren, Nicole; Humble, Jez; Kim, Gene (27 March 2018). Accelerate: The Science of Lean Software and DevOps: Building and Scaling High Performing Technology Organizations (First ed.). IT Revolution Press. ISBN 9781942788331.