| Revision as of 05:16, 15 July 2021 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,301,600 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:Green New Deal/Archive 3) (bot← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 07:38, 8 October 2024 edit undoQwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders4,013,030 editsm Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)Tag: paws [2.2] |
| (19 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{Talkheader}} |
|
⚫ |
{{not a forum}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Economics|class=C|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1= |
|
{{WikiProject Environment|class=C|importance=Low|sustainability=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Economics|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Climate change|class=C|importance=high|sustainability=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Environment|importance=Low|sustainability=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Finance & Investment|class=C|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Climate change|importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject International relations|class=C|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Finance & Investment|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Politics|class=C|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject International relations|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject United States|class=C|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Low}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
⚫ |
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|ap|brief}} |
| ⚫ |
{{not a forum}} |
|
| ⚫ |
{{Ds/talk notice|ap|brief}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} |
|
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} |
| Line 19: |
Line 19: |
|
|archive = Talk:Green New Deal/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|archive = Talk:Green New Deal/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{Archives |search=yes |bot=Lowercase sigmabot III |age=3 |units=months |index=/Archive index }} |
|
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
|target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes |
|
|target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Misplaced Pages:Wiki_Ed/UCSD/Introduction_to_Policy_Analysis_-_Summer_Session21_(Summer) | assignments = ], ] | start_date = 2021-06-28 | end_date = 2021-07-31 }} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Section organization of AOC plan and Biden plan and miscellaneous minor corrections == |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Should the sections about the AOC plan and the Biden plan relating to the Green New Deal not be subsections of the United States section instead of subsections of the By country or region section? Given that the AOC plan has such extensive currently sub-subsection coverage in this article that would not be covered in the index if the current AOC plan subsection was a sub-subsection of the currently placed United States subsection, should each country just be its own section (Australia as section 3, Canada as section 4, the EU as section 5, etc) and not a subsection of the By country or region section so that the United States section could contain the AOC plan as a subsection and all of the AOC plan’s current sub-subsections as instead sub-subsections of the United States section within the AOC plan subsection? For clarity, this is my proposed organization of this article’s sections: |
|
|
|
|
|
1 History |
|
|
1.1 Proposals to include the Green New Deal in recovery program from COVID-19 |
|
|
2 Environmental justice |
|
|
3 Australia |
|
|
4 Canada |
|
|
5 European Union |
|
|
6 South Korea |
|
|
7 United Kingdom |
|
|
8 United States |
|
|
8.1 Early efforts |
|
|
8.2 The Rep. Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Markey Green New Deal |
|
|
8.2.1 Background |
|
|
8.2.2 Green New Deal Resolution |
|
|
8.2.3 House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis |
|
|
8.2.4 January 2019 letter to Congress from environmental groups |
|
|
8.2.5 Criticism |
|
|
8.2.6 Supporters |
|
|
8.2.7 Detractors |
|
|
8.2.8 Legislative outcome |
|
|
8.2.9 2020 Presidential Campaign |
|
|
8.3 The Biden climate plan |
|
|
9 See also |
|
|
10 References |
|
|
11 External links |
|
|
11.1 Projects referred to as "Green New Deal" |
|
|
11.2 Green New Deal proposal in 116th Congress |
|
|
|
|
|
This organization of sections would match the precedent of section followed by articles such as ] where the discussion of how the topic is applied over a geographic region is given its own section instead of being a subsection of a theoretical section called By state such as how this article creates a section called By country or region. This reorganization would place the AOC plan and the Biden plan relating to the Green New Deal under the United States section where they should go instead of the current section organization that seems to imply that the AOC plan and the Biden plan are countries or regions. |
|
|
|
|
|
(2) In section 3.7.8 of the current article (section 8.2.9 in my proposal of the section organization), the title is currently misspelled as "Legistrative outcome". It should say "Legislative outcome". |
|
|
|
|
|
(3) There is an unnecessary extra line break between the Biden plan section and the See also section that should be deleted. I would do all of these things if I could edit this article. |
|
|
|
|
| ⚫ |
] (]) 19:45, 29 March 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
:] '''Done'''. Thanks so much for taking the time to clearly specify those excellent improvements. ] (]) 09:23, 30 March 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Democrat leader council labeled conservative? == |
|
|
|
|
|
Article labels Dlc conservative. Not supported by cited article. Center-left would be better description. |
|
|
|
|
|
Read further and American Action Network called center-right. Am very confused how DLC and PPI were listed as conservative in this and AAN was called center-right. |
|
|
:If you examine the articles on these three groups, the characterizations are quite accurate. The ] is the conservative pro-corporate (they claim to be "moderate") Democratic establishment group; the ] is their think tank. (By global standards, there is '''''no''''' center-left in the American Democratic Party.) And the ] is a moderate (''i.e.'', center-right) Republican group. --] | ] 12:50, 22 June 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
By that standard the AAN would almost certainly be considered a far right group as a brief visit to their website clearly shows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment== |
|
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 15 July 2021 == |
|
|
|
] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2021-08-26">26 August 2021</span> and <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2021-12-24">24 December 2021</span>. Further details are available ]. Student editor(s): ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{small|Above undated message substituted from ] by ] (]) 21:58, 17 January 2022 (UTC)}} |
|
{{edit extended-protected|Green New Deal|answered=yes}} |
|
|
Add a section to the "Green New Deal Resolution" sub-article as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment== |
|
On April 20, 2021, Rep. Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Markey reintroduced the Green New Deal Resolution at the ]. The resolution reaffirms the threat produced by climate change and the responsibility of the US to recommit to meeting the emission goals outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.<ref>{{cite web |title=SENATOR MARKEY AND REPRESENTATIVE OCASIO-CORTEZ REINTRODUCE GREEN NEW DEAL RESOLUTION |url=https://www.markey.senate.gov/news/press-releases/senator-markey-and-representative-ocasio-cortez-reintroduce-green-new-deal-resolution |website=markey.senate.gov |access-date=14 July 2021}}</ref> |
|
|
|
] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2021-06-28">28 June 2021</span> and <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2021-07-31">31 July 2021</span>. Further details are available ]. Student editor(s): ], ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{small|Above undated message substituted from ] by ] (]) 22:43, 16 January 2022 (UTC)}} |
|
|
== Michelle Wu == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
If ] is elected mayor of Boston in November, she can be added as a supporter of the AOC-Markey Green New Deal. https://www.boston.com/news/policy/2020/08/24/michelle-wu-green-new-deal-boston/ ] (]) 00:39, 15 September 2021 (UTC) |
|
Also, to add a section to the "The Biden climate plan" sub-article as follows: |
|
|
⚫ |
* DONE! ] (]) 05:11, 31 December 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== reversals == |
|
President Biden’s infrastructure package, which pledges to halve the U.S. greenhouse gas emissions by 2030<ref>{{cite web |last1=Frazin |first1=Rachel |title=Overnight Energy: Biden reportedly will pledge to halve US emissions by 2030 | Ocasio-Cortez, Markey reintroduce Green New Deal resolution |url=https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/overnights/549335-overnight-energy-biden-reportedly-will-pledge-to-halve |website=TheHill |access-date=14 July 2021}}</ref>, has been criticized by progressives, including Rep. Ocasio-Cortez, as not being ambitious enough to achieve the scale required to mitigate climate change.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Kurtzleben |first1=Danielle |title=Ocasio-Cortez Sees Green New Deal Progress In Biden Plan, But 'It's Not Enough' |url=https://www.npr.org/2021/04/02/983398361/green-new-deal-leaders-see-biden-climate-plans-as-a-victory-kind-of |website=npr |access-date=14 July 2021}}</ref> Biden’s climate plan also outlined an American Jobs and Families Plan, which would lead to the creation of a Civilian Climate Corps.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Segers |first1=Grace |title=Green New Deal advocates see imprint on Biden's climate agenda |url=https://www.cbsnews.com/news/green-new-deal-influence-american-jobs-plan/ |website=cbsnews |access-date=14 July 2021}}</ref> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am a little concerned about the reversions you did to an edit by me about the University of Florida Green New Deal and to another contributors' part about a GND at American University. They were removed under the justification they were too local, which I agree in terms of Misplaced Pages's structuring rules, but in that case couldn't a new section be created for university and local efforts? Additionally, the Boston GND (which has its own separate article) was left on the Green New Deal article but is also local. I do not personally agree with the removal of either the AU one or UF one if it remains notable enough to not be removed. In the case of the UF one, it had coverage by the Guardian US and the Hill, both well-recognized sources. I respect your contributions to the Misplaced Pages community but as a younger Wikipedian, more explanations or details on how I could write about what happened at AU and UF would be appreciated. ] (]) 13:44, 22 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
::this article deals with the whole world. What we have here are two small, new local efforts. U of Florida took no action--it was only a resolution passed by its student government. Worldwide there are hundreds of such events and that would overwhelm the already too long article. I suggest you start a new separate article on Green efforts on college campuses. As for Boston, a link to a long article for a major city (which has lots of colleges and universities) is ok but I think a separate section for Boston duplicates the listing under mayors, so I deleted the separate section. ] (]) 00:52, 23 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
Sandbox page: |
|
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/User:CEGarcia001/Green_New_Deal?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template ] (]) 00:31, 15 July 2021 (UTC) |
|
:::this is reasonable, thank you ] (]) 04:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC) |
|
:] '''Done''' , allthough I added a new L3 section for the re-introduction, otherwise it might not be clear that various earlier sections refer just to the original AOC & Markey GND. Thanks for drafting these useful updates. ] (]) 01:32, 15 July 2021 (UTC) |
|
I am a little concerned about the reversions you did to an edit by me about the University of Florida Green New Deal and to another contributors' part about a GND at American University. They were removed under the justification they were too local, which I agree in terms of Misplaced Pages's structuring rules, but in that case couldn't a new section be created for university and local efforts? Additionally, the Boston GND (which has its own separate article) was left on the Green New Deal article but is also local. I do not personally agree with the removal of either the AU one or UF one if it remains notable enough to not be removed. In the case of the UF one, it had coverage by the Guardian US and the Hill, both well-recognized sources. I respect your contributions to the Misplaced Pages community but as a younger Wikipedian, more explanations or details on how I could write about what happened at AU and UF would be appreciated. RALupien (talk) 13:44, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2021 and 24 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Eaw259.