| Revision as of 12:10, 1 February 2007 editThebee (talk | contribs)1,956 edits →Apology← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:28, 26 October 2023 edit undoFayenatic london (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators337,111 edits →top | ||
| (116 intermediate revisions by 30 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User WikiProject Schools}} | |||
| == Citations and references == | |||
| ===== Archive Pages ===== | |||
| Hello! Welcome to Misplaced Pages. I hope you enjoy your time here and find ways to make valuable contributions to the articles here. | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| ==] nomination of ]== | |||
| The Waldorf education article (and associated articles) are in a clean-up and arbitration process with special attention being given to ensuring that statements are attributed to ] sources, preferably print-published and third-party reviewed. It will help if you ensure that such sources are given for new statements added. ] is to be avoided; this includes all statements made on the basis of one's individual experience that cannot be supported by objective documentation that meets Misplaced Pages standards. All of us are learning to work within these constraints; it is, after all, an encyclopedia! | |||
| ] | |||
| {{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} | |||
| A tag has been placed on ] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under ], because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the ], such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about ]. | |||
| If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by ] and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request ]. <!-- Template:Db-notability-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> ] (]) 17:38, 10 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
| With best wishes! ] 02:26, 8 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Your submission at ]: ] has been accepted == | |||
| ==Hello WikiWag== | |||
| <div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em; width: 90%;">] '''], which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br /> The article has been assessed as '''Stub-Class''', which is recorded on the article's ]. You may like to take a look at the ] to see how you can improve the article. | |||
| I was sidelined yesterday so I especially appreciated seeing your efforts. There have been some restrictions on who can edit the articles because we had a few "visitors" dropping in at times. The restrictions are not intended to keep legitimate editors out. If you're having trouble getting access to edit a particular article, please let me know. I'm sure we can have one of the administrators extend permission to you. Thank you for your efforts! The articles are way too one-sided, as you noted, and your help in bringing them in to line is very appreciated. BTW, please don't be intimidated by the "tweed-jacket" editors who pretend to patiently be explaining the rules to you - they are sometimes confused about what is allowed themselves, and bend the rules in order to push their POV. Happy editing. '''] 13:32, 8 January 2007 (UTC)''' | |||
| You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to ]. {{#if:{{#invoke:IPAddress|isIp|1=Wikiwag}} | |||
| |You may wish to consider ] so you can create articles yourself | |||
| |Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can ], and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to ] if you prefer | |||
| }}. | |||
| * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks"></span>'''. | |||
| * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}. | |||
| Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages! | |||
| ] (]) 16:46, 14 April 2015 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc talk--> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| ==From TheBee's page== | |||
| I tried to address the sources issue on TheBee's page, but he has deleted the discussion (I've added it back but he'll delete it again - it's very Waldorfian to try to control communications, wouldn't you agree?) Anyway, here is what I tried to say to you on TheBee's page: | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} ] (]) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC) | |||
| It would be a good idea to actually get the gist of the arbitration agreement directly from the arbitration agreement (and not from TheBee). TheBee is rather confused about what the decision meant regarding reliable sources and polemic sources - and this has already led to edit warring. In the one instance where he brought this conflict to the arbitrators, he was shown to be wrong. Your edits have been fine and other than a couple of sources that are not allowed, waldorfanswer, for example, they are pointing to good sources. I'll be happy to keep an eye on your edits. BTW, I think TheBee thinks you are a former Waldorf parent named Margaret (M.S.?) He's fishing because it's important for him to know who you are in order to disqualify you - and by extension, your edits. Hang in there, and don't get discouraged by the authoritative and aggressive tone of TheBee's response. Best wishes. '''] 15:44, 8 January 2007 (UTC)''' '''] 17:30, 8 January 2007 (UTC)''' | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692047625 --> | |||
| == Image without license == | |||
| :Hey Pete, | |||
| ===Unspecified source/license for ]=== | |||
| :Well if someone's fishing, they're going to be disappointed. I've never edited on Misplaced Pages before. I have no desire to turn this into a contest. But facts are facts. I've read the arbitration ruling and it is concise and to-the-point about what is allowed and what isn't, as well as what is "self published" and what isn't. | |||
| ] | |||
| :I will write facts and cite them where I can. We shall see if those who disagree have the courage to allow them to stand in the interest of NPOV. | |||
| Thanks for uploading ]. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Misplaced Pages can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate ], it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{tl|PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{tlx|self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag ] - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well. | |||
| For more information on using images, see the following pages: | |||
| :- ''']''' 07:02, 9-Jan-2007 (UTC) | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| This is an automated notice by ]. For assistance on the image use policy, see ]. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page.<!-- Template:Image source-bot --> --] <sup>(] • ] • ])</sup> 20:00, 11 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks Wikiwag. I've been trying to put some reasonable edits in on the Waldorf article today. We'll see how long it takes them to revert everything I've done. I'd love your input on whatever you see that might be a bit too aggressive on my part. I'm trying to put in stuff I know to be true (like, have you ever seen a Waldorf school with a football team?). '''] 20:31, 9 January 2007 (UTC)''' | |||
| == ] notification: ] has a new comment == | |||
| == My Interpretation of the Waldorf Education Arbitration Ruling == | |||
| <div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;padding-bottom:1em;color:black;margin-bottom: 1.5em;width: 100%;"> ] | |||
| I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at ]. Thanks! ] (]) 21:40, 22 December 2017 (UTC) </div> | |||
| :Thanks and sorry about the citation overkill. I noticed that the article had been attempted and deleted twice before and didn't want to take any chances with unverifiable statements. I know there's a huge backlog, and appreciate the human attention to the article. Cheers! '''- ]''' <sub>(])</sub> 22:28, 22 December 2017 (UTC) | |||
| Originally posted to ] Talk page: | |||
| == Your submission at ]: ] has been accepted == | |||
| -------------------------------------------------------------------- | |||
| <div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em; width: 90%;">] '''], which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br /> The article has been assessed as '''Start-Class''', which is recorded on the article's ]. You may like to take a look at the ] to see how you can improve the article. | |||
| You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to ]. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can ] without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to ] if you prefer. | |||
| * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks"></span>'''. | |||
| * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}. | |||
| Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages! | |||
| ] (]) 13:00, 20 February 2018 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc talk--> | |||
| == ArbCom 2018 election voter message == | |||
| :Greetings Thebee! | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, Wikiwag. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| :Well as promised, I thoroughly reviewed all the ground covering this whole group of articles. I think it's important to break down the salient points, beginning with ] itself (which might be more accurately referred to as a statement of probation rather than a ruling) and ]. I've included my interpretations in parentheses: | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| :::1) Waldorf education, Rudolf Steiner, Anthroposophy and related articles contain large amounts of original research and information gathered from Anthroposophical related sources which are for verification purposes properly considered ] by the Anthroposophy movement. '''(It was unanimously agreed by the arbitration panel that material gathered from Anthroposophical related sources is self-published, and therefore unacceptable for ] and/or citation purposes. They must therefore be removed.)''' | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :::5) Hgilbert is a teacher in a Waldorf school and a writer regarding the educational theories used at the Waldorf schools. His edits are strongly supportive of the Waldorf schools and their philosophy of education, see an early edit. He has also edited Anthroposophy, Rudolf Steiner and other related articles with a strong positive bias. He has made some edits to Homeopathy and related articles, but very few to other articles outside those related to Rudolf Steiner and the Waldorf schools. '''(It was unanimously agreed that Hgilbert is biased and in the sub-findings of fact , was unanimously found to have published original research or inappropriate references as fact.)''' | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/12&oldid=866998410 --> | |||
| ==Notice of Fringe Theories Noticeboard discussion== | |||
| :::'''Waldorf education and related articles placed on probation''' 1) Waldorf education, Rudolf Steiner, Anthroposophy and the extended family of related articles such as Social Threefolding are placed on article probation. Editors of these articles are expected to remove all original research and other unverifiable information, including all controversial information sourced in Anthroposophy related publications. It is anticipated that this process may result in deletion or merger of some articles due to failure of verification by third party peer reviewed sources. If it is found, upon review by the Arbitration Committee, that any of the principals in this arbitration continue to edit in an inappropriate and disruptive way editing restrictions may be imposed. Review may be at the initiative of any member of the Arbitration Committee on their own motion or upon petition by any user to them. | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:FTN-notice--> Thank you.--] <sup>(]</sup> <sup>])</sup> 18:16, 29 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| :It seems unequivocally clear, that panel's unanimous intent was that the Anthroposophy-related citations be removed, on the grounds that they are unverifiable as self-published and/or original research. Indeed, the matter appears that contrary to your assertion - only the controversial references be removed - Anthroposophical references by their very nature are controversial and must be removed entirely. | |||
| :You and ] as two of the named parties in the arbitration, as well as the chief architects of its content, have therefore been specifically charged with this task. Indeed, you personally requested the arbitration. So presumably, you intend to abide by the panel's findings and remedies. | |||
| :Being the civil person I am, I do not wish to do what you did to my edits before I was properly informed of the conditions applied to this particular article - meaning wipe the slate clean and pare it down the the barest of facts. With that said, I too was wrong for posting what I did - but my excuse was pure ignorance; you unfortunately cannot make the same claim. | |||
| :However, it may simply be that the named parties in this matter are too close to this issue to see things clearly and perhaps it requires a fresh set of eyes, from someone who is enough of a student of Steiner (I loved the approach first, then grew to question it, then grow to doubt much of the basis behind it) to look at things from a more objective POV. | |||
| :I can play that role, because I respect the Waldorf movement for much of what I believe it did for my children from a character perspective and preserving their childhood for as long as we could. But academically, as far as my own children's experiences and the experiences of their peers at their former school , the approach does not live up to many of the claims made by its practitioners. Moreover, the spiritual pseudo-science behind the method has no more basis in independent third-party research (meaning outside of Steiner/Anthroposophy/Waldorf), than Catholic, Christian, Jewish, Muslim or other independent schools do. Childhood education at Waldorf remains what it always has been in general - experimental. | |||
| :Therefore challenge is this: that much of the facts and experience both pro- and anti- Waldorf (in particular), is original research, anecdotal, or self-published as defined by both the Misplaced Pages guidelines and the Arbitration Panel. | |||
| :Perhaps if the parties involved up until this point were all courageous enough and respectful enough of each other's POV earlier on in the process to allow both PsOV to co-exist in the interest of crafting a well-written, honest and balanced article...matters might be different now. But it seems that we have no alternative but to strip the whole thing down to its most fundamental facts - meaning those that can be verified by independent 3rd-party research and publications. What we and the public will be left with, will utterly fail to inform the people who need it most - those who are considering a Waldorf education for their children. | |||
| :I look forward to your reply. | |||
| :'''] 21:15, 9 January 2007 (UTC)''' | |||
| ::I disagree with much of what you write and have put up an analysis of the Arbitration at my talks page, telling on what points I disagree and why. '''] 00:01, 12 January 2007 (UTC)''' | |||
| Wikiwag, I hope you haven't let TheBee bully you away from editing here. We need your help in these articles. He has done the same thing to many editors who have tried to help. Please hang in there. I have tried to address the Waldorf Ed article recommendations on the Waldorf Ed talk page. ''' ] 17:29, 13 January 2007 (UTC)''' | |||
| :Hello Captain Wikivag, | |||
| :Still here? '''] 12:16, 14 January 2007 (UTC)''' | |||
| ::No worries gentlemen, I'm still here. It takes more than this to deter me. I frankly had to take a breather and focus on other more pressing matters. The first thing I did was restore the arbitration probation tag to the top of the article page. It needs to be there and it should be there. Give me a day or two to get caught up and I'll be participating once again. For my own part, I intended to concede ] point about differentiating between controversial and non-controversial matters with respect to anthroposophical references. I did however, find it heartening that my interpretation of the probation statement seems to be firmly in line with the arbitrator's intent - Thebee's assertions to the contrary, not withstanding. See you in the Talk. '''- ] 16:55, 18 January 2007 (UTC)''' | |||
| :::Thanks Wikiwag. I'm glad you're back. '''] 16:59, 18 January 2007 (UTC)''' | |||
| == Article probation == | |||
| Please do not place the article probation tag on the article page. Such tags belong on the talk page only. Also, the generic {{tl|article probation}} template is not appropriate for this article, as the specific ] in this case does not authorize admins ban disruptive editors, as shown ]. Thanks. ] 19:29, 18 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ::Understood. I think then, that ] needs to be corrected. '''- ] 22:51, 18 January 2007 (UTC)''' | |||
| == Not a "sock puppet" or "meat puppet" or whatever... == | |||
| Apparently, ] thinks that if someone takes a few days off to actually focus on something called ... uh ... LIFE! that they're automatically someone else who took issue with him - in a different guise. That's either extreme paranoia, or extreme conceit - and I haven't decided which one. | |||
| I've had enough of your personal attacks ] (one attack), ] (two attacks) ] and now ] (numerous and at length) that up until now, I've largely let go without comment or retaliation. | |||
| So you've finally gone too far and exhausted my civil tone. Therefore, here's what I have to say back: Grow up, pal. And try getting a life yourself, before your own little "meat puppet" becomes your only friend. | |||
| '''- ] 06:10, 19 January 2007 (UTC)''' | |||
| P.S. Maybe the Misplaced Pages markup was a stretch for you to grasp. But I assure you, that many others (myself included) aren't similarly handicapped. | |||
| ==Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Waldorf_education/Review== | |||
| Pursuant to ] I have initiated a review of the behavior of the editors of Waldorf education at ]. This review will consider appropriate editing restrictions on editors of the article. ] 02:03, 30 January 2007 (UTC) | |||
| :Be my guest. You will discover that my editing has been professional, in good faith, civil and in pursuit of the NPOV facts on this issue. '''- ] 02:32, 30 January 2007 (UTC)''' | |||
| ::He's not talking about you Wikiwag. He's inviting you to give testimony on the other editors - possibly based on my suggestion that current editors should be invited to the arbitration. I'm quite sure you're not being considered for editing restrictions. '''] 02:37, 30 January 2007 (UTC)''' | |||
| Ah. Ok. Was worried that I'd accidentally touched the "third rail." '''- ] 20:52, 30 January 2007 (UTC)''' | |||
| ==Apology== | |||
| I'm sorry if I've hurt your feelings with my suspicions that you might be a sock puppet, based on the description of ] at Misplaced Pages, while Durova more seems to have lent towards meat puppetry. Then, who are you, and what made you come to Misplaced Pages specifically now to edit the Waldorf Ed article with such passion ?-)) '''] 11:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC)''' | |||
| :Addition on your comment above, that I did not see before: | |||
| ::"''... here's what I have to say back: Grow up, pal. And try getting a life yourself, before your own little "meat puppet" becomes your only friend.''" | |||
| :Hm, Durova would probably suggest that I disregard it... '''] 12:01, 1 February 2007 (UTC)''' | |||
| :As also this: | |||
| ::"''P.S. Maybe the Misplaced Pages markup was a stretch for you to grasp. But I assure you, that many others (myself included) aren't similarly handicapped.''" | |||
| :'''] 12:10, 1 February 2007 (UTC)''' | |||
Latest revision as of 10:28, 26 October 2023
 | This user participates in WikiProject Schools. |
Archive Pages
Speedy deletion nomination of Reichert Technologies
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Reichert Technologies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:38, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles A. Spencer has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!
Onel5969 (talk) 16:46, 14 April 2015 (UTC)ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Image without license
Unspecified source/license for File:Carolyn marks blackwood.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Carolyn marks blackwood.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Misplaced Pages can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot 20:00, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Carolyn Marks Blackwood has a new comment
- Thanks and sorry about the citation overkill. I noticed that the article had been attempted and deleted twice before and didn't want to take any chances with unverifiable statements. I know there's a huge backlog, and appreciate the human attention to the article. Cheers! - Wikiwag (blahblah...) 22:28, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Carolyn Marks Blackwood has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Misplaced Pages. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thank you for helping improve Misplaced Pages!
TeaDrinker (talk) 13:00, 20 February 2018 (UTC)ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Wikiwag. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Notice of Fringe Theories Noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Fringe theories/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Shibbolethink 18:16, 29 November 2018 (UTC)